WHEN THE NOTION OF BEING IS EXPRESSED INDEPENDENTLY.

I must except from this class all instances where the substantive verb

is formed from a radical, inasmuch as this root, like any other, must

assume the verbal form, and thus come under one of the two other

divisions. In such case it expresses the notion of Being, either by an

auxiliary, as in the German _Ich bin gewesen_, or simply in the form,

as, _I am_. When it is remembered that the substantive verbs of all

languages are derived from concrete conceptions and impart to these

merely the general notion of Being, the above becomes still more

obvious.

Now if there is no root-form for the substantive verb, and yet it is

expressed independently, and not by another verbal form, this can only

be done either by the position of the governing and governed words, or

by linguistic elements which are not properly verbs, but only become

so by this use. In the former case the substantive verb is merely

understood, in the latter it appears in a definite word, but without a

fixed radical.

The Philosophic Grammar of American Languages, as Set Forth by Wilhelm von Humboldt With the Translation of an Unpublished Memoir by Him on the American Verb · 第 17 / 27 题