CHAPTER VIII

THE DESTROYERS

The Empire of the Sea-Kings had not been immune from disaster and

defeat any more than any other great Empire of the ancient world.

The times of conquest and triumph, when Knossos exacted its human

tribute from the vanquished states, Megara or Athens, or from its

own far-spread dependencies, had occasionally been broken by periods

when victory left its banners, and when the indignities it had

inflicted on other states were retaliated on itself. Once at least

in the long history of the palace at Knossos, if not twice, there

had come a disastrous day when the Minoan fleet had either been

defeated or eluded, when some invading force had landed and swept

up the valley, had overcome what resistance could be made by the

guard of the unfortified palace, and had ebbed back again to its

ships, leaving death and fire-blackened walls behind it. The Second

Middle Minoan period closes with the evidence of such a general

catastrophe, in which the palace was sacked and fired, and there

are also traces which suggest that the end of the preceding period

was marked by a similar disaster.

But these catastrophes, whether the agents of them were mere sea-rovers,

making a daring raid upon the eyrie of the great sea-power, or

the warriors of rival mainland states, eager to avenge upon their

enemy what they themselves had suffered at her hands, or, as Dr.

Evans and other explorers incline rather to believe, Cretans from

Phæstos, whose purpose was merely to overthrow the ruling dynasty,

scarcely interrupted the current of Minoan development. If the

enemy came from without, he came only to destroy and plunder, not

to occupy, and, having done his work, departed; if from within

the Empire, his triumph made no breach in the continuity of the

Minoan tradition. The palace rose again from its ashes, greater

and more glorious than before, and men of the same stock carried

on the work that had been checked for a while by the rough hand of

war. The men of the Third Middle Minoan period reared the beginnings

of the second palace on the site where the first had stood, and in

the relics of their arts and crafts the same spirit which informed

the earlier period still prevails, with no greater modifications

than such as come naturally to the art of any nation by the mere

lapse of time.

From the beginning of Middle Minoan III. to the end of Late Minoan

II.--a period, that is to say, of either some 500 or almost 2,000

years, according to the scheme of Egyptian chronology which we

may adopt--the civilization of Crete apparently followed a course

of even and peaceful development. At Knossos, Phæstos, and Hagia

Triada the great palaces slowly grew to their final glory. The

art that had produced the beautiful polychrome Kamares ware passed

away, and was succeeded by the naturalism which has left us the Blue

Boy who gathers the white crocuses, and the faïence reliefs of the

Temple Repositories, a naturalism which, with various modifications

in style and material, persists to the end of Late Minoan I. In the

midst of this period (Late Minoan I.) come what are perhaps the

highest developments of Minoan art in the shape of the steatite vases

of Hagia Triada, Boxer, Harvester, and Chieftain. On the mainland

the kindred culture of Mycenæ was rising to its culmination, and

the art represented in the Circle-Graves was almost in the fulness

of its bloom. Naturalism declines in its turn, and is succeeded by

the Later Palace style, more grandiose, more mannered, and less

free than that which had preceded it. It was in the Later Palace

period (Late Minoan II.) that the miniature frescoes were painted,

to preserve for us the strangely modern style of the Minoan Court,

with its flounced and furbelowed dames. Naturalism, though failing,

was still capable of great things, and its last efforts in the palace

at Knossos gave us the magnificent reliefs of painted stucco, such

as the bull's head and the King with the peacock plumes. Over the

seas, the Egyptians of the Eighteenth Dynasty were setting down on

their tomb walls those likenesses of the Keftiu which have helped

us to the date of this last development of Minoan greatness.

[Illustration XXII: THEATRAL AREA, KNOSSOS: RESTORED (_p_. 100)

_G. Maraghiannis_]

Probably the power and grandeur of the Empire was never more imposing

than during the hundred years before 1400 B.C. The House of Minos

at Knossos had reached its full development, and stood in all its

splendour, an imposing mass of building, crowning the hill of Kephala

with its five storeys around the great Central. Court, its Theatral

Area, and its outlying dependencies. Within its spacious porticoes and

corridors the walls glowed with the brilliant colours of innumerable

frescoes and reliefs in coloured plaster. The Cup-Bearer, the Queen's

Procession, the Miniature Frescoes of the Palace Sports, stood

out in all their freshness. Magnificent urns in painted pottery,

with reliefs like those of the great papyrus vase (Plate XXIII.),

decorated the halls and courts, and were rivalled by huge stone

amphoræ, exquisitely carved. The King and his courtiers were served

in costly vessels of gold, silver, and bronze _repoussé_ work.

The Empire of the Sea-Kings was at its apogee, and on every hand

there were the evidences of security and luxury.

But, as in the contemporary Egypt of Amenhotep III. a similar

development in all the comforts and luxuries of civilized life

was swiftly followed by the downfall under Akhenaten, so in Crete

the luxury of Late Minoan II. was only the prelude to its great

and final disaster. Exactly when the catastrophe came we cannot

tell. The Cretan Empire was certainly still existent in all its

glory in 1449 B.C., when Amenhotep II., the son of the great Tahutmes

III., came to the throne, for Rekh-ma-ra, the Vizier of Tahutmes,

in whose tomb the visit of the Keftian ambassadors is pictured,

survived, as we know, into the reign of Amenhotep. The twenty-six

years of Amenhotep II.'s reign, and the almost nine of Tahutmes

IV., bring us to the accession of Amenhotep III. in 1414, and the

thirty-six years of the latter take us to 1379 B.C. or thereby,

when the heretic Akhenaten, whose reign was to witness the downfall

of the Egyptian Empire in Syria, ascended the throne. Somewhere

within these seventy years the Empire of the Minoans passed away

in fire and bloodshed, and we shall probably not go far wrong if

we suppose that the great catastrophe came about the year 1400

B.C. The conclusion of Dr. Evans is that 'it seems reasonable to

suppose that the overthrow at Knossos had taken place not later

than the first half of the fourteenth century.'[*] Mrs. H. B. Hawes

places the fall of Knossos at 1450; but Rekh-ma-ra must have still

been living at that date, and, as Professor Burrows remarks, 'it

would at least be a strange coincidence if Egyptian artists were

painting the glories of the Palace at the very moment when they

were passing away.'

[Footnote *: 'Scripta Minoa,' pp. 52, 53.]

That there was a huge disaster, which broke for ever the power of

the Sea-Kings, is unmistakable. The Minoan kingdom did not fall

from over-ripeness and decay, as was the case with so many other

empires. The latest relics of its art before the catastrophe show

no signs of decadence; the latest specimens of its linear writing

show a marked advance on those of preceding periods. A civilization

in full strength and growth was suddenly and fatally arrested.

Everywhere throughout the palace at Knossos there are traces of

a vast conflagration. The charred ends of beams and pillars, the

very preservation of the clay tablets with their enigmatic records,

a preservation due, probably, to the tremendous heat to which they

were exposed by the furious blazing of the oil in the store jars

of the magazines, the traces of the blackening of fire upon the

walls--everything tells of an overwhelming tragedy. Nor was the

catastrophe the result of an accident. There is no mistaking the

significance of the fact that in the palace scarcely a trace of

precious metal, and next to no trace of bronze has been discovered.

Fire at Knossos was accompanied by plunder, and the plundering

was thorough. A few scraps of gold-leaf, and the little deposit

of bronze vessels that had been preserved from the plunderers by

the fact that the floor of the room in which they were found had

sunk in the ruin of the conflagration, are evidences, better than

absolute barrenness would have been, to the fact that the place

was pillaged with minute thoroughness, and the unfinished stone jar

in the sculptor's workshop tells its own tale of a sudden summons

from peaceful and happy toil to the stern realities of warfare.

The evidence from Phæstos and Hagia Triada tallies with that from

Knossos. Everywhere there are the traces of fire on the walls,

and a sudden interruption of quiet and luxurious life. The very

stone lamps still stand in the rooms at Hagia Triada, and on the

stairs of the Basilica at Knossos, as they stood to lighten the

last night of the doomed Minoans. Of course there are no records,

and if there were we could not read them; but it is easy to imagine

the disastrous sea-fight off the mouth of the Kairatos River, or

elsewhere along the coast, the wrecks of the once invincible Minoan

fleet driven ashore in hopeless ruin in the shallow bay, like the

Athenian fleet at Syracuse, the swift march of the mainland conquerors

up the valley, the brief, desperate resistance of the palace guards,

and then the horrors of the sack, and the long column of flushed

victors winding down to their ships, laden with booty, and driving

with them crowds of captive women. Similar scenes must have been

enacted at Phæstos and Hagia Triada, either by other forces of

invaders, or by the same host sweeping round the island.

From this overwhelming disaster the Minoan Empire never recovered.

The palace at Knossos was never reoccupied as a palace, at least on

anything like the scale of its former magnificence. The invaders

possibly departed as swiftly as they had come, or if, as seems

more probable, they eventually established themselves as a ruling

caste among the subject Minoans, they chose for their dwellings

other sites than those of the old palaces. The broken fragments of

the Minoan race crept back after the sack to the blackened ruins

of their holy and beautiful house, not to rebuild it, but to divide

its stately rooms and those of its dependencies by rude walls into

poor dwelling-houses, where they lived on--a very different life

from that of the golden days before the sack.

[Illustration XXIII: GREAT JAR WITH PAPYRUS RELIEFS (_p_. 206)]

In their own way they strove to continue, possibly under the modifying

influence of the art tradition of their conquerors, the great story

of the art of Knossos. There is no abrupt break in the style of the

pottery and other articles belonging to the latest Minoan period, as

compared with that of the days before the catastrophe. Technical skill

is almost as great as ever; it is degeneration in the inspiration of

the art that has begun. The spirit of the nation has been broken,

and its art is no longer living. Though the old models are followed,

it is with less complete understanding, with a perpetually increasing

interval, and with less and less fidelity. 'With the inability to

create new ideas of art and life,' says Dr. Mackenzie, 'is coupled

the slavish adherence to inherited tradition and custom in both.

Nothing new is produced, and nothing old is changed.'[*] 'For Crete

the sack is Ægospotami, Late Minoan III., the long months that

culminate in the surrender of Athens; the sack is Leipzig, Late

Minoan III., the slow closing in on Paris that leads up to the

abdication of Napoleon.'[**] Finally, even the technique fails, and

the great art which gave to the world the figures of the Cup-Bearer

and the King with the Peacock Plumes dies out in monstrosities.

[Footnote *: _Annual of the British School at Athens_, vol. xiii.,

p. 426.]

[Footnote **: R. M. Burrows, 'The Discoveries in Crete,' p. 100.]

The long decay was to some extent arrested by the coming of other

waves of invaders, probably Achæans, to whose influence may be

attributed the change in customs which begins to show itself in the

post-Minoan period. Burning begins to take the place of inhumation

as a means of disposing of the dead; Continental types of weapons

make their appearance in the tombs; iron swords and daggers are

even found. In life the men who use these weapons are clad, not

with the Minoan loin-cloth, but with the garments which we associate

with the Greeks of the Classical period, garments which require

the use of the fibula or safety-pin to fasten them. The potter's

art begins to find new motives, and to develop the use of the human

form as a type of adornment in a manner almost entirely foreign to

the Minoan tradition. At last, perhaps four centuries after the

fall of Knossos, comes the great tidal wave of Dorian invasion,

engulfing the work alike of conquerors and conquered, and blowing

out all the landmarks of the ancient cultures.

And through all these changes, and ever since, the ruined House of

Minos remained absolutely deserted, until, more than 3,000 years

after the sack, its echoes were wakened by the spades and picks

of Dr. Evans's workmen. Around the ruins grim and cruel legends

swiftly grew up. The old traditions, dimly surviving in the minds

of the native Cretans, of the bull-fight and the prize-ring, and

the tribute of toreadors from the conquered nations, seemed to be

corroborated by the very decorations of the palace walls, still

visible amidst the ruins, and around them were woven the stories

which have come down to us as legends of early Greece. 'Let us

place ourselves for a moment,' says Dr. Evans, 'in the position of

the first Dorian colonists of Knossos after the great overthrow,

when features now laboriously uncovered by the spade were still

perceptible amid the mass of ruins. The name [Labyrinth] was still

preserved, though the exact meaning, as supplied by the native

Cretan dialect, had been probably lost. Hard by the western gate,

in her royal robes, to-day but partially visible, stood Queen Ariadne

herself--and might not the comely youth in front of her be the

hero Theseus, about to receive the coil of thread for his errand

of liberation down the mazy galleries beyond? Within, fresh and

beautiful on the walls of the inmost chambers, were the captive

boys and maidens locked up here by the tyrant of old. At more than

one turn rose a mighty bull, in some cases, no doubt, according

to the favourite Mycenæan motive, grappled with by a half-naked

man. The type of the Minotaur itself as a man-bull was not wanting

on the soil of prehistoric Knossos, and more than one gem found

on this site represents a monster with the lower body of a man

and the forepart of a bull.

'One may feel assured that the effect of these artistic creations

on the rude Greek settler of those days was not less than that of

the disinterred fresco on the Cretan workman of to-day. Everything

around--the dark passages, the lifelike figures surviving from an

older world, would conspire to produce a sense of the supernatural.

It was haunted ground, and then, as now, "phantasms" were about. The

later stories of the grisly King and his man-eating bull sprang,

as it were, from the soil, and the whole site called forth a

superstitious awe. It was left severely alone by the new-comers.

Another Knossos grew up on the lower slopes of the hill to the

north, and the old Palace site became "a desolation and hissing."

Gradually earth's mantle covered the ruined heaps, and by the time

of the Romans the Labyrinth had become nothing more than a tradition

and a name.'[*]

[Footnote *: _Monthly Review_, March, 1901, pp. 131, 132.]

Who, then, were the invaders who, whether they remained as a ruling

caste in the land which they had conquered, or merely destroyed

and departed, inflicted upon the Minoan civilization a blow from

which it never recovered? The Cretans of Præsos, whose story of the

Sicilian expedition of Minos has already been mentioned, stated to

Herodotus that, after that great disaster, 'to Crete, thus destitute

of inhabitants ... other men, and especially the Grecians, went, and

settled there.' As Mr. Hogarth has pointed out, 'the men of Præsos

were no doubt, in the true saga spirit, foreshortening history by

crystallizing a process into a single event.' It is very improbable,

in view of the evidence afforded by the long survival and gradual

decay of the Minoan tradition, that there was any immediate general

occupation of the island on the part of the conquering race. The

process which finally resulted in the island of Crete becoming

'the mixed land,' with a heterogeneous population of Pelasgians,

Dorians, Achæans, and other tribes, must have been a gradual one,

extending, in all probability, over several centuries. Any large

influx of foreign elements was impossible so long as Crete was

dominated by a great and warlike central power; but once that power

was broken by the catastrophe in which the Palaces of Knossos and

Phæstos were overthrown, there was nothing to hinder the gradual

drifting in of the wandering tribes of the Ægean and of the North.

How that catastrophe came about we can see, not with any certainty

of detail, but with some amount of probability as to its general

outlines, from that echo of a period of wandering and strife in

the Mediterranean area which comes to us from the records of Ramses

III. at Medinet Habu. 'The isles were restless, disturbed among

themselves,' and it was one of the later waves of that storm which

broke itself against the armed strength of Egypt about 1200 B.C.

Probably the process of migration had been going on for several

generations. The rude but vigorous tribes of the North had been

pressing down upon the races which had created that remarkable

Bronze Age civilization of the Danubian area, whose relics have

been coming to light of late years; and these in their turn, under

the pressure from the North, had been moving down towards the

Mediterranean, driving before them the peoples, probably of kindred

stock to themselves, who had occupied the lands of the Mycenæan

civilization.

We know that long before the Homeric poems took shape the Achæans

had established themselves as the ruling caste in the Argolid,

in Laconia, and elsewhere; and that the pressure had begun even

while Mycenæ was at the height of its power is suggested by the

figures on one of the steles of the Circle-Graves, where a Mycenæan

chieftain in his chariot is pursuing an enemy whose leaf-shaped

sword shows that he was one of the Danubian race. The Mycenæan

was the victor in the first shock; but the steady pressure of the

tribes from the North was not to be permanently resisted, and the

end was the establishment of an alien race in power at Mycenæ. The

Mycenæan stele, where the chief of the ancient stock pursues his

Northern assailant, has its _motif_ reversed in the archaic Greek

stele discovered by Dr. Pernier at Gortyna, where a big Northerner

with round shield and greaves threatens a tiny Minoan or Mycenæan,

crouching behind his figure-of-eight shield. The two rude pictures

may be taken as typical of the beginning and the end of the process

which resulted in the establishment of the race of Agamemnon at

'Golden Mycenæ.' Pressed upon thus by the warlike Achæans, perhaps

already forced from their homes on the mainland, the Mycenæans

of Tiryns and Mycenæ were obliged to fare forth in search of new

dwelling-places. Not unnaturally the emigrants may have turned to

the land from which their civilization had originally sprung, in

the expectation that the Cretans would not refuse a welcome and a

home to men of their own stock. Seemingly they were disappointed in

their expectation. The Minoans, or, at least, the Minoan rulers, were

not prepared to admit peacefully the incursion of this new element

into their kingdom; and the wanderers, under the spur of desperate

need, took by force what was denied to them as suppliants. So, in

all probability, the glory of the Minoan Empire was destroyed by

the hands of its own children, the descendants of men whom Knossos

herself had sent forth to hold her mainland colonies.[*]

[Footnote *: _Cf_. Dr. Mackenzie, _Annual of the British School

at Athens_, vol. xiii., pp. 424, 425.]

In such circumstances there would be no sudden eclipse of the ancient

culture. Modified slightly, if at all, by the influx of what, after

all, was a kindred element, it would persist, as the evidence shows

it persisted, until it perished of natural decay. Even when the

Achæans, and, later still, the Dorians, followed in the wake of the

Mycenæan immigrants, though their advent brought, as we have seen,

important changes in customs and in art motives, the ancient native

culture remained the fundamental element of the newer civilization.

It has been pointed out by Mr. Hogarth that the Geometric vases

of the early Iron Age in Crete exhibit in their decoration merely

stylized Minoan motives, while 'the shields and other bronzes of the

Idæan Cave, the latest of which come down probably to the ninth

or even the eighth century, are artistic descendants of Minoan

masterpieces modified by some element of uncouthness which was

probably of Northern origin.'[*]

[Footnote *: _Fortnightly Review_, October, 1908, p. 602.]

Thus in slow decay, after the great catastrophe, passed away the

great civilization of the Minoan Empire. Not all of the tribes

which had owned the dominion of the House of Minos were content,

however, to remain as subjects to the mainland conquerors. The

destruction of the central power at Knossos must have involved, as

Dr. Evans has suggested,[*] the collapse of much of the commerce

on which the island of the Hundred Cities depended for the support

of its great population. Already in the reign of Amenhotep III.

of Egypt, that powerful monarch had been obliged to establish a

special coastguard service at the mouths of the Nile to protect his

trade-routes against the Lycian pirates. When the Minoan fleet was

no longer in being to police the Ægean, these and other piratical

races must have quickly driven the Cretan merchant marine from the

seas. The purple fisheries and the oil trade would dwindle and

die, and the population which had been supported by them would be

driven from a land which could no longer maintain it. The colonizing

movement which has left traces of Minoan culture in Anatolia, in

Palestine, in Sicily, and even in Spain, began, no doubt, at an

earlier period, when the Empire of the Sea-Kings was in its full

strength; but it probably received a considerable impulse at this

time of forced emigration. The sudden introduction of the same

culture into Cyprus at some period after 1400 B.C. has been referred

to conquest by men of the Ægean race, who may very well have been the

men of Knossos driven forth by the pressure of altered conditions

to find a new home for themselves.

[Footnote *: 'Scripta Minoa,' p. 59.]

The Mycenæan pottery found at Tell-el-Amarna shows that there was

still an opening in Egypt for the products of Ægean art at least as

late as the reign of Akhenaten; and it is more than probable that

in Egypt many of the _émigrés_ of the Minoan _débâcle_ found a home.

The art of the reign of Akhenaten is characterized by the somewhat

sudden outburst of a naturalistic style almost entirely foreign to

the Egyptian tradition; and, as Mr. Hall foresaw eleven years ago,

it has been suggested[*] that the naturalism of Tell-el-Amarna

owes some of its inspiration to the influence of the fugitives

who brought with them from Crete the traditions of the great art

of Knossos. Such a suggestion is no longer so improbable as it

seemed to be in 1901, when it was still a tenable theory that the

new development of Egyptian art was due to Mesopotamian influence,

and came from Mitanni with Queen Tyi, the wife of Amenhotep III.

Now that it is certain that Tyi was no Mitannian, but a native

Egyptian, that door is closed, and we must suppose either that

Egyptian art suddenly and spontaneously awakened to a new style of

vision and execution, from which, again, it as suddenly departed,

or else that some foreign influence was working strongly upon the

rigid Egyptian convention, modifying and vivifying it. If a foreign

influence, why not the influence of the Minoan _émigrés_, whose

art we at least know to have been capable of such an effect? Of

course, it is, after all, matter of surmise, and perhaps the chances

are rather in favour of the new art of Akhenaten's time having

been a genuinely native growth, influenced and inspired by the

new ideas with which the heretic King was seeking to leaven the

national life; but it is certainly far from unlikely that the break-up

of the Minoan Empire did influence the art of Egypt, and perhaps

that or other nations, in a manner something similar to, though on

a smaller scale than, that in which the capture of Constantinople

influenced the culture of Europe in the fifteenth century.

[Footnote *: R. M. Burrows, 'The Discoveries in Crete,' p. 96.]

We have already seen the evidence for the migration of Minoan tribes

of a later age in the assault of the Zakkaru and Pulosathu upon

Egypt 200 years after the fall of Knossos, and the establishment

of the latter tribe as an independent power upon the coast of

Palestine--events which may have been due to the advance of another

wave of Northern colonists upon the shores of Crete. One more glimpse

of the dying sea-power of the Cretan race, now itself disorganized

and predatory, is given us by the Golenischeff papyrus, which tells,

among other adventures of the unfortunate Wen-Amon, envoy of Her-hor,

the priest-King of Upper Egypt (_circa_ 1100 B.C.), how the Egyptian

ambassador was threatened with capture by eleven ships of Zakru

pirates, who put into Byblos when he was about to sail thence.

Whether these were genuine Minoans or not, it is impossible to

tell; their immediate connection was apparently with Dor, on the

coast of Palestine; but their name suggests the town of Zakro, in

Eastern Crete, and it is not unlikely that they belonged to the

same race as the Zakkaru of the time of Ramses III.

Thereafter the Egyptian records are silent as to the scattered

tribes of Crete, just as they had been silent since the rise of

the Nineteenth Dynasty as to the organized Empire of the Keftians.

The eleven shiploads of Zakru sea-robbers are the last degenerate

representatives of the great marine which, under the Kings of the

House of Minos, had once held the undisputed Empire of the Ægean.

The ring of Minos was destined to lie for long ages beneath the

waves before the descendants of Theseus brought it up again.

The Sea-Kings of Crete · 第 8 / 11 章