APPENDIX.

Having shown in the preceding pages that in the point of view of

scientific accuracy the yard, mètre, and toise standards are on a

common level, and that in the matter of comparisons there is no extreme

accuracy, I will now refer to the proposed change of our standard from

the yard to the mètre.

Theoretically the mètre is the 10,000,000th part of the earth’s quadrant,

and the yard the 36/39·13929th part of a seconds pendulum at London.

Practically, neither the mètre nor yard could be recovered with exactness

from their natural basis. The legal French mètre differs from the

latest reduction enough to give an excess of over three miles to the

circumference of the earth. In fact, the mètre and yard are only the

lengths of bars of metal kept in certain offices, from which copies are

made. Decimally considered, it is as easy to divide one as the other into

tenths, hundredths, etc., and the yard standard is often so divided.

As to nomenclature, the metrical system is overloaded with Greek and

Latin prefixes, which are in no way so easy and convenient in expression

as the short, sharp Anglo-Saxon words yard, foot, inch.

In all sciences Latin and Greek names are given for easier purposes

of classification; but the different peoples invariably keep their

own household names for daily purposes, leaving prefix and affix to

specialists, probably with advantage to both parties.

The units used for different purposes are entirely distinct from the

base of any system, and though always referable to such base, are not

practically so referred. It therefore seems useless to burden the people

with long scientific names in the ordinary transactions of daily life.

For long distances the units in the yard and metrical systems are

respectively the mile and the kilomètre.

The mile has a definite meaning in our minds, being associated, from the

days of youth, with the measured distances in race-courses, speed in

walking, railway and steamer travel, length of surveyed lots--the same

being in use among about 100,000,000 people.

For mechanical structures, the units are respectively the foot and the

mètre. The foot is used instead of the yard, as being the most convenient

in practice, and is fixed in the minds of the people by constant

association with length of foot-rules, size of buildings, doors, windows,

etc., all of which are always before us.

For commercial purposes the units are respectively the yard and the

mètre. The yard is associated with length of yard-sticks, distance

between brass nails on counters, so many finger-lengths by ladies.

Probably three fourths of the business of the world is conducted on the

yard standard.

For machine and shop work the English unit is the inch and fractions,

and countries having the metrical standard have universally adopted the

millimètre.

The inch is well fixed in the minds of all mechanics by constant use, and

the ease with which the fractions are had by halving only renders the

system very convenient.

As more figures must be used to indicate a size by millimètres than by

inches and fractions, it appears that the metrical system cannot shorten

the work of arithmetical computation in shop work, and is therefore of no

advantage to the mechanic or draftsman, but rather the reverse. This is

the opinion of Coleman Sellers, the distinguished Philadelphia engineer

and manufacturer, who, after a trial of the millimètre in his shops for

some years, returned to the use of the inch, and writes in _Engineering

News_: “The loss from the use of a small unit requiring many figures

to express what is needed, takes away from the other advantages of the

system when considered from a labor-saving point of view.”

In France itself the metrical system is not wholly decimal in actual

practice, as we find the following measures in use in addition to the

decimal divisions: double decamètre, demi-decamètre, double mètre,

demi-mètre, and double decimètre.

The metrical system has been adopted in the following countries: France

and colonies, Holland and colonies, Belgium, Spain and colonies,

Portugal, Italy, Germany, Greece, Roumania, British India, Mexico,

New Granada, Ecuador, Peru, Brazil, Uruguay, Argentine Confederacy,

Chili, Venezuela; and partially in Wurtemburg, Bavaria, Baden, Hesse,

Switzerland, Denmark, Austria, and Turkey.

In the past centuries all the work and records of English-speaking

peoples--now numbering about 100,000,000, and increasing and progressing

faster than all other nationalities, as well as being closely connected

by descent and business--have been done and recorded under the yard

standard, and any change now would inevitably render necessary continual

reductions, to the great detriment and inconvenience of the mass of our

people, and with little or no practical benefit, except perhaps to a

small class of scientific and pseudo-scientific men, who can and do amuse

themselves with the fancied uniformity of the mètre.

All our numerous text-books and tables, mechanical and scientific, would

be rendered entirely useless by the change, and this is a serious final

consideration.

Standard Measures of United States, Great Britain and France History and actual comparisons. With appendix on introduction of the mètre · 第 15 / 15 题