We recently overheard a remark which made us query if we cannot get along
without servants? A lady was commenting on the character of the “help,”
which one was obliged to employ to-day, and expressed the opinion that, if
our public schools continued to fill the heads of children with the notion
that one person was as good as another, it would not be long before it
would be impossible to get help at all.
There seems to be an idea abroad in this land as well as in others, that a
certain class of people are for the purpose of producing servants for
another class of people, and that this servant-producing class has no
right to give their children an education that is calculated to elevate
them above the position of their parents. We are not in sympathy with this
idea. If there is one person on this earth that is of less account than
another it is the person who is helpless, who is dependent upon others for
everything that makes life possible or endurable. We must confess that
there are too many people in this country who are of this kind, who must
have someone to do for them what they ought to do for themselves.
Why should one person be expected to wait upon another? Why should a man
or woman look upon a fellow-being as fit only to be a servant? Is one born
to serve and the other to be waited upon?
Such notions have no right on our democratic soil. In this country there
must be no caste, no division of society into classes.
We rejoice that such a criticism of the character of the “help” employed
in the houses of the rich as we overheard, is true, for it reveals a
condition of things that may lead to what is much needed to-day, viz.: a
simpler mode of living on the part of a great many of our American people.
Is it necessary to live in such a way that a dozen or more servants are
required in a home to keep it in order?
We believe the community in which all are independent and none are
servants is the ideal one. Why should not this be the ambition of the
race, to live in a manner that will leave others their independence and
encourage in them the desire for a home? Our children all ought to be
taught to work, and be made to work, and not be brought up with the notion
that they have the right to expect others to wait upon them.
We do not wish to imply that one individual should not consider it his or
her duty to help another or to work for another. What we desire to convey
is this, that if people did more of their own work, and waited upon their
own wants more, they would not only be doing what is best for themselves,
but also what is best for the community in general. For men or women to be
dependent upon servants and almost helpless without them, is not a
condition to be proud of, but to be ashamed of. The man who cannot harness
or drive his horse; the woman who cannot buy and cook a dinner for her
family, has not been properly educated.
The home in which there are the fewest servants is the happiest home. The
father that brings up his sons to work, to know how to earn a living; the
mother who teaches her daughters to cook, to sew, to do housework, is
doing them good, not harm. There are too many know-nothings and
do-nothings in the world. It is honorable to be useful in this world, and
it ought to be dishonorable to be useless. Let us work for the day when we
can get along without servants; when life shall be so simple that each
family can do its own work. The servant system is but little different
from the slave system, and it ought to be abolished.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
The money man gives to get him into heaven is what he ought to use to
improve the earth.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
The Unitarian walks with a cane, the Congregationalist, Methodist,
Presbyterian and Baptist go with crutches, the Episcopalian has to be
pushed about in an invalid’s chair, while the Roman Catholic crawls on his
hands and knees and is led around with a ring in his nose by a priest.