Murat was in no hurry to commence his reign, and his subjects showed no

great anxiety to see their new ruler. But when King Joachim Napoleon, to

give him his new title, arrived at Naples he was received with

unexpected warmth. The new monarch, with his striking personality and

good looks, at once captivated the hearts of his fickle Southern

subjects. Joseph had been prudent and cold, Joachim was ostentatious and

fiery. The Neapolitans had never really cared for their Bourbon

sovereigns. Some of the noblesse had from interest clung to the old

dynasty, but the greater part of the nobility cared little who ruled

them so long as their privileges were not interfered with. Among the

middle class there was a strong party which had accepted the doctrines

of the French Revolution. The lower class were idle and lazy, and

willing to serve any sovereign who appealed to them by ostentation. The

people who really held the key of the hearts of the mass of the

population were the clergy. Joseph, with his liberal ideas, had

attempted to free the people from clerical thraldom. Joachim, however,

with his Southern instincts, refused to deny himself the use of such a

powerful lever, and quickly ingratiated himself with his new subjects.

From the moment that he arrived at Naples the new King determined, if

not to rule Naples for the Neapolitans, at least, by pretending to do

so, to rule Naples for himself and not for Napoleon. It is not,

therefore, surprising that before the close of the year 1808 friction

arose, which was further increased by the intrigues of Talleyrand and

Fouche. These ministers, firmly convinced that Napoleon would never

return from the Spanish war, had decided that in the event of his death

they would declare Murat his successor rather than establish a regency

for the young son of Louis Napoleon, the King of Holland.

In pursuance of the plan of winning his subjects' affections Joachim had

at once called to his aid Agar, who had so successfully managed the

finances of the Grand Duchy of Berg. The difficulties of finance in

Naples were very great, and with Agar the King had to associate the

subtle Corsican, Salicetti, who had so powerfully contributed to the

rise of Napoleon. Taxation in Naples was heavy, for the Neapolitans had

to find the money for the war with their old dynasty, which was

threatening them from Sicily, aided by the English fleet. To secure the

kingdom against the Sicilians and English, a large Neapolitan army of

thirty thousand troops had to be maintained along with an auxiliary

force of ten thousand French. Moreover, the Neapolitans had to pay for

having a King like Joachim and a Queen Consort like Caroline. The royal

household alone required 1,395,000 ducats per annum. To meet this heavy

expense the ministers had to devise all sorts of expedients to raise

money. Regular taxation, monopolies, mortgages, and loans barely

sufficed to provide for the budget. Still the King managed to retain his

popularity, and in his own way attempted to ameliorate the lot of his

subjects. He introduced the Code Napoleon. He founded a military

college, an artillery and engineer college, a naval college, a civil

engineer college and a polytechnic school. He also instituted primary

schools in every commune, and started an Ecole Normale for the training

of teachers. He expanded the staff of the University and established an

Observatory and Botanical Garden at Naples. He attempted to conciliate

the Neapolitan noblesse by gradually dismissing his French ministers and

officers and appointing Neapolitan nobles in their place. At the same

time he abolished feudal dues and customs. He also attempted to develop

industries by giving them protection. Above all, by the strict measures

of his minister Manhes he established peace in the interior by breaking

down the organised system of the freebooters and robbers. As time went

on he found that the clergy and monks were too heavy a burden for his

kingdom to bear, and, at the expense of his popularity, he had to cut

down the numbers of the dioceses and parishes and abolish the religious

orders.

From the first the new King grasped the fact that his kingdom would

always be heavily taxed, and his throne insecure as long as the

Bourbons, backed by the English, held Sicily. His plan of campaign,

therefore, was to drive his enemy out of the smaller islands, and

thereafter to demand the aid of French troops and make a determined

effort against Sicily. In October, 1808, by a well-planned expedition,

he captured the island of Capri, and caused the English commander, Sir

Hudson Lowe, to capitulate. It was not till the autumn of 1810, however,

that he was ready for the great expedition. Relying on the traditional

hatred of the people of Messina for the Bourbons, he collected a strong

force on the Straits, and waited till the moment when, after a gale, the

English fleet had not yet arrived from the roads of Messina. On the

evening of September 17th he sent away his advance guard of two thousand

men in eighty small boats. Cavaignac, the commander of this force,

secured the important villages of Santo Stefano and Santo Paolo. But at

the critical moment the commander of the French division, acting

according to the Emperor's orders, refused to allow his troops to cross.

Before fresh arrangements could be made the English fleet reappeared on

the scene, and Cavaignac and his force were thus sacrificed for no

purpose. Joachim, as time showed, never forgave the Emperor for the

failure of his cherished plan.

By the commencement of 1812, the coming Russian campaign overshadowed

all other questions. Murat, who had earnestly begged to be allowed to

share the Austrian campaign of 1809, was delighted to serve in person.

But as King of Naples he refused to send a division of ten thousand men

to reinforce the Grand Army, "as a Frenchman and a soldier he declared

himself to the core a subject of the Emperor, but as King of Naples he

aspired to perfect independence." It was this double attitude which,

from the moment Murat became King, clouded the relations between him and

Napoleon. But nevertheless, once he rejoined the Emperor at Dantzig, he

laid aside all his royal aspirations and became the faithful dashing

leader of cavalry.

During the advance on Moscow the cavalry suffered terribly from the

difficulties of constant reconnaissances and want of supplies, but in

spite of this Murat urged the Emperor not to halt at Smolensk, but to

push on, as he believed the Russians were becoming demoralised. Scarce a

day passed without some engagement in which the King of Naples showed

his audacity and his talent as a leader. Notwithstanding, Napoleon,

angry at the constant escape of the Russians, declared that if Murat had

only pursued Bagration in Lithuania he would not have escaped. This

reproach spurred on the King of Naples to even greater deeds of bravery,

and so well was his figure known to the enemy that the Cossacks

constantly greeted him with cries of "Hurrah, hurrah, Murat!" At the

battle of Moskowa he and Ney completely overthrew the Russians, and if

Napoleon had flung the Guard into the action, the Russian army would

have been annihilated. In spite of the losses during the campaign, when

the French evacuated Moscow Murat had still ten thousand mounted troops,

but by the time the army had reached the Beresina there remained only

eighteen hundred troopers with horses. When the Emperor deserted the

Grand Army, he left the King of Naples in command, with orders to rally

the army at Vilna. But Murat saw that it was impossible to re-form the

army there, and accordingly ordered a retirement across the Niemen, a

line which he soon found it was impossible to hold. On January 10, 1813,

came the news that the Prussians had actually gone over to the enemy. It

seemed as if Napoleon was lost, and Murat thereupon at once deserted the

army, and set out in all haste for Italy, thinking only of how to save

his crown.

The King arrived in Naples bent on maintaining his crown and on allowing

no interference from the Emperor. But in spite of this he could not

decide on any definite line of action. He was afraid the English and

Russians would invade his country, but on the other hand his old

affection for Napoleon, and a sort of sneaking belief in his ultimate

success, prevented him from listening to the insidious advice of the

Austrian envoy, whom the far-seeing Metternich had at once sent to

Naples. If Napoleon had not in his despatch glorified Prince Eugene's

conduct to the disparagement of the King of Naples, if he had only

vouchsafed some reply to the King's persistent letters of inquiry

whether he still trusted his old comrade and lieutenant, Murat would

have thrown himself heart and soul into the melee on the side of his old

friend. But in April Napoleon quitted Paris for the army in Germany

without sending one line in reply to these imploring letters. Meanwhile

on April 23rd came a letter from Colonel Coffin suggesting the

possibility of effecting an entente between the English and Neapolitan

Governments, or at any rate a commercial convention. Thereupon Murat

sent officers to enter into negotiations with Lord William Bentinck, who

represented the English Government in Sicily. All through the summer the

negotiations were continued, but Murat, in spite of the guarantee of the

throne of Naples which the English offered, could not break entirely

with his Emperor and benefactor. Still Napoleon, in his blindness,

instead of attempting to conciliate his brother-in-law, allowed articles

to his disparagement to appear in the _Moniteur_. Nevertheless Murat at

bottom was Napoleon's man. Elated by the Emperor's success at Luetzen and

Bautzen, although he refused to allow the Neapolitan troops to join the

Army of Italy under Prince Eugene, he hurried off in August to join the

French army at Dresden. There a reconciliation took place between the

brothers-in-law. But after the defeat at Leipzig King Joachim asked and

obtained leave to return to his own dominions.

His presence was needed at home, for in Italy also the war had gone

against the French. Prince Eugene had had to fall back on the line of

the Adda, and the defection of the Tyrol had opened to the Allies the

passes into the Peninsula. Murat, in his hurry, had to leave his coach

snowed up in the Simplon Pass and proceed on horseback to Milan, where

he halted but a few hours to write a despatch to the Emperor, which

practically foretold his desertion. He declared that if he, instead of

Eugene, was entrusted with the defence of Italy, he would at once march

north from Naples with forty thousand men. He had indeed never forgotten

the slight put upon him by the article in the _Moniteur_, after the

Russian campaign, and he was ready to sacrifice even his kingdom if only

he could revenge himself on his enemy, Eugene. As Napoleon would not

grant him this request, he determined to humiliate Eugene, and, at the

same time, to save his crown by negotiating with the enemy. On reaching

Naples, he found that his wife, who hitherto had been an unbending

partisan of the French, had entirely changed her politics and was now

pledged to an Austrian alliance. The King was ever unstable, vanity

always governed his conduct: the Queen was always determined, governed

solely by a cold, calculating ambition. Negotiations were at once opened

with the Austrians. The King protested "that he desired nothing in the

world so much as to make common cause with the allied Powers." He

promised that he would join them with thirty thousand troops, on

condition that he was guaranteed the throne of Naples, and that he

should have the Roman States in exchange for Sicily. Meanwhile he

addressed an order of the day to his army, stating that the Neapolitan

troops should only be employed in Italy. This of course did not commit

him either to Napoleon or the Austrian alliance. Meanwhile the Emperor

had despatched Fouche to try to bind his brother-in-law to France, but

that distinguished double-dealer merely advised the Neapolitan King to

move northwards to the valley of the Po with all his troops, and there

to wait and see whether it would be best to help the French, or to enter

France with the Allies, and perhaps the Tuileries as Emperor.

Joachim Napoleon quietly occupied Rome and pushed forward his troops

towards the Po, using the French magazines and depots, but still

negotiating with the Austrians, and, at the same time, holding out

hopes to the purely Italian party. For the national party of the

Risorgimento were striving hard to seize this opportunity to unite Italy

and drive out the foreigner, and no one seemed more capable of carrying

out their policy than the popular King of Naples. The Austrians

flattered the hopes of "young Italy" by declaring in their proclamation

that they had only entered Italy to free her from the yoke of the

stranger, and to aid the King of Naples by creating an independent

kingdom of Italy. Still Murat hesitated on the brink. As late as the

27th of December he wrote to the Emperor proposing that Italy should be

formed into two kingdoms, that he should govern all the peninsula south

of the Po, and that the rest of the country should be left to Eugene.

Three days later the Austrian envoy arrived with the proposals of the

Allies. But he could not yet make up his mind, and, moreover, the

English had not yet guaranteed him Naples. In January, however, these

guarantees were given, and against his will he had to sign a treaty.

Scarcely was the writing dry when he began to negotiate with Prince

Eugene. He used every artifice to prevent a collision between the French

and Neapolitan troops. When the campaign opened his troops abandoned

their position at the first shot, while he himself took good care not to

reach the front until the news of Napoleon's abdication arrived.

But Murat's conduct had alienated everybody. The French loathed him for

his duplicity; the Allies suspected him of treachery, and the party of

the Risorgimento looked on him as the cause of their subjection to the

foreigner; for the Austrian victory had not brought Italy unity and

independence, but had merely established the fetters of the old regime.

During the remainder of 1814 the lot of the King of Naples was most

unenviable. The restored Bourbons of France and Spain regarded him as

the despoiler of the Bourbon house of Sicily. Russia had been no party

to the guarantee of his kingdom. England desired nothing so much as his

expulsion. Austria alone upheld him, for she had been the chief party to

the treaty; but Metternich was waiting for him to make some slip which

might serve as a pretext for tearing up that treaty. Even the Pope

refused the bribe which the King offered him when he proposed to restore

the Marches in return for receiving the papal investiture. In despair

Murat once again entered into negotiations with the Italian party. A

general rising was planned in Lombardy, but failed, as the Austrians

received news of the proposed cession of Milan. With cruel cunning they

spread the report that the King of Naples had sold the secret.

Henceforward Murat had no further hope. Foreigners, Italians, priests,

carbonari and freemasons, all had turned against him.

Such was the situation when on March 8, 1815, the King heard that

Napoleon had left Elba. As usual he dealt double. He at once sent a

message to England that he would be faithful, while at the same time he

sent agents to Sicily to try to stir up a revolt against the Bourbons.

As soon as the news of Napoleon's reception in France arrived, he set

out at the head of forty thousand troops, thinking that all Italy would

rise for him. But the Italians mistrusted the fickle King; the Austrian

troops were already mobilised, and accordingly, early in May, the

Neapolitan army fled homewards before its enemies. King Joachim's

popularity was gone. A grant of a constitution roused no enthusiasm

among the people. City after city opened its gates to the enemy.

Resistance was hopeless, so on the night of May 19th the King of Naples,

with a few hundred thousand francs and his diamonds, accompanied by a

handful of personal friends, fled by sea to Cannes. But the Emperor

refused to receive the turncoat, though at St. Helena he bitterly

repented this action, lamenting "that at Waterloo Murat might have given

us the victory. For what did we need? To break three or four English

squares. Murat was just the man for the job." After Waterloo the poor

King fled before the White Terror, and for some time lay hid in

Corsica. There he was given a safe conduct by the Allies and permission

to settle in Austria. But the deposed monarch could not overcome his

vanity. He still believed himself indispensable to Naples. Some four

hundred Corsicans promised to follow him thither. The filibustering

expedition set out in three small ships on the 28th of September. A

storm arose and scattered the armada, but in spite of this, on October

7th, the ex-King decided to land at Pizzo. Dressed in full uniform, amid

cries of "Long live our King Joachim," the unfortunate man landed with

twenty-six followers. He was at once arrested, and on October 13th tried

by court martial, condemned to death, and executed a few hours later.

Joachim Murat met his death like a soldier. As he wrote to his wife, his

only regret was that he died far off, without seeing his children. Death

was what he courted when landing at Pizzo, for he must have known how

impossible it was for him to conquer a kingdom with twenty-six men.

Still, he preferred to die in the attempt to regain his crown rather

than to spend an ignoble old age, a pensioner on the bounty of his

enemies. Murat died as he had lived, brave but vain, with his last words

calling out, "Soldiers, do your duty: fire at my heart, but spare my

face."

The King of Naples owed his elevation entirely to his fortunate marriage

with the Emperor's sister; otherwise it is certain he would never have

reached such exalted rank, for Napoleon really did not like him or trust

him, and had a true knowledge of his ability. "He was a Paladin," said

the Emperor at St. Helena, "in the field, but in the Cabinet destitute

of either decision or judgment. He loved, I may rather say, adored me;

he was my right arm; but without me he was nothing. In battle he was

perhaps the bravest man in the world; left to himself, he was an

imbecile without judgment." Murat was a cavalry leader pure and simple.

His love of horses, his intuitive knowledge of exactly how much he

could ask from his horsemen, his reckless bravery, his fine

swordsmanship, his dashing manners, captivated the French cavalry and

enabled him to "achieve the impossible." Contrary to accepted opinion

Napoleon believed "that cavalry, if led by equally brave and resolute

men, must always break infantry." Consequently we find that at

Austerlitz, Jena, and Eylau, the decisive stroke of the day was in each

case given by immense bodies of some twenty thousand men under the

command of Murat, whose genius lay in his ability to manoeuvre these

huge bodies of cavalry on the field of battle, and in the tenacity with

which he clung to and pursued a beaten enemy. But this was the sum total

of his military ability. He had no conception of the use of the other

arms of the service, and never gained even the most elementary knowledge

of strategy. When trusted with anything like the command of a mixed body

of troops he proved an utter failure. Before Ulm he nearly ruined

Napoleon's combination by failing to get in contact with the enemy. In

the later half of the campaign of 1806 he hopelessly failed to make any

headway against the Russians east of the Vistula. In the retreat across

the Niemen he proved himself absolutely incapable of reorganising a

beaten force. As a king, Murat was full of good intentions towards his

people, but his extravagance, his vanity, his indecision cost him his

crown. As a man he was generous and extraordinarily brave. In the

Russian campaign he used to challenge the Cossacks to single combat, and

when he had beaten them he sent them away with some medal or souvenir of

himself. He was a good husband, and lived at peace and amity with his

wife, and was exceedingly fond of his children. His faults were

numerous; he was by nature intensely jealous, especially of those who

came between him and Napoleon, and he stooped to anything whereby he

might injure his rivals, Lannes and Prince Eugene. His hot Southern

blood led him into numerous quarrels. Although extremely arrogant, at

bottom he was a moral coward, and before the Emperor's reproaches he

scarcely dared to open his mouth. But his great fault, through which he

gained and lost his crown, was his vanity. Vanity, working on ambition

and an unstable character, is the key to all his career. His blatant

Jacobinism, his intrigue with Josephine, his overtures to the Directors,

his underhand treatment of his fellow Marshals, his discontent with his

Grand Duchy, his subtle dealings in Spain, his system of government in

Naples, his opposition to Napoleon's schemes, his dissimulation and

desertion, his almost theatrical bravery, and his very death were due to

nothing save extravagant vanity.

III

ANDRE MASSENA, MARSHAL, DUKE OF RIVOLI, PRINCE OF ESSLING

Napoleon's Marshals · 第 4 / 30 段