TWO OLD HOUSES AND THREE YOUNG WOMEN

There are times and places that come back yet again, but that, when the

brooding tourist puts out his hand to them, meet it a little slowly, or

even seem to recede a step, as if in slight fear of some liberty he may

take. Surely they should know by this time that he is capable of taking

none. He has his own way--he makes it all right. It now becomes just

a part of the charming solicitation that it presents precisely a

problem--that of giving the particular thing as much as possible without

at the same time giving it, as we say, away. There are considerations,

proprieties, a necessary indirectness--he must use, in short, a little

art. No necessity, however, more than this, makes him warm to his work,

and thus it is that, after all, he hangs his three pictures.

I

The evening that was to give me the first of them was by no means the

first occasion of my asking myself if that inveterate “style” of which

we talk so much be absolutely conditioned--in dear old Venice and

elsewhere--on decrepitude. Is it the style that has brought about the

decrepitude, or the decrepitude that has, as it were, intensified

and consecrated the style? There is an ambiguity about it all that

constantly haunts and beguiles. Dear old Venice has lost her complexion,

her figure, her reputation, her self-respect; and yet, with it all, has

so puzzlingly not lost a shred of her distinction. Perhaps indeed the

case is simpler than it seems, for the poetry of misfortune is familiar

to us all, whereas, in spite of a stroke here and there of some happy

justice that charms, we scarce find ourselves anywhere arrested by the

poetry of a run of luck. The misfortune of Venice being, accordingly, at

every point, what we most touch, feel and see, we end by assuming it to

be of the essence of her dignity; a consequence, we become aware, by the

way, sufficiently discouraging to the general application or pretension

of style, and all the more that, to make the final felicity deep, the

original greatness must have been something tremendous. If it be the

ruins that are noble we have known plenty that were not, and moreover

there are degrees and varieties: certain monuments, solid survivals,

hold up their heads and decline to ask for a grain of your pity. Well,

one knows of course when to keep one’s pity to oneself; yet one clings,

even in the face of the colder stare, to one’s prized Venetian privilege

of making the sense of doom and decay a part of every impression.

Cheerful work, it may be said of course; and it is doubtless only in

Venice that you gain more by such a trick than you lose. What was most

beautiful is gone; what was next most beautiful is, thank goodness,

going--that, I think, is the monstrous description of the better part

of your thought. Is it really your fault if the place makes you want so

desperately to read history into everything?

You do that wherever you turn and wherever you look, and you do it,

I should say, most of all at night. It comes to you there with longer

knowledge, and with all deference to what flushes and shimmers, that the

night is the real time. It perhaps even wouldn’t take much to make you

award the palm to the nights of winter. This is certainly true for the

form of progression that is most characteristic, for every question

of departure and arrival by gondola. The little closed cabin of

this perfect vehicle, the movement, the darkness and the plash, the

indistinguishable swerves and twists, all the things you don’t see and

all the things you do feel--each dim recognition and obscure arrest is

a possible throb of your sense of being floated to your doom, even when

the truth is simply and sociably that you are going out to tea. Nowhere

else is anything as innocent so mysterious, nor anything as mysterious

so pleasantly deterrent to protest. These are the moments when you are

most daringly Venetian, most content to leave cheap trippers and other

aliens the high light of the mid-lagoon and the pursuit of pink and

gold. The splendid day is good enough for _them_; what is best for you

is to stop at last, as you are now stopping, among clustered _pali_ and

softly-shifting poops and prows, at a great flight of water-steps that

play their admirable part in the general effect of a great entrance.

The high doors stand open from them to the paved chamber of a basement

tremendously tall and not vulgarly lighted, from which, in turn, mounts

the slow stone staircase that draws you further on. The great point is,

that if you are worthy of this impression at all, there isn’t a single

item of it of which the association isn’t noble. Hold to it fast that

there is no other such dignity of arrival as arrival by water. Hold to

it that to float and slacken and gently bump, to creep out of the low,

dark _felze_ and make the few guided movements and find the strong

crooked and offered arm, and then, beneath lighted palace-windows, pass

up the few damp steps on the precautionary carpet--hold to it that these

things constitute a preparation of which the only defect is that it may

sometimes perhaps really prepare too much. It’s so stately that what

can come after?--it’s so good in itself that what, upstairs, as we

comparative vulgarians say, can be better? Hold to it, at any rate, that

if a lady, in especial, scrambles out of a carriage, tumbles out of a

cab, flops out of a tram-car, and hurtles, projectile-like, out of

a “lightning-elevator,” she alights from the Venetian conveyance as

Cleopatra may have stepped from her barge. Upstairs--whatever may be

yet in store for her--her entrance shall still advantageously enjoy

the support most opposed to the “momentum” acquired. The beauty of

the matter has been in the absence of all momentum--elsewhere so

scientifically applied to us, from behind, by the terrible life of our

day--and in the fact that, as the elements of slowness, the felicities

of deliberation, doubtless thus all hang together, the last of

calculable dangers is to enter a great Venetian room with a rush.

Not the least happy note, therefore, of the picture I am trying to frame

is that there was absolutely no rushing; not only in the sense of a

scramble over marble floors, but, by reason of something dissuasive and

distributive in the very air of the place, a suggestion, under the

fine old ceilings and among types of face and figure abounding in the

unexpected, that here were many things to consider. Perhaps the simplest

rendering of a scene into the depths of which there are good grounds of

discretion for not sinking would be just this emphasis on the value of

the unexpected for such occasions--with due qualification, naturally, of

its degree. Unexpectedness pure and simple, it is needless to say, may

easily endanger any social gathering, and I hasten to add moreover

that the figures and faces I speak of were probably not in the least

unexpected to each other. The stage they occupied was a stage of

variety--Venice has ever been a garden of strange social flowers. It

is only as reflected in the consciousness of the visitor from

afar--brooding tourist even call him, or sharp-eyed bird on the

branch--that I attempt to give you the little drama; beginning with the

felicity that most appealed to him, the visible, unmistakable fact that

he was the only representative of his class. The whole of the rest of

the business was but what he saw and felt and fancied--what he was

to remember and what he was to forget. Through it all, I may say

distinctly, he clung to his great Venetian clue--the explanation of

everything by the historic idea. It was a high historic house, with such

a quantity of recorded past twinkling in the multitudinous candles that

one grasped at the idea of something waning and displaced, and might

even fondly and secretly nurse the conceit that what one was having was

just the very last. Wasn’t it certainly, for instance, no mere illusion

that there is no appreciable future left for such manners--an urbanity

so comprehensive, a form so transmitted, as those of such a hostess and

such a host? The future is for a different conception of the graceful

altogether--so far as it’s for a conception of the graceful at all. Into

that computation I shall not attempt to enter; but these representative

products of an antique culture, at least, and one of which the secret

seems more likely than not to be lost, were not common, nor indeed

was any one else--in the circle to which the picture most insisted on

restricting itself.

Neither, on the other hand, was anyone either very beautiful or very

fresh: which was again, exactly, a precious “value” on an occasion

that was to shine most, to the imagination, by the complexity of its

references. Such old, old women with such old, old jewels; such ugly,

ugly ones with such handsome, becoming names; such battered, fatigued

gentlemen with such inscrutable decorations; such an absence of youth,

for the most part, in either sex--of the pink and white, the “bud” of

new worlds; such a general personal air, in fine, of being the worse for

a good deal of wear in various old ones. It was not a society--that was

clear--in which little girls and boys set the tune; and there was that

about it all that might well have cast a shadow on the path of even the

most successful little girl. Yet also--let me not be rudely inexact--it

was in honour of youth and freshness that we had all been convened. The

_fiançailles_ of the last--unless it were the last but one--unmarried

daughter of the house had just been brought to a proper climax; the

contract had been signed, the betrothal rounded off--I’m not sure that

the civil marriage hadn’t, that day, taken place. The occasion then had

in fact the most charming of heroines and the most ingenuous of heroes,

a young man, the latter, all happily suffused with a fair Austrian

blush. The young lady had had, besides other more or less shining recent

ancestors, a very famous paternal grandmother, who had played a great

part in the political history of her time and whose portrait, in the

taste and dress of 1830, was conspicuous in one of the rooms. The

grand-daughter of this celebrity, of royal race, was strikingly like her

and, by a fortunate stroke, had been habited, combed, curled in a

manner exactly to reproduce the portrait. These things were charming and

amusing, as indeed were several other things besides. The great Venetian

beauty of our period was there, and nature had equipped the great

Venetian beauty for her part with the properest sense of the suitable,

or in any case with a splendid generosity--since on the ideally suitable

_character_ of so brave a human symbol who shall have the last word?

This responsible agent was at all events the beauty in the world about

whom probably, most, the absence of question (an absence never wholly

propitious) would a little smugly and monotonously flourish: the one

thing wanting to the interest she inspired was thus the possibility

of ever discussing it. There were plenty of suggestive subjects round

about, on the other hand, as to which the exchange of ideas would by no

means necessarily have dropped. You profit to the full at such times by

all the old voices, echoes, images--by that element of the history of

Venice which represents all Europe as having at one time and another

revelled or rested, asked for pleasure or for patience there; which

gives you the place supremely as the refuge of endless strange secrets,

broken fortunes and wounded hearts.

Italian Hours · 第 17 / 56 题