2. Should the preacher wear his beretta while preaching?

3. Should the little bell be rung at the moment when Benediction is

given with the Blessed Sacrament?

4. Should the thurifer incense the Blessed Sacrament whilst Benediction

is being given?

* * * * *

1. It is usual in certain churches not only to leave the altar-charts

permanently on the altar, but also to place them on it as an ornament

during vespers and other functions, and even to furnish with them

altars at which Mass is not said. Now, it is quite certain that

whatever specially belongs to the Mass should not be on the altar

except during the Holy Sacrifice. The Rubric of the Missal prescribes

that the altar-charts should be prepared before Mass, and does not

suppose that they remain permanently on the altar. Except at Mass

time, and even during the celebration of the divine office, the altar

ought to remain covered. In the _Caeremoniale Episcop._, l. 2, c.

1, n. 13, we read that the acolytes should uncover the altar before

the incensation at the _Magnificat_. "Interim duo acolyti procedunt

ad altare, elevantes hinc inde anteriorem partem superioris tobalae,

seu veli super altare positi, illamque conduplicant usque ad medium".

Nothing is more opposed to the spirit of liturgical rules than objects

for which there is no use. Altar-charts are not a decoration, but are

made to serve a purpose; therefore they should be displayed when they

are wanted. Care should also be taken that they be legible, and not, as

sometimes happens, rather pictures than anything else.

2. The Rubric of the _Caeremon. Episcop._ is clear on this point: "Mox

surgit, et capite coöperto incipit sermonem."--(l. 1, c. 22, n. 3).

According to the Rubric of the Missal, the preacher uncovers his head

as often as he pronounces the holy names of Jesus and Mary, or of the

saint whose feast is being celebrated. In order not to do this too

often, he should avoid a too frequent mention of their names. "Si SS.

nominum Jesu uel Mariæ fiat mentio", says Lohner (_Instr. Pract._, t.

1., p. 50), "caput discoöperire debet (concionator); si tamen saepe

sint repetenda, utatur potius nomine Christi, Redemptoris, Dominæ

nostrae, C[oe]li Reginæ, aut similibus".

We may remark, however, that this regulation of the Rubric is an

exception to the general rule. The general rule is, that ecclesiastics

in church or choir are never covered except when seated, unless those

who, _paramentis induti_, move from place to place without passing

before the clergy. A priest who goes from the sacristy to the choir, or

to any other part of the church, if he do not wear at least the stole,

should not wear his beretta. Much less should he wear the beretta if he

be not in choir habit.

3. No author speaks of this usage. There appears, therefore, no reason

why it should be introduced. We would not venture to say that it ought

to be suppressed. However, it appears more becoming to reserve for Mass

the use of the small bell, and to ring during Benediction the large

bells of the church, as is the custom in Rome.

4. During Benediction the thurifer may incense the Blessed Sacrament on

his knees, as at High Mass; but it is better to omit such incensation.

The first of these assertions rests upon various decrees of the Sacred

Congregation of Rites; the second upon authority, especially that of

Gardellini.

_1st Decree._--"Cum non una sit auctorum sententia, nec eadem Ecclesiae

praxis quoad incensationem SS. Sacramenti dum populo cum ipso

impertitur benedictio, R. P. Fr. Paschalis a Platea Branculi sacerdos

ordinis minorum ... S. R. C. sequentia dubia enodanda proposuit,

nimirum: 1. Num utraque auctorum sententia, videlicet eorum qui

affirmant et eorum qui denegant talem thurificationem adhibendam tuto

teneri possit? 2.... 3. Quatenus respondeatur in sensu denegantium, an

usus, sive consuetudo incensandi, ubi viget, sit de medio tollendus?

Respons. _Servetur Rituale Romanum_"--(Dec. 11 Sept., 1847, No. 5105,

q. 1, d. 3).

_2nd Decree._--"Utrum conveniens sit, quod cæremoniarius vel

thuriferarius incenset SS. Eucharistiæ Sacramentum cum populo

benedictio impertitur, uti fit in elevatione SS. Sacramenti in Missa

solemni? Respons. _Non praescribi_" (Decret. 11 Sept., 1847, No. 5111,

q. 9).

The Rubric of the Ritual referred to in the first decree does not speak

of this incensation. In the second the usage appears to be tolerated,

but is not prescribed.

Gardellini, § xxxi., No. 23, thus speaks:

"Heic loci altera se offert quæstio, num scilicet

thuriferarius, dum sacerdos benedicit populum debeat,

incensare Sacramentum? Silentium, quod tenent Caeremoniale,

Rituale, Instructio clementina, et auctores fere omnes,

qui caeteroquin nihil omiserunt de iis, quae in sacra hac

actione servanda sunt, plane suadet hanc incensationem esse

omittendam. Nihilominus Cavalerius ... et Tetamus, qui eum

sequitur ... innixi quodam decreto ... existimant faciendam

esse, vel saltem in arbitrio relinqui. Videtur tamen magis

congruere contrariam sententiam consentaneam silentio

Caeremonialis, Ritualis, et Instructionis. Cur enim in his,

licet enumerentur ritus et caeremoniae ommnes servandae, de

hac una ne verbum quidem fit? Non alia est ratio, nisi quia

locum habere nequit. Si quaeris: cur? Dicam: quia dignior

id est sacerdos, jam Sacramentum thurificavit, nec inferior

debet postea thurificationem iterare. Dum benedicitur populus

supplet vices incensi bonus adorationis odor. Nec me commovent

assertum decretum et Missalis rubrica. Nam ad illud quod

attinet, jam supra notavi decretum illud non reperiri in

regestis S. R. C. ac penitus ignorari a qua congregatione vel

cujus auctoritate datum fuerit; et forte nihil aliud est, nisi

privatum responsum ad consultationem factam alicui Rubricarum

perito, qui potius variam ecclesiarum consuetudinem attendens,

quam rationum vim, respondit: Servari posse alterutram. Quod

vero spectat rubricam Missalis, longe diversa militat ratio.

Ideo enim rubrica praescribit in Missa solemni: _Thuriferarius

genuflexus in cornu epistolae ter incensat Hostiam, cum

elevatur, et similiter calicem, posito incenso in thuribulo

absque benedictione_, tum quia unica haec est incensatio,

quae ad Sacramentum adolendum fit in Missa, solemni, tum quia

alius non est thuriferario dignior, qui eo fungatur munere;

nam sacerdos celebrat, diaconus ei assistit, subdiaconus

impeditus est patena, cæremoniarius invigilat ut quisque suo

fungatur officio. Id adeo verum est, ut in Missa defunctorum

cum dignior thuriferario subdiaconus non sit impeditus,

Sacramentum incensat jubente rubrica: _Subdiaconus non tenet

patenam post celebrantem, sed tempore elevationis Sacramenti in

cornu epistolae illud incensat_. Contra vero cum benedicendus

est populus cum Sacramento, curnam iteranda erit thurificatio

per acolythum, si jam ab omnium in ea actione ministrantium

dignissimo, celebrante scilicet, peracta fuerat? Si has

rationes parvi fieri oportere existimas, haud contemnendum

censeas librorum ritualium silentium, qui certe hanc

thurificationem demandassent, quemadmodum jusserunt fieri ad

hymni cantum ante orationem. Haec dixi, ne quid magis congruum

mihi videtur, praeterirem: caeterum absit ut velim turbas

movere, ac damnare consuetudinem, quae licet minus conveniat,

ritus tamen substantiam non laedit. Cum autem eadem consuetudo

in bene multis ecclesiis obtineat, difficillimum esset eamdem

penitus eliminare".

The Irish Ecclesiastical Record, Volume 1, October, 1864 · 第 13 / 35 题