BY WILLIAM COBBETT

(_Although Cobbett produced not a few political pamphlets in the

strictest sense of the term, the infinitely greater part of his work

is comprised during his earlier days in the volumes of _Peter

Porcupine's Gazette_, during his later in those of the _Weekly

Register_. This latter, however, he himself for a time actually

entitled _The Weekly Political Pamphlet_, while he alluded to it under

that name even at other times; and his whole work was imbued even more

deeply than that of Defoe with the pamphlet character. I have selected

two examples from the critical time when he was still exasperated by

his imprisonment, and stung into fresh efforts by debt and the

prospect of fresh difficulties. They exhibit in the most striking form

all Cobbett's pet hatreds--of the unreformed Parliament, of paper

money, of political economy, of potatoes, and of many other things.

The first is the _Register_ of 2d November 1816, the first number of

the cheapened form, which was sold at twopence, and so acquired the

name of 'Twopenny Trash,' from a phrase of, as some say, Canning's,

others Castlereagh's. The second is an early number of the papers

written from America. They will, with the notes, explain themselves._)

LETTER TO THE JOURNEYMEN AND LABOURERS OF ENGLAND, WALES, SCOTLAND,

AND IRELAND, ON THE CAUSE OF THEIR PRESENT MISERIES; ON THE MEASURES

WHICH HAVE PRODUCED THAT CAUSE; ON THE REMEDIES WHICH SOME FOOLISH AND

SOME CRUEL AND INSOLENT MEN HAVE PROPOSED; AND ON THE LINE OF CONDUCT

WHICH JOURNEYMEN AND LABOURERS OUGHT TO PURSUE, IN ORDER TO OBTAIN

EFFECTUAL RELIEF, AND TO ASSIST IN PROMOTING THE TRANQUILLITY AND

RESTORING THE HAPPINESS OF THEIR COUNTRY.

Friends And Fellow-countrymen--Whatever the pride of rank, of riches,

or of scholarship may have induced some men to believe, or to affect

to believe, the real strength and all the resources of a country ever

have sprung and ever must spring from the _labour_ of its people; and

hence it is that this nation, which is so small in numbers and so poor

in climate and soil compared with many others, has, for many ages,

been the most powerful nation in the world: it is the most

industrious, the most laborious, and, therefore, the most powerful.

Elegant dresses, superb furniture, stately buildings, fine roads and

canals, fleet horses and carriages, numerous and stout ships,

warehouses teeming with goods; all these, and many other objects that

fall under our view, are so many marks of national wealth and

resources. But all these spring from _labour_. Without the journeyman

and the labourer none of them could exist; without the assistance of

their hands the country would be a wilderness, hardly worth the notice

of an invader.

As it is the labour of those who toil which makes a country abound in

resources, so it is the same class of men, who must, by their arms,

secure its safety and uphold its fame. Titles and immense sums of

money have been bestowed upon numerous Naval and Military Commanders.

Without calling the justice of these in question, we may assert that

the victories were obtained by _you_ and your fathers and brothers and

sons, in co-operation with those Commanders, who, with _your_ aid,

have done great and wonderful things; but who, without that aid, would

have been as impotent as children at the breast.

With this correct idea of your own worth in your minds, with what

indignation must you hear yourselves called the Populace, the Rabble,

the Mob, the Swinish Multitude; and with what greater indignation, if

possible, must you hear the projects of those cool and cruel and

insolent men, who, now that you have been, without any fault of yours,

brought into a state of misery, propose to narrow the limit of parish

relief, to prevent you from marrying in the days of your youth, or to

thrust you out to seek your bread in foreign lands, never more to

behold your parents or friends? But suppress your indignation, until

we return to this topic, after we have considered the _cause_ of your

present misery, and the measures which have produced that cause.

The times in which we live are full of peril. The nation, as described

by the very creatures of Government, is fast advancing to that period

when an important change must take place. It is the lot of mankind

that some shall labour with their limbs and others with their minds;

and, on all occasions, more especially on an occasion like the

present, it is the duty of the latter to come to the assistance of the

former. We are all equally interested in the peace and happiness of

our common country. It is of the utmost importance that, in the

seeking to obtain these objects, our endeavours should be uniform, and

tend all to the same point. Such an uniformity cannot exist without

an uniformity of sentiment as to public matters, and to produce this

latter uniformity amongst you is the object of this address.

As to the cause of our present miseries, it is the enormous amount of

the taxes which the Government compels us to pay for the support of

its army, its placemen, its pensioners, etc., and for the payment of

the interest of its debt. That this is the _real_ cause has been a

thousand times proved; and it is now so acknowledged by the creatures

of the Government themselves. Two hundred and five of the

Correspondents of the Board of Agriculture ascribe the ruin of the

country to taxation. Numerous writers, formerly the friends of the

Pitt system, now declare that taxation has been the cause of our

distress. Indeed, when we compare our present state to the state of

the country previous to the wars against France, we must see that our

present misery is owing to no other cause. The taxes then annually

raised amounted to about fifteen millions: they amounted last year to

seventy millions. The nation was then happy; it is now miserable.

The writers and speakers who labour in the cause of corruption, have

taken great pains to make the labouring classes believe that _they_

are _not taxed_; that the taxes which are paid by the landlords,

farmers, and tradesmen, do not affect you, the journeymen and

labourers; and that the tax-makers have been very lenient towards

you. But, I hope that you see to the bottom of these things now. You

must be sensible that if all your employers were totally ruined in one

day, you would be wholly without employment and without bread; and, of

course, in whatever degree your employers are deprived of their means,

they must withhold means from you. In America the most awkward common

labourer receives five shillings a day, while provisions are cheaper

in that country than in this. Here, a carter, boarded in the house,

receives about seven pounds a year; in America, he receives about

thirty pounds a year. What is it that makes this difference? Why, in

America the whole of the taxes do not amount to more than about ten

shillings a head upon the whole of the population; while in England

they amount to nearly six pounds a head! _There_, a journeyman or

labourer may support his family well, and save from thirty to sixty

pounds a year: _here_, he amongst you is a lucky man, who can provide

his family with food and with decent clothes to cover them, without

any hope of possessing a penny in the days of sickness or of old age.

_There_, the Chief Magistrate receives six thousand pounds a year;

_here_, the civil list surpasses a million of pounds in amount, and as

much is allowed to each of the Princesses in one year, as the chief

magistrate of America receives in two years, though that country is

nearly equal to this in population.

A Mr. Preston, a lawyer of great eminence, and a great praiser of

Pitt, has just published a pamphlet, in which is this remark: 'It

should always be remembered, that the eighteen pounds a year paid to

any placeman or pensioner, withdraws from the public the means of

giving active employment to one individual as the head of a family;

thus depriving five persons of the means of sustenance from the fruits

of honest industry and active labour, and rendering them paupers.'

Thus this supporter of Pitt acknowledges the great truth that the

taxes are the cause of a people's poverty and misery and degradation.

We did not stand in need of this acknowledgment; the fact has been

clearly proved before; but it is good for us to see the friends and

admirers of Pitt brought to make this confession.

It has been attempted to puzzle you with this sort of question: 'If

taxes be the cause of the people's misery, how comes it that they were

not so miserable before the taxes were reduced as they are now?' Here

is a fallacy which you will be careful to detect. I know that the

taxes have been reduced; that is to say, _nominally_ reduced, but not

so in fact; on the contrary, they have, in reality, been greatly

augmented. This has been done by the sleight-of-hand of paper money.

Suppose, for instance, that four years ago, I had a hundred pounds to

pay in taxes, then a hundred and thirty bushels of wheat would have

paid my share. If I have now seventy-five pounds to pay in taxes, it

will require a hundred and ninety bushels of wheat to pay my share of

taxes. Consequently, though my taxes are nominally reduced, they are,

in reality, greatly augmented. This has been done by the legerdemain

of paper money. In 1812, the pound-note was worth only thirteen

shillings in silver. It is now worth twenty shillings. Therefore, when

we now pay a pound-note to the tax-gatherer, we really pay him twenty

shillings where we before paid him thirteen shillings; and the

Landholders who lent pound-notes worth thirteen shillings each, are

now paid their interest in pounds worth twenty shillings each. And the

thing is come to what Sir Francis Burdett told the Parliament it would

come to. He told them in 1811, that if they ever attempted to pay the

interest of their debt in gold and silver, or in paper money equal in

value to gold and silver, the farmers and tradesmen must be ruined,

and the journeymen and labourers reduced to the last stage of misery.

Thus, then, it is clear that it is the weight of the taxes, under

which you are sinking, which has already pressed so many of you down

into the state of paupers, and which now threatens to deprive many of

you of your existence. We next come to consider what have been the

causes of this weight of taxes. Here we must go back a little in our

history, and you will soon see that this intolerable weight has all

proceeded from the want of a Parliamentary Reform.

In the year 1764, soon after the present king came to the throne, the

annual interest of the Debt amounted to about five millions, and the

whole of the taxes to about nine millions. But, soon after this, a war

was entered on to compel the Americans to submit to be taxed by the

Parliament, without being represented in that Parliament. The

Americans triumphed, and, after the war was over, the annual interest

of the Debt amounted to about nine millions, and the whole of the

taxes to about fifteen millions. This was our situation when the

French people began their Revolution. The French people had so long

been the slaves of a despotic government, that the friends of freedom

in England rejoiced at their emancipation. The cause of Reform, which

had never ceased to have supporters in England for a great many years,

now acquired new life, and the Reformers urged the Parliament to grant

reform, instead of going to war against the people of France. The

Reformers said: 'Give the nation reform, and you need fear no

revolution.' The Parliament, instead of listening to the Reformers,

crushed them, and went to war against the people of France; and the

consequence of these wars is, that the annual interest of the Debt now

amounts to forty-five millions, and the whole of the taxes, during

each of the last several years, to seventy millions. So that these

wars have ADDED thirty-six millions a year to the interest of the

Debt, and fifty-five millions a year to the amount of the whole of

the taxes! This is the price that we have paid for having checked (for

it is only checked) the progress of liberty in France; for having

forced upon that people the family of Bourbon, and for having enabled

another branch of that same family to restore the bloody Inquisition,

which Napoleon had put down.

Since the restoration of the Bourbons and of the old Government of

France has been, as far as possible, the grand result of the contest;

since this has been the end of all our fightings and all our past

sacrifices and present misery and degradation; let us see (for the

inquiry is now very full of interest) what sort of Government that was

which the French people had just destroyed, when our Government began

its wars against that people.

If, only twenty-eight years ago, any man in England had said that the

Government of France was one that ought to be suffered to exist, he

would have been hooted out of any company. It is notorious that that

Government was a cruel despotism; and that we and our forefathers

always called it such. This description of that Government is to be

found in all our histories, in all our Parliamentary debates, in all

our books on Government and politics. It is notorious, that the family

of Bourbon has produced the most perfidious and bloody monsters that

ever disgraced the human form. It is notorious that millions of

Frenchmen have been butchered, and burnt, and driven into exile by

their commands. It is recorded, even in the history of France, that

one of them said that the putrid carcass of a Protestant smelt sweet

to him. Even in these latter times, so late as the reign of Louis

XIV., it is notorious that hundreds of thousands of innocent people

were put to the most cruel death. In some instances, they were burnt

in their houses; in others they were shut into lower rooms, while the

incessant noise of kettle-drums over their heads, day and night, drove

them to raving madness. To enumerate all the infernal means employed

by this tyrant to torture and kill the people, would fill a volume.

Exile was the lot of those who escaped the swords, the wheels, the

axes, the gibbets, the torches of his hell-hounds. England was the

place of refuge for many of these persecuted people. The grandfather

of the present Earl of Radnor, and the father of the venerable Baron

Maseres were amongst them; and it is well known that England owes no

inconsiderable part of her manufacturing skill and industry to that

atrocious persecution. Enemies of freedom, wherever it existed, this

family of Bourbon, in the reign of Louis XIV. and XV., fitted out

expeditions for the purpose of restoring the Stuarts to the throne of

England, and thereby caused great expense and blood-shed to this

nation; and, even the Louis who was beheaded by his subjects, did, in

the most perfidious manner, make war upon England, during her war

with America. No matter what was the nature of the cause, his conduct

was perfidious; he professed peace while he was preparing for war. His

object could not be to assist freedom, because his own subjects were

slaves.

Such was the family that were ruling in France when the French

Revolution began. After it was resolved to go to war against the

people of France, all the hirelings of corruption were set to work to

gloss over the character and conduct of the old Government, and to

paint in the most horrid colours the acts of vengeance which the

people were inflicting on the numerous tyrants, civil, military, and

ecclesiastical, whom the change of things had placed at their mercy.

The people's turn was now come, and, in the days of their power, they

justly bore in mind the oppressions which they and their forefathers

had endured. The taxes imposed by the Government became at last

intolerable. It had contracted a great debt to carry on its wars. In

order to be able to pay the interest of this debt, and to support an

enormous standing army in time of peace, it laid upon the people

burdens which they could no longer endure. It fined and flogged

fathers and mothers if their children were detected in smuggling. Its

courts of justice were filled with cruel and base judges. The nobility

treated the common people like dogs; these latter were compelled to

serve as soldiers, but were excluded from all share, or chance of

honour and command, which were engrossed by the nobility.

Now, when the time came for the people to have the power in their

hands, was it surprising that the first use they made of it was to

take vengeance on their oppressors? I will not answer this question

myself. It shall be answered by Mr. Arthur Young, the present

Secretary of the Board of Agriculture. He was in France at the time,

and living upon the very spot, and having examined into the causes of

the Revolution, he wrote and published the following remarks, in his

_Travels_, vol. i. page 603:--

'It is impossible to justify the excesses of the people on

their taking up arms; they were certainly guilty of

cruelties; it is idle to deny the facts, for they have been

proved too clearly to admit of doubt. But is it really the

people to whom we are to impute the whole? Or to their

oppressors, who had kept them so long in a state of bondage?

He who chooses to be served by slaves and by ill-treated

slaves, must know that he holds both his property and his

life by a tenure far different from those who prefer the

service of well-treated freemen; and he who dines to the

music of groaning sufferers, must not, in the moment of

insurrection, complain that his sons' throats are cut. When

such evils happen, they surely are more imputable to the

tyranny of the master than to the cruelty of the servant. The

analogy holds with the French peasants. The murder of a

seigneur, or a country seat in flames, is recorded in every

newspaper; the rank of the person who suffers attracts

notice; but where do we find the registers of that seigneur's

oppressions of his peasantry, and his exactions of feudal

services from those whose children were dying around them for

want of bread? Where do we find the minutes that assigned

these starving wretches to some vile pettifogger, to be

fleeced by impositions, and mockery of justice, in the

seigneural courts? Who gives us the awards of the Intendant

and his _sub-delegues_, which took off the taxes of a man of

fashion, and laid them with accumulated weight on the poor,

who were so unfortunate as to be his neighbours? Who has

dwelt sufficiently upon explaining all the ramifications of

despotism, regal, aristocratical, and ecclesiastical,

pervading the whole mass of the people; reaching, like a

circulating fluid, the most distant capillary tubes of

poverty and wretchedness? In these cases the sufferers are

too ignoble to be known; and the mass too indiscriminate to

be pitied. But should a philosopher feel and reason thus?

Should he mistake the cause for the effect? and, giving all

his pity to the few, feel no compassion for the many, because

they suffer in his eyes not individually but by millions? The

excesses of the people cannot, I fear, be justified; it would

undoubtedly have done them credit, both as men and as

Christians, if they had possessed their new acquired power

with moderation. But let it be remembered that the populace

in no country ever use power with moderation; excess is

inherent in their aggregate constitution: and as every

Government in the world knows that violence infallibly

attends power in such hands, it is doubly bound in common

sense, and for common safety, so to conduct itself, that the

people may not find an interest in public confusions. They

will always suffer much and long, before they are effectually

roused; nothing, therefore, can kindle the flame but such

oppressions of some classes or order in society as give able

men the opportunity of seconding the general mass; discontent

will diffuse itself around; and if the Government take not

warning in time, it is alone answerable for all the burnings

and all the plunderings and all the devastation and all the

blood that follow.'

Who can deny the justice of these observations? It was the Government

alone that was justly chargeable with the excesses committed in this

early stage, and, in fact, in every other stage, of the Revolution of

France. If the Government had given way in time, none of these

excesses would have been committed. If it had listened to the

complaints, the prayers, the supplications, the cries of the

cruelly-treated and starving people; if it had changed its conduct,

reduced its expenses, it might have been safe under the protection of

the peace-officers, and might have disbanded its standing army. But it

persevered; it relied upon the bayonet, and upon its judges and

hangmen. The latter were destroyed, and the former went over to the

side of the people. Was it any wonder that the people burnt the houses

of their oppressors, and killed the owners and their families? The

country contained thousands upon thousands of men that had been ruined

by taxation, and by judgments of infamous courts of justice, 'a

mockery of justice'; and, when these ruined men saw their oppressors

at their feet, was it any wonder that they took vengeance upon them?

Was it any wonder that the son, who had seen his father and mother

flogged, because he, when a child, had smuggled a handful of salt,

should burn for an occasion to shoot through the head the ruffians who

had thus lacerated the bodies of his parents? Moses slew the insolent

Egyptian who had smitten one of his countrymen in bondage. Yet Moses

has never been called either a murderer or a cruel wretch for this

act; and the bondage of the Israelites was light as a feather compared

to the tyranny under which the people of France had groaned for ages.

Moses resisted oppression in the only way that resistance was in his

power. He knew that his countrymen had no chance of justice in any

court; he knew that petitions against his oppressors were all in vain;

and 'looking upon the burdens' of his countrymen, he resolved to begin

the only sort of resistance that was left him. Yet it was little more

than a mere insult that drew forth his anger and resistance; and, if

Moses was justified, as he clearly was, what needs there any apology

for the people of France?

It seems at first sight very strange that the Government of France

should not have 'taken warning in time.' But it had so long been in

the habit of despising the people that its mind was incapable of

entertaining any notion of danger from the oppressions heaped upon

them. It was surrounded with panders and parasites who told it nothing

but flattering falsehoods; and it saw itself supported by two hundred

and fifty thousand bayonets, which it thought irresistible; though it

found in the end that those who wielded those bayonets were not long

so base as to be induced, either by threats or promises, to butcher

their brothers and sisters and parents. And, if you ask me how it

came to pass that they did not 'take warning in time,' I answer that

they did take warning, but that, seeing that the change which was

coming would deprive them of a great part of their power and

emoluments, they resolved to resist the change, and to destroy the

country, if possible, rather than not have all its wealth and power to

themselves. The ruffian whom we read of, a little time ago, who

stabbed a young woman because she was breaking from him to take the

arm of another man whom she preferred, acted upon the principle of the

ministers, the noblesse, and the clergy of France. They could no

longer unjustly possess, therefore they would destroy. They saw that

if a just government were established; that if the people were fairly

represented in a national council; they saw that if this were to take

place, they would no longer be able to wallow in wealth at the expense

of the people; and, seeing this, they resolved to throw all into

confusion, and, if possible, to make a heap of ruins of that country

which they could no longer oppress, and the substance of which they

could no longer devour.

Talk of violence indeed! Was there anything too violent, anything too

severe to be inflicted on these men? It was they who produced

confusion; it was they who caused the massacres and guillotinings; it

was they who destroyed the kingly government; it was they who brought

the king to the block. They were answerable for all and for every

single part of the mischief, as much as Pharaoh was for the plagues in

Egypt, which history of Pharaoh seems, by the bye, to be intended as a

lesson to all future tyrants. He 'set taskmasters over the Israelites

to afflict them with burdens; and he made them build treasure cities

for him; he made them serve with rigour; he made their lives bitter

with hard bondage, in mortar and in brick, and in all manner of

service of the field; he denied them straw, and insisted upon their

making the same quantity of bricks, and because they were unable to

obey, the taskmasters called them idle and beat them.' Was it too much

to scourge and to destroy all the first-born of men who could

tolerate, assist, and uphold a tyrant like this? Yet was Pharaoh less

an oppressor than the old government of France.

Thus, then, we have a view of the former state of that country, by

wars against the people of which we have been brought into our present

state of misery. There are many of the hirelings of corruption, who

actually insist on it that we ought now to go to war again for the

restoring of all the cruel despotism which formerly existed in France.

This is what cannot be done, however. Our wars have sent back the

Bourbons; but the tithes, the seigneurs, and many other curses have

not been restored. The French people still enjoy much of the benefit

of the Revolution; and great numbers of their ancient petty tyrants

have been destroyed. So that even were things to remain as they are,

the French people have gained greatly by their Revolution. But things

cannot remain as they are. Better days are at hand.

In proceeding now to examine the remedies for your distresses, I shall

first notice some of those which foolish, or cruel and insolent men

have proposed. Seeing that the cause of your misery is the weight of

taxation, one would expect to hear of nothing but a reduction of

taxation in the way of remedy; but from the friends of corruption

never do we hear of any such remedy. To hear them, one would think

that _you_ had been the guilty cause of the misery you suffer; and

that you, and you alone, ought to be made answerable for what has

taken place. The emissaries of corruption are now continually crying

out against the weight of the Poor-rates, and they seem to regard all

that is taken in that way as a dead loss to the Government! Their

project is to deny relief to all who are able to work. But what is the

use of your being able to work, if no one will, or can, give you work?

To tell you that you must work for your bread, and, at the same time,

not to find any work for you, is full as bad as it would be to order

you to make bricks without straw. Indeed, it is rather more cruel and

insolent; for Pharaoh's taskmasters did point out to the Israelites

that they might go into the fields and get _stubble_. The _Courier_

newspaper of the 9th of October, says, 'We must thus be cruel only to

be kind.' I am persuaded that you will not understand this kindness,

while you will easily understand the cruelty. The notion of these

people seems to be that everybody that receives money out of the taxes

has a right to receive it, except you. They tremble at the fearful

amount of the Poor-rates: they say, and very truly, that those rates

have risen from two and a half to eight or ten millions since the

beginning of the wars against the people of France; they think, and

not without reason, that these rates will soon swallow up nearly all

the rent of the land. These assertions and apprehensions are perfectly

well founded; but how can _you_ help it? You have not had the

management of the affairs of the nation. It is not you who have ruined

the farmers and tradesmen. You only want food and raiment: you are

ready to work for it; but you cannot go naked and without food.

But the complaints of these persons against you are the more

unreasonable, because they say not a word against the sums paid to

sinecure placemen and pensioners. Of the five hundred and more

Correspondents of the Board of Agriculture, there are scarcely ten who

do not complain of the weight of the Poor-rates, of the immense sums

taken away from them by the poor, and many of them complain of the

idleness of the poor. But not one single man complains of the immense

sums taken away to support sinecure placemen, who do nothing for their

money, and to support pensioners, many of whom are women and children,

the wives and daughters of the nobility and other persons in high

life, and who can do nothing, and never can have done anything for

what they receive. There are of these places and pensions all sizes,

from twenty pounds to thirty thousand and nearly forty thousand pounds

a year! And surely these ought to be done away before any proposition

be made to take the parish allowance from any of you who are unable to

work, or to find work to do. There are several individual placemen,

the profits of each of which would maintain a thousand families. The

names of the ladies upon the pension list would, if printed, one under

another, fill a sheet of paper like this. And is it not, then, base

and cruel at the same time in these Agricultural correspondents to cry

out so loudly against the charge of supporting the unfortunate poor,

while they utter not a word of complaint against the sinecure places

and pensions?

The unfortunate journeymen and labourers and their families have a

right, they have a just claim, to relief from the purses of the rich.

For there can exist no riches and no resources which they by their

labour have not assisted to create. But I should be glad to know how

the sinecure placemen and lady pensioners have assisted to create

food and raiment, or the means of producing them. The labourer who is

out of work or ill, to-day, may be able to work, and set to work

to-morrow. While those placemen and pensioners never can work; or, at

least, it is clear that they never intend to do it.

You have been represented by the _Times_ newspaper, by the _Courier_,

by the _Morning Post_, by the _Morning Herald_, and others, as the

_scum_ of society. They say that you have no business at public

meetings; that you are rabble, and that you pay no taxes. These

insolent hirelings, who wallow in wealth, would not be able to put

their abuse of you in print were it not for your labour. You create

all that is an object of taxation; for even the land itself would be

good for nothing without your labour. But are you not taxed? Do you

pay no taxes? One of the correspondents of the Board of Agriculture

has said that care has been taken to lay as little tax as possible on

the articles used by you. One would wonder how a man could be found

impudent enough to put an assertion like this upon paper. But the

people of this country have so long been insulted by such men, that

the insolence of the latter knows no bounds.

The tax gatherers do not, indeed, come to you and demand money of you:

but there are few articles which you use, in the purchase of which you

do not pay a tax.

On your shoes, salt, beer, malt, hops, tea, sugar, candles, soap,

paper, coffee, spirits, glass of your windows, bricks and tiles,

tobacco: on all these, and many other articles you pay a tax, and even

on your loaf you pay a tax, because everything is taxed from which the

loaf proceeds. In several cases the tax amounts to more than one half

of what you pay for the article itself; these taxes go in part to

support sinecure placemen and pensioners; and the ruffians of the

hired press call you the scum of society, and deny that you have any

right to show your faces at any public meeting to petition for a

reform, or for the removal of any abuse whatever!

Mr. Preston, whom I quoted before, and who is a member of Parliament

and has a large estate, says upon this subject, 'Every family, even of

the poorest labourer, consisting of five persons, may be considered as

paying, in indirect taxes, at least ten pounds a year, or more than

half his wages at seven shillings a week!' And yet the insolent

hirelings call you the mob, the rabble, the scum, the swinish

multitude, and say that your voice is nothing; that you have no

business at public meetings; and that you are, and ought to be

considered as nothing in the body politic! Shall we never see the day

when these men will change their tone! Will they never cease to look

upon us [as on] brutes! I trust they will change their tone, and that

the day of the change is at no great distance!

The weight of the Poor-rate, which must increase while the present

system continues, alarms the corrupt, who plainly see that what is

paid to relieve you, they cannot have. Some of them, therefore, hint

at your early marriages as a great evil, and a clergyman named Malthus

has seriously proposed measures for checking you in this respect;

while one of the correspondents of the Board of Agriculture complains

of the increase of bastards, and proposes severe punishment on the

parents! How hard these men are to please! What would they have you

do? As some have called you the swinish multitude, would it be much

wonder if they were to propose to serve you as families of young pigs

are served? Or if they were to bring forward the measure of Pharaoh,

who ordered the midwives to kill all the male children of the

Israelites?

But, if you can restrain your indignation at these insolent notions

and schemes, with what feelings must you look upon the condition of

your country, where the increase of the people is now looked upon as a

curse! Thus, however, has it always been, in all countries where taxes

have produced excessive misery. Our countryman, Mr. Gibbon, in his

History of the _Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire_, has the

following passage: 'The horrid practice of murdering their new-born

infants was become every day more frequent in the provinces. It was

the effect of _distress_, and the distress was principally occasioned

by the _intolerable burden of taxes_, and by the vexatious as well as

cruel prosecutions of the officers of the revenue against their

insolvent debtors. The less opulent or less industrious part of

mankind, instead of rejoicing at an increase of family, deemed it an

act of paternal tenderness to release the children from the impending

miseries of a life which they themselves were unable to support.'

But that which took place under the base Emperor Constantine will not

take place in England. You will not murder your new-born infants, nor

will you, to please the corrupt and insolent, debar yourselves from

enjoyments to which you are invited by the very first of Nature's

laws. It is, however, a disgrace to the country that men should be

found in it capable of putting ideas so insolent upon paper. So, then,

a young man arm-in-arm with a rosy-cheeked girl must be a spectacle of

evil omen! What! and do they imagine that you are thus to be

extinguished, because some of you are now (without any fault of yours)

unable to find work? As far as you were wanted to labour, to fight, or

to pay taxes, you were welcome, and they boasted of your numbers; but

now that your country has been brought into a state of misery, these

corrupt and insolent men are busied with schemes for getting rid of

you. Just as if you had not as good a right to live and to love and to

marry as they have! They do not propose, far from it, to check the

breeding of sinecure placemen and pensioners, who are supported in

part by the taxes which you help to pay. They say not a word about the

whole families who are upon the pension list. In many cases there are

sums granted in trust for _the children_ of such a lord or such a

lady. And while labourers and journeymen who have large families too,

are actually paying taxes for the support of these lords' and ladies'

children, these cruel and insolent men propose that they shall have no

relief, and that their having children ought to be checked! To such a

subject no words can do justice. You will feel as you ought to feel;

and to the effect of your feelings I leave these cruel and insolent

men.

There is one more scheme to notice, which, though rather less against

nature is not less hateful and insolent; namely, to encourage you to

emigrate to foreign countries. This scheme is distinctly proposed to

the Government by one of the correspondents of the Board of

Agriculture. What he means by encouragement must be to send away by

force, or by paying for the passage; for a man who has money stands in

no need of relief. But, I trust, that not a man of you will move, let

the _encouragement_ be what it may. It is impossible for many to go,

though the prospect be ever so fair. We must stand by our country, and

it is base not to stand by her, as long as there is a chance of seeing

her what she ought to be. But the proposition is, nevertheless, base

and insolent This man did not propose to encourage the sinecure

placemen and pensioners to emigrate; yet, surely, you who help to

maintain them by the taxes which you pay, have as good a right to

remain in the country as they have! You have fathers and mothers and

sisters and brothers and children and friends as well as they; but

this base projector recommends that you may be encouraged to leave

your relations and friends for ever; while he would have the sinecure

placemen and pensioners remain quietly where they are!

No: you will not leave your country. If you have suffered much and

long, you have the greater right to remain in the hope of seeing

better days. And I beseech you not to look upon yourselves as the

_scum_; but, on the contrary, to be well persuaded that a great deal

will depend upon your exertions; and therefore, I now proceed to point

out to you what appears to me to be the line of conduct which

journeymen and labourers ought to pursue in order to obtain effectual

relief, and to assist in promoting tranquillity and restoring the

happiness of the country.

We have seen that the cause of our miseries is the burden of taxes

occasioned by wars, by standing armies, by sinecures, by pensions,

etc. It would be endless and useless to enumerate all the different

heads or sums of expenditure. The remedy is what we have now to look

to, and that remedy consists wholly and solely of such a reform in the

Commons' or People's House of Parliament, as shall give to every payer

of direct taxes a vote at elections, and as shall cause the Members to

be elected annually.

In a late _Register_ I have pointed out how easily, how peaceably, how

fairly, such a Parliament might be chosen. I am aware that it may, and

not without justice, be thought wrong to deprive those of the right of

voting who pay indirect taxes. Direct taxes are those which are

directly paid by any person into the hands of the tax-gatherers, as

the assessed rates and taxes. Indirect taxes are those which are paid

indirectly through the maker or seller of goods, as the tax on soap or

candles or salt or malt. And, as no man ought to be taxed without his

consent, there has always been a difficulty upon this head. There has

been no question about the _right_ of every man who is free to

exercise his will, who has a settled place in society, and who pays a

tax of any sort, to vote for Members of Parliament. The difficulty is

in taking the votes by any other means than by the Rate-book; for if

there be no list of tax-payers in the hands of any person, mere menial

servants, vagrants, pickpockets, and scamps of all sorts might not

only come to the poll, but they might poll in several parishes or

places, on one and the same day. A corrupt rich man might employ

scores of persons of this description, and in this way would the

purpose of reform be completely defeated. In America, where one branch

of the Congress is elected for four years and the other for two years,

they have still adhered to the principle of direct taxation, and in

some of the States they have made it necessary for a voter to be worth

one hundred pounds. Yet they have, in that country, duties on goods,

custom duties, and excise duties also; and, of course, there are many

persons who really pay taxes, and who, nevertheless, are not permitted

to vote. The people do not complain of this. They know that the number

of votes is so great that no corruption can take place, and they have

no desire to see livery servants, vagrants, and pickpockets take part

in their elections. Nevertheless it would be very easy for a reformed

Parliament, when once it had taken root, to make a just arrangement of

this matter. The most likely method would be to take off the indirect

taxes, and to put a small direct tax upon every master of a house,

however low his situation in life.

But this and all other good things, must be done by a reformed

Parliament. We must have that first, or we shall have nothing good;

and any man who would beforehand take up your time with the detail of

what a reformed Parliament ought to do in this respect, or with

respect to any changes in the form of government, can have no other

object than that of defeating the cause of reform; and, indeed, the

very act must show, that to raise obstacles is his wish.

Such men, now that they find you justly irritated, would persuade you

that, because things have been perverted from their true ends, there

is nothing good in our constitution and laws. For what, then, did

Hampden die in the field, and Sydney on the scaffold? And has it been

discovered at last that England has always been an enslaved country

from top to toe? The Americans, who are a very wise people, and who

love liberty with all their hearts, and who take care to enjoy it too,

took special care not to part with any of the great principles and

laws which they derived from their forefathers. They took special care

to speak with reverence of, and to preserve Magna Charta, the Bill of

Rights, the Habeas Corpus, and not only all the body of the Common Law

of England, but most of the rules of our courts, and all our form of

jurisprudence. Indeed it is the greatest glory of England that she has

thus supplied with sound principles of freedom those immense regions

which will be peopled perhaps by hundreds of millions.

I know of no enemy of reform and of the happiness of the country so

great as that man who would persuade you that we possess nothing good,

and that all must be torn to pieces. There is no principle, no

precedent, no regulations (except as to mere matter of detail),

favourable to freedom, which is not to be found in the Laws of

England or in the example of our ancestors. Therefore I say we may ask

for, and we want nothing new. We have great constitutional laws and

principles to which we are immovably attached. We want great

alteration, but we want nothing new. Alteration, modification, to suit

the times and circumstances; but the great principles ought to be and

must, be the same, or else confusion will follow.

It was the misfortune of the French people that they had no great and

settled principles to refer to in their laws or history. They sallied

forth and inflicted vengeance on their oppressors; but, for want of

settled principles to which to refer they fell into confusion; they

massacred each other; they next flew to a military chief to protect

them even against themselves; and the result has been what we too well

know. Let us therefore congratulate ourselves that we have great

constitutional principles and laws, to which we can refer, and to

which we are attached.

That reform will come I know, if the people do their duty; and all

that we have to guard against is confusion, which cannot come if

reform take place in time. I have before observed to you that when the

friends of corruption in France saw that they could not prevent a

change, they bent their endeavours to produce confusion, in which they

fully succeeded. They employed numbers of unprincipled men to go about

the country proposing all sorts of mad schemes. They produced first a

confusion in men's minds, and next a civil war between provinces,

towns, villages and families. The tyrant Robespierre, who was exceeded

in cruelty only by some of the Bourbons, was proved to have been in

league with the open enemies of France. He butchered all the real

friends of freedom whom he could lay his hands on, except Paine, whom

he shut up in a dungeon till he was reduced to a skeleton. This

monster was at last put to death himself; and his horrid end ought to

be a warning to any man who may wish to walk in the same path. But I

am, for my part, in little fear of the influence of such men. They

cannot cajole you as Robespierre cajoled the people of Paris. It is,

nevertheless, necessary for you to be on your guard against them, and

when you hear a man talking big and hectoring about projects which go

further than a real and radical reform of the Parliament, be you well

assured that that man would be a second Robespierre if he could, and

that he would make use of you and sacrifice the life of the very last

man of you; that he would ride upon the shoulders of some through

rivers of the blood of others, for the purpose of gratifying his own

selfish and base and insolent ambition.

In order effectually to avoid the rock of confusion, we should keep

steadily in our eye not only what we wish to be done but what can be

done now. We know that such a reform as would send up a Parliament,

chosen by all payers of direct taxes, is not only just and

reasonable, but easy of execution. I am therefore for accomplishing

that object first; and I am not at all afraid that a set of men who

would really hold the purse of the people, and who had been just

chosen freely by the people, would very soon do everything that the

warmest friend of freedom could wish to see done.

While, however, you are upon your guard against false friends, you

should neglect no opportunity of doing all that is within your power

to give support to the cause of reform. Petition is the channel for

your sentiments, and there is no village so small that its petition

would not have some weight. You ought to attend at every public

meeting within your reach. You ought to read to and to assist, each

other in coming at a competent knowledge of all public matters. Above

all things, you ought to be unanimous in your object, and not suffer

yourselves to be divided.

The subject of religion has nothing to do with this great question of

reform. A reformed Parliament would soon do away with all religious

distinctions and disabilities. In their eyes, a Catholic and a

Protestant would both appear in the same light.

The _Courier_, the _Times_, and other emissaries of corruption, are

constantly endeavouring to direct your wrath against bakers, brewers,

butchers, and other persons who deal in the necessaries of life. But,

I trust that you are not to be stimulated to such a species of

violence. These tradesmen are as much in distress as you. They cannot

help their malt and hops and beer and bread and meat being too dear

for you to purchase. They all sell as cheap as they can, without being

absolutely ruined. The beer you drink is more than half _tax_, and

when the tax has been paid by the seller he must have payment back

again from you who drink, or he must be ruined. The baker has numerous

taxes to pay, and so has the butcher, and so has the miller and the

farmer. Besides, all men are eager to sell, and, if they could sell

cheaper they certainly would, because that would be the sure way of

getting more custom. It is the weight of the taxes which presses us

all to the earth, except those who receive their incomes out of those

taxes. Therefore I exhort you most earnestly not to be induced to lay

violent hands on those who really suffer as much as yourselves.

On the subject of lowering wages too, you ought to consider that your

employers cannot give to you that which they have not. At present,

corn is high in price, but that high price is no benefit to the

farmer, because it has risen from the badness of the crop, which Mr.

Hunt foretold at the Common Hall, and for the foretelling of which he

was so much abused by the hirelings of the press, who, almost up to

this very moment, have been boasting and thanking God for the goodness

of the crop! The farmer whose corn is half destroyed, gains nothing by

selling the remaining half for double the price at which he would

have sold the whole. If I grow 10 quarters of wheat, and if I save it

all and sell it for two pounds a quarter, I receive as much money as

if I had sold the one-half of it for four pounds a quarter. And I am

better off in the former case, because I want wheat for seed, and

because I want some to consume myself. These matters I recommend to

your serious consideration; because it being unjust to fall upon your

employers to force them to give that which they have not to give, your

conduct in such cases must tend to weaken the great cause in which we

ought all now to be engaged, namely the removal of our burdens through

the means of a reformed Parliament. It is the interest of vile men of

all descriptions to set one part of the people against the other part;

and therefore it becomes you to be constantly on your guard against

their allurements.

When journeymen find their wages reduced, they should take time to

reflect on the real cause, before they fly on their employers, who are

in many cases in as great or greater distress than themselves. How

many of those employers have of late gone to jail for debt and left

helpless families behind them! The employer's trade falls off. His

goods are reduced in price. His stock loses the half of its value. He

owes money. He is ruined; and how can he continue to pay high wages?

The cause of his ruin is the weight of the taxes, which presses so

heavily on us all, that we lose the power of purchasing goods. But it

is certain that a great many, a very large portion of the farmers,

tradesmen, and manufacturers, have, by their supineness and want of

public spirit, contributed towards the bringing of this ruin upon

themselves and upon you. They have _skulked_ from their public duty.

They have kept aloof from, or opposed all measures for a redress of

grievances; and indeed, they still skulk, though ruin and destruction

stare them in the face. Why do they not now come forward and explain

to you the real cause of the reduction of your wages? Why do they not

put themselves at your head in petitioning for redress? This would

secure their property much better than the calling in of troops, which

can never afford them more than a short and precarious security. In

the days of their prosperity they were amply warned of what has now

come to pass; and the far greater part of them abused and calumniated

those who gave them the warning. Even if they would now act the part

of men worthy of being relieved, the relief to us all would speedily

follow. If they will not; if they will still skulk, they will merit

all the miseries which they are destined to suffer.

Instead of coming forward to apply for a reduction of those taxes

which are pressing them as well as you to the earth, what are they

doing? Why, they are applying to the Government to add to their

receipts by passing Corn Bills, by preventing foreign wool from being

imported; and many other silly schemes. Instead of asking for a

reduction of taxes they are asking for the means of paying taxes!

Instead of asking for the abolition of sinecure places and pensions,

they pray to be enabled to continue to pay the amount of those places

and pensions! They know very well that the salaries of the judges and

of many other persons were greatly raised, some years ago, on the

ground of the rise in the price of labour and provisions, why then do

they not ask to have those salaries reduced, now that labour is

reduced? Why do they not apply to the case of the judges and others

the arguments which they apply to you? They can talk boldly enough to

you; but they are too great cowards to talk to the Government, even in

the way of petition! Far more honourable is it to be a ragged pauper

than to be numbered among such men.

These people call themselves the _respectable_ part of the nation.

They are, as they pretend, the virtuous part of the people, because

they are quiet; as if virtue consisted in immobility! There is a

canting Scotchman in London, who publishes a paper called the

'_Champion_' who is everlastingly harping upon the virtues of the

'fireside,' and who inculcates the duty of quiet submission. Might we

ask this Champion of the teapot and milk-jug whether Magna Charta and

the Bill of Rights were won by the fireside? Whether the tyrants of

the House of Stuart and of Bourbon were hurled down by fireside

virtues? Whether the Americans gained their independence, and have

preserved their freedom, by sitting by the fireside? O, no! these were

all achieved by action, and amidst bustle and noise. Quiet indeed! Why

in this quality a log, or a stone, far surpasses even the pupils of

this Champion of quietness; and the chairs round his fireside exceed

those who sit in them. But in order to put these quiet, fireside,

respectable people to the test, let us ask them if they approve of

drunkenness, breaches of the peace, black eyes, bloody noses, fraud,

bribery, corruption, perjury, and subornation of perjury; and if they

say no, let us ask them whether these are not going on all over the

country at every general election. If they answer yes, as they must

unless they be guilty of wilful falsehood, will they then be so good

as to tell us how they reconcile their inactivity with sentiments of

virtue? Some men, in all former ages, have been held in esteem for

their wisdom, their genius, their skill, their valour, their devotion

to country, etc., but never until this age, was _quietness_ deemed a

quality to be extolled. It would be no difficult matter to show that

the quiet, fireside gentry are the most callous and cruel, and,

therefore, the most wicked part of the nation. Amongst them it is that

you find all the peculators, all the blood-suckers of various degrees,

all the borough-voters and their offspring, all the selfish and

unfeeling wretches, who, rather than risk the disturbing of their

ease for one single month, rather than go a mile to hold up their hand

at a public meeting, would see half the people perish with hunger and

cold. The humanity, which is continually on their lips, is all

fiction. They weep over the tale of woe in a novel; but round their

'decent fireside,' never was compassion felt for a real sufferer, or

indignation at the acts of a powerful tyrant.

The object of the efforts of such writers is clearly enough seen. Keep

all _quiet_! Do not rouse! Keep still! Keep down! Let those who

perish, perish in silence! It will, however, be out of the power of

these quacks, with all their laudanum, to allay the blood which is now

boiling in the veins of the people of this kingdom; who, if they are

doomed to perish, are at any rate resolved not to perish in silence.

The writer whom I have mentioned above, says that he, of course, does

not count 'the lower classes, who, under the pressure of need or under

the influence of ignorant prejudice, may blindly and weakly rush upon

certain and prompt punishment; but that the security of every decent

fireside, every respectable father's best hopes for his children,

still connect themselves with the Government.' And by Government he

clearly means all the mass as it now stands. There is nobody so

callous and so insolent as your sentimental quacks and their patients.

How these 'decent fireside' people would stare, if some morning they

were to come down and find them occupied by uninvited visitors! I

hope they never will. I hope that things will never come to this pass:

but if one thing more than any other tends to produce so sad an

effect, it is the cool insolence with which such men as this writer

treats the most numerous and most suffering classes of the people.

Long as this Address already is, I cannot conclude without some

observations on the 'Charity Subscriptions' at the London Tavern. The

object of this subscription professes to be to afford relief to the

distressed labourers, etc. About forty thousand pounds have been

subscribed, and there is no probability of its going much further.

There is an absurdity on the face of the scheme; for, as all parishes

are compelled by law to afford relief to every person in distress, it

is very clear that, as far as money is given by these people to

relieve the poor, there will be so much saved in the parish rates. But

the folly of the thing is not what I wish you most to attend to.

Several of the subscribers to this fund receive each of them more than

ten thousand pounds and some more than thirty thousand pounds each,

out of those taxes which you help to pay, and which emoluments not a

man of them proposes to give up. The clergy appear very forward in

this subscription. An Archbishop and a Bishop assisted at the forming

of the scheme. Now then, observe that there has been given out of the

taxes, for several years past, one hundred thousand pounds a year,

for what, think you? Why for the relief of the poor clergy! I have no

account at hand later than that delivered last year, and there I find

this sum!--for the poor clergy! The rich clergy do not pay this sum;

but it comes out of those taxes, part, and a large part of which you

pay on your beer, malt, salt, shoes, etc. I daresay that the 'decent

firesides' of these poor clergy still connect themselves with the

Government. Amongst all our misery we have had to support the

intolerable disgrace of being an object of the charity of a Bourbon

Prince, while we are paying for supporting that family upon the throne

of France. Well! But is this all? We are taxed, at the very same

moment, for the support of the French Emigrants! And you shall see to

what amount. Nay, not only French, but Dutch and others, as appears

from the forementioned account laid before Parliament last year. The

sum, paid out of the taxes, in one year, for the relief of suffering

French Clergy and Laity, St. Domingo Sufferers, Dutch Emigrants,

Corsican Emigrants, was one hundred and eighty-seven thousand seven

hundred and fifty pounds; yes, one hundred and eighty-seven thousand

seven hundred and fifty pounds paid to this set in one year out of

those taxes of which you pay so large a share, while you are insulted

with a subscription to relieve you, and while there are projectors who

have the audacity to recommend schemes for preventing you from

marrying while young, and to induce you to emigrate from your

country! I'll venture my life that the 'decent firesides' of all this

swarm of French clergy and laity, and Dutch, and Corsicans, and St.

Domingo sufferers 'still connect themselves closely with the

Government'; and I will also venture my life that you do not stand in

need of one more word to warm every drop of blood remaining in your

bodies! As to the money subscribed by regiments of soldiers, whose pay

arises from taxes in part paid by you, though it is a most shocking

spectacle to behold, I do not think so much of it. The soldiers are

your fathers, brothers, and sons. But if they were all to give their

whole pay, and if they amount to one hundred and fifty thousand men,

it would not amount to one-half of what is now paid in Poor-rates, and

of course would not add half a pound of bread to every pound which the

unhappy paupers now receive. All the expenses of the Army and Ordnance

amount to an enormous sum--to sixteen or eighteen millions; but the

pay of one hundred and fifty thousand men, at a shilling a day each,

amounts to no more than two million seven hundred and twelve thousand

five hundred pounds. So that, supposing them all to receive a shilling

a day each, the soldiers receive only about a third part of the sum

now paid annually in Poor-rates.

I have no room, nor have I any desire, to appeal to your passions upon

this occasion. I have laid before you, with all the clearness I am

master of, the causes of our misery, the measures which have led to

those causes, and I have pointed out what appears to me to be the only

remedy--namely a reform of the Commons', or People's House of

Parliament. I exhort you to proceed in a peaceable and lawful manner,

but at the same time to proceed with zeal and resolution in the

attainment of this object. If the skulkers will not join you, if the

'decent fireside' gentry still keep aloof, proceed by yourselves. Any

man can draw up a petition, and any man can carry it up to London,

with instructions to deliver it into trusty hands, to be presented

whenever the House shall meet. Some further information will be given

as to this matter in a future Number. In the meanwhile, I remain your

Friend, WM. COBBETT.

Political Pamphlets · 第 26 / 41 题