Reign of Pekah 759-739

Reign of Hoshea 730-721

Assassination of Pekah and succession

of Hoshea, mentioned by Tiglath-

pileser IV. .. 733 (or 732)[51]

Capture of Samaria by Sargon in

Hezekiah's Hezekiah's sixth year

(2 Kings xviii. 10) 721 722

Invasion of Judah by Sennacherib in

Hezekiah's fourteenth year (_ibid._

ver. 13) 713 701

Manifestly all the Biblical dates earlier than 733-732 B.C. are too

high, and must be considerably reduced: the two events, also, in

Hezekiah's reign--the fall of Samaria and the invasion of

Sennacherib--which the compiler of the book of Kings treats as separated

by an interval of _eight_ years, were separated in reality by an

interval of _twenty-one_ years.[52]

Much has been written on the chronology of the kings and many endeavours

have been made to readjust the Biblical figures so as to bring them into

consistency with themselves and at the same time into conformity with

the Assyrian dates. But, though the fact of there being errors in the

Biblical figures is patent, it is not equally clear at what points the

error lies, or how the available years ought to be redistributed between

the various reigns. It is in any case evident that the accession of Jehu

and Athaliah must be brought down from 884 to 842 B.C.; and this will

involve, naturally, a corresponding reduction of the dates of the

previous kings of both kingdoms, and of course, at the same time, of

those of Solomon, David and Saul. The difficulty is, however, greatest

in the 8th century. Here, in Judah, from the accession of Athaliah to

the accession of Ahaz, tradition gives 143 years, whereas, in fact,

there were but 106 years (842-736); and in Israel, from the death of

Menahem to the fall of Samaria, it gives 31 years, whereas from 738

(assuming that Menahem died in that year) to 722 there are actually only

16 years. The years assigned by tradition to the reigns in both kingdoms

in the middle part of the 8th century B.C. have thus to be materially

reduced. But in the following period, from the fall of Samaria in 722 to

the capture of Jerusalem by the Chaldaeans in 586, the Biblical dates,

so far as we can judge, are substantially correct. (See further the

table above.)

4. _From the Destruction of Jerusalem in 586 to the close of the Old

Testament History._--Here, though it is true that there are events in

the Biblical history which are not fully or unambiguously dated, there

is otherwise no difficulty. The lengths of the reigns of Nebuchadrezzar

and his successors on the throne of Babylon, and also, after the

conquest of Babylon, of Cyrus and the following Persian kings, are known

from the "Canon of Ptolemy," referred to above, the particulars in

which, for the earlier part of this period, are also confirmed by the

testimony of the monuments.

See, for further information on the subject, the article CHRONOLOGY,

and the same heading in the _Encyclopedia Biblica_, cols. 773-799,

with the literature referred to on col. 819 (especially the writings

of Noeldeke, Wellhausen, and Kamphausen there mentioned). (S. R. D.)

(B) NEW TESTAMENT.

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Bible" to "Bisectrix" Volume 3, Slice 7 · 第 22 / 78 题