The population of Attica is divided into seven communes or demarchies.[B]

[Footnote B: To this population of 33,909, must be added the troops and

strangers in Athens, and at the Piraeus, who are not citizens. They

generally exceed three thousand.]

1. Athens, containing . 22,309 inhabitants.

2. Piraeus, . . . 2099 ...

3. Kekropia, . . . 2158 ...

4. Marathon, . . . 1214 ...

5. Phyle, . . . 2659 ...

6. Laurion, . . . 1470 ...

7. Kalamos, . . . 2000 ...

------

33,909

It will be enough for our purpose to describe the local constitution of

the city of Athens, and then point out the slight variations which

circumstances render necessary in the secluded agricultural communes of

the province.

The magistrates of Athens consist of a demarch (provost), six paredhroi

(bailies), and a town council composed of eighteen members. The

town-council is selected by all the citizens, who vote by signed lists,

containing the names of thirty-six individuals. The eighteen who have a

majority of votes become members of the town-council, and the remaining

eighteen who have the greatest number form a list of supplementary

members to supply vacancies, and prevent any election being necessary

except at the stated periods provided by law. The election of the demarch

and paredhroi is a more complicated affair. The eighteen members chosen

to form the town-council, and eighteen citizens who are the highest

tax-payers in the community, then meet together under the presidency of

the royal governor of the province. This meeting first proceeds to elect

two of its number to open the ballot-box, and assist and control the

conduct of the royal governor, as vice-presidents of the assembly. The

election proceeds, the persons present voting by ballot. The names of

candidates for the office of demarch must be returned, from which the

king selects one, and six paredhroi chosen, who must all have an absolute

majority of votes. The indirect election of the demarch is extremely

unpopular, as it has no effect except to enable the king to exclude two

popular but uncourtly citizens from every municipal office.

The plan of election in the country districts is precisely similar, but

the town-council is less numerous, and each village has its own resident

paredhros. The election of the demarch and of the paredhroi is conducted

as at Athens, and the royal governor of the province is compelled to visit

each commune in turn, in order to preside at the election. The whole

system rests on a popular basis. Every citizen possessing property, or

enrolled in the list of citizens from paying taxes, enjoys a vote in the

election of the magistrates of his demos. The royal authority only concurs

in so far as is required to preserve order, and give an official

certificate of the legality of the proceedings.

We come now to another popular institution, which gives a great degree of

political strength to the municipal organization of Greece, and protects

its liberties in a manner unknown in most other countries. Each province

possesses a provincial council, the members of which are elected by the

citizens of the different demoi into which the province is divided--a

demos containing 2000 inhabitants, sends one representative; a demos with

10,000 but exceeding 2000, sends two representatives; and a demos having

more than 10,000 inhabitants, sends three. Here, however, the electors are

required to pay fifty drachmas of direct taxes to the general government

in order to be entitled to vote.[C]

[Footnote C: Twenty-eight drachmas make a pound sterling.]

It will be seen, on referring to the population of the Attic demoi, that

the provincial council of Attica consists of twelve members, and these

members are elected for six years. The restriction on the electors is not

unpopular in Greece, as it is connected with an extended suffrage in the

municipal elections. Upwards of 500 citizens voted in Athens at the last

elections of provincial councillors. The provincial councils meet every

year in the months of February or March, as that is the season when the

landed proprietors in the country can most conveniently absent themselves

from their farms. The council chooses its own president and secretary, but

the royal governor of the province has the right to attend its meeting.

The budget of each demos must be presented to the council and approved by

it, and it has the power of rejecting any item of expenditure; but it can

only recommend, not enforce, any additional expense. It is likewise the

business of the provincial council to examine the grounds on which any

demos solicits the power of imposing local taxes: it proposes also general

improvements for the whole province, and has the power of assessing the

taxes necessary for carrying them into effect. Roads, barracks for

_gendarmes_, prisons, hospitals, and schools, are objects of its

attention. Its acts must all be presented to the minister of the interior

at the conclusion of the session, and they acquire validity only from the

time the minister communicates the royal assent to the proceedings.

This system of popular government, in all matters directly connected with

the daily business of the citizens, is a wise arrangement, and it has

proved a powerful engine for the preservation of order amidst a population

accustomed to anarchy, revolution, and despotism; and it has also formed a

firm barrier against the tyrannical aspirations of the Bavarians. Indeed,

had King Otho's government not been prevented, by this municipal system,

from coming into daily contact with the people, we are persuaded that it

would long ago have thrown Greece into convulsions, and caused the

massacre of every Bavarian in the country.

From the account we have given of the royal central government on the one

hand, and of the local magistracy on the other, it will be evident to our

readers that there are two powers at work in Greece, which, unless they

are united in the pursuit of some common objects, must at last engage in a

contest for the mastery.

We shall now notice the newspaper allegation, that the Greek court is

composed entirely of Bavarians. This was once the case, but it ceased to

be strictly true from the moment Armansperg introduced the system of

bribing the Greeks to join the Bavarian party; and at present the

government is supported almost entirely by Greek deserters from the

national cause. There is now no Bavarian in the ministry, and there are

Greeks in the cabinet. Many of the Greeks who affect with foreigners to be

loud in their complaints against the Bavarians, are, in the

administration, the most strenuous supporters of King Otho's system, and,

like Maurocordatos, the declared opponents of a national assembly and of a

representative form of government. They declare to the king that it is

necessary to retain some Bavarians in Greece, and they really wish it done

in order to exclude their Greek rivals from office. A revolution, followed

by a foreign government, and a lavish expenditure, has demoralized sterner

stuff than Greek politicians are made of, so that it is more to be

regretted than wondered at, when it appears that the Greek court has an

unusually large supply of venal political adventurers always ready to

enter its service.

This band consists of the Fanariotes, who were trained to official

aptitude and immorality under the Turks--of the politicians of the

revolution who deserted the cause of their country for the service of the

protecting powers at the last national assembly--and of a large class of

educated men not bred to commerce, who have resorted to Greece to make

their fortunes, and are now ready to accept places under any government.

The court, in its ignorance of Greece, has often purchased the services of

these men at their own valuation; and from this cause originates the crowd

of incapable councillors of state, useless ambassadors and consuls,

ignorant ministerial councillors and royal governors, and dishonest

commissaries, who assemble round King Otho in his palace. But time is

rolling on--ten years have elapsed since King Otho first stepped on the

Hellenic soil--the heroes of the war are sinking into the grave--Miaulis,

the best of the brave--Zaimi, the sagacious timid Moreote

noble--Kolocotroni, the sturdy strewd old klephtic chieftain;--these

three representatives and leaders of numerous classes of their

countrymen, now sleep in an honoured grave, and their followers no longer

form a majority in the land. A new race has arisen, a race equal in

education to the Maurocordatos, Rizos, Souizos, Karadjas, Tricoupis, and

Kolettis, and possessing the immense advantage over these men of

occupying a social position of greater independence. The fiery vehemence

of youth placed most of these new men in the opposition when they entered

on life. A political career being closed, they were, fortunately for

their country, obliged to devote all their attention to the cultivation

of their estates, and content themselves with improving their vineyards

and olive plantations instead of governing their country. Years have now

brought an increase of wealth, habits of moderation, steadiness of

purpose, and feelings of independence.

In a country such as we have described Greece, and we flatter ourselves

our description will bear examination on the part of travellers and

diplomatic gentlemen, we ask if there can be any doubt of the ultimate

success of popular institutions? For our own part, we feel persuaded that

Greece can only escape from a fierce civil war by the convocation of a

national representative assembly.--We adopted this opinion from the moment

that the Bavarian government was unable to destroy the liberty of the

press, after plunging into the contest and awakening the political

passions of the people. When a sovereign attacks a popular institution

without provocation, and fails in his attack, and when the people show

that concentrated energy which inspires the prudence necessary to use

victory with a moderation which produces no reaction against their cause,

their victory is sure. Under such circumstances a nation can patiently

wait the current of events. If Greece exist as a monarchy, we believe it

will soon have a national assembly; and if King Otho remain its sovereign,

we have a fancy that he will not long delay convoking one. Nothing,

indeed, can long prevent some representative body from meeting together,

unless it be the interference, direct or indirect, of the three protecting

powers. They, indeed, have strength sufficient to become the Three

Protecting Tyrants.

We hope that we have now given a tolerably intelligible account of King

Otho's government, and how it stands. We shall, therefore, proceed to the

second division of our enquiry, and strive to explain the actual state of

public feeling in Greece; what the king's government was expected to do,

and what it has left undone. We may be compelled here to glance at a few

delicate and contested questions in Greek politics, on which, however, we

shall not pretend to offer any opinion of our own, but merely collect the

facts; and we advise all men who wish to form a decided opinion on such a

question, to wait patiently until they have been discussed in a national

assembly of Greeks.

The first great question on which the government of King Otho was expected

to decide, was the means necessary to be adopted for discharging the

internal debt contracted for carrying on the war against the Turks. This

debt resolved itself into two heads: payment for services, and repayment

of money advanced. The national assemblies which had met during the

revolution, had decreed that every man who served in the army should, at

the conclusion of the war, receive a grant of land. It was proposed that

King Otho should carry these decrees into execution, by framing lists of

all those who had served either in the army, the navy, or in civil

employments. The same registers which contain the lists of the citizens of

the various communes, could have been rendered available for the purpose

of verifying the services of each individual. A fixed number of acres

might then have been destined to each man, according to his rank and time

of service. This measure would have enabled the Greek government to say,

that it had kept faith with the people. It would have induced many of the

military to settle as landed proprietors when the first current of

enthusiasm in favour of peaceful occupations set in, and it would have

been the means of silencing many pretensions of powerful military chiefs,

whose silence has since been dearly purchased.

The royal government always resisted these demands of the Greeks, and the

consequence was, that when it was necessary to yield from fear, Count

Armansperg adopted a law of dotation, which, under the appearance of being

a general measure, was only carried into application in cases where

partisanship was established; and yet national lands have been alienated

to a far greater extent than would have satisfied every claim arising out

of the revolutionary war. The king, it is true, has in late years made

donations of national land to favoured individuals, to maids of honour,

Turkish neophytes, and Bavarian brides; and he has rewarded several

political renegades with currant lands, and held out hopes of conferring

villages on councillors of state who have been eager defenders of the

court; but all this has been openly done as a matter of royal favour.

With regard to the second class of claimants. Common honesty, if royal

gratitude go for nothing in Greece, required that those who advanced money

to their country in her day of need, should be repaid their capital. All

interest might have been refused--the glory of their disinterested conduct

was all the reward they wanted; for few of them would have demanded

repayment of the sums due had they been rich enough to offer them as a

gift. The refusal of King Otho to repay these sums when he lavished money

on his Bavarian favourites and Greek partizans, has probably lowered his

character more, both in the East and in Europe, than any of those errors

in diplomacy which induced the _Morning Chronicle_ to publish, that

several Bavarians of rank had written a certificate of his being an idiot,

and forwarded it to his royal father. The sum required to pay up all the

claims of this class, would not have exceeded the agency paid by King Otho

to his Bavarian banker for remitting the loan contracted at Paris to

Greece, by the rather circuitous route of Munich.

It was also expected by the Greeks that one of the first acts of the royal

government would have been to abolish the duty on all articles carried by

sea from one part of the kingdom to another; this duty amounted to six per

cent, and was not abolished until the late demands of the three protecting

powers for prompt payment of the money due to them by his Hellenic

majesty, rendered King Otho rather more amenable to public opinion than he

had been previously. A decree was accordingly published a few months ago,

abolishing this most injurious tax, the preamble of which declares, with

innocent _naïveté_, that the duty thus levied is not based on principles

of equal taxation, but bears oppressively on particular classes.[D]

Alas! poor King Otho! he begins to abolish unjust taxation when his

exchequer is empty, and when his creditors are threatening him with the

Gazette; and yet he delays calling together a national assembly. It is

possible that, little by little, King Otho may be persuaded by

circumstances to become a tolerable constitutional sovereign at last; but

we fear our old friend Hadgi Ismael Bey--may his master never diminish the

length of his shadow!--will say on this occasion, as we have heard him say

on some others, "Machallah! Truly, the sense of the ghiaour doth arrive

after the mischief!" But we hold no opinions in common with Hadgi Ismael

Bey, who drinketh water, despiseth the Greek, and hateth the Frank. Our

own conjecture is, that King Otho has been studying the history of

Theopompus, one of his Spartan predecessors who, like himself, occupied

barely half a throne. Colleagues and ephori were in times past as

unpleasant associates in the duties of government as protecting powers now

are. Now Theopompus looked not lovingly on those who shared his royalty,

but as he understood the signs of the times, he sought to make friends at

Sparta by establishing a popular council, that is to say, he convoked a

national assembly. Thus, by diminishing the pretensions of royalty, he

increased its power. Let King Otho do the same, and if some luckless

Bavarian statesmen upbraid him with having thrown away his power, let him

reply--"No, my friend, I have only rendered the Bavarian dynasty more

durable in Greece." [Greek: Oi deta, paraoioômi gar ten basileian

poluchroniôteran.] If King Otho would once a day recall to his mind the

defence of Missolonghi, if he would reflect on the devotion shown to the

cause of their country by the whole population of Greece, he would surely

feel prouder of identifying his name and fortunes with a country so

honoured and adored, than of figuring in Bavarian history as the protector

of the artists who has reared the enormous palace he has raised at Athens.

[Footnote D: This decree was published in the _Athena_ newspaper, and is

dated the 20th of April 1843. It does not appear to have been published

until some weeks later.]

The Greeks expected that a civilized government would have taken measures

for improving the internal communications of the country, and exerted

itself to open new channels of commercial enterprise. They had hoped to

see some part of the loan expended in the formation of roads, and in

establishing regular packets to communicate with the islands. The best

road the loan ever made, was one to the marble quarries of Pentelicus in

order to build the new palace, and the only packets in Greece were

converted by his majesty into royal yachts.[E] The regency, it is true,

made a decree announcing their determination to make about 250 miles of

road. But their performances were confined to repairing the road from

Nauplia to Argos, which had been made by Capo d'Istria. The Greek

government, however, has now completed the famous road to the marble

quarries, a road of six miles in length to the Piraeus, and another of

five miles across the isthmus of Corinth. The King of Bavaria very nearly

had his neck broken on a road said to have been then practicable between

Argos and Corinth. We can answer for its being now perfectly impassable

for a carriage. Two considerable military roads are, however, now in

progress, one from Athens to Thebes, and another from Argos to

Tripolitza. But these roads have been made without any reference to

public utility, merely to serve for marching troops and moving artillery,

and consequently the old roads over the mountains, as they require less

time, are alone used for commercial transport.

[Footnote E: This is no exaggeration. We once visited the island of

Santorin, which has a population of 9000 souls, who own 46 vessels of 200

tons and upwards, besides many smaller craft. King Otho was sailing about

in one steamer at the time, and another was acting the man-of-war amidst

a fleet of English, French, Prussian, and Austrian frigates in the front

of the Piraeus; yet no post had been forwarded to Santorin for a

fortnight. Santorin is about 90 miles from Athens, and yields a very

considerable revenue to the Greek monarchy.]

It is evident that a poor peasantry, possessing no other means of

transport than their mules and pack-horses, must reckon distance entirely

by time, and the only way to make them perceive the advantages to be

derived from roads, is forming such bridle-paths as will enable them to

arrive at their journey's end a few hours sooner. The Greek government

never though of doing this, and every traveller who has performed the

journey from Patras to Athens, must have seen fearful proofs of this

neglect in the danger he ran of breaking his neck at the Kaka-scala or

cursed stairs of Megara.

Nay, King Otho's government has employed its _vis inertiae_ in preventing

the peasantry, even when so inclined, from forming roads at their own

expense; for the peasantry of Greece are far more enlightened than the

Bavarians. In the year 1841, the provincial council of Attica voted that

the road from Kephisia--the marble-quarry road--should be continued

through the province of Attica as far as Oropos. Provision was made for

its immediate commencement by the labour of the communes through which it

was to pass. Every farmer possessing a yoke of oxen was to give three

days' labour during the year, and every proprietor of a larger estate was

to supply a proportional amount of labour, or commute it for a fixed rate

of payment in money. This arrangement gave universal satisfaction.

Government was solicited to trace the line of road; but a year passed--one

pretext for delay succeeding another, and nothing was done. The provincial

council of 1842 renewed the vote, and government again prevented its being

carried into execution. It is said that his Majesty is strongly opposed to

the system of allowing the Greeks to get the direction of any public

business into their own hands; and that he would rather see his kingdom

without roads than see the municipal authorities boasting of performing

that which the central government was unable to accomplish.

We shall only trouble our readers with a single instance of the manner in

which commercial legislation has been treated in Greece. We could with

great ease furnish a dozen examples. Austrian timber pays an import duty

of six per cent, in virtue of a commercial treaty between Royal Greece and

Imperial Austria. Greek timber cut on the mountains round Athens pays an

excise duty of ten per cent; and the value of the Greek timber on the

mountains is fixed according to the sales made at Athens of Austrian

timber, on which the freight and duty have been paid. The effect can be

imagined. In our visit to Greece we spent a few days shooting woodcocks

with a fellow-countryman, who possesses an Attic farm in the mountains,

near Deceleia. His house was situated amidst fine woods of oak and pine;

yet he informed us that the floors, doors, and windows, were all made of

timber from Trieste, conveyed from Athens on the backs of mules. The house

had been built by contract; and though our friend gave the contractor

permission to cut the wood he required within five hundred yards of the

house, he found that, what with the high duty demanded by the government,

and with the delays and difficulties raised by the officers charged with

the valuation, who were Bavarian forest inspectors, the most economical

plan was to purchase foreign timber. The consequence of this is, the

Greeks burn down timber as unprofitable, and convert the land into

pasturage. We have seen many square miles of wood burning on Mount

Pentelicus; and on expressing our regret to a Greek minister, he shrugged

up his shoulders and said: "That, sir, is the way in which the Bavarian

foresters take care of the forests." Yet this Greek, who could sneakingly

ridicule the folly of the Bavarians, was too mean to recommend the king to

change the law.

Let us now turn to a more enlivening subject of contemplation, and see

what the Greeks have done towards improving their own condition. We shall

pass without notice all their exertions to lodge and feed themselves, or

fill their purses. We can trust any people on those points; our

observations shall be confined to the moral culture. We say that the

Greeks deserve some credit for turning their attention towards their own

improvement, instead of adopting the Gallican system of reform, and

raising a revolution against King Otho. They seem to have set themselves

seriously to work to render themselves worthy of that liberty, the

restoration of which they have so long required in vain from the allied

powers. There is, perhaps, no feature in the Greek revolution more

remarkable than the eager desire for education manifested by all classes.

The central government threw so many impediments in the way of the

establishment of a university, that the Greeks perceived that no buildings

would be erected either as lecture-rooms for the professors, or to contain

the extensive collections of books which had been sent to Greece by

various patriotic Greeks in Europe. Men of all parties were indignant at

the neglect, and at last a public meeting was held, and it was resolved to

raise a subscription for building the university. The government did not

dare to oppose the measure; fortunately, there was one liberal-minded man

connected with the court at the time, Professor Brandis of Bonn, and his

influence silenced the grumbling of the Bavarians; the subscription

proceeded with unrivalled activity, and upwards of £.4000 was raised in a

town of little more than twenty thousand inhabitants--half the inhabitants

of which had not yet been able to rebuild their own houses. Many

travellers have seen the new university at Athens, and visited its

respectable library, and they can bear testimony to the simplicity and

good sense displayed in the building.

One of the most remarkable features of the great moral improvement which

has taken place in the population, is the eagerness displayed for the

introduction of a good system of female education. The first female school

established in Greece was founded at Syra, in the time of Capo d'Istria,

by that excellent missionary the late Rev. Dr Korck, who was sent to

Greece by the Church Missionary Society. An excellent female school still

exists in this island, under the auspices of the Rev. Mr Hilner, a German

missionary ordained in England, and also in connexion with the Church

Missionary Society. The first female school at Athens, after the

termination of the Revolution, was established by Mrs Hill, an American

lady, whose exertions have been above all praise. A large female school

was subsequently formed by a society of Greeks, and liberally supported by

the Rev. Mr Leeves, and many other strangers, for the purpose of educating

female teachers. This society raises about £.800 per annum in

subscriptions among the Greeks. We cannot close the subject of female

education without adding a tribute of praise to the exertions of Mrs

Korck, a Greek lady, widow of the excellent missionary whom we have

mentioned as having founded the first female school at Syra; and of Mr

George Constantinidhes, a Greek teacher, who commenced his studies under

the auspices of the British and Foreign School Society, and who has

devoted all his energy to the cause of the education of his countrymen,

and has always inculcated the great importance of a good system of female

education. We insist particularly on the merits of those who devoted their

attention to this subject, as indicating a deep conviction of the

importance of moral and religious instruction. Male education leads to

wealth and honours. Boys gain a livelihood by their learning, but girls

are educated that they may form better mothers.

Other public institutions have not been neglected. The citizens of Athens

have built a very respectable civil hospital, and we mention this as it is

one of the public buildings which excites the attention of strangers, and

which is often supposed to have been erected by the government, though

entirely built from the funds raised by local taxes. The amount of

municipal taxes which the Greeks pay, is another subject which deserves

attention. The general taxes in Greece are very heavy. Every individual

pays, on an average, twelve shillings, which makes the payment of a family

of five persons amount to £.3 sterling annually. This is a very large sum,

when the poverty and destitution of the people is taken into

consideration, and is greater than is paid by any other European nation

where the population is so thinly scattered over the surface of the

country. Yet as soon as the Greeks became convinced that the general

government would contribute nothing towards improving the country, they

determined to impose on themselves additional burdens rather than submit

to wait. Hospitals, schools, churches, and bridges, built by several

municipalities, attest the energy of the determination of the people to

make every sacrifice to improve their condition. We offer our readers a

statement of the amount of the taxes imposed by the municipalities of

Attica on themselves for local improvements. The town communes of Athens

and the Piraeus find less difficulty in collecting the large revenues they

possess, than the country districts their comparatively trifling

resources.

Drachmas

Athens, with a population of 22,309 collects 159,000

Piraeus, ... 2,099 ... 27,300

Kekropia, ... 2,158 ... 3,759

Marathon, ... 1,214 ... 1,708

Phyle, ... 2,659 ... 7,000

Laurion, ... 1,470 ... 2,356

Kalamos, ... 2,000 ... 2,747

------- -------

33,909 ... 203,870

From this statement we find that each family of five persons pays, on an

average, thirty drachmas of self-imposed taxes, or about twenty-two

shillings annually, in addition to the £.3 sterling paid to the general

government.

We think we may now ask: Are the Greeks fit for a representative system of

government? We should like to hear the reasons of those who hold the

opinion, that they are not yet able to give an opinion on the best means

of improving their own country, and the most advantageous mode of raising

the necessary revenue.

We must now conclude with a few remarks on the line of conduct towards the

Greeks which has been pursued by the three protecting powers. We do not,

however, propose entering at any length on the subject, as we have no

other object than that of rendering our preceding observations more clear

to our readers. We are persuaded that the policy of interfering as little

as possible in the affairs of Greece, which has been adopted, and

impartially acted on by Lord Aberdeen, is the true policy of Great

Britain.

But in reviewing the general position of the Greek state, it must not be

forgotten that the Greek people have had communications with the great

powers of Europe of a nature very different from those which existed

between the protecting powers and King Otho. As soon as it became evident

that Turkey could not suppress the Greek revolution without suffering most

seriously from the diminution of her resources, Russia and England began

to perceive that it would be a matter of some importance to secure the

good-will of the Greek population. The Greeks scattered over the

countries in the Levant, amount to about five millions, and they are the

most active and intelligent portion of the population of the greater part

of the provinces in which they dwell. The declining state of the Ottoman

empire, and the warlike spirit of the Greek mountaineers and sailors,

induced both Russia and England to commence bidding for the favour of the

insurgents. In 1822 the deputy sent by the Greeks to solicit the

_compassion_ of the European ministers assembled at Verona, was not

allowed to approach the Congress. But the successful resistance of the

Greeks to the whole strength of the Ottoman empire for two years, induced

Russia to communicate a memoir to the European cabinets in 1824, proposing

that the Greek population then in arms should receive a separate, though

independent, political existence. This indiscreet proposition awakened the

jealousy of England, as indicating the immense importance attached by

Russia to securing the good-will of the Greeks. England immediately outbid

the Czar for their favour, by recognising the validity of their blockades

of the Turkish fortresses, thus virtually acknowledging the existence of

the Greek state. The other European powers were compelled most unwillingly

to follow the example of Great Britain. Mr Canning, however, in order to

place the question on some public footing, laid down the principles on

which the British cabinet was determined to act, in a communication to the

Greek government, dated in the month of December 1824. This document

declares that the British government will observe the strictest neutrality

with reference to the war; while with regard to the intermediate state of

independence and subjection proposed in the Russian memorial, it adds

that, as it has been rejected by both parties, it is needless to discuss

its advantages or defects. It also assured the Greeks that Great Britain

would take no part in any attempt to compel them by force to adopt a plan

of pacification contrary to their wishes.

France now thought fit to enter on the field. According to the invariable

principle of modern French diplomacy, she made no definite proposition

either to the Greeks or the European powers; but she sent semi-official

agents into the country, who made great promises to the Greeks if they

would choose the Duke de Nemours, the second son of the Duke d'Orleans,

now King Louis Philippe, to be sovereign of Greece. The Greeks had seen

something too substantial on the part of Russia and England to follow this

Gallic will-o'-the-wisp. But England and Russia, in order to brush all the

cobwebs of French intrigue from a question which appeared to them too

important to be dealt with any longer by unauthorized agents, signed a

protocol at St Petersburg on the 4th April 1826, engaging to use their

good offices with the Sultan to put an end to the war. The Duke of

Wellington himself negotiated the signature of this protocol, and it is

one of the numerous services he has rendered to his country and to Europe,

as the Greek question threatened to disturb the peace of the East. France,

as well as Austria, refused to join, until it became evident that the two

powers were taking active measures to carry their decisions into effect,

when France gave in her adhesion, and the treaty of the 6th of July 1827,

was signed at London by France, Great Britain, and Russia.

Events soon ran away with calculations. The Turkish fleet was destroyed

at Navarino on the 20th October 1827, the anniversary (if we may trust

Mitford's _History of Greece_) of the battle of Salamis. France now

embarked in the cause, determined to outbid her allies, and sent an

expedition to the Morea, under Marshal Maison, to drive out the troops of

Ibrahim Pasha. Capo d'Istria assumed the absolute direction of political

affairs, and by his Russian partizanship and anti-Anglican prejudices,

plunged Greece in a new revolution, when his personal oppression of the

family of Mauromichalis caused his assassination. King Otho was then

selected as king of Greece, and the consent of the Greeks was obtained to

his appointment by a loan to the new monarch of £.2,400,000 sterling, and

by a good deal of intrigue and intimidation at the assembly of Pronia.[F]

The Greeks, however, had already solemnly informed the allied powers,

that the acts of their national assemblies, consolidating the

institutions of the Greek state, and by securing the liberties of the

Greek people, "were as precious to Greece as her existence itself;" and

the protecting powers had consecrated their engagement to support these

institutions, by annexing this declaration to their protocol of the 22d

March 1830.[G]

[Footnote F: Several national assemblies have been held in Greece. The

acts of the following have been printed in a collection composed of

several volumes. The first was held at Pidhavro, near Epidaurus, of which

its name is a corruption, in 1822; the others at Astros in 1823, at

Epidaurus in 1826, at Troezene in 1827, at Argos in 1830 and the last at

Pronia, near Nauplia, in 1832.]

[Footnote G: Annex A, No. 9.]

The three allied powers have not displayed more union in their councils,

since the selection of King Otho, than they did before his appointment. In

one thing alone they have been unanimous; but unfortunately this has been

to forget their engagements to the Greek people, to see that the

institutions and liberties of Greece were to be respected. England and

France have, however, displayed at times some compunction on the subject;

but, unluckily for the Greeks, their consciences did not prick them at the

same moment. At one time the Duke de Broglie proposed that Greece should

be reinstated in the enjoyment of her free institutions, but Lord

Palmerston declared, that, her government being very anti-Russian at the

time, institutions and liberty were a mere secondary matter, and he did

not think the Greeks required such luxuries. Times, however, changed, and

King Otho, displaying considerably more affection for Russia than for

England--England conceived it necessary to propose, at one of the

conferences in London on the affairs of Greece, that the Greeks should be

called, in virtue of their national institutions, to exercise a control

over the lavish and injudicious expenditure of the revenues of the kingdom

by the royal government. But Russia and France, though admitting the

incapacity of the king's government, declared that they considered it

better to send commissioners named by the protecting powers, to control

his Hellenic majesty's expenses. Russia, indeed, distinctly declared she

would not allow the constitutional question to be discussed in the

conferences at the Foreign Office, and Lord Palmerston, with unusual

meekness, submitted. France, every ready to play a great game in small

matters, really sent a commissioner to Greece, to control King Otho's

expenses; but his Hellenic majesty soon gave proofs of how grievously the

_Morning Chronicle_ had mistaken his abilities. He gave the French

commissioner a few dinners, a large star, and a good place at all court

pageants in which he could display the uniform of Louis Philippe to

advantage, and thereby made the commissioner the same as one of his own

ministers. England and Russia kept aloof in stern disapprobation of this

paltry comedy.

The last farthing of the loan has now been expended, and the protecting

powers have intimated to King Otho, in very strong terns, that he must

immediately commence paying the interest and sinking fund, due in terms of

the treaty which placed the crown of Greece on his head. The whole burden

of this payment, of course, falls on the Greek people, who, we have

already shown, have suffered enough from the government of King Otho,

without this aggravation of their misery. Is it, we ask, just that the

Greeks should be compelled to pay sums expended on decorations to European

statesmen, pensions to Bavarian ministers, staff appointments to French

engineer officers, and ambassadors at foreign courts, when they never were

allowed even to express their conviction of the folly of these measures,

except by the public press? The truth is, that the loan was wasted, and

the amount now to be repaid by Greece was very considerably increased by

the allied powers themselves, who neglected to enforce the provisions of

the very treaty they now call upon the Greeks to execute, though not a

party to it. King Otho borrowed largely from Bavaria, as well as from the

protecting powers--he was at liberty to do so without the allies

attempting to interfere. But he was not entitled to repay any part of this

loan from the revenues of Greece, until the claims of the protecting

powers were satisfied. So says the treaty.

The allies were bound, also, to restrict the auxiliary corps of Bavarians

to 3000 men; yet they allowed King Otho to assemble round his person, at

one time, upwards of 6000 Bavarian troops, and a very great number of

civil officers and forest guards. The King of Bavaria, when he was anxious

to secure the throne for his son, promised "that limited furloughs should

be granted to Bavarian officers, and their pay continued to them. This,"

says his Majesty, "will greatly relieve the Greek treasury, by providing

for the service of the state officers of experience, possessing their own

means of subsistence without any charge upon the country." Now, the allies

knew that every Bavarian officer who put his foot in Greece, received the

pay of a higher rank than he previously held in Bavaria from the Greek

treasury. Is it, then, an equal application of the principles of justice

to king and people, to compel the Greeks to pay for the violation of the

King of Bavaria's engagement?[H]

[Footnote H: The paper from which we have quoted the above passage, is

printed as an annex to the protocol appointing King Otho, in the

Parliamentary papers.]

We believe that there now remains only one assertion which we have

ventured to make, which we have not yet proved. We repeat it, and shall

proceed to state our proofs. We say that Greece, if equitably treated, is

not bankrupt, but on the contrary she possesses resources amply sufficient

to discharge all just claims on her revenues, to maintain order in the

country, and to defend her institutions. We shall draw our proof from the

budget of King Otho for the present year, as this statement was laid

before the allied powers to excite their compassion, and show them the

absolute impossibility of King Otho paying his debts.

The revenues of Greece are stated at 14,407,795 drachmas: and we may here

remark, that last year, when his Hellenic majesty expected to persuade the

allies to desist from pressing their claims, he stated the revenues of his

kingdom at ... 17,834,000

The national expenses only amount to ... 11,735,546

Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine — Volume 54, No. 335, September 1843 · 第 20 / 27 题