ESSENCE OF PARLIAMENT.

_Tuesday, March 7th._--The House of Commons to-day devoted itself to the

process curiously known as "getting the SPEAKER out of the Chair." The

phrase suggests reluctance on the part of the occupant to leave his

seat; though I cannot recall any occasion when the employment of force

has been necessary to persuade Mr. LOWTHER to resign to the Chairman of

Committees the duty of listening to dull speeches. But this afternoon I

can imagine that the SPEAKER would have been well content to remain. For

there was fun brewing. Mr. BALFOUR was to introduce the Naval Estimates,

and his dear friend and ex-colleague, Colonel WINSTON CHURCHILL, was

announced to follow him. The conjunction of these highly-electrified

bodies is always apt to produce sparks. The House was well filled, and

over the clock could be seen Lord FISHER, like "a sweet little cherub

that sits up aloft to keep watch for the life of poor Jacky." The last

time Mr. CHURCHILL spoke of Naval affairs in the House he was not quite

nice to Lord FISHER. Would he be nicer this time?

[Illustration: WINSTON ON LEAVE.

_Bluejacket_. "A party coming aboard, Sir, to see if the Fleet's all

right."

_Admiral Balfour_. "What sort of party?"

_Bluejacket_. "Well, Sir, he's got spurs on."]

I think Mr. BALFOUR must be something of a thought-reader. Intermingled

with his narration of the varied and wonderful achievements of the

Fleet, past and present, his description of the constant efforts to

increase it both in ships and men, and his quietly confident prophecy

that with this sure shield we might face the future in cheerful

serenity, there were little sidethrusts at an imaginary critic. Some

people had been silly enough to suggest that the new Board of Admiralty

was so content with what had been done by "my right hon. and learned--I

beg his pardon--gallant friend" that it had adopted a policy of "rest

and be thankful". But there was no justification for "a certain kind of

sub-acid pessimism that sometimes reaches my ears", and he must be a

poor-spirited creature who, having been happy about the Navy in August,

1914, could be depressed about in March, 1916.

Then Colonel CHURCHILL proceeded to put the cap on. He has been studying

the problems of sea-power in the trenches of Flanders, and the process

has led him to gloomy conclusions. Suppose the Germans have been

building more ships than we have: suppose they have put into them bigger

guns than we wot of; suppose they were to come out at their selected

moment and found us at our average moment.... The House was beginning to

be a little weary of these depressing hypotheses when it was suddenly

brought up all standing by the discovery that the orator was delivering

a eulogy on Lord Fisher. He was the man who got things done in a hurry.

He was the man who had the driving power. They had "parted brass-rags"

over Gallipoli, it was true; but by-gones were by-gones. Having been

away for some months, his mind was now clear (irreverent laughter), and

he had come to recognise that his former foe was the only possible First

Sea Lord.

It must have been a little embarrassing for Lord FISHER to sit still and

hear his praises thus chanted. But it is difficult to escape from the

seat over the Clock without treading upon other people's toes, and this

Lord FISHER is notoriously averse from doing. The moment, however, that

Colonel CHURCHILL had finished he left the Gallery; but before he could

wholly emerge he had to suffer the further shock of being cheered by

some over-enthusiastic admirers behind him. It was a pity he left so

soon, for later Sir HEDWORTH MEUX, fresh from Portsmouth, had some

things to say which would not have compelled his blushes.

_Wednesday, March 8th._--Members wondered yesterday why no reply to

Colonel CHURCHILL was forthcoming from the Treasury Bench. Mr. BALFOUR

made ample amends to-day for the omission. There is something in the

personality of his critic--memories of Lord RANDOLPH, perhaps--that

seems to put on extra polish on Mr. BALFOUR'S rapier when he deals with

him. Who that heard it will ever forget his inimitable description of

the then HOME SECRETARY superintending--"with a photographer"--the

historic Siege of Sidney Street? This afternoon his sword-play was

equally brilliant; and there was even more force behind the thrusts. If

there had been delay in the progress of the new Dreadnoughts why was it?

Because his right hon. predecessor had diverted the guns and

gun-mountings intended for them into his new-fangled monitors. He had

boasted of his own rapid shipbuilding. It had indeed been rapid--so much

so that some of the vessels thus hastily constructed had now been

remodelled. Coming to the proposed "remedy"--the recall of Lord FISHER

to the Board of Admiralty--Mr. BALFOUR assumed a sterner tone. He

reminded the house that Lord FISHER had been accused by his present

champion of not having given him clear guidance or firm support over the

Gallipoli Expedition. Colonel CHURCHILL'S present opinion of Lord FISHER

was totally inconsistent with that which he had expressed a few months

ago: possibly they were both remote from the truth. But it was an

amazing proposition that the Government should be asked to dismiss Sir

HENRY JACKSON, an officer who was everything that Lord FISHER according

to Colonel CHURCHILL was not. He himself would not yield an inch to such

a demand.

Spontaneous debate has never been the Colonel's strong point. His

oratorical engines are driven by midnight oil. Wisely, therefore, he did

not attempt an elaborate _réplique_ to Mr. BALFOUR'S "sword-play," but

contented himself with a brief restatement of his case.

_Thursday, March 9th._--Prophets swarm in both Houses of Parliament, but

the House of Lords is unique in possessing one who confines himself to

subjects which he has at his fingers' ends and whose prophecies have a

habit of coming true. What Lord MONTAGU OF BEAULIEU does not know of the

petrol engine, and its use on land or sea or in the air, is not worth

knowing. Seven years ago he warned his countrymen of the bomb-dropping

possibilities of the new German air-ships. A little later he pointed out

that it was very doubtful if dirigible balloons could be successfully

attacked by gunfire from the ground, and that the only effective way of

opposing them was to meet like with like. Again in 1913 he dwelt upon

the inadequacy of our aerial defences.

His object to-day was not to extol his own merits as a prophet, but to

get the Government to act on the motto "One Element One Service" and

establish a single Ministry of the Air. Lord HALDANE thought we ought to

do some "violent thinking" before adopting the proposal, but quite

agreed (with a reminiscent glance at the Woolsack) that we had not made

sufficient use of lighter-than-air machines. That was Lord BERESFORD'S

view, too; we must oppose Zeps to Zeps. Then, having evidently done some

violent thinking over the recent debate in the Commons he launched out

into a wholly irrelevant attack upon Colonel CHURCHILL for trying to

create anxiety about the Fleet, and appealed to Lord FISHER (who was not

present though Lord BERESFORD had particularly invited him) to repudiate

the agitation conducted by the honourable Member for DUNDEE, a few

newspapers and twenty sandwichmen. Lord LANSDOWNE subsequently noted

that this most irregular digression appeared to be "not wholly

distasteful" to the peers assembled. Turning to Lord MONTAGU'S proposal

he pointed out that the Government had gone some way to meet it by

setting up Lord DERBY'S Committee. But, though prepared to see the

Cabinet increased to a round couple of dozen, he was not convinced that

the only way to remove imperfections was to appoint a new Minister to

deal with them.

It seems probable therefore that there is no truth in the report that

Colonel CHURCHILL has been asked to join the Government as Minister of

Admonitions.

* * * * *

[Illustration: _Tommy (who is learning every minute about barbed-wire

defences)._ "When I gets home, no more perishin' cats shall ever get

into my back garden."]

* * * * *

Painful Accident to a Clergyman.

"While the Rev. Mr. Stulting was camping out one of his calves

was attacked and stung to death by a passing swarm of bees."

_Cape Argus._

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 150, March 15, 1916 · 第 29 / 47 题