SAML.

That Mark Twain should feel and privately report something of his

triumphs we need not wonder at. Certainly he was never one to give

himself airs, but to have the world's great literary center paying

court to him, who only ten years before had been penniless and

unknown, and who once had been a barefoot Tom Sawyer in Hannibal,

was quite startling. It is gratifying to find evidence of human

weakness in the following heart-to-heart letter to his publisher,

especially in view of the relating circumstances.

*****

To Elisha Bliss, in Hartford:

LONDON, Sept. 28, 1872.

FRIEND BLISS,--I have been received in a sort of tremendous way,

tonight, by the brains of London, assembled at the annual dinner of the

Sheriffs of London--mine being (between you and me) a name which was

received with a flattering outburst of spontaneous applause when the

long list of guests was called.

I might have perished on the spot but for the friendly support and

assistance of my excellent friend Sir John Bennett--and I want you

to paste the enclosed in a couple of the handsomest copies of the

“Innocents” and “Roughing It,” and send them to him. His address is

“Sir John Bennett,

Cheapside,

London.”

Yrs Truly

S. L. CLEMENS.

The “relating circumstances” were these: At the abovementioned

dinner there had been a roll-call of the distinguished guests

present, and each name had been duly applauded. Clemens, conversing

in a whisper with his neighbor, Sir John Bennett, did not give very

close attention to the names, applauding mechanically with the

others.

Finally, a name was read that brought out a vehement hand-clapping.

Mark Twain, not to be outdone in cordiality, joined vigorously, and

kept his hands going even after the others finished. Then,

remarking the general laughter, he whispered to Sir John: “Whose

name was that we were just applauding?”

“Mark Twain's.”

We may believe that the “friendly support” of Sir John Bennett was

welcome for the moment. But the incident could do him no harm; the

diners regarded it as one of his jokes, and enjoyed him all the more

for it.

He was ready to go home by November, but by no means had he had

enough of England. He really had some thought of returning there

permanently. In a letter to Mrs. Crane, at Quarry Farm, he wrote:

“If you and Theodore will come over in the Spring with Livy and me,

and spend the summer you will see a country that is so beautiful

that you will be obliged to believe in Fairyland..... and Theodore

can browse with me among dusty old dens that look now as they looked

five hundred years ago; and puzzle over books in the British Museum

that were made before Christ was born; and in the customs of their

public dinners, and the ceremonies of every official act, and the

dresses of a thousand dignitaries, trace the speech and manners of

all the centuries that have dragged their lagging decades over

England since the Heptarchy fell asunder. I would a good deal

rather live here if I could get the rest of you over.”

In a letter home, to his mother and sister, we get a further picture

of his enjoyment.

*****

To Mrs. Jane Clemens and Mrs. Moffett:

LONDON, Nov. 6, 1872.

MY DEAR MOTHER AND SISTER,--I have been so everlasting busy that I

couldn't write--and moreover I have been so unceasingly lazy that I

couldn't have written anyhow. I came here to take notes for a book, but

I haven't done much but attend dinners and make speeches. But have had a

jolly good time and I do hate to go away from these English folks; they

make a stranger feel entirely at home--and they laugh so easily that it

is a comfort to make after-dinner speeches here. I have made hundreds

of friends; and last night in the crush of the opening of the New

Guild-hall Library and Museum, I was surprised to meet a familiar face

every few steps. Nearly 4,000 people, of both sexes, came and went

during the evening, so I had a good opportunity to make a great many new

acquaintances.

Livy is willing to come here with me next April and stay several

months--so I am going home next Tuesday. I would sail on Saturday, but

that is the day of the Lord Mayor's annual grand state dinner, when they

say 900 of the great men of the city sit down to table, a great many of

them in their fine official and court paraphernalia, so I must not miss

it. However, I may yet change my mind and sail Saturday. I am looking

at a fine Magic lantern which will cost a deal of money, and if I buy

it Sammy may come and learn to make the gas and work the machinery,

and paint pictures for it on glass. I mean to give exhibitions for

charitable purposes in Hartford, and charge a dollar a head.

In a hurry,

Ys affly

SAM.

He sailed November 12th on the Batavia, arriving in New York two

weeks later. There had been a presidential election in his absence.

General Grant had defeated Horace Greeley, a result, in some measure

at least, attributed to the amusing and powerful pictures of the

cartoonist, Thomas Nast. Mark Twain admired Greeley's talents, but

he regarded him as poorly qualified for the nation's chief

executive. He wrote:

*****

To Th. Nast, in Morristown, N. J.:

HARTFORD, Nov. 1872.

Nast, you more than any other man have won a prodigious victory for

Grant--I mean, rather, for civilization and progress. Those pictures

were simply marvelous, and if any man in the land has a right to hold

his head up and be honestly proud of his share in this year's vast

events that man is unquestionably yourself. We all do sincerely honor

you, and are proud of you.

Mark Twain's Letters — Complete (1853-1910) · 第 82 / 341 题