FROM THE SCHOOL TO THE GIRL

What the school is able to do for the girl depends very largely upon the

girl herself. The majority of people with whom she comes in contact do

not take that into consideration, and the school is held unfairly

responsible for the girl. All any school can do is to use the material

it finds. Some one has said, with harsh but true emphasis, that a

college does not make a fool, it simply helps in the development of one.

As an illustration of its limitations, a school sends out two girls from

the same class; one girl it is proud to have taken as a type, the other

it is sorry to have represent it. Yet both have been under exactly the

same influence. Students do not realize how fearfully at their mercy a

school is, or that, so far as reputation is concerned, it is they who

make or mar its credit.

If the school training is worth anything at all, it makes the most of

unpromising material. Its really discouraging experience is not with the

girl of limited ability who gives her best and so in some sense gets the

best, but with the student who doesn't give her best and who, because of

her own indifference, is always misrepresenting the training she is

receiving. No school ever wishes to have its ideals confused by a vulgar

display of wealth or by loud or conspicuous behaviour. Yet many a

school, with ideals all that they should be, is misjudged in public

places because of some thoughtless or unreliable girls. This doesn't

seem like fair-play or team-play, does it? The fineness of life ought to

be felt and expressed in student behaviour. Yet how often it is not!

Another way in which the ideals of a school or college are

misrepresented is by lack of intellectual integrity. Any school informed

with a large spirit wishes to meet its students on a platform of

absolute trust,--a platform which makes precautions against dishonesty

unnecessary. Just so long as a school must be vigilant in order to keep

a few students from unfair behaviour, just so long is it prevented from

meeting them all on a basis of absolute trust. Why should girls excuse

themselves for classroom dishonesty? What would they think of a girl who

cheated in basket-ball? Would they condone that? Until student

government has recognized absolute intellectual integrity as a part of

its ideas, it will not have achieved its end. The rock on which all

scholarship is founded is honour. Lack of honour is fatal to its ideal.

"Cribbing," often excused by people who do not stop to think, is the

small beginning of a big evil.

Many a large institution is like an anxious mother, not always

infallible in wisdom, but personally interested in and eager for the

success of the individual. A successful girl brings credit to her

school, for she demonstrates, as nothing else can, the fact that the

school is achieving its purpose in service to the community. How much

this encouragement is needed, girls do not realize, for they do not know

all the difficulties which institutions, especially technical and

collegiate, have to meet in sending their students out into the world.

In finding a position for a student, the school has to consider the

whole girl. It may care greatly for an attractive personality and yet

see that its possessor is lacking in qualities of faithfulness and

accuracy, and that with its utmost endeavour it has never been able to

correct these faults. On the other hand, the school may have those

students whose manners, whose dress, whose personality, whose spelling,

whose awkwardly expressed notes, whose lack of promptness, make against

success in any capacity.

Another point for which the school looks in recommending its students is

physical fitness, which shows itself in many different ways: in voice,

in carriage, in attractiveness, in staying power. One teacher who had

an excellent record as a student and was, besides, a fine girl, had so

unpleasant and absurd a voice that her students were in a continual

state of amusement and would learn nothing from her. A great many

teachers have lost in power because of a poor voice, strident, or

lifeless, or husky, or falsetto. A poor enunciation, or words that do

not carry, are ineffectual means by which to reach a class, to hold a

customer, or to introduce one's self favourably to the interest of

others. For a girl who is going to have any part in public life--and

most girls do nowadays--a good voice is an absolute essential. And it is

well for us to remember that the voice is not something superficial, but

that it is the expression of that which is within.

Another way in which physical fitness shows itself is in the carriage. A

girl who carries herself with erectness and energy brings a certain

conviction with her of fitness for many things, of self-respect, of

ability, and reveals in her bearing something of her mind as well as of

her body. We are always tempted to think a person who "slumps"

physically may slump in other ways. A good carriage, good voice, and

strong, clean, digestive system are far more important than beauty of

features.

There is another matter at which the school in placing its students must

look. To be a desirable candidate for a good position a girl need not be

expensively gowned, but she must be daintily and freshly dressed.

Immaculate shirt waist, a plain, well-made skirt, with good shoes,

stockings and gloves and a quiet, pretty hat, are all any woman needs in

meeting her business obligations. And that daintiness which she shows in

her dress she must show in her person too, in clean skin and

finger-nails, good teeth, and smooth, attractively arranged hair.

It is very important for the interests of a school, as well as for the

individual, to place its students advantageously. To have them succeed

widens its sphere of usefulness and influence and opens new channels of

service. Every college puts itself to considerable expense in looking

out for the interests of its students, for the glory of a great school

lies not only in the people whom it collects into its midst, but even

more in those whom it sends out. A girl has no right to go so lightly

through her school life that she fails to see in it all the

self-sacrifice and effort and ambitions that have gone into the building

up of what is her privilege and opportunity. In so far as she does this

she fails in the team-play spirit. Why should a girl think that she can

spend her father's money, or the means of her school, thoughtlessly?

What would happen to her if she did this with the funds of her

basket-ball team? Yet girls waste the resources of their school by

carelessness with its property, a carelessness that collectively mounts

up into thousands of dollars, and never once stop to think how

difficult every big school finds it to make ends meet.

Before it is too late, at least now that she is leaving school, let her

stop to realize that a great deal of the work for an institution is

along the line of self-sacrifice, in the gifts given, in the work of its

administrators and teachers. This unselfishness means a financial loss,

for business ability might be invested in more lucrative ways; it means

a social sacrifice, for there is a certain kind of impersonality which

is demanded in work that deals with a continually changing community; it

means risk in the great strain put upon physical and nervous strength;

it means forgetting one's self; for the true teacher is willing to be

forgotten when she has served others. What a school may accomplish for

its students is its only compensation for all this self-sacrifice.

A Girl's Student Days and After · 第 36 / 58 题