[72] A society comparable with the “Priesthood of the Bow” at Zuñi.

This society is a priesthood apparently with much less power than that

of the neighboring Cibolan pueblo, but its chief Pauwatíwa is powerful,

and, it may be said, en passant, a most genial and highly valuable

friend to have in ethnologic work at Walpi.

[73] His fiddle was a notched stick which he scraped with a sheep

scapula.

[74] Kawaíkakatcinas. Kawaíka is a Hopi name for the Laguna people of

Keresan stock.

[75] See figure in Naácnaiya, Journal of American Folk-lore,

July–September, 1892.

[76] The signification of the bundle of straw may be that here we have

the symbolic broom of the purification ceremony, if I am right in

my interpretation that the Powámú is a lustral ceremony. In Nubuatl

ceremonial, Ochpanitzli, the mother, Toci, carries the broom, which is

her symbol in this celebration, as shown in Seler's interpretation of

the Humboldt manuscripts. In this connection the reader is referred to

the facts mentioned elsewhere in this article that all the kivas are

replastered in the course of the Powámú.

[77] Elision of the syllable ka in this and similar compounds is common.

[78] The symbolism of their masks and their dance is described in the

Journal of American Ethnology and Archæology, vol. II, No. 1.

[79] See Nimánkatcina altar, called nananivo poñya, six-directions

altar. The whole ceremony is an invocation to the six world-quarter

deities.

[80] It is generally the custom to anoint the feet, hands, etc, with

honey when a person is sent out with offerings to shrines. (See “Snake

dance,” Journal of American Ethnology and Archæology, vol. IV.)

[81] See cloud-charm altar in other ceremonials. It is redundant

in this place to repeat these accounts, as the variations are not

important. (See Journal of American Ethnology and Archæology, vol. II,

No. 1.) The Powámú altars are the same as the Niman, q. v.

[82] As the number of these personages was large in this presentation,

this summary mention of their names may be of interest.

[83] Journal of American Folk-lore, October-December, 1893.

[84] It will thus be seen that the details of this ceremony vary

in different years, but the variation depends simply on the kiva

presenting it. It is commonly said that the original wími of the

Pálülükoñti (Great Plumed Snake) were brought to Tusayan by the Water

people from the far south. Other observations support that statement.

[85] To these must be added the constant accompanying priests in all

ceremonials, who are unmasked and do not personate supernatural beings.

[86] Journal of American Ethnology and Archæology, vol. II, No. 1.

[87] Ibid. The following abbreviated Katcinas have been described and

figured: (1) Humískatcina, Corn Flower; (2) Áñakatcina, Long Beard;

(3) Coyóhimkatcina, All; (4) Hehéakatcina; (5) Siokatcina, Zuñi;

(6) Málokatcina. The symbolic characters of the different Katcinas

are best shown in my article on “Dolls of the Tusayan Indians.” The

Nimánkatcina is likewise outlined in the Journal of American Ethnology

and Archæology, op. cit., and some of these abbreviated Katcinas are

accompaniments of the Nimán.

[88] The participants of course frequent the kiva to prepare their

masks and costume for one or more days previous to the public dance,

and certain simple ceremonial objects, as páhos and nakwákwocis are

made there, but in none of those Katcinas which are included in this

group have I as yet observed any altar or the like. The very name

“abbreviated” eliminates naturally these complex proceedings and

paraphernalia.

[89] Op. cit. The spruce tree of the Katcinas is commonly set up in the

plaza.

[90] Dolls of the Tusayan Indians, op. cit.

[91] The food is brought to each by wives, daughters, or other women of

his household. This feast takes place in the open air, not as at Zuñi

in the kivas.

[92] This is the only plaza large enough for a long line of dancers,

and hence is ordinarily used.

[93] To these prayers he alone responds “Antcai,” right.

[94] The configuration of the mesa and the fact that the house walls

rise almost continuously with the side of the cliff prevent the

Katcinas dancing on the different sides of the pueblo, but in Zuñi the

open spaces outside the village, in addition to the plaza in the heart

of the pueblo, are used for dances as I have elsewhere described.

[95] See also Journal of American Ethnology and Archæology, vol. IV, p.

66.

[96] “Adventures in Zuñi,” Century Magazine, vol. XXV, p. 507 et seq.

[97] Several ceremonials are derived from Zuñi, while others are

peculiar to Tusayan. The symbolism of the Síocálako and the Hopi Cálako

is different. No girls (mánas) were represented in the Síocálako.

[98] All the women and children of this family had been moved to the

mesa a few days before.

[99] Compare the crinoline hoops of the effigies of Pálülükoñûh

(Journal of American Folk-lore, October-December, 1893).

[100] Koyeamashe (see Journal of American Ethnology and Archæology,

vol. I).

[101] The association of Eótoto with Íntiwa has already been described

in my account of the Nimánkatcina (Journal of American Ethnology and

Archæology, vol. II, No. 1).

[102] Explanation of the diagram: _a_, _b_, _c_, _d_ and _a′_, _b′_,

_c′_ _d′_, successive positions of the effigy bearers on the northern

and southern sides of the plaza; _e_, Eótoto; _h_, Hahaíwüqti; _i_,

Íntiwa; _k_, Koyímise; _m_, accompanying celebrants. The figures

_a_–_d_ and _a′_–_d′_ represent the circles of meal, with cross lines,

over which the effigy bearers stand in the course of the ceremonials.

[103] The general character of the Wáwac described in my article in

the Bulletin of the Essex Institute, where certain of the masks made

use of in it are figured. The Racing Katcina performed at this time

was, however, much more complicated, and a description of it would be a

digression from the subject of this article.

[104] Journal of American Ethnology and Archæology, vol. II, No. 1.

[105] It was said that there ought to have been six (possibly one for

each cardinal point) of these, who are called Ciwáata, sisters of the

Pawíkkatcinas.

[106] I have not been permitted to see the unmasked dance of the Kóko

in the Zuñi kivas, where it is common, and was glad to supplement my

observations by the same in one of the Tusayan kivas. In the Katcinas

which I saw in 1891 at Walpi there was no dance in the kivas.

[107] The pipe was passed ceremonially after having been lit with a

coal (burning corncob) brought by a woman from a house in Sitcomovi. In

most ceremonials it is also prescribed that the makers of páhos shall

wash their heads before beginning their duties, but this takes place in

their own dwellings.

[108] The first reference which I have found to the use of tobacco

in the ceremonial smoke by the American Indians is by Monardes. This

interesting description of tobacco and its uses, accompanied with a

figure of the plant, is one of the most complete for its date (1590)

which I have seen.

[109] Íntiwa is Katcina móñwi, chief of the Katcinas; Kópeli, chief of

the Snakes; Hóñyi, hereditary Snake-Antelope chief; Wíki, chief of the

Snake-Antelopes; Pauatíwa, chief of warriors; Lésma, Bear chief.

[110] See Journal of American Ethnology and Archæology, vol. II, No. 1.

[111] When the inhabitants of another pueblo visit that in which

a sacred dance is taking place, it is customary for the hosts to

entertain by setting before them food, and it is no uncommon thing to

see visitors passing from house to house partaking of the píkami (mush)

and other delicacies. It is not unusual for the headmen of one pueblo

to send official thanks to the people of another for their sacred

dances and other efforts for rain. In a memoir on the Snake dance I

mention an instance where even the distant Havasupai Indians brought

offerings from their home to Walpi (Journal of American Ethnology and

Archæology, vol. IV).

[112] I need not describe their actions, as I have already done so for

other Katcina dances (Journal of American Ethnology and Archæology,

vol. II, No. 1.)

[113] One marked difference between Katcina and Kóko, or Hopi and Zuñi,

dancers is that in the latter the unmasked dance occurs in the kiva and

the feast is held in the same place. At Tusayan the feast is open, and

generally there is no unmasked dance. The feast in the kiva at Zuñi is

possibly a secondary modification for effecting secrecy.

[114] Journal of American Ethnology and Archæology, vol. II, No. 1.

[115] This is only time I have seen the Death god personified. The

Paiakaíamû rushed up to me and demanded a knife, and when I refused to

give it, not aware of their intention, they sought other ways to kill

the poor brute. It was an exhibition of extreme savagery, but of course

with no danger to any of the spectators. Later in their antics the

gluttons themselves were lightly struck with a cactus branch, and the

person who performed this painful act went from housetop to housetop

touching the arm or neck of every spectator—man, woman, and child.

During this dance these Tcukuwympkiyas performed the disgusting act

of drinking human urine. Mr Cushing, in the Century Magazine, records

the slaughter of a dog in a similar manner, except that he says that

his life was threatened before the dog was killed, and it was by his

defiant attitude that he was not seized by the performers.

[116] The direction of the ceremonial circuit of the Tewa is sinistral.

In this instance it began at the east. I believe this is the prescribed

circuit of all the Pueblos. Some of the Tewa have told me that in their

folktales their people did not emerge from the same sípapû as the Hopi,

but from a sípapû to the east. Although some of the priests say that

all people came from the middle of the earth, from one sípapû, others

believe that each pueblo has its own ancestral geographical opening.

The idea has been localized by environment, as is so often the case

with modified legends.

[117] There are certainly more evidences of white man’s influences in

dance paraphernalia in Zuñi than at Tusayan, such, for instance, as the

use of hats and calico shirts in dances, American chairs, rifles, etc,

etc.

[118] Notwithstanding this statement, I have already pointed out

similarities between both these women’s celebrations and certain Zuñi

dances (see American Anthropologist, vol. V, p. 236, note).

[119] Hówina (Zuñi, Ówinahe), a kind of thanksgiving dance, is

distinctly a Zuñi dance and is so recognized by the Hopi. I have

seen photographs of the celebration at Zuñi which bear such a close

resemblance to that called by the Hopi the Hówina that in all

probability the two are identical. The elaborate war dances celebrated

at Zuñi and the observances of the Priesthood of the Bow at that pueblo

are very much abbreviated in Tusayan (East mesa) where the organization

has not the same power as with the Cibolans.

[120] Cipaulovi, or the “Place of Peaches,” would necessarily have

received its name after those who brought peaches came among the Hopi.

It is known that Sitcomovi was a late colony of Asa people from the Rio

Grande, united with others from Walpi, while Hano was founded about

1700. The Cipaulovi people, however celebrate the Flute ceremony, and

the Flute people came to Tusayan shortly after the Snake. It would thus

appear that we have a date to determine that the Flute people came to

Tusayan after Vargas (1692). Morfi, in 1782, says that the people of

Xipaulovi (Cipaulovi) came from Xongopabi (Cuñopavi).

[121] I do not for a moment doubt that even when nominally

Christianized the succession of the chiefs in the several sacerdotal

societies has not been broken up to our time.

[122] Coco in Spanish signifies a bogy. In compounds it can be detected

in Cocomaricopa, where it may mean fool, possibly referring to the

inferiority of this stem. The derivation of Kóko or Kâ′kâ is not known

to me. The word Katcina has the advantage of Kóko or Kâ′kâ as a general

designation.

[123] That is, the last Katcina before their departure in Cibola, as

in Tusayan. In Walpi it is not an autumn dance, but occurs at about

the same time that I witnessed it at Zuñi, near the end of July (see

Journal of American Ethnology and Archæology, vol. I, No. 1).

[124] It is recommended that in illustrating Zuñi masks a full face

view be given, for in that way the symbolism is much better expressed

than by profile views.

[125] Pooatíwa is considered by Mrs Stevenson the “Sun Father.” I

have not gone far enough in my studies to accept this relationship

for Paútiwa. There are some reasons for considering Paútiwa the Mist

Father, which speculation has led me to interpret the Sälämobias as

Paútiwa forms of the rain-clouds of the six world-quarters, but such an

opinion is highly theoretical.

[126] The terraced elevations are common on the Zuñi nákwipis and

handled prayer-meal bowls, as can be seen in any large collection of

Zuñi ceramics; but the semicircular rain-cloud figures are very rare,

indeed wanting, in all I have seen. The frog, tadpole, snake, and

similar symbols appear, however, to be present in both. The question of

the characteristic symbolism of Zuñi and Hopi pottery is a complicated

one, which can not be considered in this article, but the two types can

readily be distinguished by a student of this subject.

[127] It would be a remarkable fact if accounts of this symbolism are

not later described.

[128] Memoirs of the International Congress of Anthropology, Chicago,

1894, p. 315.

[129] On page 314 she mentions six Ahshiwanni as “rain priests.” I

am not able to definitely decide from the text whether these six are

the same as the fourteen mentioned above. It is not clear to me in

which group Mrs Stevenson places the “Mud-heads” and “Gluttons,” well

described by Ten Broeck in 1852 from Tusayan, and later by herself and

Cushing from Zuñi, and by other writers from the Rio Grande pueblos.

[130] If these statements are true one sees that they tell in favor of

the theory which the ritual emphasized, and that while in a general way

there is a similarity between the ceremonial system of the two people,

it is absurd to say that “what is written of one is true also of the

other.” Long ago their systems may have been identical; at present they

have more or less differentiated one from the other. In Zuñi, according

to Mrs Stevenson, “at the winter and summer solstices synchronal

meetings of most of these societies are held, and also at other times.”

After having carefully studied the ceremonials at the time of the

summer solstice at Tusayan, I have not found any synchronal meetings

of the societies which correspond with those mentioned as occurring at

Zuñi at that time.

[131] It is desirable that the names of the priests who officiate

in ceremonials be given in extended accounts of them in order that

the intimate character of this sacerdotal organization may be made

out. Until the names of the members of the different societies are

complete we are more or less hampered in our studies. The Zuñi

equivalent of wympkia appears to be kyalikwe (Tcihkyalikwe, Snake

priests from tcihtola, snake, and kyalikwe, wympkia). I am unable to

tell to what priests in Tusayan the “Ahshiwanni” correspond. The Tawa

(Sun) wympkia or Sun priests have certain points in common with them,

but this is as truly an esoteric society as any in Tusayan. I have

elsewhere described the Tewa ceremony in which the Sun priests make

the páhos and their chief, Kálacai, appeals directly to the rising

sun. In that same ceremony páhos are likewise made to the Rain gods

directly. In the Katcina celebrations some of the same Sun priests,

however, appeal to the leader of the Katcinas to bring them rain, and

this personage replies that he will. In this case, supposing, as I

think we justly can, that the Katcinas are intercessors between men

and gods of highest rank, we have in Tusayan the possible equivalent

of the “Ahshiwanni (rain priests)” intrusting their prayers to a

zoomorphic and anthropomorphic supernatural personage. The prayer of a

single chief for rain for the people, showing something similar to the

so-called Ahshiwanni at Zuñi, are not uncommon in Tusayan. In Tusayan

an organization of rain priests is not differentiated at the present

day from the other societies. All holders of wímis are Rain priests, as

well as the organization called the Sun priests, and all at times make

special prayers to the Rain gods.

[132] Op. cit., p. 314. I believe many facts might be marshaled to

prove that ancestor worship is a most vital part of the Tusayan

religious system.

[133] See “The Graff collection of Greek portraits,” New England

Magazine, January, 1894. Mr J. G. Frazier (Jour. Anth. Inst. of Great

Britain and Ireland, vol. XV, p. 73) from comparative studies of burial

customs suggests that the habit of masking the dead is “to keep the way

to the grave a secret from the dead man.” This explanation seems to me

much more labored than that given above.

[134] Hahaíwüqti. I have elsewhere shown reasons to suspect that

several personages may be the same “Earth goddess.” Kókyanwüqti, the

Spider woman, is also an “Earth goddess.” As everything, even man

himself, came from the womb of the earth, symbolized by the spider, it

is not surprising that an Indian should call the spider the creator. It

is a very different thing, however, to interpret such information by

our philosophic ideas. That the primitive should consider the earth as

the mother of everything, its creator in one sense, is natural; that

the Pueblo Indian should symbolize that mother by the Spider woman is

probable, for other races have done likewise; but that he associates

with mother earth the spiritual idea which we have of the Creator is

absurd. His cosmogony bears no evidence that he rose, in pre-Columbian

times, to the belief in a Great Spirit who created the universe.

Transcriber’s Notes:

- Text enclosed by underscores is in italics (_italics_).

- Blank pages have been removed.

- Obvious typographical errors have been silently corrected.

Tusayan katcinas · 第 7 / 7 段