CHAPTER XXIV--THE UNDIVULGED SECRET

_A lie, then eternity--A promise made to the dying--Insurance money

tempts them--"Have not betrayed"--The innocent who die for the

guilty--The girl who lives as a boy_

|AS the world knows nothing of its greatest men, so the world knows

nothing of its greatest mysteries. No hint or rumour of them ever

reaches the public ear. There are strange things happening every day in

this vast, mysterious world that we call London of which no word will

ever be spoken. One or two human beings will know the secret, but it

will remain hidden away in their hearts to the end.

Sometimes from the lips of a dying man or woman comes a confession that

startles and shocks the few interested relatives gathered round

the bedside. Sometimes even in these deathbed revelations--the last

despairing effort of the burthened conscience to find relief while still

a flicker of life remains--there is still a reticence and a reservation.

The nearest and dearest are not trusted with the secret, even in that

supreme hour. The full confession is made only to the priest, upon whose

lips is the seal of silence.

The knowledge that in death there is often this desire to clear the

conscience by a confession, has caused many people to believe that

mysteries which to the world still remain unfathomed have been revealed

by criminals dying on the scaffold. There are people who still remember

the confession Neill Cream made with the rope round his neck.

"I am Jack the ---------" he gasped, and then his lips closed in the

eternal silence. This confession, like others of a similar kind, has

been generally accepted as a desperate attempt to prolong life. The

wretched man imagined that by making this statement his execution might

be stayed in order that his story might be inquired into, for he knew

that all the world was eager to have that mystery of mysteries cleared

up. But there were facts known to those on the scaffold which stamped

the statement as a lie--a lie uttered on the brink of eternity.

In the dead of night, in the ward of one of our great hospitals, some

time ago, the nurse in charge was sitting by the stove at the end of the

room when she heard a faint cry from one of the beds.

She went at once, and found that one of the patients, a man of fifty who

was not expected to live, had taken a sudden turn for the worse. She saw

that the man was dying, and was about to summon the doctor on night-duty

when the dying man grasped her hand.

"Don't go, for God's sake!" he gasped. "Listen!--I'm dying--I want to

tell you something--something that when I am gone you will keep as a

sacred secret."

The nurse, somewhat alarmed by the man's manner, gave the promise. She

bent down to hear what he had to say. Then with a white face she went

hurriedly to the telephone and called to the doctor.

The man died shortly afterwards. He died and left the nurse in

possession of a secret which she would have given a great deal never to

have heard. She gave a solemn promise to a dying man not to reveal it,

and yet she has confessed that the temptation to do so is great. She

asserts that if she opened her lips a mystery which startled London, and

which is still unsolved, would be a mystery no more. But the dying man

gave her his confession as the professional nurse by his bedside and

under an oath of secrecy, and she holds that she is bound by it. There

is one person in the world who knows the secret of that mystery--and

only one. And she will probably carry it with her to the grave.

There is many a mystery, of which no word has ever been breathed abroad,

hidden away under the marble tombs and flower-decked graves of our great

cemeteries.

It has happened that a belated traveller, passing the gates of a

cemetery in the hours of darkness, has been startled to see among

the distant tombs dim lanterns moving here and there. He has probably

hurried away, for not many of us are brave enough to overcome the dread

of watching a city of the dead after nightfall.

But he has only seen the preparations for the carrying out of the Home

Secretary's order for exhumation. An unsuspected crime is believed to

have been hidden away in the graveyard.

Something has come to light which has aroused suspicion, and the proverb

that "Murder will out" is about to be justified again.

But there are mysteries of crime which lie in the cemeteries never to

be brought to the light of day, and there are mysteries of romance lying

there unsuspected too.

The allegations in the famous Druce-Portland mystery startled England.

They remain allegations, for the Home Secretary has persistently refused

to allow the truth of the tomb to be laid bare. But there are empty

coffins in family vaults and under splendid monuments, and there are

coffins tenanted by men and women who never bore the name that is upon

the coffin-plate.

The sham funeral always conceals a mystery which is not likely to be

revealed, for those who have arranged it have the best of reasons for

keeping lifelong silence.

The sham or substituted burial takes place, as a rule, in connection

with insurance frauds.

I have given chapter and verse in a former chapter with regard to the

substitution of bodies, and quoted from the evidence given before a

Parliamentary Commission to prove that fraud under our present system

of death certification is not only possible but quite easy of

accomplishment.

Here is a case which will prove to the doubting reader how simple it is

to bury a man with all formalities satisfied, while he is still alive.

A doctor had been attending a man who was seriously ill. He called

one morning, found the patient apparently much worse, and told the

relatives--poor people!--that he would look in again in the evening

about nine o'clock.

At eight o'clock the man's wife came to the doctor's house, told him the

patient had passed away, and asked for a certificate. The doctor, who

expected the man to die, and had been attending him for some time, gave

it.

Before the wife got home the doctor's assistant, who that evening was

going the doctor's rounds for him, as he--the doctor--had a private

matter which made him anxious not to leave his home, called on the

patient, whose name was on the list he had copied from the doctor's

visiting-book.

He found the man much better and sitting up in bed chatting with his

brother, who was drinking his health from a newly-opened bottle of

whisky. This accidental visit of the assistant spoilt a neatly-arranged

scheme of fraud.

The patient was insured for £100. Shortly after the doctor's visit he

took a remarkable turn for the better, and towards evening was on the

road to recovery. The crisis had passed, and he was out of danger.

The husband's brother came in, and suggested to the man and his wife

that it would be a pity to lose the £100 that would have come to

the family if the patient had died. So the wife went out and got the

certificate.

These facts are in the Report of the Commission. The doctor who attended

the case told the story himself in the course of his evidence.

It was some time afterwards that the plan for the false burial was

discovered. The money for it was to be drawn from the burial club on the

doctor's certificate. The relatives had managed to get possession of a

shell. This was to be filled with stones and bricks, securely wrapped

up to prevent their moving, and packed in a sack to represent the man's

weight.

The shell was to be closed, and then, "in consequence of a dispute with

the first undertaker," the order for the coffin and the interment was to

be given to another undertaker.

There was no reason he should refuse the business. The production of

the doctor's certificate would justify him in taking the order and

concluding the arrangements.

There are coffins in the London cemeteries which contain no bodies. Over

some of the graves there are memorial stones, and, as in Wilkie Collins'

famous story, "The Woman in White," it sometimes happens that the "dead

person" goes to the cemetery and reads the touching tribute to his or

her virtues.

It may even be--I have heard the story told--that the dear departed will

go to the cemetery once a year and lay a memorial wreath upon her own

grave.

These are the mysteries of the dead. The mysteries of the living are

hidden away, sometimes in their own hearts, sometimes in the keeping of

the family solicitor, who has many a startling romance locked away in

the safes and tin boxes that line the walls of his quiet office.

I sat the other day in the private office of a famous solicitor who is

the confidant of the secrets of many of our titled families, and of some

of the most prominent members of the Smart Set.

As I chatted pleasantly with the famous lawyer, I could not help

thinking what a marvellous series of "Mysteries of modern London" he

could write if he were not, by reason of his office and his own high

sense of personal honour, bound to preserve silence.

In the quiet, old-fashioned little room in which I sat, looking out upon

an ancient burial ground, some of the most sensational stories of the

day have been told, and, by the skill of the diplomatic solicitor,

brought to a satisfactory last chapter, and then consigned to the

oblivion of the locked safe, of which he alone carries the key.

For most of the mysteries that have been brought to this cosy little

room have been settled there. They have not had to endure the glare of

the Law Courts and the fierce publicity of the Press. Had they done so

the world would have had some startling sensations, which would have put

many that are thrillingly headlined by the popular Press far back into

the shade.

It is not often in this country that we have the mystery of the

concealed identity in the criminal dock. No advocate rises at the Old

Bailey and endeavours to influence a jury by hinting that the prisoner

on trial for his life is the son of some great personage. "If you knew

who I was," exclaimed Prado, "you would be astounded," and his advocate

repeated his words.

We have no guilty wretches posing in the dock and pretending that by

their silence they are screening a name which is dearer to them than

life. Something of that kind was, it is true, attempted by Mrs. Pearcy

(Mary Eleanor Wheeler), the murderess of Mrs. Hogg and her child, who

arranged that after her death an advertisement should be inserted in all

the principal Madrid papers.

The advertisement duly appeared:

"M. E. C. P. Last wish of M. E. W. Have not betrayed."

The story of the murder of Mrs. Hogg was only half told. Mrs. Pearcy

practically acknowledged her guilt when she said that her sentence was

just; but there was always an unfathomed mystery in the case which was

intensified by the last request of the woman on the brink of eternity,

that someone in a foreign land should be notified that she had "not

betrayed."

Yet innocent persons have suffered for others and have not betrayed.

An innocent man has stood in the shadow of the scaffold and refused to

say the words which would have cleared him, because they would have

imperilled the life of one whom he was determined not to betray.

Innocent men and innocent women have confessed to crimes and paid the

penalty. The story told by the French novelist of the man in the last

stage of consumption who confessed to a murder by arrangement with the

relatives of the real murderer has its counterpart in fact. The man, who

proved that truth is stranger than fiction, feared a public trial. He

committed suicide, and left a confession behind him which tallied with

all the ascertained facts. His confession could well bear the impress of

truth, for the details were communicated to him by the actual author

of the crime. The man took the eternal shame upon himself for a sum of

money assured to those who, had he died of the disease that must soon

have been fatal, would have been left in the direst poverty. It was

not until some years after the suicide of the supposed murderer that

suspicion was aroused as to the genuineness of the confession by certain

circumstances which came accidentally to the knowledge of a retired

police-officer. And then it was useless to move further in the matter.

To obtain the conviction of another man would, in the circumstances,

have been almost impossible.

In the old days physical torture wrung a false confession of guilt from

hundreds of men and women. To-day it is mental torture that now and

again causes an innocent person to plead guilty to crimes that can

be purged with imprisonment, but more frequently there is a solid and

substantial benefit as the temptation.

Occasionally, when in some famous case of elaborate fraud there is a

suspicion that the person arrested is a man of good family fallen into

evil ways, there is a hint in the Press of the mystery of identity. But

it is rarely more than a hint. No one knows the truth but the unhappy

man himself and his still unhappier relatives, who throughout the trial

are in terror lest the accused should, in a moment of weakness, betray

himself, and fix the shame of his evil-doings upon the name they bear.

But, as a rule, the well-born man who has fallen low respects his

family, and the mystery of the identity of many a criminal who passes

from the dock to the convict gaol has been as well preserved, as far as

the great public are concerned, as the identity of the Man in the Iron

Mask.

One reads old stories of women who all their lives have passed without

suspicion as men, and accepts them as possible in the past. But

sometimes the world is startled by the discovery that this mystery of

sex is still maintained by women even in the lowlier walks of life,

where one would think romance of the kind would have no place.

Not long since a working-man, grey-haired and wrinkled, came before a

London magistrate, and was proved to be a woman. She had passed as a man

and laboured as a man for nearly forty years, and no one had suspected

the truth.

In some cases, for good and sufficient reasons, this form of fraud--for

in a sense it is fraud--is aided and abetted by relatives, who keep the

secret to the end.

One has only to remember that large sums of money and vast estates

pass away from families in default of an heir male to understand how

sometimes the girl-child is dressed and brought up as a "boy" from the

earliest period.

The fraud _must_ sooner or later be found out, you would think. But with

money to back it up there is no absolute reason that it should be.

Many of these men-women have been married to "wives," and the wife has

kept the secret. There are a dozen cases known and authenticated to

prove it.

In most instances the secret has been discovered or confessed at last.

But there are some cases in which the secret is kept undivulged through

life and passed on to the eternal silence of the grave.

End of Project Gutenberg's The Mysteries of Modern London, by George R. Sims

The Mysteries of Modern London · 第 24 / 24 章