WHAT DID MR. ASQUITH DO?

A famous story tells how a heckler once broke up a Liberal meeting by

asking with raucous iteration, "What did Mr. GLADSTONE say in 1878?" or

whatever year it was. Nobody knew, and neither did the inquirer himself,

but uproar followed and his end was achieved. Now had the question run,

"What did Mr. GLADSTONE do?" how different a result! For Mr. GLADSTONE,

apart from any trifles of statesmanship or legislation, did two priceless

things, as I will show.

Although, writes the Returned Traveller who in our last number was so

unhappy about the deterioration that has come upon taxi-drivers, I left

England only in October last, I find it a changed place; but no change, not

even the iniquitous prices demanded by London's restaurateurs, or the

increased darkness, or the queer division of _hors d'oeuvres_ into

half-courses and whole-courses (providing an answer at last to the pathetic

query, "What is a sardine?" "A whole course, of course")--no change is so

striking as the fact that when a paper now refers to the PRIME MINISTER or

the PREMIER, it means no longer HERBERT HENRY but DAVID. In a world of flux

and mutability I had come to think of Mr. ASQUITH as a rock, a pyramid, a

pole-star. But, alas! even he was subject to alteration.

Thinking earnestly upon his career I have realised bow sad it is that he

has bequeathed us no ASQUITH legend. Always reserved and intent, he

discouraged Press gossip to such a degree as actually to have turned the

key on the Tenth Muse. Everybody else might lunch at the hospitable board

in Downing Street, but interviewers had no chance. In vain did the Quexes

of this frivolous city hope for even a crumb--there was nothing for them.

Mr. ASQUITH came into office, held it, and left it without a single

concession to Demos's love of personalia. He did not even wear comic

collars or white hats or a single eyeglass or any other grotesquely

significant thing; and how much poorer are we in consequence and how much

poorer will posterity be!

Contrast the case of Mr. GLADSTONE, from whom anyone could draw a postcard

and most people a chip of some recently-felled tree, and who is in my mind

wonderful and supreme by reason of two inventions which, though no one

would ever guess them to be the result of a Prime Minister's cogitations,

deserve the widest fame. Of these one was the product of his unaided

genius; the other the result of the collaboration with his wife.

Let us begin with the individual triumph.

Everyone who has ever stayed under anyone else's roof, from a

dine-and-sleep at Windsor Castle to a week in lovely Lucerne, has been

confronted, when packing-up time arrived, with the problem of the sponge.

No matter how muscular the fingers that wring this article, no matter how

thick and costly the rubbered receptacle that holds it, there is always the

chance of dampness communicating itself to other things in the bag. Isn't

there?

How so to squeeze the sponge as to drive out the last drop of moisture was

the problem before the massive intellect of the Grand Old Man. Need I say

that he solved it? His method, as he himself in his unselfish way, told one

of the diarists, possibly Sir M.E. GRANT-DUFF, possibly Mr. G.W.E.

RUSSELL--I forget whom--was to wrap up the sponge in a bath-towel and jump

on it. Here, for the historical painter, is a theme indeed--something worth

all the ordinary dull occasions which provoke his talented if somewhat

staid brush: the great Liberal statesman, the promoter of Home Rule, the

author of _The Impregnable Rock of Holy Scripture_, leaping upon the

bath-towel that held his sponge. But no historical painter could do justice

to such a scene. It needs the movies.

Those of us then who dry our sponges in this way--and I am a fervent

devotee--owe the inventor a meed of praise. And equally those of us who put

into our hot water bottles at night hot tea instead of hot water (as I

never have done and never mean to do), so that, waking in the small hours,

we may yet not be without refreshment, owe a meed of praise to the same

inspired innovator, for, if the chroniclers are correct, it was Mrs.

GLADSTONE'S habit to retire to rest with a bottle thus nutritiously filled,

which would be ready for her great man on his return from the House weary

and athirst.

Here we see the difference between Liberal Premiers. For what has Mr.

ASQUITH done towards the solution of domestic problems? Who can name a

thing? Has he devised a collar stud that cannot be lost? Has he hit upon a

way instantly to stop a shaving cut from bleeding? Has he contrived a taxi

window that will open when shut or shut when open? No. In all these years

he has spared no time for any inventions.

No wonder then that he was found wanting and forced to resign.

* * * * *

A Scot among the Cynics.

"The railway fares are being raised, we are told, to stop pleasure

travelling, but it can hardly be imagined that a munition worker going

home to spend his week-end with his family is bent on pleasure."--

_Glasgow Evening News_.

* * * * *

"Beautiful set of civic cat; very large stole and muff; accept

£12."--_The Lady_.

As DICK WHITTINGTON'S mascot is the only civic cat known to history we

think the relic should be secured for the Guildhall Museum.

* * * * *

"Simply as a citizen and as a non-party man, I want to say that Mr.

Asquith has my affection and respect--and that is the highest guerdon

that any statesman can have."--_Extract from Letter in Yorkshire

Paper_.

We know now why Mr. ASQUITH refused a peerage. He did not want to vex his

modest admirer.

* * * * *

"At Caxton Hall the conference was resumed of municipal authorities

interested in the conversation of old fruit, sardine and salmon

tins."--_Birmingham Daily Mail_.

We ourselves always listen with pleasure to their talk. It has at once a

fruity and a fishy flavour.

* * * * *

[Illustration: _Gentleman_ (_In favour of national work for everyone_).

"AND WHY SHOULDN'T PEOPLE BE DOING TO-DAY WHAT THEY NEVER DREAMED OF DOING

BEFORE THE WAR?"

_New Assistant_ (_his first operation_). "EXACTLY, SIR. ALL THE SAME, IF

ANYBODY HAD TOLD ME TWO DAYS AGO THAT I SHOULD NOW BE CUTTING THE HAIR OF A

COMPLETE STRANGER, I'D NEVER HAVE BELIEVED 'IM."]

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 152, January 10, 1917 · 第 22 / 29 题