CHAPTER XXXVII.

LOW-COST HOUSES.--METHODS OF MAKING CONTRACTS.--ARCHITECTS'

ESTIMATES.--BUILDING BY THE DAY.--THE SAFEST PLAN.--GUARDING

AGAINST LIENS.

A low-cost, well-built house is sought by all. The cost of a house is

largely a question of business management,--one of knowledge. Before

considering the details of contracting for the building of a house,

there are a few general points which should be mentioned. First, it

never pays to make a contract to have a house built for less than it is

worth. In order to get a good house, it is necessary that there be a

margin of profit for the builder. Second, a good house from a

constructive standpoint can only be built by competent mechanics. One

may contract for the building of a house for less than it is worth with

parties who are incapable of doing first-class work, and require a bond

to secure the faithful execution of the contract. A contract or a bond

cannot make a man do good work if he does not know how to do it. It will

not save anxiety or trouble. It may indemnify against actual damages,

but never against trouble and vexation; nor can it compensate for poor

work done in building a home. This matter is mentioned because it is the

fault of a great many people, who are inexperienced in building, that

they are disposed to have work done for less than it is worth. It does

not pay.

It may be remembered, however, that one builder may be able to build for

less than another. One may have more energy, tact, or general ability

than another. He may have better credit; may be a better buyer. The

result is larger accomplishments.

In speaking of low-cost houses or cheap buildings, it is not to be

understood that they are cheap or low-cost in the sense of being common

or frail. I mean first-class houses at a relatively low cost; low cost

in a business sense, the best for the money.

We often hear the statement made that one can tell nothing definite

about the cost of a house until it is finished. One can come as near

knowing what a house will cost, as he can to knowing what he wants

before he begins. One can get prices on what he has in mind, if his

ideas be expressed. He cannot get prices on the unknown. The expression

of one's ideas of a house is through plans and specifications. The fact

that architects' estimates are often too low is because the owner is not

sufficiently informed in house-building to know what he wants until

after the estimate is made. The owner usually expresses a price that he

wishes to pay for his house before he expresses his idea. It may be well

to illustrate this.

One who wishes to build goes to an architect with some sketches or

prints, which he has been collecting, lays them down and says,--

"We're thinking about building a house. We want something like this.

Here are four rooms and a hall downstairs, and four rooms and a

bath-room above. We want to build of wood, and wish to have the house

warm and substantial. Can it be built for three thousand dollars? It's

all we have to put in it."

"Oh, yes," says the architect; and so it can. A good, comfortable,

substantial house, from the plans indicated, can be built for three

thousand dollars. The architect knows this, and says that the work can

be done for that price. He is ordered to make the plans. In a day or two

the owner comes into his office and says,--

"My wife and I were talking over the house last night, and concluded

that we would like to have a bay window from the dining-room,--a place

where we can sit in summer, and put flowers in the winter."

"All right."

"And she told me to ask where you were going to put a wash-stand

downstairs. You know we will want some kind of a wash-room."

"I hadn't thought anything about that," said the architect. "Nothing was

said about it. I supposed that in a house of this size the bath-room was

the only place where you would put a stationary wash-stand."

"We have to have a place downstairs. We can't go upstairs every time we

want to wash our hands."

Another two or three days pass. The owner visits the architect again. It

is the old story. He and his wife have been studying the house question

in earnest. They are educating themselves in house-building. The more

they think about it, the more they want, all of which is perfectly

natural and right. It is in the natural order of things. It is the way

the world moves.

"We were talking about the house, and have about concluded that we will

finish two front rooms upstairs in oak. What do you think it will cost?"

"If you use oak for all the wood-work, it will cost between forty and

fifty dollars."

"That isn't much. We'll have it."

And so the house grows as the owners grow, a little every day. The next

day it is a little more plate glass at a cost of fifteen dollars. Again,

it is bronze hardware at an extra cost of twenty dollars. Then it is

bevelled-glass doors in the china-closet, plastering in the attic, a

tile vestibule, a porch off from the dining-room, and so on.

The three thousand dollars is exceeded, though probably by something

less than the amount represented by the growth of the owner's ideas. The

architect had made a certain allowance for this development, though it

was not possible for him entirely to foresee it. Of those who build, the

ones who take the greatest interest in the house, those who think the

most about it, are usually the ones who exceed their original

calculations by the largest amount.

In building, it is important that the architect and the owner thoroughly

understand each other before contracts with the builders are signed. The

wants of the owner must be thoroughly understood, and carefully and

accurately set forth. From the plans and specifications estimates for

all parts of the work should be received, and the cost of everything

known, before obligations are created. The process of making the plans

and specifications, and taking the bids, is educational in its tendency.

It brings to the owner's attention nearly everything that he may want.

Frequently he will find that the first estimates which he gets are

higher than the amount he cared to expend. This is on account of his

growth. He can frequently reduce the cost without positive injury to the

original scheme.

We will consider how contracts are usually made. Sometimes it is by

making plans and specifications for the entire house, and then asking

for bids on the building as a whole. A general contractor makes his

figures on the various parts of the work, then adds them together and

makes a lump bid. If he is awarded the contract under such a system, he

does part of the work himself and sublets the rest. Possibly he may be a

carpenter; then he sublets the brick work, plastering, tinning,

painting, etc., and, if possible, he makes a profit on all of these

sub-contracts. It does not always happen that he makes figures on these

various divisions of the contract himself when forming his original bid.

He gets sub-bids from various mechanics and adds these to his own in

making up a lump bid. It is known that there is a very wide range of

difference between bids which come in this way. In a house to cost three

thousand dollars the bids not infrequently vary twenty-five to thirty

per cent. The highest bid may be over four thousand dollars.

Another way of contracting is for the architect or owner, as the case

may be, to take bids on the various details of excavating, stone work,

brick work, carpenter work, painting, plastering, galvanized iron and

tin, glass, plumbing, gas-fitting, etc.; in fact, to detail the work as

much as possible and receive detailed bids. If the work costs too much,

if the bids run too high, one can locate the excess.

At times one can get a cheaper house by pursuing this plan. Another plan

of building is by the day. Usually this means to employ carpenters and a

foreman, take bids on the material that the carpenters use, and to

sublet the mason work, excavating, painting, plastering, tin-work,

plumbing, etc. Sometimes the mason-work is also done by the day.

Each plan has its merits. The first mentioned, of letting most of the

work in one contract, is the one in most general use. It is common

practice in this connection to let excavating, mason work, carpenter

work, plastering, tinning, painting, and hardware in one general

contract; then the mantels, gas-fixtures, furnace, plumbing, electric

work, and ornamental glass work are let in separate contracts. It is

difficult for one to specify gas-fixtures, mantels, and similar

fittings, excepting by price. There is no satisfaction in this, for the

reason that the owner or his architect may be able to make quite as good

or even a better bargain than the contractor. Then there is no

opportunity for the builder to arrange for a relatively high price with

those who furnish this class of goods. It is fair for the builder to

assume that he is entitled to a certain percentage for selecting and

negotiating for such articles. The owner may save this for himself by

making his own purchases.

Plumbing work is frequently separated from the general contract in order

that the owner may exercise his discretion as to the workmen employed to

do this important work. In such circumstances it is not altogether a

matter of cost. It is of the utmost importance that the best of workmen

be employed.

The articles which cannot be directly specified should be secured

outside the general contract. Altogether, the plan of letting most of

the work in one contract, as outlined, is the best and safest for those

to pursue who are not thoroughly familiar with building operations.

The plan of subletting the separate contracts to the lowest bidders is

not to be recommended to those without large experience. The difficulty

in locating responsibility for delays is great. There is apt to be

contention, annoyance, and sometimes loss, by this confusion. The plan

of building by the day is more satisfactory for experienced builders

than the one just mentioned, but it has the disadvantage of not fully

representing to the owner before it is finished the cost of his

structure.

In nearly every city or town there are a number of good builders, not

well supplied with means, who will take a contract for building a house,

work on it themselves until it is finished, and then take another,

never having more than one or two houses on hand. One can frequently get

good work from such builders at a much less cost than from large

contractors. The larger contractors employ a foreman at about the same

price a day that the small contractors expect to get per day out of

their entire contract. Then, in addition to that, they receive their

profits of ten, fifteen, or other per cent for their time and attention.

Any one building with the help of the smaller contractors must be very

careful, or he will get into trouble on account of the small margin of

profit.

To recur to the method first mentioned. It is well that suggestions be

made as to the course to be pursued in receiving bids on work, as

classified in that suggestion. In the first place, there should be

accurate plans and specifications made by an architect capable of doing

that kind of work. Everything should be fully represented to the owner

in both a positive and negative way; that is, not only as to what is to

go into his house, but as to what is not to go into it. As soon as the

architect or those in charge of the work begin to take bids, the owner

should be provided with a complete copy of the plans and specifications,

in order that he may be fully conversant with what is to be done. It was

said that everything should be represented to the owner in both a

positive and negative way. Not only should it be stated to him that the

first floor of the house is to be plastered, but, if such is the case,

that the cellar is not to be plastered. If the cellar floor is not to be

cemented, it should be stated definitely to him in that way before

beginning to take bids. If fly-screens are not included in the building

contract, it should be so stated. Everything should be fully

represented, and a record thereof placed before the owner, so that there

can be not the slightest opportunity for misunderstanding or

disagreement. Thus, if everything is presented to the owner, he will

know what he is to have and what he is not to have, and his business

will be done for him in a way satisfactory to all. When this is done, it

is time to begin taking bids.

In doing this there should be no favoritism. The builder should be

allowed to take a copy of the plans and specifications with him to his

office or place of business, and keep them a day or more, in order to

take off his quantities and become thoroughly conversant with everything

connected with them. Then he can return the plans, and, while others are

doing the same thing, he can compile his figures. Generally it takes

about a day for each contractor to get through with a set of plans; that

is, if five bids are received, it generally takes five or six days,

assuming that only one set of plans is in use. No one should be asked to

figure on a building unless the owner is willing to award him the

contract, providing his bid is the lowest. Anything else is unfair. When

all the bids have been received in sealed envelopes, the architect and

owner may open them. After selecting the lowest, they may add to that

figure the cost of everything not included in that proposition,--the

furnace, mantels, gas fixtures, ornamental glass, and anything else that

has not been included in the bid. This may be readily done, if the

architect provide a schedule, similar to schedule "B," of everything

which may go into the house.

In the matter of closing the contract, only general statements can be

made. Where an architect is employed, he will give proper directions;

but, as many houses are built without such assistance, it is proper to

make general statements which will assist in this work. There are forms

of building-contracts, or articles of agreement, which may be secured

from various regular sources. It is proper to fix the time of the

completion of the work, which will vary in different parts of the

country according to general customs. A house to cost from fifteen

hundred to four thousand dollars may be very easily finished, under

favorable circumstances, in ninety to a hundred days. Such houses can be

built in less time, but it is best to give the builder at least three

months. He will do better work in that time than in less. For the higher

figure named, or for those which approach it, it may be better to allow

even a little more rather than less time. As a price for liquidated

damages in event of delay in completion, the rental value of the

property is the usual sum specified.

There are various plans pursued in the matter of payments. Where there

is an architect or superintendent, he usually issues orders on the owner

for payment of material and labor furnished by a contractor less ten or

fifteen per cent. Sometimes it is stated that two-fifths of the money

will be paid when the building is enclosed and under roof; one-fifth

additional when building is plastered, painted on exterior, all exterior

appurtenances finished, the floors laid, and the house ready for other

interior wood-work; and the remaining two-fifths when all work is

finished. At times this apportionment is correct, and at other times

not. However, it is a very good general rule. It is a good plan to add

the ten per cent discount to it when possible. Sometimes an indemnifying

bond is required of the contractor in order to secure the owner the

proper execution of the contract. Otherwise the ten or fifteen per cent

discount is relied upon to secure that end.

The lien laws in the various States make it very important that the

owner, or his agent in the matter of building, should be very careful to

see that the contractor pays all his bills, or secures releases from

those who have furnished material and labor on account of the building

contract, before money is paid by owner.

The law is different in various States, and renders the owner liable,

under varying conditions, for material and labor furnished to contractor

by others as employees or sub-contractor, even though payment has been

made by owner to general contractor. Where a bond is not required, it is

proper for the owner or his agent to exact releases in proper form from

those who have furnished material and labor to contractor. The following

form is in use by the writer:--

Work located

The undersigned, in consideration of the personal credit extended

by to , Contractor, hereby consent that may pay to said contractor

any sum that may be now owing to, or may hereafter become due, said

contractor, on account of contract for the construction of the

above works, and we hereby waive all rights to Mechanics' Liens or

other claims which we have, or may have, against said property, or

owner, on account of labor or material furnished by us.

INDIANAPOLIS, 1889.

It is the custom to furnish the builder with a number of copies of the

above release before it is time for him to secure an order on the owner

for money. As the architect is in a position to know from whom material

or labor is secured, it is possible for him to know if the list of

releases is complete. If not complete, the party refusing to give a

release is required to make statement as to the amount of the

indebtedness for material and labor furnished on the contract. The

general contractor is charged with the amount represented as being due

until the matter is fully adjusted. As an additional safeguard, the

contractor is at times required to fill out and make affidavit to the

following:--

INDIANAPOLIS, ---- 1889.

The undersigned, for the purpose of securing payment on account of

contract with ----, for the construction of a ---- house, known as

No. ---- on ---- Street, situated on Lot ----, Out-lot ----, ----

Division to City of Indianapolis, Marion County, State of Indiana,

represents hereby that he has paid for all labor and material of

every kind and nature had and procured therefor, excepting,

however, that he is now owing the following sums to the respective

parties hereinafter named for labor and materials for said

building, and owes therefor no other amounts, to wit:--

In this connection it is not possible to consider all of the

ramifications of the lien law. It is important to understand, however,

that it is entirely possible for an owner to have to pay for part of or

all of his house twice, if he is not careful in matters of this kind.

HOW TO SECURE A HOME.

Convenient Houses, With Fifty Plans for the Housekeeper · 第 37 / 40 章