He was equally unable to comprehend how any man should object to saints’

days and surplices, and how any man should persecute any other man for

objecting to them. In temper he was what, in our time, is called a

Conservative, in theory he was a Republican. Even when his dread of

anarchy and his disdain for vulgar delusions led him to side for a time

with the defenders of arbitrary power, his intellect was always with

Locke and Milton. Indeed, his jests upon hereditary monarchy were

sometimes such as would have better become a member of the Calf’s Head

Club than a privy councilor of the Stuarts. In religion he was so far

from being a zealot that he was called by the uncharitable an atheist;

but this imputation he vehemently repelled; and in truth, though he

sometimes gave scandal by the way in which he exerted his rare powers

both of reasoning and of ridicule on serious subjects, he seems to have

been by no means unsusceptible of religious impressions.

He was the chief of those politicians whom the two great parties

contemptuously called trimmers. Instead of quarreling with this

nickname, he assumed it as a title of honor, and vindicated, with great

vivacity, the dignity of the appellation. Everything good, he said,

trims between extremes. The temperate zone trims between the climate in

which men are roasted and the climate in which they are frozen. The

English Church trims between the Anabaptist madness and the Papist

lethargy. The English constitution trims between Turkish despotism and

Polish anarchy. Virtue is nothing but a just temper between propensities

any one of which, if indulged to excess, becomes vice. Nay, the

perfection of the Supreme Being himself consists in the exact

equilibrium of attributes, none of which could preponderate without

disturbing the whole moral and physical order of the world.

Thus Halifax was a trimmer on principle. He was also a trimmer by the

constitution both of his head and of his heart. His understanding was

keen, skeptical, inexhaustibly fertile in distinctions and objections;

his taste refined; his sense of the ludicrous exquisite; his temper

placid and forgiving, but fastidious, and by no means prone either to

malevolence or to enthusiastic admiration. Such a man could not long be

constant to any band of political allies. He must not, however, be

confounded with the vulgar crowd of renegades. For though, like them, he

passed from side to side, his transition was always in the direction

opposite to theirs. He had nothing in common with those who fly from

extreme to extreme, and who regard the party which they have deserted

with an animosity far exceeding that of consistent enemies. His place

was on the debatable ground between the hostile divisions of the

community, and he never wandered far beyond the frontier of either. The

party to which he at any moment belonged was the party which, at that

moment, he liked least, because it was the party of which at that moment

he had the nearest view. He was, therefore, always severe upon his

violent associates, and was always in friendly relations with his

moderate opponents. Every faction in the day of its insolent and

vindictive triumph incurred his censure; and every faction, when

vanquished and persecuted, found in him a protector. To his lasting

honor it must be mentioned that he attempted to save those victims whose

fate has left the deepest stain both on the Whig and on the Tory name.

He had greatly distinguished himself in opposition, and had thus drawn

on himself the royal displeasure, which was, indeed, so strong that he

was not admitted into the Council of Thirty without much difficulty and

long altercation. As soon, however, as he had obtained a footing at

court, the charms of his manner and of his conversation made him a

favorite. He was seriously alarmed by the violence of the public

discontent. He thought that liberty was for the present safe, and that

order and legitimate authority were in danger. He therefore, as was his

fashion, joined himself to the weaker side. Perhaps his conversion was

not wholly disinterested. For study and reflection, though they had

emancipated him from many vulgar prejudices, had left him a slave to

vulgar desires. Money he did not want; and there is no evidence that he

ever obtained it by any means which, in that age, even severe censors

considered as dishonorable; but rank and power had strong attractions

for him. He pretended, indeed, that he considered titles and great

offices as baits which could allure none but fools, that he hated

business, pomp, and pageantry, and that his dearest wish was to escape

from the bustle and glitter of Whitehall to the quiet woods which

surrounded his ancient mansion in Nottinghamshire; but his conduct was

not a little at variance with his professions. In truth he wished to

command the respect at once of courtiers and of philosophers, to be

admired for attaining high dignities, and to be at the same time admired

for despising them.

More than one historian has been charged with partiality to Halifax. The

truth is that the memory of Halifax is entitled in an especial manner to

the protection of history. For what distinguishes him from all other

English statesmen is this, that through a long public life, and through

frequent and violent revolutions of public feeling, he almost invariably

took that view of the great questions of his time which history has

finally adopted. He was called inconstant, because the relative position

in which he stood to the contending factions was perpetually varying. As

well might the pole star be called inconstant because it is sometimes to

the east and sometimes to the west of the pointers. To have defended the

ancient and legal constitution of the realm against a seditious populace

at one conjuncture, and against a tyrannical government at another; to

have been the foremost champion of order in the turbulent Parliament of

1680, and the foremost champion of liberty in the servile Parliament of

1685; to have been just and merciful to Roman Catholics in the days of

the Popish Plot, and to Exclusionists in the days of the Rye House Plot;

to have done all in his power to save both the head of Strafford and the

head of Russell; this was a course which contemporaries, heated by

passion, and deluded by names and badges, might not unnaturally call

fickle, but which deserves a very different name from the late justice

of posterity.

LOUIS XIV OF FRANCE.

BY THOMAS BABINGTON MACAULAY.

[Grandson of Henry IV, the greatest of the French Bourbon kings,

though he himself was also called Le Grand, or The Great. Born

1638, died 1715. His reign was distinguished for the brilliant men

he gathered at his court and the unparalleled reverses which befell

his power and prosperity in his closing years.]

The reign of Louis XIV is the time to which ultra-royalists refer as the

golden age of France. It was, in truth, one of those periods which shine

with an unnatural and delusive splendor. Concerning Louis XIV himself,

the world seems at last to have formed a correct judgment. He was not a

great general; he was not a great statesman; but he was, in one sense of

the word, a great king. Never was there so consummate a master of what

our James I would have called kingcraft--of all those arts which most

advantageously display the merits of a prince and most completely hide

his defects. Though his internal administration was bad, though military

triumphs which gave splendor to the early part of his reign were not

achieved by himself, though his later years were crowded with defeats

and humiliations, though he was so ignorant that he scarcely understood

the Latin of his mass-book, though he fell under the control of a

cunning Jesuit and of a more cunning old woman, he succeeded in passing

himself off on his people as a being above humanity.

And this is the more extraordinary, because he did not seclude himself

from the public gaze, like those Oriental despots whose faces are never

seen, and whose very names it is a crime to pronounce lightly. It has

been said that no man is a hero to his valet; and all the world saw as

much of Louis XIV as his valet could see. Five hundred people assembled

to see him shave and put on his breeches in the morning. He then knelt

down by the side of his bed and said his prayer, the ecclesiastics on

their knees and the laymen with their hats before their faces. He walked

about his garden with a train of two hundred courtiers at his heels. All

Versailles came to see him dine and sup. He was put to bed at night in

the midst of a crowd as great as that which had met to see him rise in

the morning. He took his very emetics in state, and vomited majestically

in the presence of all the _grandes_ and _petites entrées_. Yet, though

he constantly exposed himself to the public gaze in situations in which

it is scarcely possible for any man to preserve much personal dignity,

he to the last impressed those who surrounded him with deepest awe and

reverence. The illusion which he produced on his worshipers can be

compared only to those illusions to which lovers are proverbially

subject during the season of courtship; it was an illusion which

affected even the senses.

The contemporaries of Louis thought him tall. Voltaire, who might have

seen him, and who had lived with some of the most distinguished members

of his court, speaks repeatedly of his majestic stature. Yet it is as

certain as any fact can be that he was rather below than above the

middle size. He had, it seems, a way of holding himself, a way of

walking, a way of swelling his chest and rearing his head, which

deceived the eyes of the multitude. Eighty years after his death the

royal cemetery was violated by the revolutionists; his coffin was

opened, his body was dragged out, and it appeared that the prince whose

majestic figure had been so extolled was, in truth, a little man. His

person and his government have had the same fate. He had the art of

making both appear grand and august, in spite of the clearest evidence

that both were below the ordinary standard. Death and time have exposed

both the deceptions. The body of the great king has been measured more

justly than it was measured by the courtiers who were afraid to look

above his shoe-tie. His public character has been scrutinized by men

free from the hopes and fears of Boileau and Molière. In the grave the

most majestic of princes is only five feet eight. In history the hero

and the politician dwindles into a vain and feeble tyrant, the slave of

priests and women; little in war, little in government, little in

everything but the art of simulating greatness.

He left to his infant successor a famished and miserable people, a

beaten and humbled army, provinces turned into deserts by misgovernment

and persecution, factions dividing the court, a schism raging in the

Church, an immense debt, an empty treasury, immeasurable palaces, an

innumerable household, inestimable palaces and furniture. All the sap

and nutriment of the state seemed to have been drawn to feed one bloated

and unwholesome excrescence. The nation was withered. The court was

morbidly flourishing. Yet it does not appear that the associations which

attached the people to the monarchy had lost strength during his reign.

He had neglected or sacrificed their dearest interests, but he had

struck their imaginations.

WILLIAM III OF ENGLAND.

BY THOMAS BABINGTON MACAULAY

[William Henry of Nassau, Prince of Orange and Stadtholder of

Holland, born 1650, raised to the English throne as king consort

with Mary daughter of James II, in 1688, died 1702. One of the

ablest monarchs in English annals, his accession to the throne of

Great Britain was one of the turning points in modern history, and

effectually consummated those reforms in the English Constitution

inaugurated in the revolution of 1640.]

The place which William Henry, Prince of Orange-Nassau, occupies in the

history of England and of mankind is so great that it may be desirable

to portray with some minuteness the strong lineaments of his

character.[27]

He was now in his thirty-seventh year. But both in body and in mind he

was older than other men of the same age. Indeed, it might be said that

he had never been young. His external appearance is almost as well known

to us as to his own captains and counselors. Sculptors, painters, and

medallists exerted their utmost skill in the work of transmitting his

features to posterity; and his features were such that no artist could

fail to seize, and such as, once seen, could never be forgotten. His

name at once calls up before us a slender and feeble frame, a lofty and

ample forehead, a nose curved like the beak of an eagle, an eye rivaling

that of an eagle in brightness and keenness, a thoughtful and somewhat

sullen brow, a firm and somewhat peevish mouth, a cheek pale, thin, and

deeply furrowed by sickness and by care. That pensive, severe, and

solemn aspect could scarcely have belonged to a happy or a good-humored

man. But it indicates in a manner not to be mistaken capacity equal to

the most arduous enterprises, and fortitude not to be shaken by reverses

or dangers.

Nature had largely endowed William with the qualities of a great ruler,

and education had developed those qualities in no common degree. With

strong natural sense, and rare force of will, he found himself, when

first his mind began to open, a fatherless and motherless child, the

chief of a great but depressed and disheartened party, and the heir to

vast and indefinite pretensions, which excited the dread and aversion of

the oligarchy then supreme in the United Provinces. The common people,

fondly attached during three generations to his house, indicated,

whenever they saw him, in a manner not to be mistaken, that they

regarded him as their rightful head. The able and experienced ministers

of the republic, mortal enemies of his name, came every day to pay their

feigned civilities to him, and to observe the progress of his mind. The

first movements of his ambition were carefully watched; every unguarded

word uttered by him was noted down; nor had he near him any adviser on

whose judgment reliance could be placed.

He was scarcely fifteen years old when all the domestics who were

attached to his interest, or who enjoyed any share of his confidence,

were removed from under his roof by the jealous government. He

remonstrated with energy beyond his years, but in vain. Vigilant

observers saw the tears more than once rise in the eyes of the young

state prisoner. His health, naturally delicate, sank for a time under

the emotions which his desolate situation had produced. Such situations

bewilder and unnerve the weak, but call forth all the strength of the

strong. Surrounded by snares in which an ordinary youth would have

perished, William learned to tread at once warily and firmly. Long

before he reached manhood he knew how to keep secrets, how to baffle

curiosity by dry and guarded answers; how to conceal all passions under

the same show of grave tranquillity. Meanwhile he made little

proficiency in fashionable or literary accomplishments. The manners of

the Dutch nobility of that age wanted the grace which was found in the

highest perfection among the gentlemen of France, and which, in an

inferior degree, embellished the court of England; and his manners were

altogether Dutch. Even his countrymen thought him blunt. To foreigners

he often seemed churlish. In his intercourse with the world in general

he appeared ignorant or negligent of those arts which double the value

of a favor and take away the sting of a refusal. He was little

interested in letters or science. The discoveries of Newton and

Liebnitz, the poems of Dryden and Boileau, were unknown to him. Dramatic

performances tired him, and he was glad to turn away from the stage and

to talk about public affairs, while Orestes was raving, or while

Tartuffe was pressing Elmira’s hand.

He had, indeed, some talent for sarcasm, and not seldom employed, quite

unconsciously, a natural rhetoric, quaint, indeed, but vigorous and

original. He did not, however, in the least affect the character of a

wit or of an orator. His attention had been confined to those studies

which form strenuous and sagacious men of business. From a child he

listened with interest when high questions of alliance, finance, and war

were discussed. Of geometry he learned as much as was necessary for the

construction of a ravelin or a horn-work. Of languages, by the help of a

memory singularly powerful, he learned as much as was necessary to

enable him to comprehend and answer without assistance everything that

was said to him and every letter which he received. The Dutch was his

own tongue. With the French he was not less familiar. He understood

Latin, Italian, and Spanish. He spoke and wrote English and German,

inelegantly, it is true, and inexactly, but fluently and intelligibly.

No qualification could be more important to a man whose life was to be

passed in organizing great alliances, and in commanding armies assembled

from different countries.

The faculties which are necessary for the conduct of important business

ripened in him at a time of life when they have scarcely begun to

blossom in ordinary men. Since Octavius the world had seen no such

instance of precocious statesmanship. Skillful diplomatists were

surprised to hear the weighty observations which at seventeen the prince

made on public affairs, and still more surprised to see a lad, in

situations in which he might have been expected to betray strong

passion, preserve a composure as imperturbable as their own. At eighteen

he sat among the fathers of the commonwealth--grave, discreet, and

judicious as the oldest among them. At twenty-one, in a day of gloom and

terror, he was placed at the head of the administration. At twenty-three

he was renowned throughout Europe as a soldier and a politician. He had

put domestic factions under his feet; he was the soul of a mighty

coalition; and he had contended with honor in the field against some of

the greatest generals of the age.

His personal tastes were those rather of a warrior than of a statesman,

but he, like his great-grandfather, the silent prince who founded the

Batavian commonwealth, occupies a far higher place among statesmen than

among warriors. The event of battles, indeed, is not an unfailing test

of the abilities of a commander; and it would be peculiarly unjust to

apply this test to William, for it was his fortune to be almost always

opposed to captains who were consummate masters of their art, and to

troops far superior in discipline to his own. Yet there is reason to

believe that he was by no means equal, as a general in the field, to

some who ranked far below him in intellectual powers. To those whom he

trusted he spoke on this subject with the magnanimous frankness of a man

who had done great things, and could well afford to acknowledge some

deficiencies. He had never, he said, served an apprenticeship to the

military profession. He had been placed, while still a boy, at the head

of an army. Among his officers there had been none competent to instruct

him. His own blunders and their consequences had been his only lessons.

“I would give,” he once exclaimed, “a good part of my estates to have

served a few campaigns under the Prince of Condé before I had to command

against him.”

It is not improbable that the circumstance which prevented William from

attaining any eminent dexterity in strategy may have been favorable to

the general vigor of his intellect. If his battles were not those of a

great tactician, they entitled him to be called a great man. No disaster

could for one moment deprive him of his firmness or of the entire

possession of all his faculties. His defeats were repaired with such

marvelous celerity that, before his enemies had sung the Te Deum, he was

again ready for the conflict; nor did his adverse fortune ever deprive

him of the respect and confidence of his soldiers. That respect and

confidence he owed in no small measure to his personal courage. Courage,

in the degree which is necessary to carry a soldier without disgrace

through a campaign, is possessed, or might, under proper training, be

acquired by the great majority of men. But courage like that of William

is rare indeed. He was proved by every test; by war, by wounds, by

painful and depressing maladies, by raging seas, by the imminent and

constant risk of assassination--a risk which has shaken very strong

nerves, a risk which severely tried even the adamantine fortitude of

Cromwell. Yet none could ever discover what that thing was which the

Prince of Orange feared. His advisers could with difficulty induce him

to take any precaution against the pistols and daggers of conspirators.

Old sailors were amazed at the composure which he preserved amid roaring

breakers on a perilous coast. In battle his bravery made him conspicuous

even among tens of thousands of brave warriors, drew forth the generous

applause of hostile armies, and was scarcely ever questioned even by the

injustice of hostile factions.

During his first campaigns he exposed himself like a man who sought for

death, was always foremost in the charge and last in the retreat, fought

sword in hand, in the thickest press, and with a musket ball in his arm

and the blood streaming over his cuirass, still stood his ground and

waved his hat under the hottest fire. His friends adjured him to take

more care of a life invaluable to his country; and his most illustrious

antagonist, the great Condé, remarked, after the bloody day of Seneff,

that the Prince of Orange had in all things borne himself like an old

general, except in exposing himself like a young soldier. William denied

that he was guilty of temerity. It was, he said, from a sense of duty

and on a cool calculation of what the public interest required, that he

was always at the post of danger. The troops which he commanded had been

little used to war, and shrank from a close encounter with the veteran

soldiery of France. It was necessary that their leader should show them

how battles were to be won. And in truth more than one day which had

seemed hopelessly lost was retrieved by the hardihood with which he

rallied his broken battalions and cut down the cowards who set the

example of flight. Sometimes, however, it seemed that he had a strange

pleasure in venturing his person. It was remarked that his spirits were

never so high and his manners never so gracious and easy as amid the

tumult and carnage of a battle. Even in his pastimes he liked the

excitement of danger. Cards, chess, and billiards gave him no pleasure.

The chase was his favorite recreation, and he loved it most when it was

most hazardous. His leaps were sometimes such that his boldest

companions did not like to follow him. He seemed to have thought the

most hardy field sports of England effeminate, and to have pined in the

great park of Windsor for the game which he had been used to drive to

bay in the forests of Guelders--wolves and wild boars, and huge stags

with sixteen antlers.

The audacity of his spirit was the more remarkable because his physical

organization was unusually delicate. From a child he had been weak and

sickly. In the prime of manhood his complaints had been aggravated by a

severe attack of small-pox. He was asthmatic and consumptive. His

slender frame was shaken by a constant hoarse cough. He could not sleep

unless his head was propped by several pillows, and could scarcely draw

his breath in any but the purest air. Cruel headaches frequently

tortured him. Exertion soon fatigued him. The physicians constantly kept

up the hopes of his enemies by fixing some date beyond which, if there

were anything certain in medical science, it was impossible that his

broken constitution could hold out. Yet, through a life which was one

long disease, the force of his mind never failed, on any great occasion,

to bear up his suffering and languid body.

Great leaders: Historic portraits from the great historians · 第 27 / 37 段