'Quaeque ipse miserrima vidi,

Et quorum pars magna fui.'

'Which thing myself unhappy did behold,

Yea, and was no small part thereof.'

Morris, _Aeneids_, ii. 5.

[187] In the year 1770, in _The False Alarm_, Johnson attacked Wilkes

with more than 'some asperity.' 'The character of the man,' he wrote, 'I

have no purpose to delineate. Lampoon itself would disdain to speak ill

of him, of whom no man speaks well.' He called him 'a retailer of

sedition and obscenity;' and he said:--'We are now disputing ... whether

Middlesex shall be represented, or not, by a criminal from a gaol.'

_Works_, vi. 156, 169, 177. In _The North Briton_, No. xii, Wilkes,

quoting Johnson's definition of a pensioner, asks:--'Is the said Mr.

Johnson a _dependant_? or is he _a slave of state, hired by a stipend

to obey his master_? There is, according to him, no alternative.--As Mr.

Johnson has, I think, failed in this account, may I, after so great an

authority, venture at a short definition of so intricate a word? A

_pension_ then I would call _a gratuity during the pleasure of the

Prince for services performed, or expected to be performed, to himself,

or to the state_. Let us consider the celebrated Mr. _Johnson_, and a

few other late pensioners in this light.'

[188] Boswell, in his _Letter to the People of Scotland_ (p. 70),

mentions 'my old classical companion, Wilkes;' and adds, 'with whom I

pray you to excuse my keeping company, he is so pleasant.'

[189] When Johnson was going to Auchinleck, Boswell begged him, in

talking with his father, 'to avoid three topicks as to which they

differed very widely; whiggism, presbyterianism, and--Sir John Pringle.'

Boswell's _Hebrides_, Nov 2, 1773. See also _ib_. Aug 24. 'Pringle was

President of the Royal Society--"who sat in Newton's chair, And wonder'd

how the devil he got there."' J. H. Burton's _Hume_, i. 165. He was one

of Franklin's friends (Franklin's _Memoirs_ iii. III), and so was likely

to be uncongenial to Johnson.

[190] No 22. CROKER. At this house 'Johnson owned that he always found a

good dinner.' _Post_, April 15, 1778.

[191] This has been circulated as if actually said by Johnson; when the

truth is, it was only _supposed_ by me. BOSWELL.

[192] 'Don't let them be _patriots_,' he said to Mr. Hoole, when he

asked him to collect a city Club. _Post_, April 6, 1781.

[193] See p. 7 of this volume. BOSWELL.

[194] 'Indifferent in his choice to sleep or die.' Addison's _Cato_,

act v. sc. 1.

[195] See _ante_, i. 485.

[196] He was at this time 'employed by Congress as a private and

confidential agent in England.' Dr. Franklin had arranged for letters to

be sent to him, not by post but by private hand, under cover to his

brother, Mr. Alderman Lee. Franklin's _Memoirs_, ii. 42, and iii. 415.

[197] When Wilkes the year before, during his mayoralty, had presented

An Address, 'the King himself owned he had never seen so well-bred a

Lord Mayor.' Walpole's _Journal of the Reign of George III_, i. 484.

[198] Johnson's _London, a Poem_, v. 145. BOSWELL--

'How when competitors like these contend,

Can surly virtue hope to fix a friend.'

[199] See _ante_, ii. 154.

[200] Johnson had said much the same at a dinner in Edinburgh. See

Boswell's _Hebrides_, Nov. 10, 1773. See _ante_, March 15, 1776, and

_post_, Sept. 21, 1777.

[201] 'To convince any man against his will is hard, but to please him

against his will is justly pronounced by Dryden to be above the reach of

human abilities.' _The Rambler_, No. 93.

[202] Foote told me that Johnson said of him, 'For loud obstreperous

broadfaced mirth, I know not his equal.' BOSWELL.

[203] In Farquhar's _Beaux-Stratagem_, Scrub thus describes his duties:

--'Of a Monday I drive the coach, of a Tuesday I drive the plough, on

Wednesday I follow the hounds, a Thursday I dun the tenants, on Friday I

go to market, on Saturday I draw warrants, and a Sunday I draw beer.'

Act iii. sc. 3.

[204] See _ante_, i. 393, note 1.

[205] See _post_, April 10, 1778, and April 24, 1779.

[206] See _ante_, i. 216, note 2.

[207] See _ante_, March 20, 1776, and Boswell's _Hebrides_, Sept. 22.

[208] Dryden had been dead but thirty-six years when Johnson came to

London.

[209] 'Owen MacSwinny, a buffoon; formerly director of the play-house.'

Horace Walpole, _Letters_, i. 118. Walpole records one of his puns.

'Old Horace' had left the House of Commons to fight a duel, and at once

'returned, and was so little moved as to speak immediately upon the

_Cambrick Bill_, which made Swinny say, "That it was a sign he was not

_ruffled_."' _Ib_. p. 233. See also, _ib_. vi. 373 for one of his

stories.

[210] A more amusing version of the story, is in _Johnsoniana_

(ed. 1836, p. 413) on the authority of Mr. Fowke. '"So Sir," said

Johnson to Cibber, "I find you know [knew?] Mr. Dryden?" "Know him? O

Lord! I was as well acquainted with him as if he had been my own

brother." "Then you can tell me some anecdotes of him?" "O yes, a

thousand! Why we used to meet him continually at a club at Button's. I

remember as well as if it were but yesterday, that when he came into the

room in winter time, he used to go and sit by the fire in one corner;

and in summer time he would always go and sit in the window." "Thus,

Sir," said Johnson, "what with the corner of the fire in winter and the

window in summer, you see that I got _much_ information from Cibber of

the manners and habits of Dryden.'" Johnson gives, in his _Life of

Dryden_ (_Works_, vii. 300), the information that he got from Swinney

and Cibber. Dr. Warton, who had written on Pope, found in one of the

poet's female-cousins a still more ignorant survivor. 'He had been

taught to believe that she could furnish him with valuable information.

Incited by all that eagerness which characterised him, he sat close to

her, and enquired her consanguinity to Pope. "Pray, Sir," said she, "did

not you write a book about my cousin Pope?" "Yes, madam." "They tell me

t'was vastly clever. He wrote a great many plays, did not he?" "I have

heard of only one attempt, Madam." "Oh no, I beg your pardon; that was

Mr. Shakespeare; I always confound them."' Wooll's _Warton_, p. 394.

[211] Johnson told Malone that 'Cibber was much more ignorant even of

matters relating to his own profession than he could well have

conceived any man to be who had lived nearly sixty years with players,

authors, and the most celebrated characters of the age.' Prior's

_Malone_, p. 95. See _ante_, ii. 92.

[212] 'There are few,' wrote Goldsmith, 'who do not prefer a page of

Montaigne or Colley Cibber, who candidly tell us what they thought of

the world, and the world thought of them, to the more stately memoirs

and transactions of Europe.' Cunningham's _Goldsmith's Works_, iv. 43.

[213] _Essay on Criticism_, i. 66.

[214] 'Cibber wrote as bad Odes (as Garrick), but then Gibber wrote

_The Careless Husband_, and his own _Life_, which both deserve

immortality.' Walpole's _Letters_, v. 197. Pope (_Imitations of Horace_,

II. i. 90), says:--

'All this may be; the people's voice is odd,

It is, and it is not, the voice of God.

To Gammer Gurton if it give the bays,

And yet deny _The Careless Husband_ praise,

Or say our fathers never broke a rule;

Why then, I say, the public is a fool.'

See _ante_, April 6, 1775.

[215] See page 402 of vol. i. BOSWELL.

[216] Milton's _L'Allegro_, 1. 36.

[217] 'CATESBY. My Liege, the Duke of Buckingham is taken. RICHARD. Off

with his head. So much for Buckingham.' Colley Gibber's _Richard III_,

iv. I.

[218] _Ars Poetica, i. 128.

[219] My very pleasant friend himself, as well as others _who remember

old stories_, will no doubt be surprised, when I observe that _John

Wilkes_ here shews himself to be of the WARBURTONIAN SCHOOL. It is

nevertheless true, as appears from Dr. Hurd the Bishop of Worcester's

very elegant commentary and notes on the '_Epistola ad Pisones_.'

It is necessary to a fair consideration of the question, that the whole

passage in which the words occur should be kept in view:

'Si quid inexpertum scenae committis, et audes

Personam formare novam, servetur ad imum

Qualis ab incepto processerit, et sibi constet.

Difficile est propriè communia dicere: tuque

Rectiùs Iliacum carmen deducis in actus,

Quàm si proferres ignota indictaque primus,

Publica materies privati juris erit, si

Non circa vilem patulumque moraberis orbem,

Nec verbum verbo curabis reddere fidus

Interpres; nee desilies imitator in artum

Unde pedem proferre pudor vetat aut operis lex.'

The 'Commentary' thus illustrates it: 'But the formation of quite _new

characters_ is a work of great difficulty and hazard. For here there is

no generally received and fixed _archetype_ to work after, but every one

_judges_ of common right, according to the extent and comprehension of

his own idea; therefore he advises to labour and refit _old characters

and subjects_, particularly those made known and authorised by the

practice of Homer and the Epick writers.'

The 'Note' is,

'_Difficile_ EST PROPRIE COMMUNIA DICERE.' Lambin's Comment is,

'_Communia hoc loco appellat Horatius argumenta fabularum à nullo adhuc

tractata: et ita, quae cuivis exposita sunt et in medio quodammodo

posita, quasi vacua et à nemine occupata_.' And that this is the true

meaning of _communia_ is evidently fixed by the words _ignota

indictaque_, which are explanatory of it; so that the sense given it in

the commentary is unquestionably the right one. Yet, notwithstanding the

clearness of the case, a late critick has this strange passage:

'_Difficile quidem esse propriè communia dicere, hoc est, materiam

vulgarem, notam et è medio petitam, ita immutare atque exornare, ut nova

et scriptori propria videatur, ultra concedimus; et maximi procul dubio

ponderis ista est observatio. Sed omnibus utrinque collatis, et tum

difficilis, tum venusti, tam judicii quam ingenii ratione habitá, major

videtur esse gloria fabulam formare penitùs novam, quàm veterem,

utcunque mutatam, de novo exhibere_. (Poet. Prael. v. ii. p. 164.)

Where, having first put a wrong construction on the word _comnmnia_, he

employs it to introduce an impertinent criticism. For where does the

poet prefer the glory of refitting _old_ subjects to that of inventing

new ones? The contrary is implied in what he urges about the superiour

difficulty of the latter, from which he dissuades his countrymen, only

in respect of their abilities and inexperience in these matters; and in

order to cultivate in them, which is the main view of the Epistle, a

spirit of correctness, by sending them to the old subjects, treated by

the Greek writers.'

For my own part (with all deference for Dr. Hurd, who thinks the _case

clear_,) I consider the passage, '_Difficile est propriè communia

dicere_,' to be a _crux_ for the criticks on Horace.

The explication which My Lord of Worcester treats with so much contempt,

is nevertheless countenanced by authority which I find quoted by the

learned Baxter in his edition of Horace: '_Difficile est propriè

communia dicere_, h.e. res vulgares disertis verbis enarrare, vel humile

thema cum dignitate tractare. _Difficile est communes res propriis

explicare verbis_. Vet. Schol.' I was much disappointed to find that the

great critick, Dr. Bentley, has no note upon this very difficult

passage, as from his vigorous and illuminated mind I should have

expected to receive more satisfaction than I have yet had.

_Sanadon_ thus treats of it: '_Propriè communia dicere; c'est à dire,

qu'il n'est pas aisé de former à ces personnages d'imagination, des

caractêres particuliers et cependant vraisemblables. Comme l'on a eté le

maitre de les former tels qu'on a voulu, les fautes que l'on fait en

cela sont moins pardonnables. C'est pourquoi Horace conseille de prendre

toujours des sujets connus tels que sont par exemple ceux que l'on peut

tirer des poèmes d'Homere_.'

And _Dacier_ observes upon it, '_Apres avoir marqué les deux qualités

qu'il faut donner aux personnages qu'on invente, il conseille aux Poêtes

tragiques, de n'user pas trop facilement de cette liberté quils ont d'en

inventer, car il est três difficile de reussir dans ces nouveaux

caractêres. Il est mal aisé, dit Horace_, de traiter proprement, _c'st à

dire_ convenablement, _des_ sujets communs; _c'est à dire, des sujets

inventés, et qui n'ont aucun fondement ni dans l'Histoire ni dans la

Fable; et il les appelle_ communs, _parce qu'ils sont en disposition à

tout le monde, et que tout le monde a le droit de les inventer, et

qu'ils sont, comme on dit, au premier occupant_.' See his observations

at large on this expression and the following.

After all, I cannot help entertaining some doubt whether the words,

_Difficile est propriè communia dicere_, may not have been thrown in by

Horace to form a _separate_ article in a 'choice of difficulties' which

a poet has to encounter, who chooses a new subject; in which case it

must be uncertain which of the various explanations is the true one, and

every reader has a right to decide as it may strike his own fancy. And

even should the words be understood as they generally are, to be

connected both with what goes before and what comes after, the exact

sense cannot be absolutely ascertained; for instance, whether _propriè_

is meant to signify _in an appropriated manner_, as Dr. Johnson here

understands it, or, as it is often used by Cicero, _with propriety_, or

_elegantly_. In short, it is a rare instance of a defect in perspicuity

in an admirable writer, who with almost every species of excellence, is

peculiarly remarkable for that quality. The length of this note perhaps

requires an apology. Many of my readers, I doubt not, will admit that a

critical discussion of a passage in a favourite classick is very

engaging. BOSWELL. Boswell's French in this tedious note is left as he

printed it.

[220] Johnson, after describing Settle's attack on Dryden, continues

(_Works_, vii. 277):--'Such are the revolutions of fame, or such is the

prevalence of fashion, that the man whose works have not yet been

thought to deserve the care of collecting them, who died forgotten in

an hospital, and whose latter years were spent in contriving shows for

fairs ... might with truth have had inscribed upon his stone:--

"Here lies the Rival and Antagonist of Dryden."'

Pope introduces him in _The Dunciad_, i. 87, in the description of the

Lord Mayor's Show:--

'Pomps without guilt, of bloodless swords and maces,

Glad chains, warm furs, broad banners and broad faces.

Now night descending the proud scene was o'er,

But lived in Settle's numbers one day more.'

In the third book the ghost of Settle acts the part of guide in the

Elysian shade.

[221] Johnson implies, no doubt, that they were both Americans by birth.

Trecothick was in the American trade, but he was not an American.

Walpole's _Memoirs of the Reign of George III_, iii. 184, note. Of

Beckford Walpole says:--'Under a jovial style of good humour he was

tyrannic in Jamaica, his native country.' _Ib_. iv. 156. He came over to

England when young and was educated in Westminster School. Stephens's

_Horne Tooke_, ii. 278. Cowper describes 'a jocular altercation that

passed when I was once in the gallery [of the House], between Mr. Rigby

and the late Alderman Beckford. The latter was a very incorrect speaker,

and the former, I imagine, not a very accurate scholar. He ventured,

however, upon a quotation from Terence, and delivered it thus, _Sine

Scelere et Baccho friget venus_. The Alderman interrupted him, was very

severe upon his mistake, and restored Ceres to her place in the

sentence. Mr. Rigby replied, that he was obliged to his worthy friend

for teaching him Latin, and would take the first opportunity to return

the favour by teaching him English.' Southey's _Cowper_, iii. 317. Lord

Chatham, in the House of Lords, said of Trecothick:--'I do not know in

office a more upright magistrate, nor in private life a worthier man.'

_Parl. Hist_. xvi. 1101. See _post_, Sept. 23, 1777.

[222]

'Oft have I heard thee mourn the wretched lot

Of the poor, mean, despised, insulted Scot,

Who, might calm reason credit idle tales,

By rancour forged where prejudice prevails,

Or starves at home, or practises through fear

Of starving arts which damn all conscience here.'

Churchill's _Prophecy of Famine, Poems_, i. 105.

[223] For Johnson's praise of Lichfield see _ante_, March 23, 1776. For

the use of the word _civility_, see _ante_ ii. 155.

[224] See _ante_, i. 447.

[225] See _ante_, April 18, 1775.

[226] See _post_, April 15, 1778.

[227] It would not become me to expatiate on this strong and pointed

remark, in which a very great deal of meaning is condensed. BOSWELL.

[228] 'Mr. Wilkes's second political essay was an ironical dedication to

the Earl of Bute of Ben Jonson's play, _The Fall of Mortimer_. "Let me

entreat your Lordship," he wrote, "to assist your friend [Mr. Murphy] in

perfecting the weak scenes of this tragedy, and from the crude labours

of Ben Jonson and others to give us a _complete play_. It is the warmest

wish of my heart that the Earl of Bute may speedily complete the story of

Roger Mortimer."' Almon's _Wilkes_, i. 70, 86.

[229] Yet Wilkes within less than a year violently attacked Johnson in

parliament. He said, 'The two famous doctors, Shebbeare and Johnson, are

in this reign the state hirelings called pensioners.' Their names, he

continued, 'disgraced the Civil List. They are the known pensioned

advocates of despotism.' _Parl. Hist_. xix. 118. It is curious that

Boswell does not mention this attack, and that Johnson a few months

after it was made, speaking of himself and Wilkes, said:--'The contest

is now over.' _Post_, Sept 21, 1777.

[230] The next day he wrote to Mrs. Thrale:--'For my part, I begin to

settle and keep company with grave aldermen. I dined yesterday in the

Poultry with Mr. Alderman Wilkes, and Mr. Alderman Lee, and Counsellor

Lee, his brother. There sat you the while, so sober, with your W----'s

and your H----'s, and my aunt and her turnspit; and when they are gone,

you think by chance on Johnson, what is he doing? What should he be

doing? He is breaking jokes with Jack Wilkes upon the Scots. Such,

Madam, are the vicissitudes of things.' _Piozzi Letters_, i. 325.

[231] See _ante_, March 20, 1776.

[232] If he had said this on a former occasion to a lady, he said it

also on a latter occasion to a gentleman--Mr. Spottiswoode. _Post_,

April 28, 1778. Moreover, Miss Burney records in 1778, that when Johnson

was telling about Bet Flint (_post_, May 8, 1781) and other strange

characters whom he had known, 'Mrs. Thrale said, "I wonder, Sir, you

never went to see Mrs. Rudd among the rest." "Why, Madam, I believe I

should," said he, "if it was not for the newspapers; but I am prevented

many frolics that I should like very well, since I am become such a

theme for the papers."' Mme. D'Arblay's _Diary_, i. 90.

[233] Pope, _Essay on Man_, ii. 2.

[234] Johnson wrote to Mrs. Thrale on May 14 (Tuesday):--'----goes away

on Thursday, very well satisfied with his journey. Some great men have

promised to obtain him a place, and then a fig for my father and his new

wife.' _Piozzi Letters_, i. 324. He is writing no doubt of Boswell; yet,

as Lord Auchinleck had been married more than six years, it is odd his

wife should be called _new_. Boswell, a year earlier, wrote to Temple of

his hopes from Lord Pembroke:--'How happy should I be to get an

independency by my own influence while my father is alive!' _Letters of

Boswell_, p. 182. Johnson, in a second letter to Mrs. Thrale, written

two days after Boswell left, says:--'B---- went away on Thursday night,

with no great inclination to travel northward; but who can contend with

destiny? ... He carries with him two or three good resolutions; I hope

they will not mould upon the road.' _Piozzi Letters_, i. 333.

[235] 1 _Corinthians_, xiii. 5.

[236] This passage, which is found in Act iii, is not in the acting copy

of _Douglas_.

[237] Malone was one of these gentlemen. See _post_, under June 30,

1784. Reynolds, after saying that eagerness for victory often led

Johnson into acts of rudeness, while 'he was not thus strenuous for

victory with his intimates in tête-à-tête conversations when there were

no witnesses,' adds:--'Were I to write the Life of Dr. Johnson I would

labour this point, to separate his conduct that proceeded from his

passions, and what proceeded from his reason, from his natural

disposition seen in his quiet hours.' Taylor's _Reynolds_, ii. 462.

[238] These words must have been in the other copy. They are not in that

which was preferred. BOSWELL.

[239] On June 3 he wrote that he was suffering from 'a very serious and

troublesome fit of the gout. I enjoy all the dignity of lameness. I

receive ladies and dismiss them sitting. _Painful pre-eminence_.' _Piozzi

Letters_, i. 337. 'Painful pre-eminence' comes from Addison's _Cato_,

act iii. sc. 5. Pope, in his _Essay on Man_, iv. 267, borrows the

phrase:--

'Painful pre-eminence! yourself to view,

Above life's weakness and its comforts too.'

It is humorously introduced into the _Rolliad_ in the description of the

Speaker:--

'There Cornewall sits, and oh! unhappy fate!

Must sit for ever through the long debate.

Painful pre-eminence! he hears, 'tis true,

Fox, North, and Burke, but hears Sir Joseph too.'

[240] Dean Stanley (_Memorials of Westminster Abbey_, p. 297) says:--

'One expression at least has passed from the inscription into the

proverbial Latin of mankind--

"Nihil tetigit quod non ornavit."'

In a note he adds:--'Professor Conington calls my attention to the fact

that, if this were a genuine classical expression, it would be

_ornaret_. The slight mistake proves that it is Johnson's own.' The

mistake, of course, is the Dean's and the Professor's, who did not take

the trouble to ascertain what Johnson had really written. If we may

trust Cradock, Johnson here gave in a Latin form what he had already

said in English. 'When a bookseller ventured to say something rather

slightingly of Dr. Goldsmith, Johnson retorted:--"Sir, Goldsmith never

touches any subject but he adorns it." Once when I found the Doctor very

low at his chambers I related this circumstance to him, and it instantly

proved a cordial.' Cradock's _Memoirs_, i. 231.

[241] According to Mr. Forster (_Life of Goldsmith_, i. 1), he was born

on Nov. 10, 1728. There is a passage in Goldsmith's _Bee_, No. 2, which

leads me to think that he himself held Nov. 12 as his birth-day. He says;

'I shall be sixty-two the twelfth of next November.' Now, as _The Bee_

was published in October 1759, he would be, not sixty-two, but just half

that number--thirty-one on his next birth-day. It is scarcely likely that

he selected the number and the date at random.

[242] Reynolds chose the spot in Westminster Abbey where the monument

should stand. Northcote's _Reynolds_, i. 326.

[243] For A. Chamier, see _ante_, i. 478, note 1; and _post_, April 9,

1778: for P. Metcalfe, _post_, under Dec. 20, 1782. W. Vachell seems

only known to fame as having signed this _Round Robin_, and attended Sir

Joshua's funeral. Who Tho. Franklin was I cannot learn. He certainly was

not Thomas Francklin, D.D., the Professor of Greek at Cambridge and

translator of _Sophocles_ and _Lucian_, mentioned _post_, end of 1780.

The Rev. Dr. Luard, the Registrar of that University, has kindly

compared for me six of his signatures ranging from 1739 to 1770. In each

of these the _c_ is very distinct, while the writing is unlike the

signature in the _Round Robin_.

[244] Horace Walpole wrote in Dec. of this year:--'The conversation of

many courtiers was openly in favour of arbitrary power. Lord Huntingdon

and Dr. Barnard, who was promised an Irish Bishopric, held such

discourse publicly.' _Journal of the Reign of George III_, ii. 91.

[245] He however upon seeing Dr. Warton's name to the suggestion, that

the Epitaph should be in English, observed to Sir Joshua, 'I wonder

that Joe Warton, a scholar by profession, should be such a fool.' He

said too, 'I should have thought Mund Burke would have had more sense.'

Mr. Langton, who was one of the company at Sir Joshua's, like a sturdy

scholar, resolutely refused to sign the _Round Robin_. The Epitaph is

engraved upon Dr. Goldsmith's monument without any alteration. At

another time, when somebody endeavoured to argue in favour of its being

in English, Johnson said, 'The language of the country of which a

learned man was a native, is not the language fit for his epitaph, which

should be in ancient and permanent language. Consider, Sir; how you

should feel, were you to find at Rotterdam an epitaph upon Erasmus _in

Dutch_!' For my own part I think it would be best to have Epitaphs

written both in a learned language, and in the language of the country;

so that they might have the advantage of being more universally

understood, and at the same time be secured of classical stability. I

cannot, however, but be of opinion, that it is not sufficiently

discriminative. Applying to Goldsmith equally the epithets of '_Poetae_,

_Historici_, _Physici_,' is surely not right; for as to his claim to the

last of those epithets, I have heard Johnson himself say, 'Goldsmith,

Sir, will give us a very fine book upon the subject; but if he can

distinguish a cow from a horse, that, I believe, may be the extent of

his knowledge of natural history.' His book is indeed an excellent

performance, though in some instances he appears to have trusted too

much to Buffon, who, with all his theoretical ingenuity and

extraordinary eloquence, I suspect had little actual information in the

science on which he wrote so admirably. For instance, he tells us that

the _cow_ sheds her horns every two years; a most palpable errour, which

Goldsmith has faithfully transferred into his book. It is wonderful that

Buffon, who lived so much in the country, at his noble seat, should have

fallen into such a blunder. I suppose he has confounded the _cow_ with

the _deer_. BOSWELL. Goldsmith says:--'At three years old the cow sheds

its horns and new ones arise in their place, which continue as long as

it lives.' _Animated Nature_, iii. 12. This statement remains in the

second edition. Johnson said that the epitaph on Sir J. Macdonald

'should have been in Latin, as everything intended to be universal and

permanent should be.' Boswell's _Hebrides_, Sept. 5, 1773. He treated

the notion of an English inscription to Smollett 'with great contempt,

saying, "an English inscription would be a disgrace to Dr. Smollett."'

_Ib_. Oct. 28, 1773.

[246] Beside this Latin Epitaph, Johnson honoured the memory of his

friend Goldsmith with a short one in Greek. See _ante_, July 5, 1774.

BOSWELL.

[247] See _ante_, Oct. 24, 1775.

[248] Upon a settlement of our account of expences on a Tour to the

Hebrides, there was a balance due to me, which Dr. Johnson chose to

discharge by sending books. BOSWELL.

[249] See _post_, under Nov. 29, 1777.

[250] Baretti told me that Johnson complained of my writing very long

letters to him when I was upon the continent; which was most certainly

true; but it seems my friend did not remember it. BOSWELL.

[251] See _ante_, iii. 27.

[252] See _ante_, i. 446, for Johnson's remedies against melancholy.

[253] It was not 'last year' but on June 22, 1772, that the negro, James

Somerset--who had been brought to England by his master, had escaped

from him, had been seized, and confined in irons on board a ship in The

Thames that was bound for Jamaica, and had been brought on a writ of

_Habeas Corpus_ before the Court of King's Bench was discharged by Lord

Mansfield. Howell's _State Trials_, xx. 79, and Lofft's _Reports_, 1772,

p. 1. 'Lord Mansfield,' writes Lord Campbell (_Lives of the Chief

Justices_, ii. 418), 'first established the grand doctrine that the air

of England is too pure to be breathed by a slave.' According to Lord

Campbell, Mansfield's judgment thus ended:--'The air of England has long

been too pure for a slave, and every man is free who breathes it. Every

man who comes into England is entitled to the protection of English law,

whatever oppression he may heretofore have suffered, and whatever may be

the colour of his skin:

'"Quamvis ille niger, quamvis tu candidus esses."

'Let the negro be discharged.'

Where Lord Campbell found this speech, that is to say if he did not put

it together himself, I cannot guess. Mansfield's judgment was very

brief. He says in the conclusion:--'The only question before us is,

whether the cause on the return [to the writ of _habeas corpus_] is

sufficient. If it is, the negro must be remanded; if it is not, he must

be discharged. Accordingly the return states that the slave departed,

and refused to serve; whereupon he was kept to be sold abroad. So high

an act of dominion must be recognised by the law of the country where it

is used. The power of a master over his slave has been extremely

different in different countries. The state of slavery is of such a

nature that it is incapable of being introduced on any reasons, moral or

political.... It is so odious that nothing can be suffered to support it

but positive law. Whatever inconveniences therefore may follow from a

decision, I cannot say this case is allowed or approved by the law of

England; and therefore the black must be discharged.' Lofft's _Reports_,

1772, p. 19. 'The judgment of the court,' says Broom (_Constitutional

Law_, 1885, p. 99), 'was delivered by Lord Mansfield, C.J., after some

delay, and with evident reluctance.' The passage about the air of

England that Campbell puts into Mansfield's mouth is found in Mr.

Hargrave's argument on May 14, 1772, where he speaks of England as 'a

soil whose air is deemed too pure for slaves to breathe in.' Lofft's

_Reports_, p. 2. Mr. Dunning replied:--'Let me take notice, neither the

air of England is too pure for a slave to breathe in, nor the laws of

England have rejected servitude.' _Ib_. p. 12. Serjeant Davy

rejoined:--'It has been asserted, and is now repeated by me, this air is

too pure for a slave to breathe in. I trust I shall not quit this court

without certain conviction of the truth of that assertion.' _Ib_. p. 17.

Lord Mansfield said nothing about the air. The line from Virgil, with

which Lord Campbell makes Mansfield's speech end, was 'the happily

chosen motto' to Maclaurin's published argument for the negro; Joseph

Knight, _post_, under Nov. 29, 1777.

[254] The son of Johnson's old friend, Mr. William Drummond. (See vol.

ii. pp. 26-29.) He was a young man of such distinguished merit, that he

was nominated to one of the medical professorships in the College of

Edinburgh without solicitation, while he was at Naples. Having other

views, he did not accept of the honour, and soon afterwards died.

BOSWELL.

[255] In the third and subsequent editions the date is wrongly given as

the 16th.

[256] A Florentine nobleman, mentioned by Johnson in his _Notes of his

Tour in France_ [_ante_, Oct. 18, 1775]. I had the pleasure of becoming

acquainted with him in London, in the spring of this year. BOSWELL. Mrs.

Thrale wrote to Johnson from Bath on May 16:--'Count Manucci would wait

seven years to come with you; so do not disappoint the man, but bring

him along with you. His delight in your company is like Boniface's

exultation when the squire speaks Latin; for understand you he

certainly cannot.' _Piozzi Letters_, i. 328. It was not the squire,

but the priest, Foigard, who by his Latin did Boniface good.

_The Beaux Strategem_, act iii. sc. 2.

[257] _Pr. and Med_. p. 151.

[258] _St. James_, i. 17.

[259] See _ante_, ii. 175. Seven and even eight years later Paterson was

still a student in need of Johnson's recommendation. _Post_, June 2,

1783, and April 5, 1784.

[260] See _ante_, p. 58.

[261] Why his Lordship uses the epithet _pleasantly_, when speaking of

a grave piece of reasoning, I cannot conceive. But different men have

different notions of pleasantry. I happened to sit by a gentleman one

evening at the Opera-house in London, who, at the moment when _Medea_

appeared to be in great agony at the thought of killing her children,

turned to me with a smile, and said, '_funny_ enough.' BOSWELL.

[262] Dr. Johnson afterwards told me, that he was of opinion that a

clergyman had this right. BOSWELL.

[263] Johnson, nearly three years earlier, had said of Granger:--'The

dog is a Whig. I do not like much to see a Whig in any dress; but I hate

to see a Whig in a parson's gown.' Boswell's _Hebrides_, Sept. 24, 1773.

[264] 'I did my utmost,' wrote Horace Walpole (_Letters_, v. 168), 'to

dissuade Mr. Granger from the dedication, and took especial pains to get

my _virtues_ left out of the question.'

[265]

'In moderation placing all my glory,

While Tories call me Whig, and Whigs a Tory.'

Pope, _Imitations of Horace_, Bk. ii Sat. I. 1. 67.

[266] 'One of the dippers at Brighthelmstone, seeing Mr. Johnson swim in

the year 1766, said:--"Why, Sir, you must have been a stout-hearted

gentleman forty years ago."' _Piozzi's Anec_. p. 113. Johnson, in his

verses entitled, _In Rivum a Mola Stoana Lichfeldiæ diffluentem_

(_Works_, i. 163), writes:--

'Errat adhuc vitreus per prata virentia rivus,

Quo toties lavi membra tenella puer;

Hic delusa rudi frustrabar brachia motu,

Dum docuit blanda voce natare pater.'

[267] For this and Dr. Johnson's other letters to Mr. Levett, I am

indebted to my old acquaintance Mr. Nathaniel Thomas, whose worth and

ingenuity have been long known to a respectable, though not a wide

circle; and whose collection of medals would do credit to persons of

greater opulence. BOSWELL.

[268] Johnson's letters to Mrs. Thrale shew the difference between

modern Brighton and the Brighthelmstone of his days. Thus he writes:--

'Ashbourne, Sept. 27, 1777. I know not when I shall write again, now

you are going to the world's end [i.e. Brighton]. _Extra anni solisque

vias_, where the post will be a long time in reaching you. I shall,

notwithstanding all distance, continue to think on you.' _Piozzi

Letters_, i. 387. 'Oct. 6, 1777. Methinks you are now a great way off;

and if I come, I have a great way to come to you; and then the sea is so

cold, and the rooms are so dull; yet I do love to hear the sea roar and

my mistress talk--For when she talks, ye gods! how she will talk. I wish

I were with you, but we are now near half the length of England asunder.

It is frightful to think how much time must pass between writing this

letter and receiving an answer, if any answer were necessary.'

_Ib_. ii. 2.

[269] Boswell wrote to Temple on Nov. 3, 1780:--'I could not help

smiling at the expostulation which you suggest to me to try with my

father. It would do admirably with some fathers; but it would make mine

much worse, for he cannot bear that his son should talk with him as a

man. I can only lament his unmelting coldness to my wife and children,

for I fear it is hopeless to think of his ever being more affectionate

towards them. Yet it must be acknowledged that his paying £1000 of my

debt some years ago was a large bounty. He allows me £300 a year.'

_Letters of Boswell_, p. 255.

[270] See _ante_, Aug. 27, 1775, note.

[271] See _ante_, p. 48, note 4.

[272] 'He said to me often that the time he spent in this Tour was

the pleasantest part of his life, and asked me if I would lose the

recollection of it for five hundred pounds.' Boswell's _Hebrides_,

under Nov. 22, 1773.

[273] Chap. viii. 10. A translation of this work is in

_Bibliotheca Pastorum_, ed. J. Ruskin, vol. i.

[274] 'The chief cause of my deficiency has been a life immethodical

and unsettled, which breaks all purposes, confounds and suppresses

memory, and perhaps leaves too much leisure to imagination.' _Pr. and

Med_. p. 136.

[275] Johnson wrote to Boswell (_ante_, June 12, 1774):--'I have

stipulated twenty-five for you to give in your own name.' The book was

published early in 1775. On Feb. 25, 1775, he wrote:--'I am sorry that I

could get no books for my friends in Scotland. Mr. Strahan has at last

promised to send two dozen to you.' It is strange that not far short of

two years passed before the books were sent.

[276] Boswell had 'expressed his extreme aversion to his father's

second marriage.' _Letters of Boswell_, p. 255--On Sept. 2, 1775, he

thus described his step-mother:--'His wife, whom in my conscience I

cannot condemn for any capital bad quality, is so narrow-minded, and, I

don't know how, so set upon keeping him under her own management, and so

suspicious and so sourishly tempered that it requires the utmost

exertion of practical philosophy to keep myself quiet.' _Ib_. p. 216.

[277] See _ante_, Jan. 19 and May 6, 1775.

[278] See _ante_, p. 86.

[279] See _ante_, May 27, 1775.

[280] Macquarry was the chief of Ulva's Isle. 'He told us,' writes

Boswell, 'his family had possessed Ulva for nine hundred years; but I

was distressed to hear that it was soon to be sold for payment of his

debts.' Boswell's _Hebrides_, Oct 16, 1773.

[281] See _ante_, March 24, 1776.

[282] Mrs. Thrale gives a long but scarcely credible account of her

quarrel with Baretti. It is very unlikely that he used to say to her

eldest daughter 'that, if her mother died in a lying-in which happened

while he lived here, he hoped Mr. Thrale would marry Miss Whitbred, who

would be a pretty companion for her, and not tyrannical and overbearing

like me.' Hayward's _Piozzi_, ii. 336. No doubt in 1788 he attacked her

brutally (see _ante_, p. 49). 'I could not have suspected him,' wrote

Miss Burney, 'of a bitterness of invective so cruel, so ferocious.' Mme.

D'Arblay's _Diary_, iv. 185. The attack was provoked. Mrs. Piozzi, in

January, 1788, published one of Johnson's letters, in which he wrote--at

all events she says he wrote:--'Poor B----i! do not quarrel with him; to

neglect him a little will be sufficient. He means only to be frank, and

manly, and independent, and perhaps, as you say, a little wise. To be

frank he thinks is to be cynical, and to be independent is to be rude.

Forgive him, dearest lady, the rather because of his misbehaviour I am

afraid he learnt part of me. I hope to set him hereafter a better

example.' _Piozzi Letters_, i. 277. Malone, in 1789, speaks of 'the

roughness for which Baretti was formerly distinguished.' Prior's

_Malone_, p. 391. Mrs. Thrale thus describes his departure: 'My daughter

kept on telling me that Mr. Baretti was grown very old and very cross,

would not look at her exercises, but said he would leave this house

soon, for it was no better than Pandæmonium. The next day he packed up

his cloke-bag, which he had not done for three years, and sent it to

town; and while we were wondering what he would say about it at

breakfast, he was walking to London himself, without taking leave of any

one person, except it may be the girl, who owns they had much talk, in

the course of which he expressed great aversion to me and even to her,

who, [_sic_] he said, he once thought well of.' Hayward's _Piozzi_, ii.

339. Baretti, in the _Eur. Mag_. xiii. 398, told his story. He

said:--'Madam took it into her head to give herself airs, and treat me

with some coldness and superciliousness. I did not hesitate to set down

at breakfast my dish of tea not half drank, go for my hat and stick that

lay in the corner of the room, turn my back to the house _insalutato

hospite_, and walk away to London without uttering a syllable.' In a

marginal note on _Piozzi Letters_, i. 338, he says he left Streatham on

June 4, 1776. 'I had,' he writes, 'by that time been in a manner one of

the family during six years and a-half. Johnson had made me hope that

Thrale would at last give me an annuity for my pains, but, never

receiving a shilling from him or from her, I grew tired at last, and on

some provocation from her left them abruptly.' It should seem that he

afterwards made it up with them, for in a note on vol. ii. p. 191, he

says of the day of Mr. Thrale's death, 'Johnson and I, and many other

friends, were to dine with him that day.' The rest of the note, at all

events, is inaccurate, for he says that 'Mrs. Thrale imparted to Johnson

the news [of her husband's death],' whereas Johnson saw him die.

[283] Mrs. Piozzi says that this money was given to Baretti as a

consolation for the loss of the Italian tour (_ante_, iii. 6). Hayward's

_Piozzi_, ii. 337.

[284] The Duke of York was present when Foote had the accident by which

he lost his leg (_ante_, ii. 95). Moved by compassion, he obtained for

him from the King a royal patent for performances at the Haymarket from

May 14 to Sept. 14 in every year. He played but thrice after his

retirement. Forster's Essays, ii. 400, 435.

[285] Strahan showed greater sagacity about Gibbon's _Decline and Fall_,

which had been declined by Elmsly. 'So moderate were our hopes,' writes

Gibbon (_Misc. Works_, i. 223), 'that the original impression had been

stinted to five hundred, till the number was doubled by the prophetic

taste of Mr. Strahan.' Carrick called Strahan 'rather an _obtuse_ man.'

_Post_, April 9 1778.

[286] See _post_, Sept. 19, 1777, and April 20, 1781.

[287] Johnson, I believe, at this time suffered less than usual from

despondency. See _ante_, iii. 25, note 1. The passage in which these

words are found applies to one day only. It is as follows:--'March 28.

This day is Good Friday. It is likewise the day on which my poor Tetty

was taken from me. My thoughts were disturbed in bed. I remembered

that it was my wife's dying day, and begged pardon for all our sins, and

commended her; but resolved to mix little of my own sorrows or cares

with the great solemnity. Having taken only tea without milk I went to

church; had time before service to commend my wife, and wished to join

quietly in the service, but I did not hear well, and my mind grew

unsettled and perplexed. Having rested ill in the night I slumbered at

the sermon, which, I think, I could not as I sat perfectly hear.... At

night I had some ease. L.D. [Laus Deo] I had prayed for pardon and

peace.' _Pr. and Med_. p. 153. Hawkins, however (_Life_, p. 532), says,

perhaps with considerable exaggeration, that at this time, 'he sunk into

indolence, till his faculties seemed to be impaired; deafness grew upon

him; long intervals of mental absence interrupted his conversation, and

it was difficult to engage his attention to any subject. His friends

concluded that his lamp was emitting its last rays, but the lapse of a

short period gave them ample proofs to the contrary.' The proofs were

_The Lives of the Poets_. Johnson himself says of this time:--'Days and

months pass in a dream; and I am afraid that my memory grows less

tenacious, and my observation less attentive.' _Pr. and Med_. 160.

[288]

'Lo, the poor Indian! whose untutor'd mind

Sees God in clouds, or hears him in the wind.'

Pope's _Essay on Man_, i. 99.

[289] '"I inherited," said Johnson, "a vile melancholy from my father,

which has made me mad all my life, at least not sober."' Boswell's

_Hebrides_, Sept. 16, 1773. See _ante_, i. 65, and _post_, Sept. 20,

1777.

[290] _Pr. and Med_. p. 155. BOSWELL.

[291] _Pr. and Med_. p. 158. BOSWELL.

[292] He continues:--'I passed the afternoon with such calm gladness of

mind as it is very long since I felt before. I passed the night in such

sweet uninterrupted sleep as I have not known since I slept at Fort

Augustus.' See _post_, Nov. 21, 1778, where in a letter to Boswell he

says:--'The best night that I have had these twenty years was at Fort

Augustus.' In 1767 he mentions (_Pr. and Med_. p. 73) 'a sudden relief

he once had by a good night's rest in Fetter Lane,' where he had lived

many years before. His good nights must have been rare indeed.

[293] Bishop Percy says that he handed over to Johnson various memoranda

which he had received from 'Goldsmith's brother and others of his family,

to afford materials for a _Life of Goldsmith_, which Johnson was to

write and publish for their benefit. But he utterly forgot them and the

subject.' Prior successfully defends Johnson against the charge that he

did not include Goldsmith's _Life_ among the _Lives of the Poets_. 'The

copy-right of _She Stoops to Conquer_ was the property of Carnan the

bookseller (surviving partner of F. Newbery); and Carnan being "a most

impracticable man and at variance with all his brethren," in the words

of Malone to the Bishop, he refused his assent, and the project for the

time fell to the ground.' But Percy clearly implies that it was a

separate work and not one of the _Lives_ that Johnson had undertaken.

See Prior's _Goldsmith_, Preface, p. x. Malone, in a note on Boswell's

letter of July 9, 1777, says:--'I collected some materials for a _Life

of Goldsmith_, by Johnson's desire.' He goes on to mention the quarrel

with Carnan. It should seem then that Johnson was gathering materials

for Goldsmith's _Life_ before the _Lives of the Poets_ were projected;

that later on he intended to include it in that series, but being

thwarted by Carnan that he did nothing.

[294] See Boswell's _Hebrides_, Aug. 24, 1773.

[295] 'I have often desired him not to call me Goldy.' _Ib_. Oct. 14.

[296] 'The Duke of Argyle was obliging enough to mount Dr. Johnson on a

stately steed from his grace's stable. My friend was highly pleased, and

Joseph [Boswell's Bohemian servant] said, "He now looks like a bishop."'

Boswell's _Hebrides_, Oct. 26.

[297] See _ante_, ii. 196.

[298] Even Burke falls into the vulgarism of 'mutual friend.' See his

_Correspondence_, i. 196, ii. 251. Goldsmith also writes of 'mutual

acquaintance.' Cunningham's _Goldsmith's Works_, iv. 48.

[299] He means to imply, I suppose, that Johnson was the father of

plantations. See _ante_, under Feb. 7, 1775. note.

[300] For a character of this very amiable man, see _Journal of a Tour

to the Hebrides_, 3rd edit. p. 36. [Aug. 17.] BOSWELL.

[301] By the then course of the post, my long letter of the 14th had not

yet reached him. BOSWELL.

[302] _History of Philip the Second_. BOSWELL.

[303] See _ante_, Jan. 21, 1775.

[304] See _ante_, iii. 48.

[305] He wrote to Mrs. Thrale on Jan. 15, 1777, that he had had about

twelve ounces of blood taken, and then about ten more, and that another

bleeding was to follow. 'Yet I do not make it a matter of much form. I

was to-day at Mrs. Gardiner's. When I have bled to-morrow, I will not

give up Langton nor Paradise. But I beg that you will fetch me away on

Friday. I do not know but clearer air may do me good; but whether the

air be clear or dark, let me come to you.' _Piozzi Letters_, i. 344. See

_post_, Sept. 16, 1777, note.

[306] See _ante_, i. 411, and Boswell's _Hebrides_, Aug. 24, 1773.

[307] Johnson tried in vain to buy this book at Aberdeen. _Ib_. Aug. 23.

[308] See _ante_, May 12, 1775.

[309] No doubt her _Miscellanies_. _Ante_, ii. 25.

[310] See Boswell's _Hebrides_, Aug. 22.

[311] John_son_ is the most common English formation of the Sirname from

_John_; John_ston_ the Scotch. My illustrious friend observed that many

North Britons pronounced his name in their own way. BOSWELL. Boswell

(_Hebrides_, Oct. 21, 1773) tells of one Lochbuy who, 'being told that

Dr. Johnson did not hear well, bawled out to him, "Are you of the

Johnstons of Glencro, or of Ardnamurchan?"'

[312] See _post_, under Dec. 24, 1783.

[313] Johnson's old amanuensis. _Ante_, i. 187. Johnson described him as

'a man of great learning.' Croker's _Boswell_, p. 654.

[314] On account of their differing from him as to religion and

politicks. BOSWELL. See _post_, April 13, 1778. Mr. Croker says that

'the Club had, as its records show, for many of his latter years very

little of his company.'

[315] See _ante_, i. 225 note 2, July 4, 1774, and March 20, 1776.

[316] Boswell was no reader. 'I don't believe,' Johnson once said to

him, 'you have borrowed from Waller. I wish you would enable yourself

to borrow more.' _Ante_, April 16, 1775. Boswell wrote to Temple on

March 18, 1775:--'I have a kind of impotency of study.' Two months later

he wrote:--'I have promised to Dr. Johnson to read when I get to

Scotland, and to keep an account of what I read. I shall let you know

how I go on. My mind must be nourished.' _Letters of Boswell_, pp. 181,

195.

[317] Chesterfield's _Letters to his Son_ were published in 1774, and

his _Miscellaneous Works_, together with _Memoirs and Letters to his

Friends_, early in 1777.

[318] 'Whatso it is, the Danaan folk, yea gift-bearing I fear.' Morris,

Æneids, ii. 49.

[319] He wrote to Mrs. Thrale on March 19, 1777:--'You are all young,

and gay, and easy; but I have miserable nights, and know not how to make

them better; but I shift pretty well a-days, and so have at you all at

Dr. Burney's to-morrow.' _Piozzi Letters_, i. 345.

[320] A twelfth was born next year. See _post_, July 3, 1778.

[321] It was March 29.

[322] _Pr. and Med_. p. 155. BOSWELL

[323] See _ante_, i. 341, note 3.

[324] See _ante_, i. 439.

[325] Johnson's moderation in demanding so small a sum is extraordinary.

Had he asked one thousand, or even fifteen hundred guineas, the

booksellers, who knew the value of his name, would doubtless have

readily given it. They have probably got five thousand guineas by this

work in the course of twenty-five years. MALONE.

[326] See _post_, beginning of 1781.

[327] See _ante_, ii. 272, note 2.

[328] Mr. Joseph Cooper Walker, of the Treasury, Dublin, who obligingly

communicated to me this and a former letter from Dr. Johnson to the

same gentleman (for which see vol. i. p. 321), writes to me as follows:

--'Perhaps it would gratify you to have some account of Mr. O'Connor. He

is an amiable, learned, venerable old gentleman, of an independent

fortune, who lives at Belanagar, in the county of Roscommon; he is an

admired writer, and Member of the Irish Academy.--The above Letter is

alluded to in the Preface to the 2nd edit, of his _Dissert_, p. 3.'--Mr.

O'Connor afterwards died at the age of eighty-two. See a well-drawn

character of him in the _Gent. Mag_. for August 1791. BOSWELL.

[329] Mr. Croker shows good reason for believing that in the original

letter this parenthesis stood:--'_if such there were_.'

[330] See _ante_, i. 292.

[331] 'Johnson had not heard of Pearce's _Sermons_, which I wondered at,

considering that he wrote all the _Life_ published by the Chaplain

Derby, except what his Lordship wrote himself.' _Letters of Boswell_,

p. 242. See ante, March 20, 1776.

[332] Boswell, it seems, is here quoting himself. See his _Hebrides_,

3rd edit. p. 201 (Sept. 13, 1773), where, however, he lays the emphasis

differently, writing '_fervour_ of loyalty.'

[333] 'An old acquaintance' of the Bishop says that 'he struggled hard

ten years ago to resign his Bishopric and the Deanery of Westminster, in

which our gracious King was willing to gratify him; but upon a

consultation of the Bishops they thought it could not be done with

propriety; yet he was permitted to resign the Deanery.' _Gent. Mag_.

1775, p. 421.

[334] 'This person, it is said, was a stay-maker, but being a man of wit

and parts he betook himself to study, and at a time when the discipline

of the inns of court was scandalously lax, got himself called to the

Bar, and practised at the quarter-sessions under me, but with little

success. He became the conductor of a paper called _The Public Ledger_

and a writer for the stage, in which he met with some encouragement, till

it was insinuated that he was a pensioner of the minister, and therefore

a fit object of patriotic vengeance.' Hawkins's _Johnson_, p. 518. See

_ante_, ii. 48 note, and _post_, 1784, in Mr. Nichols's account of

Johnson's last days.

[335] 'This address had the desired effect. The play was well received.'

Murphy's _Garrick_, p. 302. Johnson wrote to Mrs. Thrale from Lichfield,

'Lucy [his step-daughter] thinks nothing of my prologue for Kelly, and

says she has always disowned it.' _Piozzi Letters_, i. 352.

[336] It was composed at a time when Savage was generally without

lodging, and often without meat. Much of it was written with pen and ink

that were borrowed, on paper that had been picked up in the streets. The

unhappy poet 'was obliged to submit himself wholly to the players, and

admit with whatever reluctance the emendations of Mr. Cibber, which he

always considered as the disgrace of his performance.' When it was

brought out, he himself took the part of Overbury. 'He was so much

ashamed of having been reduced to appear as a player, that he always

blotted out his name from the list when a copy of his tragedy was to be

shown to his friends.' Johnson's _Works_, viii. 110-112.

[337] It was not at Drury-lane, but at Covent Garden theatre, that it

was acted. MALONE.

[338] Part First, Chap 4. BOSWELL. See _ante_ ii. 225.

[339] _Life of Richard Savage_, by Dr. Johnson. BOSWELL.

[340] See _ante_, i. 387, and _post_, May 17, 1783.

[341] Sheridan joined the Literary Club in March, 1777. _The Rivals_

and _The Duenna_ were brought out in 1775; _The Trip to Scarborough_

on Feb. 24, 1777, and _The School for Scandal_ in the following May.

Moore (_Life of Sheridan_, i. 168), speaking of _The Duenna_, says,

'The run of this opera has, I believe, no parallel in the annals of the

drama. Sixty-three nights was the career of _The Beggar's Opera_; but

_The Duenna_ was acted no less than seventy-five times during the

season.' _The Trip to Scarborough_ was a failure. Johnson, therefore,

doubtless referred to _The Rivals_ and _The Duenna_.

[342] The date is wrongly given. Boswell says that he wrote again on

June 23 (_post_, p. 120), and Johnson's letter of June 28 is in answer

to both letters. The right date is perhaps June 9.

[343] See Boswell's _Hebrides_, under Nov. 11, 1773.

[344] See pp. 29, 30, of this volume. BOSWELL.

[345] Johnson, describing 'the fond intimacy' of Quin and Thomson, says

(_Works_, viii. 374):--'The commencement of this benevolence is very

honourable to Quin, who is reported to have delivered Thomson, then

known to him only for his genius, from an arrest by a very considerable

present; and its continuance is honourable to both, for friendship is

not always the sequel of obligation.'

[346] See _ante_, ii. 63, and _post_, June 18, 1778.

[347] Formerly Sub-preceptor to his present Majesty, and afterwards a

Commissioner of Excise. MALONE.

[348] The physician and poet. He died in 1779.

[349] Boswell nine years earlier (_ante_, ii. 63) had heard Johnson

accuse Thomson of gross sensuality.

[350] 'Savage, who lived much with Thomson, once told me he heard a

lady remarking that she could gather from his works three parts of his

character, that he was a great lover, a great swimmer, and rigorously

abstinent; but, said Savage, he knows not any love but that of the sex;

he was perhaps never in cold water in his life; and he indulges himself

in all the luxury that comes within his reach.' Johnson's _Works_, viii.

377.

[351] Dr. Johnson was not the _editor_ of this Collection of _The

English Poets_; he merely furnished the biographical prefaces. MALONE.

See _post_, Sept. 14, 1777.

[352] See _ante_, under April 18, 1775.

[353] One letter he seems to have sent to him from this spot. See

_ante_, ii. 3, note 1.

[354] Dr. Johnson had himself talked of our seeing Carlisle together.

_High_ was a favourite word of his to denote a person of rank. He said

to me, 'Sir, I believe we may at the house of a Roman Catholick lady in

Cumberland; a high lady, Sir.' I afterwards discovered he meant Mrs.

Strickland, sister of Charles Townley, Esq., whose very noble collection

of pictures is not more to be admired, than his extraordinary and polite

readiness in shewing it, which I and several of my friends have

agreeably experienced. They who are possessed of valuable stores of

gratification to persons of taste, should exercise their benevolence in

imparting the pleasure. Grateful acknowledgments are due to Welbore

Ellis Agar, Esq., for the liberal access which he is pleased to allow to

his exquisite collection of pictures. BOSWELL.

[355] See Boswell's _Hebrides_, Sept. 11, 1773.

[356] It is no doubt, on account of its brevity that Boswell in speaking

of it writes:--'What is called _The Life_.'

[357] See Boswell's _Hebrides_, Oct, 29, 1773.

[358] See _ante_, under Feb. 7, 1775.

[359] See post, p. 139.

[360] See _ante_, i. 494.

[361] From Prior's imitation of _Gualterus Danistonus ad Amicos_; the

poem mentioned by Boswell in his _Hebrides_, Aug. 18, 1773.

[362] _Copy_ is _manuscript for printing_.

[363] Hawkins (_Life_, p. 521) says that the jury did not at the trial

recommend Dodd to mercy. To one of the petitions 'Mrs. Dodd first got

the hands of the jury that found the bill against her husband, and after

that, as it is supposed, of the jury that tried him.' Ib. p. 527. He

says that the public were at first very little interested in his fate,

'but by various artifices, and particularly the insertion of his name in

public papers, with such palliatives as he and his friends could invent,

never with the epithet of _unfortunate_, they were betrayed into such an

enthusiastic commiseration of his case as would have led a stranger to

believe that himself had been no accessory to his distresses, but that

they were the inflictions of Providence.' Ib. p. 520. Johnson wrote to

Dr. Taylor on May 19:--'Poor Dodd was sentenced last week.... I am

afraid he will suffer. The clergy seem not to be his friends. The

populace, that was extremely clamorous against him, begins to pity him.

_Notes and Queries_, 6th S., v. 423.

[364] Horace Walpole says 'the criminal was raised to the dignity of a

confessor in the eyes of the people--but an inexorable judge had already

pronounced his doom. Lord Mansfield, who never felt pity, and never

relented unless terrified, had indecently declared for execution even

before the judges had given their opinion. An incident that seemed

favourable weighed down the vigorous [qu. rigorous] scale. The Common

Council had presented a petition for mercy to the king. Lord Mansfield,

who hated the popular party as much as he loved severity, was not likely

to be moved by such intercessors. At Court it grew the language that the

king must discountenance such interposition.' Walpole adds that 'as an

attempt to rescue Dodd might be apprehended, two thousand men were

ordered to be reviewed in Hyde Park during the execution.' _Journal of

the Reign of George III_, ii. 125.

[365] Johnson, in the '_Observations_ inserted in the newspapers'

(_post_, p. 142), said 'that though the people cannot judge of the

administration of justice so well as their governors, yet their voice

has always been regarded. That if the people now commit an error, their

error is on the part of mercy; and that perhaps history cannot shew a

time in which the life of a criminal, guilty of nothing above fraud, was

refused to the cry of nations, to the joint supplication of three and

twenty thousand petitioners.' Hawkins's _Johnson_, p. 528. Johnson's

earnestness as a petitioner contrasts with the scornful way in which he

had spoken of petitions. 'There must be no yielding to encourage this,'

the minister might have answered in his own words. _Ante_, ii. 90.

[366] The king signs no sentences or death warrants; but out of respect

to the Royal perogative of mercy, expressed by the old adage, '_The

King's face gives grace_,' the cases of criminals convicted in London,

where the king is supposed to be resident, were reported to him by the

recorder, that his Majesty might have an option of pardoning. Hence it

was seriously doubted whether a recorder's report need or, indeed, could

be made at Windsor. All his Majesty did on these occasions was, to

express verbally his assent or dissent to or from the execution of the

sentence; and, though the King was on such occasions attended by his

Ministers and the great legal Privy Councillors, the business was not

technically a council business, but the individual act of the King.

On the accession of Queen Victoria, the nature of some cases that it

might be necessary to report to her Majesty occasioned the abrogation of

a practice which was certainly so far unreasonable that it made a

difference between London and all the rest of the kingdom. CROKER. 'I

was exceedingly shocked,' said Lord Eldon, 'the first time I attended to

hear the Recorder's report, at the careless manner in which, as it

appeared to me, it was conducted. We were called upon to decide on

sentences affecting no less than the lives of men, and yet there was

nothing laid before us to enable us to judge whether there had or had

not been any extenuating circumstances; it was merely a recapitulation

of the judge's opinion and the sentence. I resolved that I never would

attend another report, without having read and duly considered the whole

of the evidence of each case, and I never did.' Twiss's _Eldon_, i.

398.

[367] Under-Secretary of State and a member of the Literary Club.

_Ante_, i. 478.

[368] Johnson does not here let Boswell know that he had written this

address (_post_, p. 141). Wesley, two days before Dodd's execution,

records (_Journal_, iv. 99):--'I saw Dr. Dodd for the last time. He was

in exactly such a temper as I wished. He never at any time expressed the

least murmuring or resentment at any one; but entirely and calmly gave

himself up to the will of God. Such a prisoner I scarce ever saw before;

much less such a condemned malefactor. I should think none could

converse with him without acknowledging that God is with him.' In

earlier years Wesley was more than once refused admittance to a man

under sentence of death who was 'earnestly desirous' to speak with him.

Wesley's _Journal_, ed. 1827, i. 255, 292, 378.

[369] Between the Methodists and the Moravians there was no good-will.

In 1749 the Moravians published a declaration that 'whosoever reckons

that those persons in England who are usually called Moravians, and

those who are called Methodists, are the same, he is mistaken.'

Thereupon Wesley recorded in his _Journal_, ii. l20:--'The Methodists,

so called, heartily thank Brother Louis for his Declaration; as they

count it no honour to be in any connexion either with him or his

Brethren.'

[370] Since they have been so much honoured by Dr. Johnson I shall here

insert them:

'TO MR. SAMUEL JOHNSON.

'MY EVER DEAR AND MUCH-RESPECTED SIR,

'You know my solemn enthusiasm of mind. You love me for it, and I

respect myself for it, because in so far I resemble Mr. Johnson. You

will be agreeably surprized when you learn the reason of my writing this

letter. I am at Wittemberg in Saxony. I am in the old church where the

Reformation was first preached, and where some of the reformers lie

interred. I cannot resist the serious pleasure of writing to Mr. Johnson

from the Tomb of Melancthon. My paper rests upon the gravestone of that

great and good man, who was undoubtedly the worthiest of all the

reformers. He wished to reform abuses which had been introduced into the

Church; but had no private resentment to gratify. So mild was he, that

when his aged mother consulted him with anxiety on the perplexing

disputes of the times, he advised her "to keep to the old religion." At

this tomb, then, my ever dear and respected friend! I vow to thee an

eternal attachment. It shall be my study to do what I can to render your

life happy: and, if you die before me, I shall endeavour to do honour to

your memory; and, elevated by the remembrance of you, persist in noble

piety. May GOD, the Father of all beings, ever bless you! and may you

continue to love,

'Your most affectionate friend, and devoted servant,

'JAMES BOSWELL.'

'Sunday, Sept. 30, 1764.'

'To DR. SAMUEL JOHNSON.

'Wilton-house, April 22, 1775.

'My DEAR SIR,

'Every scene of my life confirms the truth of what you have told me,

"there is no certain happiness in this state of being."--I am here,

amidst all that you know is at Lord Pembroke's; and yet I am weary and

gloomy. I am just setting out for the house of an old friend in

Devonshire, and shall not get back to London for a week yet. You said to

me last Good-Friday, with a cordiality that warmed my heart, that if I

came to settle in London, we should have a day fixed every week, to meet

by ourselves and talk freely. To be thought worthy of such a privilege

cannot but exalt me. During my present absence from you, while,

notwithstanding the gaiety which you allow me to possess, I am darkened

by temporary clouds, I beg to have a few lines from you; a few lines

merely of kindness, as--a _viaticum_ till I see you again. In your

_Vanity of Human Wishes_, and in Parnell's _Contentment_, I find the

only sure means of enjoying happiness; or, at least, the hopes of

happiness. I ever am, with reverence and affection,

'Most faithfully yours,

'JAMES BOSWELL.'

[371] William Seward, Esq., F.R.S., editor of _Anecdotes of some

distinguished persons_, etc., in four volumes, 8vo., well known to a

numerous and valuable acquaintance for his literature, love of the fine

arts, and social virtues. I am indebted to him for several

communications concerning Johnson. BOSWELL. Miss Burney frequently

mentions him as visiting the Thrales. 'Few people do him justice,' said

Mrs. Thrale to her, 'because as Dr. Johnson calls him, he is an abrupt

young man; but he has excellent qualities, and an excellent

understanding.' Mme. D'Arblay's _Diary_, i. 141. Miss Burney, in one of

her letters, says:--'Mr. Seward, who seems to be quite at home among

them, appears to be a penetrating, polite, and agreeable young man. Mrs.

Thrale says of him, that he does good to everybody, but speaks well of

nobody.' _Memoirs of Dr. Burney_, ii. 89. He must not be confounded with

the Rev. Mr. Seward of Lichfield.

[372] See _post_, under date of June 18, 1778.

[373] In the list of deaths in the _Gent. Mag_. for 1779, p. 103, we

find, 'Feb. 8. Isaac de Groot, great-grandson to the learned Grotius.

He had long been supported by private donations, and at length was

provided for in the Charterhouse, where he died.'

[374] The preceding letter. BOSWELL.

[375] This letter was addressed not to a Mr. Dilly, but to Mr. W. Sharp,

Junior. See _Gent. Mag_. 1787, p. 99. CROKER.

[376] See _ante_, i. 312.

[377] See _ante_, p. 101.

[378] See Boswell's _Hebrides_, Oct. 16.

[379] See ante, p. 86, and _post_, under Nov. 29, 1777.

[380] Johnson gives both _epocha_ and _epoch_ in his _Dictionary_.

[381] Langton. See _ante_, p. 48, and _post_, Sept. 22, 1777.

[382] This very just remark I hope will be constantly held in

remembrance by parents, who are in general too apt to indulge their own

fond feelings for their children at the expence of their friends. The

common custom of introducing them after dinner is highly injudicious. It

is agreeable enough that they should appear at any other time; but they

should not be suffered to poison the moments of festivity by attracting

the attention of the company, and in a manner compelling them from

politeness to say what they do not think. BOSWELL. See _ante_, p. 28.

[383] Gibbon wrote to Garrick from Paris on Aug. 14:--'At this time of

year the society of the Turk's-head can no longer be addressed as a

corporate body, and most of the individual members are probably

dispersed: Adam Smith in Scotland; Burke in the shades of Beaconsfield;

Fox, the Lord or the devil knows where, etc. Be so good as to salute in

my name those friends who may fall in your way. Assure Sir Joshua, in

particular, that I have not lost my relish for _manly_ conversation and

the society of the brown table.' _Garrick Corres_. ii. 256. I believe

that in Gibbon's published letters no mention is found of Johnson.

[384] See _ante_, ii. 159, and _post_, April 4, 1778. Of his greatness

at the Bar Lord Eldon has left the following anecdote;--'Mr. Dunning,

being in very great business, was asked how he contrived to get through

it all. He said, "I do one third of it, another third does itself, and

the remaining third continues undone."' Twiss's _Eldon_, i. 327.

[385] It is not easy to detect Johnson in anything that comes even near

an inaccuracy. Let me quote, therefore, a passage from one of his

letters which shews that when he wrote to Mrs. Boswell he had not, as

he seems to imply, eaten any of the marmalade:--'Aug. 4, 1777. I believe

it was after I left your house that I received a pot of orange marmalade

from Mrs. Boswell. We have now, I hope, made it up. I have not opened my

pot.' _Piozzi Letters_, i. 350.

[386] See _ante_, March 19, 1776.

[387] What it was that had occured is shewn by Johnson's letter to Mrs.

Thrale on Aug. 4:--'Boswell's project is disconcerted by a visit from a

relation of Yorkshire, whom he mentions as the head of his clan [see

_ante_, ii. 169, note 2]. Boszy, you know, make a huge bustle about

all his own motions and all mine. I have inclosed a letter to pacify

him, and reconcile him to the uncertainties of human life.' _Piozzi

Letters_, i. 350.

[388] When she was about four months old, Boswell declared that she

should have five hundred pounds of additional fortune, on account of

her fondness for Dr. Johnson. See Boswell's _Hebrides_, Aug. 15, 1773.

She died, says Malone, of a consumption, four months after her father.

[389] See _ante_, March 23, 1776.

[390] By an odd mistake, in the first three editions we find a reading

in this line to which Dr. Johnson would by no means have subscribed,

_wine_ having been substituted for _time_. That error probably was a

mistake in the transcript of Johnson's original letter. The other

deviation in the beginning of the line (_virtue_ instead of nature) must

be attributed to his memory having deceived him. The verse quoted is the

concluding line of a sonnet of Sidney's:--

'Who doth desire that chast his wife should bee,

First be he true, for truth doth truth deserve;

Then be he such, as she his worth may see,

And, alwaies one, credit with her preserve:

Not toying kynd nor causelessly unkynd,

Nor stirring thoughts, nor yet denying right,

Nor spying faults, nor in plaine errors blind,

Never hard hand, nor ever rayns (reins) too light;

As far from want, as far from vaine expence,

Th' one doth enforce, the t'other doth entice:

Allow good companie, but drive from thence

All filthie mouths that glorie in their vice:

This done, thou hast no more but leave the rest

To _nature_, fortune, _time_, and woman's breast.'

Life of Johnson, Volume 3 1776-1780 · 第 63 / 71 题