Mr. O’CONNELL I think my explanation of that was that if I sat

in a Communist Party meeting or what she considered to be a Communist

Party meeting where all present were Communists, I had no knowledge

that they were Communists or it was a Communist Party meeting. Since I

read the testimony yesterday, I tried to recall all the meetings out

there where there would be a possibility she was present. I just cannot

recall the occasions I saw Barbara Hartle out there--usually on the

street or something of that kind--and I cannot recall any meeting that

she sat in that I was in. I just cannot remember any single meeting

that she sat in there where at least I knew she was there. She might

have been in another room or some other place, but she was not visible

to me anywhere.

Mr. TAVENNER. Were you a member of the Communist Party during

the period of time you were in the State of Washington?

Mr. O’CONNELL. I was not.

Mr. TAVENNER. Were you at any time while in the State of

Washington, that is, between 1944 and 1949, affiliated in any way with

the Communist Party?

Mr. O’CONNELL. I was not.

Mr. TAVENNER. Were you at any time a member of the Communist

Party?

Mr. O’CONNELL. I am not now and I have never been a member of

the Communist Party.

Mr. TAVENNER. You stated a desire to explain the testimony of

Mr. Louis Budenz given at the Canwell hearings.

Mr. O’CONNELL. Yes. At the Canwell hearings, Mr. Budenz--I

think to save time, and I want to save time, Mr. Budenz testified

that--I think the substance of his testimony was that he did not know

whether or not I was a Communist, very much like Mrs. Hartle does. I

think it is significant that she was the second top Communist in the

State of Washington; and yet if I were the leading Communist that she

says I was out there, she still is not sure whether I was or not. I

think that is quite significant.

Likewise with Budenz. He was not sure whether I was Communist, but he

had heard some discussion about me in the Communist Party headquarters

in New York. As far as he knew, in meetings that he had heard, I was

supposed to be all right and I was a person they could get along with.

He made many statements of that kind. Then he went into the statement

about the assassination of Leon Trotsky, which to the press in the

State of Washington, left the impression that particularly somehow

or other I was involved. So I sued Mr. Budenz in a civil suit in the

Superior Court of King County the very next day.

Mr. WILLIS. In New York?

Mr. O’CONNELL. No; in the State of Washington--Seattle, Wash.

I sued him for libel for the statements that he made about me. I fixed

the sum of damages at $1,500,000. He was served with subpena, legally

served with a summons, rather, in that suit, and through his attorneys

defended the suit by taking advantage of his immunity as a legislative

witness before the State legislative committee. He did not defend it.

Mr. WILLIS. What do you mean, he did not defend it?

Mr. O’CONNELL. I mean instead of letting the thing come to

trial, instead of letting the issue come to trial on facts, to be

tried on the facts, and so on, he and his attorneys hid behind his

legislative immunity that he was in the State of Washington by virtue

of a subpena to appear before the legislative committee of the State of

Washington and under the laws of the State could not be legally served

with a summons and sued in the State. The case was dismissed on that

ground.

Mr. TAVENNER. Was this the testimony to which you referred:

I will ask you, Professor, Do you know a former Congressman from

Montana by the name of Jerry O’Connell?

Mr. BUDENZ. Yes, sir.

Question. Do you know whether or not Mr. O’Connell was a member of

the Communist Party?

Mr. BUDENZ. Not that specific. I know that he was one

whom the party felt it must take care of because of his agreement

constantly with the party line. This came up in the case of

Congressman John T. Bernard, of Minnesota, and Congressman

O’Connell. The discussion came up in the national headquarters

of the Communist Party in the committee headed by William Winant

about how to take care of these Congressmen because they agreed

with the party line. And it was agreed that Bernard and O’Connell

both would get jobs with the International Workers Order, this

Communist-controlled front to which I have referred.

Now, it is my impression that--well, I know that Bernard got

it, and it is my impression that Mr. O’Connell temporarily also

received that cynosure through the cooperation of the party. I

heard the discussion in the party circles first, and later on I

heard that it was to be accomplished.

That is the testimony to which you refer?

Mr. O’CONNELL. That is the testimony to which I refer.

Mr. TAVENNER. You were employed by the International Workers

Order, were you not?

Mr. O’CONNELL. In order not to prolong it--Congressman Willis

did not hear this, but yesterday I testified about my connections with

the International Workers Order. The original contact, as I remember,

was made by Peter Shipka to advise the local Serbs and Croats which

existed in the city of Butte. It was, as I remember, during a period

when I think Hitler had already invaded Yugoslavia and it was a

question of whether they were supporting Milhailovich or Pavlich. There

was a lot of dissension going on between the Serbs and Croats. I was

asked to go down and advise with them and help with them. Many of them

I knew because of my political candidacies for legislature and for the

railroad and public service commission and for Congress there.

Mr. TAVENNER. That is all in the record.

Mr. O’CONNELL. Yes. Then I was sent on a specific job to do

with reference to these coal miners at Steamboat Springs who were

applying for citizenship and were members of the International Workers

Order.

Mr. TAVENNER. You were employed to go on speaking tours over

the country for which you were paid $200 a month and your expenses?

Mr. O’CONNELL. I made only one speaking tour on the plan for

plenty. The plan for plenty we had was an improved social security,

called for improvement of the social security system as it existed at

that time. I made some speeches. You asked me what I got, how much

compensation I had received. I said in my opinion it would average

about $200 a month.

Mr. TAVENNER. And your expenses?

Mr. O’CONNELL. And my expenses, yes. I knew nothing about Mr.

Budenz’ discussion with the Communist Party headquarters or anything. I

got a call from Mr. Shipka. I am sure it was Mr. Shipka, the treasurer

of the organization, who asked me first to do these two specific jobs

which I did within a short time. Then later he called me to make these

speeches on a plan for plenty.

Mr. TAVENNER. Now I have before me an excerpt from the May 29,

1941, issue of Montana Labor News. The title is, “IWO Names O’Connell

Rocky Mountain Director.” It is datelined New York, May 10. I will read

it:

“Former Representative Jerry J. O’Connell, labor’s fighting

Congressman from Montana, has been appointed regional director for

the International Workers Order in the Rocky Mountain area, Herbert

Benjamin, executive secretary of that organization, announced

today. Mr. O’Connell will be able to continue his effort on behalf

of the labor movement on a much broader scale in his new post,”

Herbert Benjamin declared, “since the IWO is labor’s foremost

and largest fraternal benefit society. Our national membership

of 155,000 supports the trade-union movement and its individual

members on many fronts; providing insurance, sickness, and accident

benefits at low rates, a rounded program of club and fraternal

social life, plus a nationwide campaign for improving living

standards, and social security embodied in our plan for plenty.”

Mr. O’CONNELL. That is the first I knew--nobody told me that

I was to be regional director of the IWO. As far as I can remember, as

far as their clubs were concerned out in the Rocky Mountain area, they

had one in Butte, which was the only one they had in the whole State

of Montana. I think they had one down in this town called Steamboat

Springs, Col. Those were the only two clubs that I know of in the

Rocky Mountain area. There were certainly no--at least on my part,

there was no idea I was to be regional director, because the first 2

assignments that I got were first to go down to advise this club in

Butte and the other to go down to this Steamboat Springs, in Colorado,

and clear up the question that the judge and the examiner were raising

there. The judge at the time thought that the IWO and the IWW were one

and the same. I brought Mr. Charles Cunningham, I think his name was,

commissioner of insurance of the State of Colorado, to the judge to

point out that the IWO was a fraternal benefit organization.

Mr. TAVENNER. You have explained all that in exactly the same

detail.

Mr. O’CONNELL. Yes, but the concept that I was a regional

director----

Mr. WILLIS. I am not so sure I followed you on the reason for

the dismissal of the suit you filed.

Mr. O’CONNELL. I did not dismiss the suit.

Mr. WILLIS. I do not think I caught the point. Was it a

jurisdictional question? Specifically, what was it?

Mr. O’CONNELL. It was a motion to quash. Actually, it arose on

the motion to quash the service of the summons.

Mr. WILLIS. On what grounds?

Mr. O’CONNELL. On the grounds that Mr. Budenz had immunity as

a legislative witness before the State legislative committee that he

was appearing before in the State of Washington.

Mr. WILLIS. He was not from Washington--not a resident of the

State of Washington?

Mr. O’CONNELL. No; he was a resident of New York.

Mr. WILLIS. You filed suit against him in Washington at a time

while he happened to be there?

Mr. O’CONNELL. While he happened to be there.

Mr. WILLIS. But he was there on State legislative business?

Mr. O’CONNELL. Yes.

Mr. WILLIS. And therefore was immune from service, and that

was the basis for his motion to quash?

Mr. O’CONNELL. We served the summons on him. My desire was to

get a test and a trial on the factual merits.

Mr. WILLIS. Was it filed in the State or Federal court?

Mr. O’CONNELL. In the superior court of King County.

Mr. WILLIS. His motion to quash was based on the fact he

was served with the papers while he happened to be in the State of

Washington on State legislative business and therefore was not subject

to service process?

Mr. O’CONNELL. Yes.

Mr. WILLIS. And his motion came up before the court and the

court dismissed the action?

Mr. O’CONNELL. Yes.

Mr. WILLIS. Did you sue him elsewhere?

Mr. O’CONNELL. And I did not pursue it elsewhere.

Mr. WILLIS. You did not file suit elsewhere against him?

Mr. O’CONNELL. By the time that was done he was gone.

Mr. WILLIS. I am not talking about that. You could have sued

him. Anybody is subject to suit somewhere, and his domicile is the real

place. I say did you not pursue him, upon dismissal of the suit in

Washington and file another suit elsewhere?

Mr. O’CONNELL. You mean go to New York and file a suit against

him?

Mr. WILLIS. Yes.

Mr. O’CONNELL. No; certainly not.

Mr. WILLIS. Or in the Federal court or in any court?

Mr. O’CONNELL. Well, I would have to go to New York. If he was

a resident of New York, I would have to go to New York in order to get

service; but I had him out in the State of Washington where I did get

service on him.

Mr. TAVENNER. I desire to offer the photostatic copy of the

news article from the Montana Labor News and ask that it be marked as

“O’Connell Exhibit No. 7” for identification purposes only, and to be

made a part of the committee files.

Mr. WILLIS. It is so ordered.

Mr. TAVENNER. I would like the record to show at this point

that the International Workers Order was cited as subversive and

Communist by Attorney General Tom Clark on December 4, 1947, and again

on September 21, 1948, and that it was cited by Attorney General

Francis Biddle on September 24, 1942, as one of the strongest Communist

organizations. It has also been cited by other committees, including

this committee.

Were you acquainted with its secretary, Herbert Benjamin?

Mr. O’CONNELL. I knew Herbert Benjamin. I am pretty sure he is

the same Herbert Benjamin who was an officer in the Workers Alliance

during WPA days, when I was in Congress. But I have actually had no

contact with Benjamin in the IWO. In fact, this is the first I knew

he had any connection with the IWO. But I knew him; I am sure he was

lobbying here on the Hill with a man by the name of David Lasser while

I was in Congress. I think he was with the Workers Alliance.

Mr. TAVENNER. Were you acquainted with Louis Budenz prior to

the time he appeared as a witness at the Canwell hearings in the State

of Washington?

Mr. O’CONNELL. No, I was not acquainted with him. Shortly

before he left the Communist Party he wrote me a letter asking me to

write a series of articles for the Daily Worker about Senator Wheeler,

which I refused, which I rejected. That is the only contact I ever had.

I never met Budenz, never saw him or anything, until he was out in the

State of Washington.

Mr. VELDE. Did he want you to write articles favorable to

Senator Wheeler?

Mr. O’CONNELL. No, he wanted me to write anti-Wheeler

articles. Senator Wheeler and I became tangled politically out there.

I was going to run against Senator Wheeler for the Senate in 1940, and

Senator Wheeler of course took care of me in 1938. So I did not get to

run. I mean the fight, there were people who were anxious to defeat

Wheeler from 1940 on down until he was actually defeated in 1946.

He wrote that letter to me, I would say, just shortly before he left

the Communist Party.

Mr. WILLIS. Those articles were to appear in the Daily Worker?

Mr. O’CONNELL. In the Daily Worker; yes.

Mr. WILLIS. Would an unfavorable article appearing in the

Daily Worker be harmful to one’s political life in those days in

Montana?

Mr. O’CONNELL. No, I mean----

Mr. WILLIS. You did not want to inject yourself in it?

Mr. O’CONNELL. I did not want to write the articles, that is

all.

Mr. WILLIS. I would say the best compliment to me in my

district would be for the Daily Worker to say that I was a rotter.

Mr. O’CONNELL. Well, I think that would be true today. You

would be surprised if you went out to the State of Montana and went

into some of the mining camps and taverns and what not. For instance,

we have a character in Butte by the name of Paddy King. Paddy sells the

Daily Worker. He has silicosis. He is a real character around there. He

goes all around the town. Everybody buys the Daily Worker from Paddy.

They do not think much of it. Some of them read it, some of them throw

it away, and so on.

Mr. VELDE. Do you still read it?

Mr. O’CONNELL. No; I do not. Of course, I do not live in Butte

any longer. I actually do not think I have seen the Daily Worker since

they used to be delivered to our doors here in Washington.

Mr. TAVENNER. Were you acquainted with Alexander Bittelman?

Mr. O’CONNELL. No. Who is he?

Mr. TAVENNER. Alexander Bittelman has been identified in

testimony as a functionary of the Communist Party in the city of New

York.

Mr. O’CONNELL. I do not know any Alexander Bittelman.

Mr. TAVENNER. Mr. Chairman, I have no further questions.

Mr. VELDE. I have no questions to ask the witness. It is

apparent from his testimony, that Mr. O’Connell has a great deal of

knowledge about Communist Party activities which he has refused to give

this committee. That does not disturb me as much as the fact that it

appears that he is still ideologically favorable to the Communist Party

of the United States. It is very regrettable, but apparently every

person, including those favorable to the Communist Party, has a right

to express his opinion in this country. I want to say this: I hope that

Mr. O’Connell will think this matter over in the future and give us the

benefit of the knowledge that he possesses about the activities of the

Communist Party in the United States.

Mr. O’CONNELL. Congressman, I have done my very best. I have

talked to you. I do not want to argue. I do say that I appreciate

all the consideration which the committee has given me, particularly

on the two instances when I asked for continuations because of my

illness. I appreciate the fairness with which the committee has treated

me throughout the hearings. I just want to say that, as far as I

am concerned--that is, the best way I can describe it honestly and

sincerely, is that from my environment, from the poverty since my birth

and the things that happened to me as a child and as a young man, and

so on, I grew up in a very, very liberal tradition where people were

certainly tolerant of all the various shades and hues of political

opinion as we saw them. I think I could best describe myself, I am just

an old-fashioned American liberal. I want to assure you that I have had

no training----

Mr. TAVENNER. I do not want to prolong the discussion. At the

beginning of the hearing you mentioned the fact that you had passed

the bar in Montana, and that you are now a practicing lawyer, and you

intended to forget about any type of political activity. I just wonder

whether you consider the Communist Party activity as being political.

Mr. O’CONNELL. I think you asked me that question before.

Mr. TAVENNER. I do not think I did.

Mr. O’CONNELL. Well, somebody asked me it before. As far as I

am concerned, I am not engaged in any Communist Party activity in the

State of Montana or any party activity, Progressive, or Democrat, or

anything. I have been asked by the Progressive Party in 1950 to run for

the United States Senate and I refused. I have been asked by the press

in Montana--I am not being braggadocio or conceited--by the various

newspapers, the Great Falls Tribune, the Lewistown Daily News, and

many others, whether I was going to come back into the political life

of the State. I have always told them, and told them constantly, that

I wanted to be a lawyer; I wanted to be, if I could, the best lawyer

that Montana ever had. That was the desire that I had. I have been

practicing law to the very best of my ability. When a man starts to

practice law, as I did, when he is about 40 years of age, he has a lot

to learn. There are many--well, I am sure, Mr. Willis, as an attorney

you know the best teacher, of course, is experience. I have been trying

to keep my nose clean and hewing to the line. I have been practicing

law. That is what I have been doing. I think in my work out there I

have earned the respect and consideration of all the people in the kind

of job I have been doing.

We do not have any integrated bar in the State of Montana. The Montana

Supreme Court regulates and supervises the bar out there. I am sure

that the members of the supreme court will tell you the things I have

said here today about my friend and all that are true.

Mr. VELDE. Do you not think you are a bit gullible or naive

when you say that you did not know there was a Soviet espionage ring

operating in this country? Tell the committee the truth.

Mr. O’CONNELL. Now listen. I think I have set forth my

position. I do not know that that is actually true. I do not know that

it is true. I do not know it. I have never met a Soviet spy that I know

of.

Mr. VELDE. It is just unbelievable to me. Of course, that is

just my opinion.

Mr. O’CONNELL. You are in a different position than I am.

Mr. VELDE. With all your connections that have been brought

out here with the various front groups, with all of your connections

with well-known Communists, not to realize that there has been an

espionage ring operating in this country is amazing to me. You are an

intelligent man.

Mr. O’CONNELL. Any of those groups or any of the individuals

that have been mentioned here can be tied down to specific programs or

purposes or things of that kind, but certainly nothing along the line

of espionage.

Mr. WILLIS. Would it surprise you if they were?

Mr. O’CONNELL. No, it would not surprise me; but what I am

saying is that I do not know.

Mr. WILLIS. The committee is adjourned and the witness is

dismissed.

Mr. O’CONNELL. Thank you.

(Whereupon, at 5:25 p. m., the hearing in the above matter was

concluded and the committee recessed to the call of the Chair.)

INDEX

INDIVIDUALS

Adair, Robin, 473

Archer, James, 436

Armstrong, Harry C., 419, 420, 586, 588

Astley, Theodore Raymond, 522

Atkinson, N. P., 423

Atkinson, Roy, 470, 504

Bader, Barney, 435

Bailey, George, 434

Baldwin, C. B., 553

Balmer, Alice, 485

Batterson, Frank, 512

Beattie, John F., 312

Belden (Mr.), 589

Benjamin, Herbert, 272, 599, 601

Bernard, John T., 572, 573, 598

Bitterman, Jacob, 441-443 (testimony)

Bitterman, Ruth, 442, 522

Bittleman, Alexander, 602

Blauvelt, Mildred, 550

Bloor, Ella Reeve, 583

Boggs, Elizabeth, 471

Bourne, James, 357, 359, 479

Bradley, George, 273, 336, 356

Bristol, Al, 471

Bristol, Frances, 471

Brockway, Harold, 356

Brockway, John, 356

Brodsky, Joseph, 508

Browder, Earl, 264, 475, 581

Brown, Roy, 262

Buchanan, Tom 559, 593

Budenz, Louis, 264, 585, 590, 591, 594, 596-598, 600, 601

Burns, Helmi (Mrs. Tom Burns; also known as Hutenen, Helmi), 437

Burns, Tom, 437

Burton, Philip L., 414

Camozzi, Robert, 469

Campbell, Ray, 311

Carlson, Edwin A., 327-329 (testimony), 365-374 (testimony)

Carlson, Frank, 545, 548

Carmichael, Edward Brook, Jr., 322-326 (testimony)

Carter, Edward C., 461

Cayton, Revels, 467

Chafee, Zechariah, Jr., 507

Clinton, Rose, 558, 593

Clott, Herman, 563

Clott, Lillian, 563, 564, 593

Cluck, Jack R., 443, 450

Coffee, John M., 573

Cohen, Abraham Arthur, 490-492 (testimony)

Cohen, Elizabeth Boggs, 521, 523

Cole, Merwin, 469

Coley, Ward, 469

Corr, Bill, 468

Costigan, Howard, 401, 402, 406, 407, 411, 421

Cour, Jim, 468

Cummings, Al, 381

Cvetic, Matthew, 564, 565

Dafoe, Doc, 473

Daggett, Charles, 468, 469

Daggett, Herbert, 469

Danielson, Jean, 522

Daschbach, John, 472, 520-522, 544, 545, 548, 549, 566, 584

Daschbach, Marjorie, 522

Davis, Jerome, 361

Davis, John, 523, 540

DeLacy, Hugh, 406, 407, 413, 434, 519, 592, 593, 596

Delaney, Paul William, 438-440 (testimony)

Dennett, Eugene Victor, 249-303 (testimony), 335-362 (testimony),

391-413 (testimony), 419-438 (testimony), 466-490 (testimony),

492-493 (testimony), 307, 308, 483, 494, 501, 513, 514, 517,

518, 521, 528, 529.

Dennett, Harriette, 482-484

Dobbins, William K., 406, 407

Dodd, William E., Jr, 541

Dokter, Ted, 470

Donaldson, Hallie, 485

Doran, Dave, 345

DuBois, W. E. B., 569

Ebey, Harold, 406, 407, 412, 434

Egroth, Fair Taylor, 523, 592

Engstrom, James, 355, 395

Espe, Conrad, 438

Field, Gladys, 432, 470

Fisher, C. H., 516, 520

Fletcher, Jess, 340, 406, 434, 469, 586

Flood, George, 434, 435

Fluent, Russell, 520, 553, 565, 567, 592

Fogg, Kathryn, 586, 588

Ford, James W., 540

Foster, William Z., 262

Fowler (Mrs.), 582

Fox, Ernest, 394, 427, 428, 470

Fox, Elsie (Mrs. Ernest Fox; also known as Gilland, Elsie), 470

Frankfeld, Philip, 472

Freyd, Bernard, 492-494 (testimony)

Furuseth, Andrew, 395

Gates, John, 566

Gemson, Richard L., 438

George, Lawrence Earl, 414-416 (testimony)

Gilland, Elsie. (_See_ Fox, Elsie)

Granich, Max, 264

Greenglass, David, 594

Gundlach, Ralph, 523, 544, 545

Gustafson, Margaret Elizabeth, 374-377 (testimony)

Haines, Victor, 258, 351, 352, 358

Halonen, Oiva R., 299-301, 302-308 (testimony)

Hall, Gus, 567

Hall, Robert, 557

Hanke, Ed, 357

Hannon, Bruce, 395

Harding, Alex, 474

Harding, Arthur, 470

Harding, Jean, 470

Harris, Calvin, 381

Harris, Lem, 530, 532, 533

Harter (Mrs.). (_See_ Noral, Mrs. Alex.)

Hartle, Barbara, 247, 278, 299, 300, 305, 311, 314, 315, 319,

327, 332, 365, 380, 381, 385, 388, 414, 415, 417, 426, 427,

437, 439-442, 474, 489, 496, 501, 509-511, 514, 516-518,

521-523, 543-545, 591-595, 597.

Hatten, C. T., 317, 362, 363, 493, 495

Hatten, Eugene R., 485

Henderson, Donald, 437

Henry, Edward E., 490

Hicks, Victor, 434

Hillman, Sidney, 504

Hoffman, Elsie, 566

Honig, Nat, 433, 586

Hosue, I., 438

Huber, L. R., 468

Hudson, Roy, 430, 431, 472

Huff, Helen, 485

Huff, Henry, 475, 477, 479, 484, 566, 571

Hunterer, L. C., 520, 565, 566

Hutcheson (William), 268

Hutchins, Hutchin R., 349, 357

Hutenen, Helmi. (_See_ Burns, Helmi.)

Jackins (Carl), Harvey, 521

Jackson, Gardner, 530-533

Jackson, Harry, 405, 406, 436, 470

Jackson, Henry, 405

Johnson, A. A., 356

Johnston, Harold, 313-316 (testimony), 331, 332, 363-364

(testimony), 365, 471

Kerr, Frank, 311, 312, 499, 500

King, Paddy, 570, 602

Kinney, Alice, 485

Kinney, Glenn, 311, 471

Kirkwood, Trudi, 485

Knudsen, C. Calvert, 330

Krahl, Robert B., 379-382 (testimony)

Kroener, Donna, 332

Kroener, Edmund D., 330-333 (testimony)

Larsen, Karley, 406, 407, 433, 592

Lasser, David, 601

Law, Dick, 470

Law, Laura, 470

Lawrence, Adrian, 434

Lawrie, John (Jack), Jr., 316, 317-322 (testimony)

Lawrie, John, Sr., 260, 359, 479

Leavitt, Edward, 260, 359

Leeds, David, 570

Legg, Charles, 472

Lesser, Sarah H., 322

Linden, Emil, 262

Lokanath, D(r.), 461

London, M. M., 273, 336, 340

Lovestone, Jay, 279

Luddington, Mel, 356

Lundeberg, Harry, 269, 394, 395, 427-429

Lundquist, Hugo, 435

MacDonald, Kenneth A., 249, 335, 374, 391, 419, 441, 466, 492

Investigation of Communist activities in Seattle, Wash., area. Hearings, Part 3 · 第 12 / 13 段