OUR NEW YORK PAINTERS.

Sometime ago, when I indited a letter on the paintings of Cole, I partly

intended it to be the first of a series, which should include all those

of our painters who have established themselves as masters. Since then,

however, I have relinquished that idea. I am not _sufficiently_ well

acquainted with all these gentlemen, and the number of their

productions, to devote a separate paper to each, and have, therefore,

concluded briefly to embody my opinions concerning them in a single

letter. I propose to speak of those only who are identified with New

York, and who are now in the full tide of successful operation; and my

object will be merely to write what would correspond to a letter of

introduction. In my list, made without respect to persons, are the

following names; Durand, Huntington, Edmonds, Page, Mount, Doughty,

Wier, Inman, Ingham, Chapman, and Harvey.

_Durand._ If you are at all conversant with the history of art in this

country, you need not be told that this gentleman has long borne the

enviable reputation of being our best engraver of the human figure. It

is also a well-known fact, that he has executed some remarkable pictures

in the way of portraiture and fanciful history; but as he is now

devoting himself principally to landscape, I shall consider his merits

in this department alone.

His only imaginative landscapes, are a pair, allegorically portraying

the “Morning and Evening” of human life. In one, the monuments of art

and the works of nature are in their prime, and a halo of hope seems to

surround the brow of every living creature, young men and maidens, and

dancing children. In the other, the same monuments and the same nature

are falling to decay, and most of earth’s children are trembling under

the weary load of life. And here, on a fallen column, is seated an old

man leaning upon his staff, and listening, as it were, to a song of

memory, as it recalls the unnumbered joys of other days. A saddening

subject, in reality, is here portrayed, but how has the genius of the

painter endowed it with a spirit of immortality! To the thoughtful mind,

it possesses a world of eloquence, and touches the heart with the thrill

of poetry. Considered as a maiden effort in the most exalted branch of

landscape painting, it affords abundant reason to believe that Mr.

Durand would accomplish great things in this department, if he would but

persevere. The only fault I can find with it, is this—in the idea of its

design, and in some parts of its execution, it bears too close a

resemblance to the Departure and Return, or the Past and Present, of

Thomas Cole.

The majority of Mr. Durand’s landscapes I should designate as actual

views and fanciful pictures; and here, I think, he is without a

superior. In the choice of subjects, he always displays an exquisite

taste; and as he paints with great care, and finishes highly, there is

an indescribable summer-day charm about his pictures which is peculiarly

their own. The three most difficult things in nature for an artist to

delineate, are trees, atmospheres, and figures; but all these have been

thoroughly mastered by Mr. Durand. His trees are strongly

characteristic, and his figures numerous, happily introduced, and

accurately drawn. Of his views, I mostly admire “Lake Geneva,”

“Shakspeare’s Church,” two “Views in Switzerland,” “Island of Capri,”

“Deserted Road-side,” “Farm Yard on the Hudson,” “Oak Tree with horses

under it,” and a “View on the Rhine.” Each one of these is a perfect

gem, a beautiful and poetical reproduction of the original scene. But

the most unique and superb of all his paintings, is a fanciful picture

of a large size, exhibiting an extensive lake in a wilderness. The sun

is on the verge of the horizon, the sky is studded with an array of most

gorgeous clouds, and the surface of the lake is quivering under the

pinions of an evening breeze. In one corner of the foreground is a

cluster of luxuriant trees, encircled with grape-vines, and in the

other, an admirable rock, on which is standing a solitary heron, the

only living creature in the whole scene. The great triumph of this

picture is in the water—the gold-tipt waves.

The last time I saw Mr. Durand, he was finishing some studies of

chestnut trees in blossom, which stand on the margin of Esopus Creek.

They are wonderfully true to nature, and will enhance his reputation,

even if he should not paint anything more during the coming summer. But

I hope that he may not only live to do this, but to paint a dozen

summers more, and a dozen pictures in each summer; for he is a great

artist, and an honor to his native country.

_Huntington._ Although this gentleman is under thirty years of age, he

has produced many admirable pictures, which place him on a level with

the most gifted artists of any country. He commenced his career by

painting landscapes, many of which were wood-scenes and waterfalls on

the Rondout. They are remarkable for their rich coloring, and dashing

style of execution. But it is as a portrait and historical painter that

he is most celebrated. In both these departments his power is wonderful.

Eight years ago he was a pupil of Mr. Morse, but now is an acknowledged

master, and the pride of his profession. He uses the most glowing

colors, and yet there is a perfect harmony in all he paints; he handles

the pencil in a fine off-hand style, and yet his flesh possesses the

softness of the reality; he can take the most ordinary head, and by his

arrangement and his faculty of exalting his subject, make an interesting

picture, while at the same time it will be a speaking likeness. Of his

portraits, the most superb are those of his father, an uncle and aunt,

“The Venetian Girl,” the “Roman Girl,” and “Shepherd Boy of the

Campagna.” The last of these, which we think is equal to Murillo’s

“Beggar Boy,” was painted in the incredible short period of four hours.

If this fact and this picture do not prove Huntington to be a wonderful

genius, we do not know what could do so. But even all the pictures just

mentioned are eclipsed by his two historical ones, taken from the

Pilgrim’s Progress, viz.: “Mercy’s Dream,” and “Christiana and Family

passing through the Valley of the Shadow of Death.” In the first, Mercy

is in a reclining position, resting on one arm, with her face raised

heavenward, while the angel hovering above her is on the point of

placing the crown upon her head. In her position there may be something

a little unnatural, and the expression of the angel may be somewhat too

earthly; but where, in the whole range of art, is there anything more

beautifully designed, more accurately drawn, or more richly colored? In

the other picture, Christiana and her family are represented on a rock

overlooking a valley of flame. At first we are startled by a feeling of

terror, but when the eye falls upon the principal figure, her upraised

countenance beaming with holy confidence and hope, the first impulse

vanishes, and the heart throbs with peaceful joy. The soul depicted in

that countenance, its conception and execution, is a triumph of art

which we believe can never be surpassed. But the interest does not stop

here. What a world of poetry has the painter portrayed in the eldest son

attempting to shield the loved ones from the impending danger, and in

the youngest child cleaving to its mother for protection! All, in fact,

look to Christiana for safety, while she, with the meekness of

childhood, looks calmly up to the Almighty. I should rather be the

author of that painting than of any others of superior merit. Oh, it is

a blessed thing to see genius consecrating its powers to the promotion

of His glory, from whom all genius flows! Huntington possesses both

great and good qualities, and we trust that his sojourn in Europe will

not be prolonged beyond an extensive tour.

_Edmonds._ This gentleman, who occupies the responsible station of

cashier in a bank, is considered one of the ablest financiers in New

York, while, at the same time, he enjoys a remarkable reputation as an

artist. His paintings are comparatively few, owing to his peculiar

situation, and to the correct notion which he entertains, that a work of

art should not be exhibited to the public until its author has done his

best to make it perfect. His style of coloring is warm and glowing, and

his drawing exceedingly accurate. As a designer, he is more particular

than our artists generally; and very few, I think, understand the

principles of composition so well. He is a man of quite extensive

reading, and of expansive mind, and his pictures are an index to the

humor which it contains. They are of a comical character, and never fail

to tell their story at a single glance. They are always intended to make

you laugh, and are, therefore, agreeable helpers on to a long life; and

sometimes possess an undercurrent of poetry or philosophy, which makes

them voiceless preachers to the thinking man. His best pictures are the

“Newspaper Boy,” “The Country and City Beaux,” “Sparking,” “The Bashful

Cousin,” “Italian Mendicants,” “The Epicure,” and “Stealing Milk.” The

first represents a large room thronged with men, women, and children,

into the midst of whom a ragged boy has entered to sell his Sunday

morning papers. In the second we have a charming country lady and her

accepted lover, suddenly surprised by the appearance of a city dandy;

and while the latter is nettled by the appearance of things, the former,

who is rocking himself in an arm-chair, very coolly puffs the smoke of

his cigar into the face of his disappointed rival. In the next, a

country damsel is peeling apples before a large blazing fire, while a

hearty fellow is talking to her, “solemnly and slow,” about his heart

and other kindred matters. In the next, a bashful young fellow is taking

leave of his friends, who urge him to sit down to tea, which is now

ready. The next is a blind old man, led by a little girl, asking alms in

the streets of Rome. In the Epicure, we have a butcher displaying his

nice things to an old gentleman, almost eaten up in health by rich

living. In the last, we have a school-boy in his mother’s pantry,

swallowing large quantities of rich cream, who is discovered by his

“anxious Ma” in the very act. All things considered, I think Mr. Edmonds

one of the most remarkable men of the age, and hope that he may live to

make many more additions to the genius-stamped treasures of American

art.

_Page._ Here we come to another honored artist, but one who has been

greatly over-rated; not a man of genius, but one of rare, of

extraordinary talent. As a mere portrait painter or map-taker, he is

without a rival, I believe, in any country. The man who sits to him for

a likeness, must expect to have every hair on his face delineated to

perfection, but must not expect to have himself exalted or

intellectualized. This is a thing which Page has never done, and can

never do, and consequently he will never excel as an historical painter.

I am warranted in making this assertion by looking at his past efforts

in this department? What admirable execution has he squandered on his

picture of “The Whistle,” his “Prison Scene,” and lately in his “Ecce

Homo.” In coloring and drawing, these pictures cannot be surpassed; but

how very inferior are they in conception, and especially the last!

Surely, the Saviour of the world could never have borne so _physical_ a

countenance as Page has here conceived! It is understood, that he is

engaged on a large picture, to be called “Jephtha’s Daughter.” I

sincerely _hope_ that he may triumph there, but I cannot but doubt.

Parts of it I know will be astonishingly fine, but, as a whole, it will

be a failure. I have been thus free in my remarks concerning this

artist, because he is lauded as a great _genius_, which I am not willing

to acknowledge, although I admire him as a portrait painter. His style

of coloring is not easily described, for it varies with every one of his

subjects, now pale as death or red as a cherry, and now blue as sapphire

or green as an emerald. If I desired my children to behold their very Pa

long after he is in the grave, I would rather have Page paint me than

any other man. His greatest portraits are those of Mrs. Ridner, a single

head and with a child, of Lowell the poet, of Mr. Leup, and of himself.

_Mount._ Three cheers for the laughter-loving and incomparable genius of

Stony Brook, whom I know to be a first-rate fisherman, and a most

pathetic player on the violin. Here is a man who stands alone in the art

of painting, for, in everything he does, he is entirely original. His

productions are stamped with an entirely American character, and so

comically conceived, that they always cause the beholder to smile,

whatever may be his troubles. His coloring is what we call cold, but

remarkable for its fidelity; and his power and knowledge of drawing are

superior to those of any other man in the country. Unlike Mr. Edmonds,

he pays but little attention to designing by rule, but in expression, he

always lays himself out, and I know not that he has ever failed, in a

single instance, to delineate the character he aimed at. He is peculiar

in the habit of tasking his own mind for his subjects, so that you never

see him illustrating the pages of any writer, historian, poet or wit.

And this is a feature I greatly admire. The man who cannot conceive and

execute a picture on his own hook entirely, is nothing but a copyist,

whatever may be his knowledge of the art. Thinking and strictly original

painters, are the only ones that exert a lasting and salutary influence

on the pictorial genius of their country, and Mr. Mount, I am glad to

know, is emphatically one of these. But let me glance at those pictures

which I believe warrant the foregoing opinions. Their general character

may be imagined by their titles, which are as follows: “Cider Making,”

“The Raffle,” “Tough Yarn,” “Fortune Telling,” “Bargaining for a Horse,”

“Gamesters Surprised,” “Winding Up,” “Ringing a Hog,” “Artist showing

his Work,” “The last Clam,” “Hoeing Corn,” “Husking Corn,” “Rustic

Dance,” and “Rabbit Catching.” In the first, we have a Long Island cider

mill, with all the laughable appurtenances thereof. In the next, a

company of loafers in a country bar-room are raffling for a goose,

illustrating the proverb, that “birds of a feather flock together.” The

next picture, a lame old “covey” telling a story to two impatient

gentlemen, which has been illustrated by an admirable story from the pen

of Seba Smith, Esq. In the next, a couple of farmers, in a barn-yard,

are discussing the merits of a “slick looking” horse hitched to a fence,

one of them rolling a stone with his foot, and the other whittling a

stick. In the next, we have some truant boys, who have stolen into a

barn to play “heads or tails,” who are discovered by the farmer; and

while he approaches cautiously, with a long stick in his hand and

vengeance in his eye, one of the boys is frightened by the approaching

step, but another is so absorbed in the game, that a nameless portion of

his body is about to sting under the chastising stroke. The next

exhibits a gentleman lover holding a skein of yarn for a buxom country

damsel. The next, is a _painted_ “concord of _sharp_ sounds.” In the

next, an artist is showing a country farmer a picture, which causes him

great delight. The next, portrays the garret of a disappointed bachelor,

seated before a fireless fireplace, and mourning over the departure of a

few clams, the shells of which are on the hearth at his feet. The four

remaining pictures are described in their titles. The man who could

paint such a variety of subjects, ought assuredly to be a good portrait

painter; and Mr. Mount is such. His portraits are only occasionally

executed, and for particular friends, and the former only when the

spirit moves him, for he is a creature of impulse. And besides, his

health has ever been of a delicate nature, which will not suffer him to

“bone” down to labor. This fact, I presume, will be a satisfactory

answer to those who are continually inquiring, “Why don’t Mount paint

more?” The pictures he has produced, admirable and numerous as they are,

are but as the bud to the fruit, when we consider his great capacity. I

hope that it may be his fortune to enjoy a long and happy life, and that

he may make many more additions to American art.

_Doughty._ This gentleman has long been a favorite landscape painter

with the public, and has executed many exceedingly beautiful pictures,

principally of a fanciful character. In number they are too great, which

is his misfortune and not his fault. He has been obliged to paint at a

cheap price, or the public would have let him starve to death, as they

would any other artist, or a man of refined and exalted taste. And

having painted so much, it is not to be wondered at that many of his

productions should have been too hastily done, and that there should be

a sameness in his subjects. Finishing, as he generally does, with great

care, it always gratifies the eye to behold his pictures; but it is

obvious that he has never painted much from nature, for there is a

monotony in his touch, which cannot escape the criticism of the

attentive student of foliage. There are some, however, and very

important features too, in landscape painting, which are completely

mastered by Mr. Doughty, and in which he is without a rival, either in

Cole, Durand, or Huntington. His skies and water are the most true and

beautiful that we have ever seen. A carefully painted waterfall by

Doughty, is a picture of rare excellence and great value. His

atmospheres, too, are sometimes most exquisitely conceived and executed.

Good figures are the principal things wanting in his paintings to make

some of them nearly perfect, and his inability to paint them is

undoubtedly another reason for the sameness of his subjects. When a man

paints without a story or a moral in view, it is difficult to designate

his pictures; but our favorites among those of Mr. Doughty, are a large

“upright” with waterfall, an autumn scene, owned in Boston, another sold

to the Apollo Association, and a scene on Lake George.

_Wier._ This gentleman is the accomplished teacher of drawing at the

Academy of West Point. The majority of his productions, which are

numerous, give evidence of his possessing extensive literary

acquirements, a refined mind, and brilliant imagination. He is the

author of a number of pleasing landscapes, the best of which, “Constable

Bourbon’s March to Rome,” has been illustrated by the pen of Gulian C.

Verplanck. The amusing pictures, called the “Boat Club,” and “St.

Nicholas,” have proven, that if he would attempt it, he might excel in

that department of the art occupied by Mount and Edmonds. But it is as

an historical painter, that his name will live, and is now mostly

celebrated. His drawing is remarkably correct, his coloring rich, and

his style of execution highly finished. Another qualification belonging

to his works, and one which makes us love the man, is, that they are

purely American. Who that has seen it, can ever forget his full-length

portrait of “Red Jacket,” the warrior and orator of the Senecas? Aside

from the noble subject, it is unquestionably the most faithful and

competent delineation of Indian character to be found; and who that has

ever seen the “Indian Captives,” by the same hand, has not mourned over

the fate of the much wronged Aborigines of our land, even as “brave men

mourn the brave?” In this painting, we have an Indian and his squaw, in

prison, and an English soldier warning them of their impending fate.

Although it is an intensely interesting scene, yet the painter has not

availed himself of a single “face divine,” which I fancy to be a

beautifully poetic idea, and could not be carried out but by a man of

genius. Mr. Wier is one of the four artists appointed by the General

Government to execute four paintings for the Rotunda at Washington. The

subject of his, is the “Departure of the Pilgrims from Leyden;” but as I

have not yet seen it, I am unable to express an opinion as to its

merits.

_Inman._ The reputation of this gentleman as a portrait painter is very

extensive, and he has ever commanded a higher price than any other in

New York. His productions are very numerous, and there is not a single

branch of the art in which he has not made some successful attempts. His

coloring is rich and life-like, his style of execution exceedingly bold

and free. Painting as he does with great rapidity, we find that his

drawing is seldom as correct as it should be. He manifests a refined and

exalted taste in the arrangements of his portraits, and generally in his

miscellaneous designs. But, after all, he has painted some poor

pictures, and this is an evidence of the fact, that he is a man of

uncommon genius, and not talent. There is a wonderful spirit in his

heads, and unlike his rival, Page, he portrays the mind, which, after

all, is a greater triumph of art, and far more important in a portrait,

than the mere shell of humanity, as delineated by Page. His full-length

portrait of Macready, as William Tell, is a masterly performance, well

conceived, well colored, and well drawn; and among his miscellaneous

pictures, the most remarkable, are—“Rip Van Winkle,” “Bride of

Lammermoor,” “Mumble the Peg,” and “News-Boy;” all of them possessing

many peculiar beauties, with some glaring faults. Of his plain

portraits, I would mention only two as good specimens of his skill in

general, namely, those of Nicholas Biddle and Bishop White. I do not

deem it within the power of any man to go beyond these in portraying the

body of man and the soul within. Mr. Inman is also one of those artists

honored by a commission from the Government for a 10,000 dollar

painting. I understand that he is very far behind-hand in his great

undertaking. I know, however, that he has met with some sad misfortune,

which may be the cause; but I trust that he will soon be at work, and

may accomplish a national work worthy of his ability and his fame.

_Ingham._ This gentleman is one of the most celebrated and unique of all

our portrait painters. His style is emphatically his own, and may be

designated as that of exquisite finishing. You can never discern the

traces of his pencil, and the reason is, he produces his effect by

successive glazing. His pictures are distinguished for their

transparency, richness of color, and harmony; and being a man of

sentiment and delicate feeling, he is the universal favorite among the

ladies, and probably the most faultless painter in this country of those

charming but incomprehensible creations of Heaven. His best productions

are the portraits of “Miss McNevin,” “Mr. Dunlap,” “Dr. Channing,” and

the “White Plume;” and as genuine works of art, are inferior to nothing

in the whole range of that department. That of Dr. Channing, is one of

the best specimens of soul painting that I have ever seen, and any one

familiar only with the writings of the great original, could not fail to

select this portrait as his, from the midst of a hundred of other men,

so full is it of expression, and so perfect and exalted is the effect of

the painter. Ingham is a man of genius as well as talent, a friend to

young artists, and an honor to American art.

_Chapman._ All hail to this poetical and ready artist, and accomplished

gentleman, who has executed first-rate pictures in almost every

department of painting! His coloring is rather gaudy and paint-like, but

his drawing, when he takes pains, is correct and vigorous. His knowledge

of design is profound, and his conception of a picture is quick, and

always in admirable taste. He has been a devoted student of the old

masters, and copied more celebrated paintings than any other American.

Having been an extensive traveller throughout the United States, and

ever being on the lookout for valuable subjects to paint, and a lover of

historical lore, he has collected a large quantity of valuable

materials, the whole of which I hope he may live to embody in national

paintings. It was he who received the commission from Government to

paint the third picture (Vanderlyn is at work on the fourth) for the

Rotunda at Washington, and he has manfully fulfilled his obligation in

the execution of the “Baptism of Pocahontas.” Some of his other

prominent pictures, are “Hagar and Ishmael fainting in the wilderness,”

full length portrait of “David Crocket,” “Beppo,” “The First Ship,” a

large historical landscape representing “The Retreat from Fort

Necessity,” and a full length of “Washington in his youth.” These,

however, are but a small portion of what he has done, for he is one of

the most industrious men living. He is also a complete master of

sketching, and as he has a historical mind, his efforts of this kind are

very beautiful and very numerous. He is without a rival in this

lucrative branch of art, and for the past two years has mostly been

devoted to it, and is consequently a favorite among booksellers. He is a

lover of the “poor Indian,” and has done much toward perpetuating their

personal and national characteristics. Among the many things which now

occupy his time, is an American Drawing Book, which is what we very much

need in this country, and his I know will be a superb and valuable one

in every point of view.

_Harvey._ This gentleman is a landscape painter of rare merit; but many

of his pictures, unfortunately for us, are owned in England. His

principal work, and one which places him in a very high rank, is Forty

Atmospheric Views in the United States, executed in watercolors, and in

a style of uncommon beauty. He is a good draftsman, and possesses a

remarkable eye for color, and everything from his pencil teems with

sentiment and poetry. His contemplated work of “American Scenery,” when

published after his own expensive plan, will be an invaluable

acquisition to our treasury of art, and I hope that it may be received

by the public with the favor it so richly deserves.

Such is the array of painters, of which the emporium of America may well

be proud. Fame must ever attend their names, as surely as it is

attending those of West, Copley, Stuart, Allston, Jarvis, Trumbull, and

Malbone, among the dead; and Sully, King, Harding, Fisher, Neagle,

Morse, Vanderlyn, and Audubon, among the living of other

cities;—altogether making a company which would reflect honor on any

nation in the world.

Letters from a Landscape Painter · 第 19 / 20 题