FRIEDRICH WÖHLER.

At the age of eighty-two years, and full of honor, after a life actively

devoted to scientific work of the highest and most accurate kind, which

has contributed more than that of any other contemporary to establish

the principles on which an exact science like chemistry is founded, the

illustrious Wöhler has gone to his rest.

After he had worked for some time with Berzelius in Sweden, he taught

chemistry from 1825 to 1831 at the Polytechnic School in Berlin; then

till 1836 he was stationed at the Higher Polytechnic School at Cassel,

and then he became Ordinary Professor of Chemistry in the University of

Göttingen, where he remained till his death. He was born, July 31, 1800,

at Eschersheim, near Frankfort-on-the-Main.

Until the year 1828 it was believed that organic substances could only

be formed under the influence of the vital force in the bodies of

animals and plants. It was Wöhler who proved by the artificial

preparation of urea from inorganic materials that this view could not be

maintained. This discovery has always been considered as one of the most

important contributions to our scientific knowledge. By showing that

ammonium cyanate can become urea by an internal arrangement of its

atoms, without gaining or losing in weight, Wöhler furnished one of the

first and best examples of isomerism, which helped to demolish the old

view that equality of composition could not coexist in two bodies, A

and B, with differences in their respective physical and chemical

properties. Two years later, in 1830, Wöhler published, jointly with

Liebig, the results of a research on cyanic and cyanuric acid and on

urea. Berzelius, in his report to the Swedish Academy of Sciences,

called it the most important of all researches in physics, chemistry,

and mineralogy published in that year. The results obtained were quite

unexpected, and furnished additional and most important evidence in

favor of the doctrine of isomerism. In the year 1834, Wöhler and Liebig

published an investigation of the oil of bitter almonds. They prove by

their experiments that a group of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen atoms

can behave like an element, take the place of an element, and can be

exchanged for elements in chemical compounds. Thus the foundation was

laid of the doctrine of compound radicals, a doctrine which has had

and has still the most profound influence on the development of

chemistry--so much so that its importance can hardly be exaggerated.

Since the discovery of potassium by Davy, it was assumed that alumina

also, the basis of clay, contained a metal in combination with oxygen.

Davy, Oerstedt, and Berzelius attempted the extraction of this metal,

but could not succeed. Wöhler then worked on the same subject, and

discovered the metal aluminum. To him also is due the isolation of the

elements yttrium, beryllium, and titanium, the observation that silicium

can be obtained in crystals, and that some meteoric stones contain

organic matter. He analyzed a number of meteorites, and for many years

wrote the digest on the literature of meteorites in the _Jahresbericht

der Chemie_; he possessed, perhaps, the best private collection of

meteoric stones and irons existing. Wöhler and Sainte Claire Deville

discovered the crystalline form of boron, and Wöhler and Buff the

hydrogen compounds of silicium and a lower oxide of the same element.

This is by no means a full statement of Wöhler's scientific work; it

even does not mention all the discoveries which have had great influence

on the theory of chemistry. The mere titles of the papers would fill

several closely-printed pages. The journals of every year from 1820 to

1881 contain contributions from his pen, and even his minor publications

are always interesting. As was truly remarked ten years ago, when it was

proposed by a Fellow of the Royal Society that a Copley medal should be

conferred upon him, "for two or three of his researches he deserves the

highest honor a scientific man can obtain, but the sum of his work is

absolutely overwhelming. Had he never lived, the aspect of chemistry

would be very different from that it is now."

While sojourning at Cassel, Wöhler made, among other chemical

discoveries, one for obtaining the metal nickel in a state of purity,

and with two attached friends he founded a factory there for the

preparation of the metal.

Among the works which he published were "Grundriss der Anorganischen

Chemie," Berlin, 1830, and the "Grundriss der Organischen Chemie,"

Berlin, 1840. Nor must we omit to mention "Praktischen Uebringen der

Chemischen Analyse," Berlin, 1854, and the "Lehrbuch der Chemie,"

Dresden, 1825, 4 vols.

At a sitting of the Academy, held on October 2, 1882, M. Jean Baptiste

Dumas, the permanent secretary, with profound regret, made known

the intelligence of the death of the illustrious foreign associate,

Friedrich Wöhler, professor in the University of Göttingen. He said: "M.

Friedrich Wöhler, the favorite pupil of Berzelius, had followed in the

lines and methods of work of his master. From 1821 till his last year he

has continuously published memoirs or simple notes, always remarkable

for their exactness, and often of such a nature that they took among

contemporaneous production the first rank by their importance, their

novelty, or their fullness. Employed chiefly, during his sojourn in

Sweden, in work on mineral chemistry, he has remained all his life the

undisputed chief in this branch of science in German universities. This

preparation and preoccupation, which one might have thought sufficient

to occupy his time, did not, however, prevent him from taking the chief

part in the development of organic chemistry, and of filling one of the

most elevated positions in it.

"His contemporaries have not forgotten the unusual sensation produced by

the unexpected discovery by which he was enabled to make artificially,

and by a purely chemical method, urea, the most nitrogenous of animal

substances. Other transformations or combinations giving birth to

substances which, until then, had only been met with in animals or

plants, have since been obtained, but the artificial formation of urea

still remains the neatest and most elegant example of this order of

creation. All chemists know and admire the classical memoir in which

Wöhler and Liebig some time after made known the nature of the benzoic

series, and connected them with the radicals of which we may consider

them as being the derivatives comparable with products of a mineral

nature. Their memoirs on the derivatives of uric acid, a prolific source

of new and remarkable substances, has been an inexhaustible mine in the

hands of their successors.

"This is not a moment when we should pretend to review the work which M.

Wöhler has done in mineral chemistry. Among the 240 papers which he has

published in scientific journals, there are few which the treatises of

chemistry have not immediately turned to account. We need only confine

ourselves to the discovery of aluminum, to which the energy and

inventive genius of our _confrère_, Henry Deville, soon gave a place

near the noble metals. United by a rivalry which would have divided

less noble minds, these two great chemists carried on together their

researches in chemistry, and joined their forces to clear up points

still obscure in the history of boron, silicium, and the metals of

the platinum group, and remained closely united, which each year only

strengthened.

"The reader will pardon me a souvenir entirely personal. We were born,

M. Wöhler and I, in 1800. I am his senior by a few days. Our scientific

life began at the same date, and during sixty years everything has

combined to bind more closely the links of brotherhood which has existed

for so long a time."

* * * * *

Scientific American Supplement, No. 362, December 9, 1882 · 第 8 / 57 题