A PRESBYTERIAN VIEW OF THE TRIERS (1653).

=Source.=--Richard Baxter, _Reliquæ Baxterianæ_. Vol. i., p. 72.

One of the chief works which he [Cromwell] did was the purging of

the Ministry; of which I shall say somewhat more. And here I suppose

the reader to understand that the Synod of Westminster was dissolved

with the Parliament; and therefore a society of ministers with some

others were chosen by Cromwell to sit at Whitehall, under the name of

Triers, who were mostly Independents, but some sober Presbyterians

with them, and had power to try all that came for institution or

induction, and without their approbation none were admitted. This

assembly of Triers examined themselves all that were able to come up

to London, but if any were unable, or were of doubtful qualification

between worthy or unworthy, they used to refer them to some ministers

in the country where they lived, and to approve them if _they_

approved them.

And because this assembly of Triers is most heavily accused and

reproached by some men, I shall speak the truth of them, and suppose

my word shall be the rather taken, because most of them took me for

one of their boldest adversaries as to their opinions, and because I

was known to disown their power, insomuch that I refused to try any

under them upon their reference, except a very few, whose importunity

and necessity moved me (they being such as for their episcopal

judgment, or some such cause, the Triers were like to have rejected).

The truth is that, though their authority was null, and though some

few over busy and over rigid Independents among them were too severe

against all that were Arminians, and too particular in enquiring

after evidences of Sanctification in those whom they examined, and

somewhat too lax in their admission of unlearned and erroneous men

that favoured Antinomianism or Anabaptism; yet to give them their

due, they did abundance of good to the church. They saved many a

congregation from ignorant ungodly drunken teachers; that sort of

men that intended no more in the ministry than to say a sermon, as

readers say their Common Prayers, and so patch up a few good words

together to talk the people asleep with on Sunday; and all the rest

of the week go with them to the alehouse and harden them in their

sin. And that sort of Ministers that either preached against a holy

life, or preached as men that never were acquainted with it; all

those that used the ministry but as a common trade to live by and

were never likely to convert a soul, all these they usually rejected,

and in their stead admitted of any that were able serious Preachers,

and lived a godly life, of what tolerable opinion soever they were.

So that though they were many of them somewhat partial for the

Independents, Separatists, Fifth Monarchy men and Anabaptists, and

against the Prelatists and Arminians, yet so great was the benefit

above the hurt which they brought to the Church, that many thousands

of souls blessed God for the faithful ministers whom they let in, and

grieved when the Prelatists afterwards cast them out again.

Puritanism and Liberty (1603-1660) Third Edition · 第 141 / 164 题