THE OLD AND THE NEW

This is essentially an age of change. Things which have been established

for centuries are no longer regarded as fixed. That which has been looked

upon as absolute is now respectfully held to be uncertain. The foundations

of old ideas are being disturbed and man finds that he has built upon

sandy bottom. Much which in times past answered the human soul, now

affords no satisfaction. It is plain that a revolution has commenced that

will be far reaching and important in its actions and reactions. There is

to be a general overhauling of matters secular and religious, political

and social and a wholesale clearing out of old words and forms, of

outgrown habits and customs, may be expected. The world of man is about to

take account of stock and to have a universal comparison of estimates of

values. Too long have we been subsisting upon the say-soes of our

ancestors and taking their eyes and ears as infallible.

For many years men have regarded all questions of religion as settled, and

that the whole duty of this and future generations was to accept the

conclusions of the past upon all religious matters. We do not understand

how men ever came to regard such conclusions as final or how they came to

expect the whole human race to receive them as the utmost of human

knowledge. We do not look upon the questions of religion as settled, and

the growing doubts of the infallibility of the common religious ideas

demand that we reconsider these questions. To do this we have not to go

into any theological discussion. No learned authorities are to be

consulted to establish or refute any line of argument. No dictionary of

terms is to be examined to settle the meanings of words. We have only to

decide whether mankind had better facilities for observing and studying

the phenomena of the universe in past times than we have to-day; whether

their eyes and ears were better than ours, and their methods and

opportunities for ascertaining the truth of things higher than those of

this age.

If men in the past had facilities inferior to ours for observing the

phenomena of the universe, it would follow that their ideas of the

universe would be inferior. Now, if we have superior ideas of the

universe, ideas nearer the truth of things, why should we be expected to

surrender these and hold ideas which are false?

It seems to us that the questions of religion may be settled by deciding

whether or not we are to believe our own eyes and ears and trust our own

knowledge and experience. It is certain that if we can trust our senses

and our knowledge, the old ideas of the universe, of the origin of earth,

of life, of man, and of good and evil and the whole catalogue of religious

things are incorrect; and if we accept them we do so contrary to our

reason and understanding.

With faith in the present, and in all that makes it peculiar,—its

scientific tendencies,—and with the belief that out of the doubt and

uncertainty that are now around us will come higher convictions which will

deepen and widen life’s purpose and make humanity a fairer word and a

fairer reality, we say:

“Ring out the old, ring in the new;

Ring out the false, ring in the true.”

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

Hell is where cowards have sent heroes.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

A man never fell down stairs that he did not blame the stairs.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

The cross people carry to-day is made of gold or set with diamonds.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

There is nothing in this world of ours that will work harder, fight

harder, wait more patiently and suffer longer than love, unless it be

hate.

Is The Bible Worth Reading, and Other Essays · 第 59 / 118 题