CHAP. XII.

Excepting only Rome and its immediate neighbourhood, no part of Italy

can exhibit so many remains of Roman antiquity as are to be found within

a short distance of Avignon. The Romans seem to have united Provence to

Italy, as the French have since united Piedmont to France. Our English

travellers, who, according to the plan mentioned in the first chapter,

pass one summer in going to Italy and another in returning from it, will

do well to make Avignon their head quarters for some time, and visit the

curiosities around. There is Nismes with the Pont du Gard, Arles, St.

Remy, Orange, already mentioned, and other places. There is also the

far-famed fountain of Vaucluse. A commission of antiquarian research is

established within the department; at Nismes also much attention is paid

to these objects, and with good reason; for no town in Europe, Rome

excepted, possesses such precious remains.

In the beginning of the month of September of my second year, I hired a

coach with three horses again, (for no god of them all is so fond of an

uneven number as these coach-masters,) and, with part of my family, took

the road to Vaucluse. It passes first over a fertile alluvial plain,

formed, in remote ages, by the Rhone and Durance when they overflowed

their banks, as the Oby and Tobol do now. Then we traversed a country of

corn, wine, and oil, and descended to Lisle, a little town on the

Sorgues, the river of Vaucluse, from whose fountain it is distant about

four miles. For three of these four miles as far as the village, we were

able to proceed in our carriage; but, from this point, the Naiad

requires to be reverentially approached on foot. We ascended a gentle

steep, the Sorgues on our right-hand,--a stream, which, even here, so

near its head, has force to turn several mills that harmonise well with

the landscape. Above the mills it began to assume more and more a

torrent-like appearance; the rocks approached nearer on each side, and

confined us within a still closer valley. Whither has the nymph of the

stream retired? At length the termination of the valley appeared before

us; a lofty curtain of rock, at half the height of which was seen a wide

and dusky arch, overshadowed by a fig-tree growing out of the precipice

above. Over a shelving rock, at the foot of this arch, the water throws

itself.

But there was at this time no cascade; the fountain was more than

ordinarily low; streams gushed through fissures at the foot and sides of

the rock below the arch, and indicated their source. The shelf or lip,

at the mouth of the cavern, forms a natural bridge over these streams:

we ascended to this shelf, and went down into the cavern a considerable

depth before we arrived at the water: here, a rock projecting into the

water prevented us from going into a second cavern; but we could see,

(for the opening above afforded sufficient light,) that this second

cavern was the last.

I thought it very fortunate that the fountain was so low: had it been

full, we should have seen a water-fall; but I had now seen the Helicon

of Petrarch,--had penetrated to the source of his inspiration,

------atque sacri libamina palleo fontis,

as was written by a young man of genius at Oxford, in my time, whose

name I do not remember, though I have not forgotten this striking and

beautiful expression. In sober sadness, I think it an advantage to

understand the nature and situation of the fountain better than I

should have done had I seen only a picturesque cascade. I do not

believe the immediate source of the fountain to be within the cavern,

but that its waters are supplied in subterranean courses by the

surrounding country: this is proved, I think, by their quantity being so

much affected by rain or drought. St. Winifred's well at Holywell, in

Flintshire,--a fountain as copious as that of the Sorgues,--is not at

all increased or diminished by any change of the seasons.

We loitered for two hours on the bank of the tumbling torrent, sat under

the shade of walnut trees, and eat of their fallen fruit; drank water

from the fountain, talked about Petrarch and Laura, and refused, from

incredulity, and on account of the heat of the sun, to mount a hill to a

house which, we were assured, had been inhabited by the bard. At the

village of Vaucluse, we took into our carriage some delicious grapes,

and returned to Lisle, where we dined on eels and trout, the boasted

fare of the place, prepared in three several ways. As the landlord at

Lisle is said sometimes to over-charge, I will do his reputation the

justice to observe that, for a dejeune a la fourchette, and dinner for

five persons, with good vin du pays, he demanded twenty-five

francs,--perhaps ten sous a head too much. We got into our coach as the

sun set and the moon rose, and our three horses took us back to Avignon

in two hours.

In the very heart and centre of the romantic scenery of the Vallis

Clausa, a little to the right of the cavern out of which issues the

fountain, on the ledge over which it falls, is stuck a mean ugly pillar,

put there by somebody to commemorate something. I mention this pillar

only in the hope that good taste will command its demolition. Even if it

were fine and rare, it would be there misplaced: "fortasse cupressum

scis simulare," but what has that to do with a shipwreck?

My younger son had accompanied to Vaucluse the lady whose visit of

fifteen days had so much astonished the Avignonais a few months before.

Our excursion thither was made under the conduct of my elder son, and

was rendered more agreeable by his frank manners and cheerful

attentions. As the fate of this young man, now in his nineteenth year,

is the occurrence the most important to me, and, I am persuaded, the

subject most interesting to my readers in the contents of this

narrative,--I will give some account of the infancy of this son, that he

may be introduced to their acquaintance, and the last scene of his life

in some sort prepared for. Alas! within two years, on the anniversary

of our journey to Vaucluse, the delirium of his fever deprived me for

the remainder of my life of the comfort of his society, excepting only

one short and consoling conversation immediately before his death. I

trust, in the divine mercy, to rejoin him in the abodes of the just.

His birth was announced to me at three o'clock in the morning of the 5th

of May 1801. In anxious expectation of this news I had forborn to retire

to rest. It was still necessary for me to wait some little time before I

could be admitted to see my first-born. I then lived at Bath, in the

west wing of Lansdown Crescent: behind each house of this building is a

long strip of garden, of the breadth of the house. In the tumult of new

affections I went out into my garden: the twilight of the morning was

visible: I offered to God this child, who, by the ancient law, would

have been consecrated to him, to serve at the altar, if such were the

divine will; praying that, in whatever state, he might so live as to

secure his own salvation, and contribute to the edification of others:

that if he were not to fulfil this only worthy purpose of existence, he

might now die in infancy; but that rather his days might be prolonged,

if that were to the glory of God, and the increase of his own merit and

reward. My prayer was heard: I returned into the house, and gave a

father's blessing to the stranger.

He received in baptism the names Henry Kenelm; the former adopted in his

family for the last four generations, the latter derived from my

maternal grandfather. His sponsors were Sir Thomas Fletewood, the last

of an ancient and pious family of Cheshire; and his lady, afterwards

married to the Count St. Martin de Front, Sardinian ambassador at

London. To her it is no doubt a source of Christian consolation to know,

even in this life, that her godson fulfilled the engagement contracted

in his name.

They who have attentively observed the early years of children must be

convinced that each and every one of them is born with a distinct and

individual character. Two men of fifty, "stained with the variation of

each soil," will differ from each other in manners and opinions more

than two children of the same family: but two children of the same

family will, in character, differ from each other as much as two men of

fifty. Pascal suggests a doubt whether, as custom is called a second

nature, nature itself may not be a former custom. This profound thought

leads to the question whether human souls have existed previously to

their imprisonment in this "body of our humiliation." That they have so

existed I think extremely probable for many very cogent reasons: it is

an opinion which I could defend, merely as an opinion, by many powerful

arguments. I am contented "not to be wise beyond what is written." Yet

it is written that, when the disciples asked our Lord, "Did this man sin

or his parents, that he was born blind?" our Lord, without reproving the

supposition that the man might have sinned before his birth, simply

answered, "Neither did this man sin, nor his parents."

Henry Kenelm manifested, as early as the natural character can be

manifested, a proud, impetuous, obstinate, angry temper: that he wanted

any thing was, with him, a reason why he should have it; that any other

child was younger or weaker than himself, entitled him, as he thought,

to domineer. He had also the good qualities usually opposed to these

faults in the same character; he was generous, grateful, confiding,

compassionate. As no one, in so short a life, ever more completely

subdued than he did the faults of his natural temper, I record them for

the sake of doing homage to that religion by the aid of which he was

enabled to correct them.

His understanding was quick and lively, and he learned readily and with

pleasure. A cause of hindrance and delay that occurred to him in

learning to read shall here be mentioned as a caution to parents,

institutors, and governesses. To play at learning to read is regarded as

a great improvement on the "Reading-made-easy," of less enlightened

times. A lady made him a present of a cylindrical ivory box containing

counters, on which were inscribed the letters of the alphabet. He

trundled the box on the carpet, he threw the letters on the carpet, and

viewed them in all directions, sometimes sideways, sometimes

topsy-turvy; so that he no longer knew them again when he saw them

upright in a book: b and q and d and p more especially puzzled him:

besides, the place of letters in words is of great use towards learning

their power, and this help his counters did not afford him. To impose on

him the task of arranging the letters in _verbal_ order, would have

included all the restraint of a formal lesson. The conclusion is, that

if children play, they do not learn; and while they learn, they must not

play: there is a time for all things: their lessons must be short on

account of the softness of the brain, but attention must be insisted on;

they cannot be cheated as to the nature of the occupation, but they

have sense enough to find pleasure in the consciousness of improvement.

When Kenelm was little more than five years and a half old, his elder

sister died: she was thirteen months younger than himself. Never was

child more lovely in death than this little girl. I gazed on her with

the feeling, since portrayed in the inimitable lines of the Giaour,

beginning

He who hath bent him o'er the dead.

These lines I read fourteen years afterwards at Avignon; they thrilled

and electrified me: the touch of genius recalled the scene I had

witnessed. Yet it should seem that associations supplied by reason and

experience are requisite to the contemplation of such an object with the

sentiments described by Lord Byron. I led Kenelm to see his sister two

hours after her death: terror was his predominant emotion; the

immobility of what still so much resembled life appalled him. He burst

into tears. "If I had thought she would have looked _so_, I would not

have come to see her;" nor could he for some time pass the door of that

chamber without shuddering.

When he was twelve years old, I placed him at Stoneyhurst college in

Lancashire. This society of English Jesuits, the dreadful Jesuits of

St. Omers, of the Popish plot, had, within half a century, suffered

three removes or _demenagemens_, which both the French and English

proverb says are worse than a fire. They had been expelled from St.

Omers by the French government, had been obliged by Joseph II. to quit

Bruges, and had been driven from Liege by the approach of the French

armies. They had now been established for some years in a country-seat

of the family of Lulworth castle. Mr. Weld had given them a beneficial

lease of the house and domain of Stoneyhurst, for which they expressed

much gratitude. It is good to be grateful: gratitude is a Christian

virtue, and well-becoming those who by their missions, their literary

labours, and their institutions for education, have acquired so much

glory to themselves, and rendered such signal services to the Christian

world. Let them always be grateful.

An account of their plan of education may not be unacceptable, and may

furnish some hints to the heads of our great schools. I am inclined to

think that the Jesuits, though as much spoken against, are very little

more known in England than at the time when I left it.

The whole number of boys, about two hundred and fifty, is divided into

six schools or classes, to each of which a master is appointed, who, in

the course of six years, conducts his set of boys, from the elements of

grammar in the French, Latin, and Greek languages, to rhetoric, or the

reading of the best classical authors. The fifth year, or that before

rhetoric, is set apart for the study of the poets only. After this

course of six years, lectures are given by the professors of moral and

natural philosophy.

The masters have no intercourse with their scholars except during the

holding the class or saying the lesson: prefects are appointed to

superintend them at all other times. They study in a large room destined

to this use only: a prefect, in a lofty tribune, enforces application: a

prefect attends them while at play to prevent violence, quarrelling, or

indecorous language: a prefect sleeps in a little room with a glass door

at the end of the dormitory.

The play-ground is divided into two equal portions, one of which is

allotted to the boys of the three higher, the other to the boys of the

three lower schools, and no one is allowed to cross the bisecting line.

Thus the tyranny of the great boys over the little ones, and the

requisition of petty, irregular, or mischievous services is prevented:

thus also the years and strength of those who play together are

generally more equal.

No master or other superior, who conceives that a boy has deserved

punishment, is allowed to inflict that punishment himself, but is

obliged to send such boy to the prefect appointed for the time

administrator of the ferula: the boys, either from custom or the point

of honour, or the fear of worse, always ask for the number of strokes of

the ferula which they may be ordered by the superior to receive. A

whimsical result of subordination, that a lad of seventeen shall go to a

man of five and twenty, and say, "Please, Sir, to give me nine ferulas."

Horace talks of the ferula; he does not say that he petitioned for it

himself; and I saw, by an al fresco at Portici, that boys were flogged,

two thousand years ago, just as they now are in our country schools.

The dormitory is a lofty room, in which each boy has his bed-place to

himself, separated from his neighbours by a wainscot partition six feet

high; a curtain, with a number upon it, is drawn at the foot of the

bed-place, which is open at the top. During the day-time the dormitory

is locked, and none but the servants of the house are, on any account,

permitted to go into it.

The eleves of Stoneyhurst wear an uniform: this regulation, I am

persuaded, has a better moral influence on their minds than ferulas and

disciplines: "their feet are accommodated," as a fine writer once

expressed it, with very thick shoes; "and their heads are protected" by

a leathern cap: this cap is made to shade the face or to be turned up at

pleasure; it is trimmed with fur, and, while fresh, looks very smart:

but it is soon _degraded_, as the French phrase is, by the various uses

to which caprice or convenience induces the boys to apply it: they sit

upon it; they kneel upon it; they blow, or rather fan the fire with it;

they use it for a bag, and perhaps sometimes, when unseen by the

prefect, they give each other slaps on the face with it;--a trait

d'ecolier for the which its form, when folded, is admirably well

adapted. A blue jacket and red waistcoat of coarse cloth, dark velveteen

pantalon, and worsted stockings, a black velvet stock round the collar

of a very coarse shirt, complete the habiliments of the Stoneyhurst

collegian. "Forsan et haec olim," &c.

The boys rise at half past five in the morning and go to bed at half

past eight in the evening. Prayers in the chapel begin and end every

day, and they assist at mass daily. Those who are of sufficient age

confess and communicate once a fortnight.

Such are, in the main, the regulations of this Jesuits' college. During

their unsettled state, the society had admitted but few new members; in

consequence, the education of their youth was, at this time, conducted

chiefly by old men without activity, and young men without experience.

The course of a few years has remedied this evil.

When Kenelm arrived at Stoneyhurst, his heart bounded within him at the

sight of the spacious buildings, and of between two and three hundred

playfellows: he immediately procured a cap and black collar, and was as

vain of them as a young ensign of his cockade and sword. The superior

led me over the college; Kenelm followed and considered all as provided

for his use and convenience. I tried to persuade him that his visits to

the library, the academy-room, the strangers' apartment, and the garden

of the superiors, would not hereafter be very frequent; that his repasts

in the refectory, though sufficient and wholesome, would not be

luxurious. I was unable to moderate his transport: hardly could I

prevail on him to show some signs of regret at parting from me. I

appealed to "Philip when sober."

The next summer, I found him sober enough: he had discovered that he was

only one of a crowd; he felt the want of domestic affections, and of

those comforts which home only can supply. I consoled him however, and

left him, after three days spent at Whalley, in a disposition to endure

all that his duty and the destined course of his studies might require.

"O Athenians," said Themistocles, "how much do I suffer to gain your

applause!" Children have but too much reason to exclaim, "O

Themistocles, how much do we suffer to be able to read your history!"

The next summer, I sent for him to Park Gate, where he rejoined his

brother and sisters after two years absence. To the number of his

sisters was added one, whose infancy, unsuited for travelling, delayed

my journey to France. At this time he was gay and cheerful: he did not

know the world, and was not afraid of it; yet his behaviour was directed

by an ever sure sense of propriety. I was pleased and satisfied with

him:--he passed five weeks with us. I had given him the meeting at

Liverpool, whither he had been conducted by a prefect: I now took him

back to the same town, where we found a prefect with whom he returned to

his college.

In the month of July of the following year, 1816, I received a letter

from one of the superiors of the college, informing me that my son, with

thirty-six other boys, had fallen ill of the measles; that my son had

recovered, but, having been allowed to go out too soon, had again fallen

ill. The letter was couched in terms so ambiguous, and implying so much

doubt of the event, that it caused great alarm. I set off immediately:

no other letter was written, and Kenelm's mother was kept in a state of

fearful anxiety, till I wrote to her from Stoneyhurst that her son was

recovered from the relapse. He was however so much weakened, that I

thought it advisable to take him to the sea-coast. I passed ten days

with him alone, and had an opportunity of appreciating his character, of

observing his unaffected good sense, his gentle and amiable manners, his

watchfulness over his conscience, his dutiful affection to his father,

his piety towards God.

We returned to college to be present at the academy-day, and the

distribution of the prizes. Kenelm had been assured that, but for his

illness, one of these prizes would have fallen to his share. I

comforted him as well as I could, quoting--"satis est potuisse videri."

In the spring of the following year, I took my younger son to

Stoneyhurst, in the hope that the brothers would find present pleasure

in each others' company, and hereafter talk over together the scenes of

their boyhood. I observed that Kenelm's spirits appeared depressed: I

questioned him; he assured me he had nothing to complain of: I

interrogated the master: he spoke of Kenelm with great regard, and knew

not that any cause of uneasiness existed for him. I passed three days

with my sons, during which time Kenelm's cheerfulness returned, or

seemed to return; and I left them together.

Towards the end of this year, I finally resolved to put in execution my

long-projected, long-delayed, continental plan. I advised the brothers

of my purpose, who were, of course, delighted with the news. A kind and

much-esteemed friend, who wished to see Stoneyhurst college, brought

them back with him into Lincolnshire at the end of March following.

In the month that intervened between the return of my sons and our

arrival in Paris, the expectation of the journey, the preparation for

the journey, and the journey itself, so far occupied the mind of

Kenelm, that I had not remarked in him any extraordinary want of gaiety:

I perceived only that he was more serious, that his manner was less

frank, and even his carriage less easy than heretofore. At Paris, the

first discovery I made respecting him was that he was become

short-sighted. As we were viewing the statues of the Louvre, he

exclaimed, "I see nothing but blocks of marble;" and he went off

immediately to Chevalier's, the optician, to buy himself a lorgnette. I

sympathized with him, knowing by experience that a short sight deprives

us of a great part of the pleasure of existence, besides being an

incalculable disadvantage in society. He imputed his short-sightedness

to his having imprudently given himself up to study, before his health

was fully re-established after the measles, in the hope of gaining, at

the next academy-day, the medal which he had lost by his illness; that

he had read a great deal by the flaring gas lights with which the

college is illuminated.

Something remained behind, a reserve, a sadness even, which I entreated

him to account for. He gave me his full confidence; and I learned, with

very great sorrow, that, for the last eighteen months of his stay in

college, his mind had been a prey to scruples. This "pious awe, and

fear to have offended," carried to excess through inexperience and a

want of due apprehension that it is by the will only that we

offend,--had destroyed his gaiety, retarded his improvement, and

doubtlessly much injured his health.

I asked him, "What advice did your director give you?"--"None."--"Any

other superior?"--"None." Yet his state was sufficiently evident: he

joined in no play; he did not seek the company of his brother. Alone, or

with one or two companions, he employed the time allowed for play in

walking up and down, indulging the workings of his own mind. I regretted

that I had not taken him home when he requested, after his illness: I

regretted that, instead of taking his brother to college,--a measure so

inefficient for his consolation,--I had not come to France a twelvemonth

sooner: I regretted the time lost, and the time that was still to be

lost in regaining it. But Kenelm's mind was now at ease; feelings,

originating probably in a weak state of health, and continued only

through want of good counsel and sympathy, were at an end, when he found

himself with those whom he loved, by whom he was beloved: his

understanding was too clear for him to persevere either in inadequate

notions of the divine goodness, or in false judgments respecting duty.

Scruples are, by no means, of the nature of religious melancholy; they

are not inconsistent with the Christian grace of hope: they suppose

innocence; for the sinner may be hardened, may be penitent, may be

wavering, but cannot properly be said to be scrupulous: scruples not

only preserve from sin, but have also the good effect (the gift of

divine mercy,) of purging the heart from all affection to sin, as was

manifested in the future life of Kenelm.

Yet this fear, "the beginning of wisdom," acting on an ill-informed

conscience, is hurtful, as it indisposes to a cheerful energetic

performance of duty. I said to Kenelm, "If there are beings, (and we are

told that such there are,) who are interested that man should do ill,

they could by no other means so effectually obtain their purpose as by

fixing our attention on that by which we may offend." A priest, whom I

had known in England during his emigration, and whom I had the advantage

of meeting again at Paris; a man whose sanctity inspired Kenelm with

respect and confidence,--said to him, "Unless you shall be as sure that

you have offended God in the way in which you apprehend, as you would be

sure of having committed murder, I forbid you to mention it even to me

in confession." I will own that the vigour and prudence united in this

counsel struck me with awe. The saints are men of great minds:

philosophers are mistaken in thinking them fools.

A kind and discreet priest, at Avignon, talked to Kenelm in the same

sense, reminding him of the saying of St. Francis of Sales, "that

scruples are the worst things in the world except sin." Kenelm's mind

recovered its wonted cheerfulness and activity: family affections,

change of scene, and new occupations soon completed what good advice had

begun. He was yet too young to enter into society: he laboured to

perfect himself in the French language; he was delighted with drawing,

declaring that, were it consistent with duty, he could pass the whole

day in that amusement. He continued his classical studies from the point

at which they had been interrupted by his leaving college, where he was

in his fifth or poetical year. I read with him Homer and Virgil.

Of the Iliad he said, that, a few well-known sublime passages excepted,

the rest, was vulgar: and when I mouthed forth the Greek, in order to

impose on him the conviction that it was very fine,--"I grant you that

Homer has the advantage of a sonorous language and the hexameter line;

but there is very little grace in the expression, nor is the thought

deserving of it." He admired the delicacy of sentiment in the AEneid: he

discovered in it traces of more advanced civilization and more improved

knowledge than are to be found in Homer, as well as a more correct and

refined taste. I recommended the Odyssey to him, not only on account of

its varied fable and "specious wonders," but for the justness with which

human character and natural feeling are there rendered. We also read

together that Machiavel of historians, Tacitus, who, as I endeavoured to

persuade Kenelm, has treated the fame of Tiberius with great injustice,

by representing him, on every occasion, as a cunning and cruel tyrant;

whereas he was always wise, habitually just, and often beneficent. Let

any one fairly and impartially analyse the actions of this sovereign and

the comments of the historian, and he will perhaps be inclined to allow

that my opinion is not altogether unreasonable. Concerning the personal

vices of Tiberius there is here no question.

I was delighted with one of the results of my continental plan,--that my

children were now all of them under my own care. To what purpose subject

boys to all the privations, restraints, and severities,--all the

consequences of the ignorances and negligences of the managers of great

schools,--that they may acquire a very moderate knowledge of two dead

languages, which they generally neglect during the rest of their lives;

and this for six years or more? Who doubts but that he could learn to

read French in six months? And why should he not be equally capable of

learning Latin in the same space of time? And in six months more he may

learn to read Greek, which is rather the easier language of the two: he

may thus obtain admission to the treasures of wisdom and good taste

contained in those languages, in one-sixth of the time now usually

thrown away in a vain attempt to that purpose; for, I repeat it, boys

are compelled to employ the time of their education in _not_ learning

what is of no use to them.

Latin is no longer the language of literary composition, diplomatic

intercourse, or epistolary correspondence. It is sufficient that a few

men, in every generation, write Latin, like Bishop Louth, or Dr. Martin

Joseph Routh. The principal nations of Europe have their classics,

formed indeed upon the ancient classical model; and these, therefore,

will be better understood and more enjoyed by those who cultivate an

acquaintance with that model. Still, however, such previous acquaintance

is not indispensable: its advantage consists chiefly in being able to

note allusions and institute comparisons.

Let me not be understood to express a wish that the Greek and Latin

authors were less read than they are at present; on the contrary, I hope

that they will always be considered as an essential part of the studies

of a literary man. That the Greek especially should be so little known

as now it is, is to me a cause of regret. This language has the singular

privilege of having been, during twelve centuries, the language of the

most ingenious and enlightened people of all that existed during that

long aera. We have their authors from Hesiod to Photius, and still lower

down; a library superior to that of any modern nation; for the trash has

been swept away.

Far, very far from me, be the desire, that it should be said of such a

people in any sense, literary or political,

'Tis Greece, but living Greece no more.

I have been led into this train of reflection, on recording the

contentment with which I saw my children under my own superintendence at

Avignon. How far it may be reasonable to continue to inflict on our sons

all the suffering which they endure, when banished from the paternal

roof, and consigned to the coarse, undiscriminating care of strangers

for the sake of the instruction acquired by this plan, I leave every one

to determine for himself.

Four Years in France or, Narrative of an English Family's Residence there during that Period; Preceded by some Account of the Conversion of the Author to the Catholic Faith · 第 64 / 90 题