CHAPTER IX

_THE GREAT NAPES AND ITS GULLIES_

It has already been explained that the Great Napes rises like a huge

screen out of the southern slopes of Gable. Its crest runs from

north-west to south-east. It is possible to travel along the whole

length of the ridge from Hell’s Gate (called Deep Gill on the Ordnance

map) to the White Napes scree at Little Hell Gate, and this route,

religiously followed without divergence on to either face, will be

found to offer many interesting pitches. The outside face of the Napes

is cut by the Needle Gully, the Eagle’s Nest Gully, and the Arrowhead

Gully, taken in order from east to west.

The Needle Gully has two separate branches leading to the crest of

the Napes, neither of them particularly difficult or interesting.

The Eagle’s Nest Gully is in summer time little more than a scree

walk. So likewise is the main Arrowhead Gully, which, however, has

a branch up to the left leading to a fine-looking chimney and out

on to the open face two-thirds of the way up towards the ridge. To

the west of the Arrowhead Gully the Napes is much less imposing, and

though small gullies cut it up considerably they are too indefinite to

particularize.

[Illustration:

G. P. Abraham & Sons, Photos. Keswick

GREAT GABLE FROM LINGMELL

(_Face page 146_)]

The chief _arêtes_ on the face are, taking them in order from east to

west, the Needle ridge immediately to the right of the Needle Gully;

the Eagle’s Nest ridge between the Eagle’s Nest Gully and the Needle

Gully; and the Arrowhead ridge between the Eagle’s Nest Gully and the

Arrowhead Gully. All these _arêtes_ offer most enjoyable climbs. The

Gable Needle (or Napes Needle) is a sharp pinnacle rising vertically

from the lower part of the Needle ridge. It is a climb for experts

only, with steady heads. The Bear rock is a smaller pinnacle a few

yards to the west of the foot of Arrowhead Gully. Its ascent is a

simple problem in rock-climbing--a pull up with the arms from the notch

at the back--but it is worth visiting on account of its singular aspect.

THE ARROWHEAD GULLY is almost entirely devoid of interest.

It has not often been visited, for the reason that its material is

loose, its one pitch is easy, and the neighbourhood is very rich in

more inviting climbs. A large party went up it last April and were

exceedingly unhappy so long as a single member remained in it. Our

interest had been concentrated on the Eagle’s Nest ridge, and after

some considerable time had been spent about the crags, we found

ourselves at the foot of the Arrowhead Gully, afflicted with the

unanimous desire to reach the summit of the Napes by a way that none of

us had attempted before. There remained to us this gully and its branch

up by the left. It soon became manifest that we should have to divide,

for the place was too small to hold us, and too narrow to permit free

passage of loose stones that the higher members almost immediately

began to dislodge. We lunched a few feet up the left branch, and were

decidedly uncomfortable during our hasty meal. The ledges that we had

chosen were so uncertain and the scree below so steep that all were

glad when the sandwiches were finished and preparations commenced for

roping-up. My own section of the party elected to follow the branch

to its abrupt ending out on the face. The others kept to the main

gully, and were busy chimney-sweeping most of their time. Their one

pitch was straightforward, but loose blocks abounded and required

careful treatment so long as their fall might endanger the safety of

any one. Over would go a boulder as soon as the last man had passed

it, smashing from side to side, and we in our gully vaguely wondered,

at each successive bombardment of the Arrowhead, whether it would not

be fair to give the next comers the credit of trying a new climb;

the old gully was rapidly altering, and the change in its ancient

landmarks testifying to the influence of man as a geological agent. But

in spite of their extensive quarrying operations they reached their

destination before us. We found that our variation involved some good

climbing, spoilt, however, by a plentiful supply of dangerous _débris_

on all its available ledges. I was leading, and therefore safe from

bombardment; but those below me were now and again peppered, and my

feelings hurt by their objurgations. Those who read this book as a

literary production will, no doubt, sympathise with the writer in his

difficulties with so limited a vocabulary as climbing affords. That

words of primary importance are few is a fact patent to all students

of the “Alpine Journal.” But in moments of excitement the climber is

urged to expand his limits, and to call on other sciences (notably the

theological) for suitable expressions that will relieve his feelings.

We started by working up on the right to a ledge at the foot of the big

pitch. Then followed a traverse across to a short chimney on the other

side. This chimney was obviously a possible route, but for greater

safety and in order to avoid a lengthening of the rope between the

second man and myself, I worked up for a few feet and then rounded

the buttress into the central portion of the gully, where a second

crack started upwards. Six feet higher this crack terminated at the

same level as the left-hand chimney, and some dangerously loose grass

holds helped me to drag up into a small cave where moderate anchorage

could be obtained. Unfortunately a block as large as my fist managed

to escape past me and to attack deliberately the unlucky member of

our party. He, poor man! has the reputation of never being missed by

a vagrant stone, and on this occasion he was hit rather badly on the

head. It was no use hurrying, but we feared a faint, and when two of us

were squeezed well into the cave, the wounded man was engineered up

to our level. He was a bit dazed, but on the whole seemed moderately

jubilant at this latest proof of his case-hardened condition. When

reassured as to his welfare we wriggled clumsily out of the narrow

cave, feet foremost, and made our way easily by the left wall to the

roof of the cave and the top of the pitch. The rest of the gully was

little more than mere walking, and a few minutes later we joined our

friends on the crest of the Napes.

THE NEEDLE GULLY has rather a bad reputation. My personal

experience of it has not been altogether pleasant. I tried it in

January, 1893, with the enterprising classic referred to in my account

of the Oblique Chimney, and found the soft snow so troublesome in its

steepness and want of tenacity that we decided to leave the gully for

some more auspicious occasion. The opportunity came in the following

August, after an ascent of the Needle, and with it came the conviction

that in dry weather the gully possesses no interest to the climber pure

and simple, if such an anomaly exists, but that it should be visited by

those who take pleasure in rock scenery. The Eagle’s Nest ridge is a

marvellously fine sweep of clean-cut rock bounding the western wall of

the gully. The jagged outline of the Needle ridge on the eastern side

is scarcely inferior in grandeur.

We found two easy pitches to begin with, taking us to about the level

of the Needle summit. Then a vertical wall interposed itself directly

in our way. We scrambled in or near a slight cleft on our right,

using rather treacherous grass-covered ledges, and distributing our

weight over as many points of support as possible. That portion of

the pitch was only about three feet high, and then came a momentary

‘easy’ before another steep little bit of eight feet. The resting

place is just large enough for one man. At the top of the second piece

a ledge led round by the left past an awkward corner that seemed to

alarm our more substantial members by its narrowness, and then two

or three steep grass steps had to be taken directly upwards. There

we found a projecting knob forming a convenient saddle for each to

anchor as he manipulated the rope for the man below, a deep crack

offering itself in the right position for belaying the rope. A foot

or two higher, and we were able to traverse back into the bed of the

gully, and thence find an easy way up screes and short rock slopes to

the top. The climb along the ridge itself to the highest point of the

Napes was pleasantly varied. We could readily distinguish the points

of articulation of the chief buttresses, for the general angle was too

steep to disguise the contours. When close to the connecting ridge

between Napes and the Westmorland crags we bore down on to Hell’s Gate

screes and crossed over to the opposite rocks to hunt out the little

climb up to the Westmorland cairn. This was not so easy to find, and we

wasted much time in attempting an attack by some smooth slabs too high

up the scree. At last we found that the climb began in a small gully

some distance down, which bore upwards a little to the right till a

short pinnacle was reached. Then from the neck behind the pinnacle we

traversed across the face to the left for a few yards, before climbing

hand over hand to the summit ridge. It came as a surprise that the

ascent had such neatness; and we were all at the end willing enough

to indorse the favourable opinions expressed in the climbing book.

Be it remembered that the cairn at the top was built by the brothers

Westmorland of Penrith, not for the purpose of indicating the finish

of a climb, but to mark the coign of vantage for one of the finest

mountain views in the country. Remember also that proposition of a

well-known mountaineer that the view from a summit is much the same

whatever be the route taken to get there; and apply it by visiting

Westmorland cairn to look at the Napes, even if the expedition involves

no troublesome climbing.

[Illustration:

G. P. Abraham & Sons, Photos. Keswick

THE RIDGES OF THE GREAT NAPES

(_Face page 153_)]

Rock-climbing in the English Lake District Third Edition · 第 9 / 19 章