[Cola Gabrini Rienzi, the “last of the Roman tribunes,” born about

1312, died by assassination during a popular _emeute_, 1354.

Inspired by his patriotic enthusiasm and made powerful by his

eloquence, Rienzi, during the troubles in Rome ensuing on the

removal of the Papal See to Avignon, organized an insurrection

against the turbulent and factious nobles. The latter were crushed

and driven from Rome, and Rienzi rose to supreme power under the

title of “tribune.” Success, however, corrupted the republican

virtues of the _parvenu_ tribune of the new republic; and his

arrogance and splendor soon laid heavy burdens of taxation on the

people, which provoked a reaction. He was finally driven from power

and compelled to seek safety in flight. The return of the barons

and their iron oppression, however, paved the way for the

successful return of Rienzi to the chief magistracy in 1354.

Unwarned by experience he again resumed the pomp and pride of

royalty, and was shortly after killed in an insurrection of the

citizens of Rome.]

In a quarter of the city which was inhabited only by mechanics and Jews,

the marriage of an innkeeper and a washerwoman produced the future

deliverer of Rome. From such parents Nicholas Rienzi Gabrini could

inherit neither dignity nor fortune; and the gift of a liberal

education, which they painfully bestowed, was the cause of his glory and

untimely end. The study of history and eloquence, the writings of

Cicero, Seneca, Livy, Cæsar, and Valerius Maximus elevated above his

equals and contemporaries the genius of the young plebeian; he perused

with indefatigable diligence the manuscripts and marbles of antiquity;

loved to dispense his knowledge in familiar language; and was often

provoked to exclaim: “Where are now these Romans? their virtue, their

justice, their power? Why was I not born in those happy times?” When the

republic addressed to the throne of Avignon an embassy of the three

orders, the spirit and eloquence of Rienzi recommended him to a place

among the thirteen deputies of the commons. The orator had the honor of

haranguing Pope Clement VI, and the satisfaction of conversing with

Petrarch, a congenial mind; but his aspiring hopes were chilled by

disgrace and poverty, and the patriot was reduced to a single garment

and the charity of the hospital. From this misery he was relieved by the

sense of merit or smile of favor; and the employment of apostolic notary

afforded him a daily stipend of five gold florins, a more honorable and

extensive connection, and the right of contrasting, both in words and

actions, his own integrity with the vices of the state. The eloquence of

Rienzi was prompt and persuasive; the multitude is always prone to envy

and censure; he was stimulated by the loss of a brother and the impunity

of the assassins; nor was it possible to excuse or exaggerate the public

calamities.

A prophecy, or rather a summons, affixed on the church door of St.

George, was the first public evidence of his designs; a nocturnal (May

20, A.D. 1347) assembly of a hundred citizens on Mount Aventine, the

first step to their execution. After an oath of secrecy and aid, he

represented to the conspirators the importance and facility of their

enterprise; that the nobles, without union or resources, were strong

only in the fear of their imaginary strength; that all power, as well as

right, was in the hands of the people; that the revenues of the

apostolical chamber might relieve the public distress; and that the Pope

himself would approve their victory over the common enemies of

government and freedom. After securing a faithful band to protect his

first declaration, he proclaimed through the city, by sound of trumpet,

that on the evening of the following day all persons should assemble

without arms before the church of St. Angelo to provide for the

re-establishment of the good estate. The whole night was employed in the

celebration of thirty masses of the Holy Ghost, and in the morning,

Rienzi, bareheaded, but in complete armor, issued from the church,

encompassed by the hundred conspirators.

The Pope’s vicar, the simple Bishop of Orvieto, who had been persuaded

to sustain a part in this singular ceremony, marched on his right hand,

and three great standards were borne aloft as the emblems of their

design. In the first, the banner of _liberty_, Rome was seated on two

lions, with a palm in one hand and a globe in the other; St. Paul, with

a drawn sword, was delineated in the banner of _justice_; and in the

third, St. Peter held the keys of _concord_ and _peace_. Rienzi was

encouraged by the presence and applause of an innumerable crowd, who

understood little and hoped much; and the procession slowly rolled

forward from the castle of St. Angelo to the Capitol. His triumph was

disturbed by some secret emotions which he labored to suppress; he

ascended without opposition, and with seeming confidence, the citadel of

the republic, harangued the people from the balcony, and received the

most flattering confirmation of his acts and laws. The nobles, as if

destitute of arms and counsels, beheld in silent consternation this

strange revolution; and the moment had been prudently chosen, when the

most formidable, Stephen Colonna, was absent from the city. On the first

rumor, he returned to his palace, affected to despise this plebeian

tumult, and declared to the messenger of Rienzi that at his leisure he

would cast the madman from the windows of the Capitol. The great bell

instantly rang an alarm, and so rapid was the tide, so urgent was the

danger, that Colonna escaped with precipitation to the suburb of St.

Laurence; from thence, after a moment’s refreshment, he continued the

same speedy career till he reached in safety his castle of Palestrina,

lamenting his own imprudence, which had not trampled the spark of this

mighty conflagration. A general and peremptory order was issued from the

Capitol to all the nobles that they should peaceably retire to their

estates; they obeyed, and their departure secured the tranquillity of

the free and obedient citizens of Rome.

Never, perhaps, has the energy and effect of a single mind been more

remarkably felt than in the sudden though transient reformation of Rome

by the tribune Rienzi. A den of robbers was converted to the discipline

of a camp or convent; patient to hear, swift to redress, inexorable to

punish, his tribunal was always accessible to the poor and stranger; nor

could birth or dignity or the immunities of the Church protect the

offender or his accomplices. The privileged houses, the private

sanctuaries in Rome, on which no officer of justice would presume to

trespass, were abolished; and he applied the timber and iron of their

barricades in the fortifications of the Capitol. The venerable father of

the Colonna was exposed in his own palace to the double shame of being

desirous and of being unable to protect a criminal. A mule, with a jar

of oil, had been stolen near Capranica, and the lord of the Ursini

family was condemned to restore the damage and to discharge a fine of

four hundred florins for his negligence in guarding the highways. Nor

were the persons of the barons more inviolate than their lands or

houses, and, either from accident or design, the same impartial rigor

was exercised against the heads of the adverse factions.

Peter Agapet Colonna, who had himself been senator of Rome, was arrested

in the street for injury or debt; and justice was appeased by the tardy

execution of Martin Ursini, who, among his various acts of violence and

rapine, had pillaged a shipwrecked vessel at the mouth of the Tiber.

His name, the purple of two cardinals, his uncles, a recent marriage,

and a mortal disease were disregarded by the inflexible tribune, who had

chosen his victim. The public officers dragged him from his palace and

nuptial bed; his trial was short and satisfactory; the bell of the

Capitol convened the people. Stripped of his mantle, on his knees, with

his hands bound behind his back, he heard the sentence of death, and,

after a brief confession, Ursini was led away to the gallows. After such

an example, none who were conscious of guilt could hope for impunity,

and the flight of the wicked, the licentious, and the idle soon purified

the city and territory of Rome. In this time (says the historian) the

woods began to rejoice that they were no longer infested with robbers;

the oxen began to plow; the pilgrims visited the sanctuaries; the roads

and inns were replenished with travelers; trade, plenty, and good faith

were restored in the markets; and a purse of gold might be exposed

without danger in the midst of the highway. As soon as the life and

property of the subject are secure, the labors and rewards of industry

spontaneously revive. Rome was still the metropolis of the Christian

world, and the fame and fortunes of the tribune were diffused in every

country by the strangers who had enjoyed the blessings of his

government.

The deliverance of his country inspired Rienzi with a vast and perhaps

visionary idea of uniting Italy in a great federative republic, of which

Rome should be the ancient and lawful head, and the free cities and

princes the members and associates. His pen was not less eloquent than

his tongue, and his numerous epistles were delivered to swift and trusty

messengers. On foot, with a white wand in their hand, they traversed the

forests and mountains; enjoyed, in the most hostile states, the sacred

security of ambassadors; and reported, in the style of flattery or

truth, that the highways along their passage were lined with kneeling

multitudes, who implored Heaven for the success of their undertaking.

Beyond the Alps, more especially at Avignon, the revolution was the

theme of curiosity, wonder, and applause. Petrarch had been the private

friend, perhaps the secret counselor, of Rienzi; his writings breathe

the most ardent spirit of patriotism and joy; and all respect for the

Pope, all gratitude for the Colonna, was lost in the superior duties of

a Roman citizen. The poet-laureate of the Capitol maintains the act,

applauds the hero, and mingles with some apprehension and advice the

most lofty hopes of the permanent and rising greatness of the republic.

While Petrarch indulged these prophetic visions the Roman hero was fast

declining from the meridian of fame and power; and the people who had

gazed with astonishment on the ascending meteor began to mark the

irregularity of its course and the vicissitudes of light and obscurity.

More eloquent than judicious, more enterprising than resolute, the

faculties of Rienzi were not balanced by cool and commanding reason; he

magnified in a tenfold proportion the objects of hope and fear; and

prudence, which could not have erected, did not presume to fortify his

throne. In the blaze of prosperity his virtues were insensibly tinctured

with the adjacent vices--justice with cruelty, liberality with

profusion, and the desire of fame with puerile and ostentatious vanity.

He might have learned that the ancient tribunes, so strong and sacred in

the public opinion, were not distinguished in style, habit, or

appearance from an ordinary plebeian; and that as often as they visited

the city on foot a single _viator_, or beadle, attended the exercise of

their office. The Gracchi would have frowned or smiled could they have

read the sonorous titles and epithets of their successor, “NICHOLAS,

SEVERE AND MERCIFUL; DELIVERER OF ROME; DEFENDER OF ITALY; FRIEND OF

MANKIND, AND OF LIBERTY, PEACE, AND JUSTICE; TRIBUNE AUGUST.” His

theatrical pageants had prepared the revolution; but Rienzi abused, in

luxury and pride, the political maxim of speaking to the eyes as well as

the understanding of the multitude. From nature he had received the

gift of a handsome person till it was swelled and disfigured by

intemperance; and his propensity to laughter was corrected in the

magistrate by the affectation of gravity and sternness. He was clothed,

at least on public occasions, in a party-colored robe of velvet or satin

lined with fur and embroidered with gold. The rod of justice, which he

carried in his hand, was a scepter of polished steel, crowned with a

globe and cross of gold, and inclosing a small fragment of the true and

holy wood. In his civil and religious processions through the city he

rode on a white steed, the symbol of royalty. The great banner of the

republic, a sun with a circle of stars, a dove with an olive-branch, was

displayed over his head; a shower of gold and silver was scattered among

the populace; fifty guards with halberds encompassed his person; a troop

of horse preceded his march, and their cymbals and trumpets were of

massy silver.

These extraordinary spectacles might deceive or flatter the people; and

their own vanity was gratified in the vanity of their leader. But in his

private life he soon deviated from the strict rule of frugality and

abstinence; and the plebeians, who were awed by the splendor of the

nobles, were provoked by the luxury of their equal. His wife, his son,

his uncle (a barber in name and profession), exposed the contrast of

vulgar manners and princely expense; and without acquiring the majesty,

Rienzi degenerated into the vices of a king.

TIMOUR OR TAMERLANE.

BY EDWARD GIBBON.

[Tamerlane, corruption of Timour Lenk (“the lame”), born 1336, died

1405. One of the greatest conquerors of history, he was a second

Genghis Khan, whom he resembled much in character. His descendants

speedily lost the greater part of his conquests, and the last of

his family fell before the power of the English East India Company

in India, of which he had become a mere pensioner, though nominally

the “Great Mogul” and Emperor of Delhi.]

The conquest and monarchy of the world was the first object of the

ambition of Timour. To live in the memory and esteem of future ages was

the second wish of his magnanimous spirit. All the civil and military

transactions of his reign were diligently recorded in the journals of

his secretaries; the authentic narrative was revised by the persons best

informed of each particular transaction, and it is believed in the

empire and family of Timour that the monarch himself composed the

“Commentaries” of his life and the “Institutions” of his government. But

these cares were ineffectual for the preservation of his fame, and these

precious memorials in the Mogul or Persian language were concealed from

the world, or at least from the knowledge of Europe. The nations which

he vanquished exercised a base and impotent revenge; and ignorance has

long repeated the tale of calumny which had disfigured the birth and

character, the person, and even the name of _Tamerlane_. Yet his real

merit would be enhanced, rather than debased, by the elevation of a

peasant to the throne of Asia; nor can his lameness be a theme of

reproach, unless he had the weakness to blush at a natural, or perhaps

an honorable, infirmity.

In the eyes of the Moguls, who held the indefeasible succession of the

house of Zingis, he was doubtless a rebel subject; yet he sprang from

the noble tribe of Berlass; his fifth ancestor, Carashar Nevian, had

been the vizier of Zagatai in his new realm of Transoxiana; and in the

ascent of some generations the branch of Timour is confounded, at least

by the females, with the imperial stem. He was born forty miles to the

south of Samarcand, in the village of Sebzar, in the fruitful territory

of Cash, of which his fathers were the hereditary chiefs, as well as of

a toman of ten thousand horse. His birth was cast on one of those

periods of anarchy which announce the fall of the Asiatic dynasties, and

opened a new field to adventurous ambition. The khans of Zagatai were

extinct, the emirs aspired to independence, and their domestic feuds

could only be suspended by the conquest and tyranny of the khans of

Kashgar, who, with an army of Getes or Calmucks, invaded the Transoxian

kingdom.

From the twelfth year of his age, Timour had entered the field of

action; in the twenty-fifth he stood forth as the deliverer of his

country; and the eyes and wishes of the people were turned toward a hero

who suffered in their cause. The chiefs of the law and of the army had

pledged their salvation to support him with their lives and fortunes;

but in the hour of danger they were silent and afraid; and, after

waiting seven days on the hills of Samarcand, he retreated to the desert

with only sixty horsemen. The fugitives were overtaken by a thousand

Getes, whom he repulsed with incredible slaughter, and his enemies were

forced to exclaim, “Timour is a wonderful man; fortune and the divine

favor are with him.” But in this bloody action his own followers were

reduced to ten, a number which was soon diminished by the desertion of

three Carizmians. He wandered in the desert with his wife, seven

companions, and four horses; and sixty-two days was he plunged in a

loathsome dungeon, whence he escaped by his own courage and the remorse

of the oppressor. After swimming the broad and rapid stream of the

Jihoon, or Oxus, he led, during some months, the life of a vagrant and

outlaw, on the borders of the adjacent states. But his fame shone

brighter in adversity; he learned to distinguish the friends of his

person, the associates of his fortune, and to apply the various

characters of men for their advantage, and above all for his own. On his

return to his native country, Timour was successively joined by the

parties of his confederates, who anxiously sought him in the desert; nor

can I refuse to describe, in his pathetic simplicity, one of their

fortunate encounters. He presented himself as a guide to three chiefs,

who were at the head of seventy horse. “When their eyes fell upon me,”

says Timour, “they were overwhelmed with joy; and they alighted from

their horses; and they came and kneeled; and they kissed my stirrup. I

also came down from my horse, and took each of them in my arms. And I

put my turban on the head of the first chief; and my girdle, rich in

jewels and wrought with gold, I bound on the loins of the second; and

the third, I clothed in my own coat. And they wept, and I wept also; and

the hour of prayer was arrived, and we prayed. And we mounted our

horses, and came to my dwelling; and I collected my people, and made a

feast.”

His trusty hands were soon increased by the bravest of the tribes; he

led them against a superior foe, and after some vicissitudes of war, the

Getes were finally driven from the kingdom of Transoxiana. He had done

much for his own glory, but much remained to be done, much art to be

exerted, and some blood to be spilled, before he could teach his equals

to obey him as their master. The birth and power of Emir Houssein

compelled him to accept a vicious and unworthy colleague, whose sister

was the best beloved of his wives. Their union was short and jealous;

but the policy of Timour in their frequent quarrels exposed his rival to

the reproach of injustice and perfidy; and, after a small defeat,

Houssein was slain by some sagacious friends, who presumed, for the last

time, to disobey the commands of their lord.

At the age of thirty-four, and in a general diet or _couroultai_, he was

invested with imperial command, but he affected to revere the house of

Zingis; and while the Emir Timour reigned over Zagatai and the East, a

nominal khan served as a private officer in the armies of his servant. A

fertile kingdom, five hundred miles in length and in breadth, might have

satisfied the ambition of a subject; but Timour aspired to the dominion

of the world, and before his death the crown of Zagatai was one of the

twenty-seven crowns which he had placed on his head.

The fame of Timour has pervaded the East and West; his posterity is

still invested with the imperial title; and the admiration of his

subjects, who revered him almost as a deity, may be justified in some

degree by the praise or confession of his bitterest enemies. Although he

was lame of a hand and foot, his form and stature were not unworthy of

his rank; and his vigorous health, so essential to himself and to the

world, was corroborated by temperance and exercise. In his familiar

discourse he was grave and modest, and, if he was ignorant of the Arabic

language, he spoke with fluency and elegance the Persian and Turkish

idioms. It was his delight to converse with the learned on topics of

history and science; and the amusement of his leisure hours was the game

of chess, which he improved or corrupted with new refinements. In his

religion he was a zealous though not perhaps an orthodox Mussulman; but

his sound understanding may tempt us to believe, that a superstitious

reverence for omens and prophecies, for saints and astrologers, was only

affected as an instrument of policy.

In the government of a vast empire, he stood alone and absolute, without

a rebel to oppose his power, a favorite to seduce his affections, or a

minister to mislead his judgment. It was his firmest maxim that,

whatever might be the consequence, the word of the prince should never

be disputed or recalled; but his foes have maliciously observed that the

commands of anger and destruction were more strictly executed than those

of beneficence and favor. His sons and grandsons, of whom Timour left

six-and-thirty at his decease, were his first and most submissive

subjects; and whenever they deviated from their duty they were

corrected, according to the laws of Zingis, with the bastinado, and

afterward restored to honor and command. Perhaps his heart was not

devoid of the social virtues; perhaps he was not incapable of loving his

friends and pardoning his enemies; but the rules of morality are founded

on the public interest, and it may be sufficient to applaud the wisdom

of a monarch, for the liberality by which he is not impoverished, and

for the justice by which he is strengthened and enriched. To maintain

the harmony of authority and obedience, to chastise the proud, to

protect the weak, to reward the deserving, to banish vice and idleness

from his dominions, to secure the traveler and merchant, to restrain the

depredations of the soldier, to cherish the labors of the husbandman, to

encourage industry and learning, and, by an equal and moderate

assessment, to increase the revenue, without increasing the taxes--are

indeed the duties of a prince; but, in the discharge of these duties, he

finds an ample and immediate recompense. Timour might boast that at his

accession to the throne Asia was the prey of anarchy and rapine, while

under his prosperous monarchy a child, fearless and unhurt, might carry

a purse of gold from the east to the west. Such was his confidence of

merit, that from this reformation he derived an excuse for his victories

and a title to universal dominion.

The following observations will serve to appreciate his claim to the

public gratitude; and perhaps we shall conclude that the Mogul emperor

was rather the scourge than the benefactor of mankind. If some partial

disorders, some local oppressions, were healed by the sword of Timour,

the remedy was far more pernicious than the disease. By their rapine,

cruelty, and discord, the petty tyrants of Persia might afflict their

subjects; but whole nations were crushed under the footsteps of the

reformer. The ground which had been occupied by flourishing cities, was

often marked by his abominable trophies--by columns or pyramids of human

heads. Astrakhan, Carizme, Delhi, Ispahan, Bagdad, Aleppo, Damascus,

Boursa, Smyrna, and a thousand others were sacked or burned or utterly

destroyed in his presence and by his troops; and perhaps his conscience

would have been startled if a priest or philosopher had dared to number

the millions of victims whom he had sacrificed to the establishment of

peace and order. His most destructive wars were rather inroads than

conquests. He invaded Turkistan, Kipzak, Russia, Hindostan, Syria,

Anatolia, Armenia, and Georgia, without a hope or a desire of preserving

those distant provinces. Thence he departed laden with spoil; but he

left behind him neither troops to awe the contumacious, nor magistrates

to protect the obedient natives. When he had broken the fabric of their

ancient government he abandoned them to the evils which his invasion had

aggravated or caused; nor were these evils compensated by any present or

possible benefits.

Great leaders: Historic portraits from the great historians · 第 14 / 37 段