IV. WE come now, in the last place, to consider how corporations may

be dissolved. Any particular member may be disfranchised, or lose his

place in the corporation, by acting contrary to the laws of the

society, or the laws of the land; or he may resign it by his own

voluntary act[i]. But the body politic may also itself be dissolved in

several ways; which dissolution is the civil death of the corporation:

and in this case their lands and tenements shall revert to the person,

or his heirs, who granted them to the corporation; for the law doth

annex a condition to every such grant, that if the corporation be

dissolved, the grantor shall have the lands again, because the cause

of the grant faileth[k]. The grant is indeed only during the life of

the corporation; which _may_ endure for ever: but, when that life is

determined by the dissolution of the body politic, the grantor takes

it back by reversion, as in the case of every other grant for life.

And hence it appears how injurious, as well to private as public

rights, those statutes were, which vested in king Henry VIII, instead

of the heirs of the founder, the lands of the dissolved monasteries.

The debts of a corporation, either to or from it, are totally

extinguished by it's dissolution; so that the members thereof cannot

recover, or be charged with them, in their natural capacities[l]:

agreeable to that maxim of the civil law[m], "_si quid universitati

debetur, singulis non debetur; nec, quod debet universitas, singuli

debent_."

[Footnote i: 11 Rep. 98.]

[Footnote k: Co. Litt. 13.]

[Footnote l: 1 Lev. 237.]

[Footnote m: _Ff._ 3. 4. 7.]

A CORPORATION may be dissolved, 1. By act of parliament, which is

boundless in it's operations; 2. By the natural death of all it's

members, in case of an aggregate corporation; 3. By surrender of it's

franchises into the hands of the king, which is a kind of suicide; 4.

By forfeiture of it's charter, through negligence or abuse of it's

franchises; in which case the law judges that the body politic has

broken the condition upon which it was incorporated, and thereupon the

incorporation is void. And the regular course is to bring a writ of

_quo warranto_, to enquire by what warrant the members now exercise

their corporate power, having forfeited it by such and such

proceedings. The exertion of this act of law, for the purposes of the

state, in the reigns of king Charles and king James the second,

particularly by seising the charter of the city of London, gave great

and just offence; though perhaps, in strictness of law, the

proceedings were sufficiently regular: but now[n] it is enacted, that

the charter of the city of London shall never more be forfeited for

any cause whatsoever. And, because by the common law corporations were

dissolved, in case the mayor or head officer was not duly elected on

the day appointed in the charter or established by prescription, it is

now provided[o], that for the future no corporation shall be dissolved

upon that account; and ample directions are given for appointing a new

officer, in case there be no election, or a void one, made upon the

charter or prescriptive day.

[Footnote n: Stat. 2 W. & M. c. 8.]

[Footnote o: Stat. 11 Geo. I. c. 4.]

THE END OF THE FIRST BOOK.

Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book the First · 第 41 / 41 段