Chapter XIX.

METHODS IN MODERN WARFARE

Ancient and Modern Weapons—New Types of Weapons—The Iron-clad

Warship—The Balloon in War—Tennyson’s Foresight—Gunning for

Airships—The Submarine—Under-water Warfare—The New Type of

Battleship—Mobilization—The Waste of War

One hundred years ago the Battle of Waterloo had just been fought and

Napoleon’s star had set never to rise again. For years he had swept

Europe with his armies, rending the nations into fragments, and winning

world-famous victories with weapons that no one would look for today

except in a military museum, weapons antiquated beyond all possible

utility on a modern field of battle.

ANCIENT AND MODERN WEAPONS

Every fresh modern war has been fought with new weapons, and during the

past century there have been countless inventions for the carrying on

of warfare in a more destructive manner, apparently on the

philanthropic theory that war should be made so terrible that it must

quickly pass away.

But it has happened that as soon as a particularly horrible contrivance

was invented and introduced into armies and navies, other inventors

immediately set themselves to offset and discount its probable effect.

Consequently war not only has not passed away, but we have it with us

in more frightful form that ever before. Thus it is that each big war,

after being heralded as the world’s last conflagration, has proved but

the herald of another war, bigger and more death-dealing still.

Since the Civil War in the United States, in which probably more new

features in modes of fighting were introduced than in any conflict that

had preceded it, there have been immense improvements in arms, in

armament and in general efficiency of both armies and navies. It was

the Civil War that brought into being the turreted MONITOR, one of the

greatest contributions to naval architecture the navies of the world

had then known. While the turrets on the modern battleship are very

different in design, in armor and in arrangement from those on the old

monitors, they are nothing more than an adaptation of the original

devices.

The same is the case with the small arms and the field guns of the

modern armies, these having been greatly improved since the period of

the Civil war. The breech-loading and even the magazine rifle are now

in use in every army, while the smallest field piece of today is almost

as efficient as the most powerful gun in use fifty years ago.

The first attempt to use a torpedo boat dates back to the Civil War. A

primitive contrivance it was, but it showed a possibility in naval

warfare which speedily led to the general building of torpedo boats,

and to the invention of the highly efficient Whitehead torpedo.

THE IRONCLAD WARSHIP

Another lesson in warfare was taught when the ironclad MERRIMAC and

MONITOR met and fought for mastery in Hampton Roads. The ironclad

vessel was not then a new idea in naval architecture, but its

efficiency as a fighting machine was then first demonstrated. Iron for

armor soon gave way to thick and tough steel, while each improvement in

armor led to a corresponding improvement in guns and projectiles, until

now a battle at sea has grown to be a remarkably different affair from

the great ocean combats of Nelson’s time.

But development in the art of war has not ceased with the improvement

in older types of weapons. New devices, scarcely thought of in former

wars, have been introduced. These include the use of the balloon and

aeroplane as scouting devices, of the bomb filled with explosives of

frightful rending power, and of the submarine naval shark, designed to

attack the mighty battleships from under water.

THE BALLOON IN WAR

Of recent years the balloon has been developed into the dirigible, the

flying machine that can be steered and directed. Made effective by

Count Zeppelin and others, its possibilities as an aid in war were

quickly perceived. Then came the notable invention of the Wright

Brothers, and after 1904 the aeroplane quickly expanded into an

effective aerial instrument, the probably serviceableness of which in

war was evident to all. Here we are tempted to stop and quote the

remarkable prediction from Tennyson’s “Locksley Hall,” the truth of

which is now being so strikingly verified:

“For I dipt into the future, far as human eye could see,

Saw the vision of the world and all the wonder that would be;

Saw the heavens fill with commerce, argosies of magic sails,

Pilots of the purple twilight, dropping down with costly bales;

Heard the heavens fill with shouting, and there rained a ghastly dew

From the nations’ airy navies grappling in the central blue;

Far along the world-wide whisper of the south-wind rushing warm,

With the standards of the peoples plunging through the thunder storm;

Till the war drum throbbed no longer, and the battle flags were furled

In the parliament of man, the federation of the world.”

GUNNING FOR AIRSHIPS

The airship does not float safely in the cental blue, aside from

attacks by flying foes. Guns pointing upward have been devised to

attack the daring aviator from the ground and flying machines can thus

be swiftly brought down, like war eagles shot in the sky. Several types

of guns for this purpose are in use, some to be employed on warships or

fortifications, others, mounted on automobile trucks, for use in the

field.

The Ehrhardt gun, a German weapon, which is designed to be mounted on

an auto-truck, weighs nearly 1700 pounds. The car carries 140 rounds of

ammunition and the whole equipment in service condition weighs more

than six tons. The gun has an extreme range at 45 degrees elevation of

12,029 yards, or more than six miles. The sights are telescopic, a

moving object can be followed with ease, and the gun is capable of

being fired very rapidly. The British are provided with the Vickers

gun, which is mainly intended for naval use, but the military arm is

also provided with anti-balloon guns, which have great range and can

throw a three-pound shell at any high angle. Some of these guns use

incendiary shells, intended to ignite the gas in dirigibles. There is

another type that explodes shrapnel. In addition to these, rifle fire

is apt to be effective, in case of airships coming within its range.

Jules Vedrines, a well-known French aviator, tells this story of his

experience while doing scout duty for the French army:

“Those German gunners surely have tried their best to get me,” he

wrote. “Each night when I come back to headquarters my machine looks

more and more like a sieve because of the numerous bullet holes in the

wings.

“I have been keeping tab on the number of new bullet holes in my

machine each day, marking each with red chalk, so that I won’t include

any of the old ones in the next day’s count. My best record so far for

one day is thirty-seven holes. That shows how close the enemy has come

to hitting me. My duties as scout require me to cover various distances

each day. The best record so far in one day is 600 miles.”

THE SUBMARINE

The submarine is another type of war apparatus, one the utility of

which promises to be very great. It is of recent origin. At the time of

the Spanish-American War there were only five submarines in all the

navies of the world, and of this number three were in the French navy,

one in Italy and one in Portugal. The United States was building its

first one, and had not decided what type to select. At the outbreak of

the Russo-Japanese War Great Britain had nine of the American (Holland)

type of submarines and was building twenty more, while France had

accumulated thirty-six of various types and of various grades of

reported efficiency, while Germany had none. In 1914 there were nearly

four hundred vessels of this type in the world’s navies, France

standing first with 173.

It was believed that the moral effect of the submarine would be almost

as important as its physical effect in dealing with an enemy’s warship,

and this idea has been justified. Some persons maintained that fights

of submarines with each other might take place, each, like the Kilkenny

cats, devouring the other. But the fact is that when submerged the

submarine is as blind as the traditional bat. Its crew cannot see any

object under water, and is compelled to resort to the use of the

periscope, which emerges unostentatiously above the water, in order to

see its own course.

It is known that the periscope is the eye of the submarine, and

naturally attention has been paid to the best way of destroying this

vital part of such boats. Recently, grappling irons have been devised

for use from dirigibles, which are expected to drag out the periscope

as the dirigible flies above it. Careful plans for torpedoing

submarines also have been made, but their effectiveness likewise

remains to be demonstrated.

Submarine builders have naturally held the view that the submerged boat

could not be seen. But it has been discovered that from a certain

height an observer may trace the course of a submerged submarine with

as great accuracy as if it were running on the surface. It is found

that the submerged boat can readily be seen from the dirigible and the

aeroplane. On the other hand an anti-balloon gun has been devised which

can be raised from the submarine when it comes to the surface, and used

against the hostile airship.

UNDER-WATER WARFARE

The submarine is supposed to have its most important field of operation

against a fleet of battleships and cruisers besieging a seaport city.

These great war craft, covered above the waterline with thick steel

armor, are vulnerable below, and a torpedo discharged from a torpedo

boat or an explosive bomb attached to the lower hull by a submarine may

send the largest and mightiest ship to the bottom, stung to death from

below.

With this idea in view torpedo boars, destroyers designed to attack

torpedo boats and submarines have been multiplied in modern navies. We

have just begun to appreciate the effectiveness of this type of

vessels. Their possibilities are enormous and their latent power

renders the bombardment from sea of town or fort a far more perilous

operation than of old. Fired at by the great guns of the fort capable

of effective work at eight or ten miles distance, exposed to explosive

bombs dropped from soaring airships, made a target for the deadly

weapon of the torpedo boat, and in constant risk of being stung by the

submarine wasp, these great war ships, built at a cost of ten or more

millions and peopled by hundreds of mariners, are in constant danger of

being sent to the bottom with all on board a contingency likely to

shake the nerves of the steadiest Jack Tar or admiral on board.

A typical submarine has a length of about 150 feet and diameter of 15

feet, with a speed of eleven knots on the surface and five knots when

submerged. Some of the more recent have a radius of navigation of 4,500

miles without need of a new supply of stores and fuel. On the surface

they are propelled by gasoline engines, but when submerged they use

electric motors driven by storage batteries. If the weather should grow

too rough they can sink below the waves.

THE NEW TYPE OF BATTLESHIP

While the peril of the big ship has thus been increased, the size and

fighting capacity of those ships have steadily grown and at the same

time their cost, which is becoming almost prohibitive. Taking the

British navy, the leader in this field, the size of battleships was

yearly augmented until in 1907 the famous Dreadnought appeared, looked

upon at the time as the last word in naval architecture. This great

ship was of 17,900 tons displacement and 23,000 horse-power, its armor

belt eleven inches thick, its major armament composed of ten

twelve-inch guns. There are now twenty British battleships of larger

size, some much larger.

On shore a similar increase may be seen in the size and effectiveness

of armies and the strength of fortifications. In all the larger nations

of Europe except Great Britain the whole able-bodied male population

are now obliged to spend several years in the army, and to be ready at

a moment’s notice to drop all the avocations of peace and march to the

front, ready to risk their lives in their country’s service or at the

command of the autocrat under whom they live.

MOBILIZATION

Mobilization is a word with strenuous significance. When it is put into

effect every able-bodied man must report without delay for service. His

name is on the army lists; if he fails to report he is branded as a

deserter. In Germany, the order to mobilize is issued by the Emperor

and is immediately sent out by all military and civil authorities, at

home or abroad. Every person knows at once what he is required to do.

Skeleton regiments are filled out and additional regiments formed.

Simultaneously there is a levy of horses. The order reaches into every

household; into the factories, the shipyards, the hotels, the farms,

river boats, everywhere. Almost instantly the male individuals within

the prescribed ages must at once report to the barracks to come under

military discipline. Infantry, cavalry and artillery units double and

triple at once.

This is the first step in mobilization. The second is the

transportation and concentration of forces. The railways are seized,

the telegraph and telephone systems. Mail, military, aerial and railway

services are assigned. The commissary lines are laid and transportation

provided for. With marvelous efficiency the full fighting strength, in

front and rear, is made ready and co-ordinated.

The psychological effect of mobilization is tremendous. In every

household home-ties are broken. The fields are stripped of men.

Industry stops. Artillery rolls through the streets, bands play. An

atmosphere of apprehension settles down on the country.

THE WASTE OF WAR

And the waste of it all; the criminal, unbelievable waste! Consider the

vast loss of products that is due, not only to actual war, but to

unceasing and universal preparation for war.

It has been stated on the highest authority that during the last decade

forty per cent of the total outlay of European states has been absorbed

by the armies and navies which, when war arises, seek in every way to

destroy as much as they can of the remainder. Commenting on this state

of affairs, Count Sergius Witte, the ablest of Russian statesmen and

financiers, said in London not long ago:

“Sketch a picture in your mind’s eye of all that those sums, if

properly spent, could effect for the nations who now waste them on

heavy guns, rifles, dreadnaughts, fortresses and barracks. If this

money were laid out on improving the material lot of the people, in

housing them hygienically, in procuring for them healthier air, medical

aid and needful periodical rest, they would live longer and work to

better purpose, and enjoy some of the happiness or contentment which at

present is the prerogative of the few.

“Again, all the best brain work of the most eminent men is focused on

efforts to create new lethal weapons, or to make the old ones more

deadly. For one of the arts in which cultured nations have made most

progress is warfare. The noblest efforts of the greatest thinkers are

wasted on inventions to destroy human life.

“When I call to mind the gold and the work thus dissipated in smoke and

sound and compare that picture with this other villagers with drawn,

sallow faces, men and women and dimly conscious children perishing

slowly and painfully of hunger I begin to ask myself whether human

culture and the white man who personifies it are not wending toward the

abyss.”

In “War and Waste” Dr. David Starr Jordan quotes the table of Richet to

show the cost of a general European war.

Per day the French statistician figures the war’s cost thus:

Feed of men …………………………………. $12,600,000

Feed of horses ……………………………….. 1,000,000

Pay (European rates) ………………………….. 4,250,000

Pay of workmen in arsenals and ports ……………. 1,000.000

Transportation (sixty miles, ten days) ………….. 2,100,000

Transportation of provisions …………………… 4,200,000

Munitions

Infantry, ten cartridges a day …………….. 4,200,000

Artillery, ten shots per day ………………. 1,200,000

Marine, two shots per day …………………. 400,000

Equipment ……………………………………. 4,200,000

Ambulances, 500,000 wounded or ill ($1 per day) ….. 500,000

Armature …………………………………….. 500,000

Reduction of imports ………………………….. 5,000,000

Help to the poor (20 cents per day to one in ten) … 6,800,000

Destruction of towns, etc ……………………… 2,000,000

TOTAL PER DAY …………….. $49,950,000

The world war · 第 19 / 20 章