John says:--

"I am not going to be dependent upon any man. I am going to live my

own life, in my own way, as I expect other men to live theirs. If

they will leave me alone, I will leave them alone," and John

flatters himself that he is asserting his own strength of

personality, that he is emphasizing his individuality. The truth is

that John is warping himself every day by his weak dependence upon

his own prejudices. He is unwilling to look fairly at another main's

opinion for fear of being dependent upon it. He is not only warping

himself by his "independence," which is puffed up with the false

appearance of strength, but he is robbing his fellow-men; for he

cannot refuse to receive from others without putting it out of his

own power to give to others. Real giving and receiving must be

reciprocal in spirit, and absolutely dependent upon each other.

It is a curious and a sad study to watch the growing slavery of such

"independent" people.

James, on the other hand, thinks he cannot do anything without

asking another man's advice or getting another man's help; sometimes

it is always the same man, sometimes it is one of twenty different

men. And so, James is steadily losing the power of looking life in

the face, and of judging for himself whether or not to take the

advice of others from a rational principle, and of his own free

will, and he is gradually becoming a parasite,--an animal which

finally loses all its organs from lack of use, so that only its

stomach remains,--and has, of course, no intelligence at all. The

examples of such men as James are much more numerous than might be

supposed. We seldom see them in such flabby dependence upon the will

of an individual as would make them conspicuous; but they are about

us every day, and in large numbers, in their weak dependence upon

public opinion,--their bondage to the desire that other men should

think well of them. The human parasites that are daily feeding on

social recognition are unconsciously in the process of losing their

individuality and their intelligence; and it would be a sad surprise

to them if they could see themselves clearly as they really are.

Public opinion is a necessary and true protection to the world as it

is, because if it were not for public opinion, many men and women

would dare to be more wicked than they are. But that is no reason

why intelligent men should order their lives on certain lines just

because their neighbors do,--just because it is the custom. If the

custom is a good custom, it can be followed intelligently, and

because we recognize it as good, but it should not be followed only

because our neighbors follow it. Then, if our neighbors follow the

custom for the same intelligent reason, it will bring us and them

into free and happy sympathy.

Neither should a man hesitate to do right, positively and

fearlessly, in the face of the public assertion that he is doing

wrong. He should, of course, look himself over many times to be sure

that he is doing right, according to his own best light, and he

should be willing to change his course of action just as fearlessly

if he finds he has made a mistake; but, having once decided, he will

respect public opinion much more truly by acting quietly against it

with an open mind, than he would if he refused to do right, because

he was afraid of what others would think of him. To defy carelessly

the opinion of others is false independence, and has in it the

elements of fear, however fearless it may seem; but to respectfully

ignore it for the sake of what is true, and good, and useful, is

sure to enlarge the public heart and to help, it eventually to a

clearer charity. Individual dependence and individual independence

are absolutely necessary to a well-adjusted balance. It is just as

necessary to the individual men of a community as to the individual

organs of the body.

The Freedom of Life · 第 30 / 39 题