CHAPTER XVIII

WAR IN THE DARK

It is November, 1914. Britain is waking, but is far from awake. Nearly

everybody and everything are proud to be "as usual." The Fleet has been

able to secure but one action with the Germans--Beatty's smashing blow

at the Kaiser's cruiser squadron in the bight of Heligoland. A great

trophy of the engagement is in hand--Admiral von Tirpitz' son,

watch-officer in the Mainz, a prisoner in Wales. For a month and more

the war has been raging furiously in the west all the way from the Alps

to the North Sea. Antwerp is taken, after a farce-comedy attempt at

relief by levies of raw British naval reserves. Joffre is at sanguinary

grips with the "Boches" in the Aisne country. The twelve or fifteen

miles of British front in the northernmost corner of France and that

patch of Flanders not yet in the enemy's hands is the scene of

ceaseless, desperate combat. Jellicoe's dreadnoughts and destroyers

take part at intervals in the grim battle for the channel coast. Ostend

has fallen.

The German objective farthest west is now clear. The Berlin newspapers

head-line the tidings from Flanders "the Road to Calais." Major Moraht

in the _Tageblatt_ acknowledges that the campaign for the base from

which Napoleon essayed to invade England is "a matter of life or death"

for the Germans. Sir John French and the remnant of Belgium's little

army steel themselves for a stone-wall defense. Again and again they

keep the frenzied enemy at bay. Have you ever seen Harvard holding the

Yale eleven on the five-yard line three minutes before the call of time

in the last half, with dark gathering so fast that you could hardly

distinguish crimson from blue? Do you remember Yale's ferocious first,

second, third, yet always vain, attempts to batter and plunge her way

through Harvard's concrete, immobile phalanx? If you do, and if your

red-blooded heart has tingled at some such spectacle of young American

bulldoggedness, which can be seen West as well as East, in the North and

in the South, just as commonly as in the New Haven bowl, you will be

able to visualize, infinitesimally, the titanic grapple around Dixmude,

Ypres and the Yser in the bloody days and hellish nights of October and

November, 1914. "The Watch in the Mud" was the way German military

critics paraphrased their national anthem, to describe the situation in

Flanders, for the Belgians had now flooded the region contiguous to the

Yser Canal, and the Kaiser's legions, in their breathless thrust for

Calais, were fighting in mire and slush to their boot-tops. More than

one company of _Feldgrauer_ was ingloriously drowned.

The British were engaged in precisely the operation for which their

temperament best fits them--"holding." The German attack rocked against

them remorselessly, giving neither assailant nor defender rest or

quarter. But the bulldog "held." He was mauled unconscionably and bled

profusely. Thousands upon thousands of his teeth were knocked out, and

he was half-blind, and limped. Yet he "held." Winter had come. Men

lived in trenches which had been merely water-logged ditches, but were

now frozen into rock. The German eagle, hammered, of course, no less

cruelly than the bulldog, was still screaming and clawing, in his mad

desire to cleave a way to Calais. But, mangled and scarred as he was,

the bulldog barked "No!" He had set his squatty bow-legs, disjointed

though they were, squarely across "the Road to Calais." There he

intended to stay. It could be traversed, that road, only through a

welter of blood which, regardless as German commanders are of the cost

when they set themselves an objective, gave the General Staff at Berlin

furiously to ponder.

I have already intimated that Britain all this tempestuous while was

rubbing her eyes, but was only partially open-eyed. It was not

altogether Britain's fault. The immutable Censorship still gave the

public no real glimmer of the history-making struggle going on almost

within ear-shot of the chalk-cliffs of Dover. Throughout the entire

month of October, four weeks as crammed with death and glory as in all

England's martial history, Sir John French was permitted to take the

public into his confidence but on one single occasion--and that, a

dispatch dealing with operations six weeks old! For its news of the

heroic deeds and Spartan sufferings of the greatest army it ever sent

abroad, the British Empire was compelled to depend on stilted French

_communiques_ and the fantastic or irrelevant narratives of an official

"eye-witness at British Headquarters," who was allowed to bamboozle the

nation for months before his flow of mediocrity and piffle was choked

off by disgruntled public opinion. England was fighting her greatest war

in Cimmerian darkness. Casualty lists, terrible in their regularity and

magnitude, kept on coming, but of the coincident imperishable triumphs

of British sacrifice and courage, not a word. One's _Illustrated London

News_ and _Sphere_ printed depressing double-pages weekly, filled with

pictures of England's masculine flower killed in action "somewhere in

France" or "somewhere in Flanders." But of the manner in which their

precious lives had been laid down, of the price they had made the

Germans pay for them, not a syllable. If by accident some correspondent

or newspaper secured the account of an engagement, which ventured so

much as to hint with some picturesqueness of detail how Englishmen were

dying, the Press Bureau guillotine came down on the narrative with a

crash which taught the offender to mend his ways for the future.

Under the circumstances it was not surprising to hear well-founded

reports that recruiting was falling off. In the clubs men said that

Kitchener's "first half-million" was in hand, but that men for the

second five hundred thousand, for which the War Office had now called,

were holding back to a disappointing, and even disquieting, degree.

Meantime the popular ballad of the hour was, appropriately, Paul Rubens'

"Your King and Country Want You"--"a women's recruiting song," as its

sub-title runs. Its opening verse and chorus tell their own story:

We've watched you playing cricket

And every kind of game.

At football, golf and polo,

You men have made your name.

But now your country calls you

To play your part in war,

And no matter what befalls you,

We shall love you all the more.

So, come and join the forces

As your fathers did before.

CHORUS

Oh! We don't want to lose you,

But we think you ought to go.

For your King and your Country

Both need you so!

We shall want you, and miss you,

But with all our might and main

We shall cheer you, thank you, kiss you,

When you come back again!

These words, in prosaic type, look banal. Their appeal seems trite.

Yet rendered to plaintive melody by such an operatic artist as little

Maggie Teyte, they went straight to men's hearts. They must have sent

thousands upon thousands of cricketers, footballers, golfers and

poloists--that is a classification which takes in pretty nearly all

Englishmen--into khaki and training-camps. But the growing insistence

with which the walls and windows of Old England were plastered with

recruiting posters--even entire front pages of newspapers were now

employed to advertise that "Your King and Country Need You"--indicated

that Kitchener's army was not being built up yet by the desired leaps

and bounds. Obviously the war needed some other kind of advertising

than even the accomplished Mr. Le Bas could give it. It was not strange

that the enthusiasm of Englishmen, cheated of the chance to know what

was really going on at the front, was beginning to find expression in

other directions.

[Illustration: Greeting the Kaiser (in helmet) the day he declared

Germany "in a state of war," July 31st, 1914.]

It was not magnificent, for example, but it was natural, that Englishmen

should, in all the circumstances, reveal a very materialistic passion to

"capture Germany's trade." Denied the opportunity of "enthusing" over

events at the seat of war, they proceeded to dedicate themselves

energetically to the task of eliminating the Germans as a factor in the

markets of the world. A profound book on the subject appeared--_The War

on German Trade_, with the sub-titles of "Ammunition for Civilians" and

"Hints for a Plan of Campaign." My old friend, Sidney Whitman, the

distinguished author of _Imperial Germany_, dignified it with a preface.

England had not entered upon the war "in a commercial spirit or with a

commercial purpose," he said, "yet it behooves her to seize and hold

fast the ripe fruit which has dropped into Englishmen's lap--as a first

incident in the clash of nations." The volume had frankly been

published, explained Whitman, "with the purpose of stimulating the

English manufacturer and the English trader to seize the opportunities

thrust upon them by the war."

Then, as the Censorship, as callous to criticism and abuse as if it were

a sphinx, still insisted that Englishmen must fight and die in the dark,

as far as their kith and kin were concerned, patriotism at home found

vent in a crusade against the Germans still at large on British soil.

They numbered thousands. They were a distinct and undeniable danger.

In days of peace they spied patriotically and flagrantly, thanks to John

Bull's easy-going, guileless toleration of the stranger within his gate.

Personally I never believed that the German waiters and barbers in the

Savoy or the Carlton, and their myriad of _confreres_ elsewhere in the

country, were the advance guard of the German army of invasion in

disguise. Nor did I imagine (as I actually made a very British friend

once seriously believe) that Appenrodt's restaurants in the Strand and

Piccadilly were in reality masked commissariat-stations of the Kaiser's

General Staff. Nor could even so persuasive an authority as William Le

Queux, author of _German Spies in England_, convince me that every

German resident who kept homing-pigeons, owned a country-place near the

East Coast suitable for wireless, or got drunk on the Kaiser's birthday

in the Gambrinus restaurant in Glasshouse Street, was a paid member of

the Berlin secret-service. Most of these stories made me smile as

broadly as the "star" rumor of the war--the story that seventy thousand

armed Russians had been "actually seen" by Heaven knows how many

veracious Britons sneaking across England from Newcastle to Southampton,

on their stealthy way from Archangel to the Western allied front.

Yet it was palpably not the hour for German subjects, any number of them

of military age and ardor, to be at large in England. So Britain, in a

tardy manifestation of self-preservation, began to arrest and intern the

Kaiser's hapless subjects, who hitherto had suffered no impairment of

their liberties except detention in the country, compulsory visits to

the police, and restriction of movement (except by special permission)

to an area five miles from their domicile. The German is far too much of

a patriot to be trusted to do as he pleases in a country with which his

Fatherland is at war. He never forgets that he is a German _first_, and

a stock-broker earning commissions in London, a barber taking English

tips, or a waiter spilling English soup, afterward. It is always

_Deutschland, Deutschland ueber Alles_ with him. He may not have made a

profession or habit of writing home to Berlin or Hamburg, Cologne or

Breslau, Kiel or Wilhelmshaven, what he noted of interest at Aldershot,

Portsmouth, Dover, Woolwich, or Sheerness, or what his English friends

might from time to time tell him of interest at the Admiralty or the War

Office. But it was "bomb-sure," as the Teuton idiom rather

appropriately puts it, that if ever a British state secret fell into

Herr Apfelbaum's hands on the Stock Exchange, or into Johann's in the

"hair-dressing saloon" of the Ritz, or into Gustav's at the grillroom of

the Piccadilly, that morsel would sooner or later find its way to

Germany. When one considered that Englishmen of the highest class--one

even said the King had a German valet!--were attended night and day, in

their homes, their clubs, their offices and their favorite "American

bars," hotels, grillrooms, cafes and restaurants by Germans, with eyes

to see and ears to hear, it was small wonder that an irresistible cry

was sent up before the winter of war had advanced very far, that these

"enemy aliens" should not be merely ticketed, labeled and superficially

watched, but placed behind barbed-wire, with British sentries on guard.

And so it came to pass that Mr. McKenna, Home Secretary, whose

reluctance to intern the Germans gossip absurdly ascribed to his "German

connections," finally ordered "the enemy in our midst" to be rounded up.

Not all of them were at first taken. Thousands remained at liberty.

The British are a patient and a trusting clan.

It was not only the acknowledged German subject in Great Britain who was

the object of the anti-Teuton crusade. The naturalized German, in many

cases the holder for years of a certificate of British citizenship, was

made to feel the blight of the wave of passion sweeping over the

country. Naturalized Germans have won in England wealth and eminence

outstripping even the heights to which they have climbed in the United

States. In the preceding reign they were the bosom companions of the

Sovereign. King Edward's intimate circle contained the Cologne

financier, Sir Ernest Cassel, and another Prussian native, Sir Felix

Semon, was His Majesty's Physician Extraordinary. In the "City,"

London's Wall Street, German financiers almost dominated the picture.

Baron Schroeder (naturalized only within a few hours of the outbreak of

the war) was so great a power that citizenship was practically thrust

upon him as a measure of vital British self-protection. Sir Edgar

Speyer, like Cassel a member of the King's Privy Council, and a Baronet

besides, was not only a City magnate, but controlled London's vast

system of surface and underground traction lines, including the omnibus

service; yet his English counting-house was a branch of a parent

establishment in Frankfort-On-Main. These were a few of the outstanding

names among the "Germans" in high place in England. They by no means

exhausted the list. Domiciled in this country for years, they had,

while openly maintaining sentimental relations with their Fatherland,

played no inconspicuous role in British affairs, economic and political.

Any number of naturalized Germans were married to British women and were

fathers of British-born families. Scores of their sons were already

wearing King George's khaki in Kitchener's army. Sir Ernest Cassel had

given five thousand pounds to the Prince of Wales' National Relief Fund.

Yet rumor shortly afterward had him locked up in a traitor's cell in the

Tower of London! No matter how acclimatized these naturalized Germans

had become, no matter how long they had been British subjects--in many

cases their title to that distinction was half a century old--they found

themselves under a ban. They were not physically maltreated. Their

windows were not broken. Men did not spit in their faces. They were

permitted (like the rest of the British) to do "business as usual,"

except the stock-brokers, who were invited to keep off 'Change. But they

were a marked class. If they ventured to visit clubs in Pall Mall or

St. James Street, to which they had paid dues for years, they were

confronted with notices reading:

+-------------------------------------------------+

| |

| Members of German or Austrian nationality |

| are requested, in their own interests, not |

| to frequent the club premises during the war, |

| and British members are asked not to |

| bring to the club any guests of enemy |

| nationality. |

| |

+-------------------------------------------------+

Or, if the naturalized German, no matter whether his boy had just fallen

at Ypres or not, went to his favorite golf-club of a Saturday or Sunday,

he received a greeting to the same effect. The virtue of tolerance, a

prized British quality, was vanishing from the face of these war-ridden

isles.

The anti-German fury in England claimed an early victim and a shining

mark--His Serene Highness Vice-Admiral Prince Louis of Battenberg, who,

as First Sea Lord of the Admiralty, was practically in supreme control

of British strategy at sea. Prince Louis is a native-born Austrian, and

although he had been a naturalized British subject and attached to the

Royal Navy since 1868, and in 1884 married into the British Royal Family

by wedding his own cousin, Princess Victoria of Hesse, a grand-daughter

of Queen Victoria, a campaign inaugurated and mercilessly prosecuted by

the aristocratic _Morning Post_, led, on October 29, to the Prince's

resignation. Public opinion unreservedly approved the disappearance

from a post, from which it was not too much to say the destinies of the

Empire were controlled, of a man who was brother-in-law of Prince Henry

of Prussia, the Inspector-General of the German Navy, and of the Grand

Duke of Hesse, one of the Kaiser's federated allies. The same spirit of

"Safety First" which sent the German barbers and waiters to camps in

Frith Hill and the Isle of Man dispatched Vice-Admiral Prince Louis of

Battenberg into official oblivion. Nobody actually distrusted his

patriotism. But England was in no humor to run even remote risks. He

had to go. Satisfaction over Battenberg's retirement was only slightly

modified by a later revelation that it was Prince Louis himself, and not

Mr. Churchill, as universally supposed, who was chiefly responsible for

the mobilization of the British Fleet just before the outbreak of war in

consequence of having "commanded the ships to stand fast, instead of

demobilizing as ordered."

November was a month of kaleidoscopic sorrow and joy for the British.

It began in gloom, with Turkey's entry into the war and the inherent

menace to Egypt which that event denoted. Then came the great naval

action off Chili, with first blood to the Kaiser in the only regulation

stand-up battle in which British and German warships had so far met.

The sinking of Admiral Sir Christopher Cradock's flagship, the cruiser

_Good Hope_, and her companion, the _Monmouth_, by Admiral Count von

Spee's cruiser squadron, with the loss of one thousand four hundred

precious lives, was a bitter blow. Lord Charles Beresford, under whom

Cradock had once served, told me that his death was a more serious loss

to the British Fleet than a squadron of cruisers.

It was a depressing beginning for the First Sea Lordship of Lord

"Jackie" Fisher, who succeeded Prince Louis of Battenberg. Churchill

was still First Lord of the Admiralty--what we in the United States

should call Secretary of the Navy--but Fisher, as First Sea Lord, was in

practical control of everything connected with the actual activities of

the Fleet. The First Lord of the Admiralty's business is to get ships

for the navy. The First Sea Lord's task is to man, arm and fight them.

Fisher lost no time in angry remorse over Cradock's disaster. He set

about to repair it. He applied forthwith the "Fisher touch." He

ascertained that it was Rear-Admiral Sir Frederick Doveton Sturdee,

Chief of the War Staff, who had been chiefly responsible for dispatching

Cradock's squadron to waters in which it would have to meet a German

force superior in both tonnage and gun-power. Whereupon Fisher ordered

Sturdee to place himself at the head of a squadron which was to find and

destroy von Spee, and not come back until it had done so. Sturdee

"delivered the goods" with neatness and dispatch. Almost a month later

to the day--it is a fortnight's journey from British waters to the

Southern Atlantic even for twenty-seven-knot battle-cruisers--he carried

out Fisher's imperious orders. On December 8 Cradock was gloriously

avenged. Von Spee in his flagship, the _Scharnhorst_, together with the

sister cruiser _Gneisenau_ and the smaller _Leipzig_, was sent to the

bottom off the Falkland Islands, and the remaining units in the German

squadron, the _Dresden_ and _Nuernberg_, were accounted for later.

Britain breathed easier. The bulldog breed in her navy was still to be

relied upon. Everybody instinctively felt that there was any number of

more Sturdees and ships and guns and sailors ready to do equally

invincible service for England if the Germans would but give them the

chance von Spee had offered at the Falklands.

Spirits which had drooped when Cradock was lost were revived ten days

later by the most welcome piece of naval news the British people had had

since the war began--the destruction of the Kaiser's champion

commerce-raider _Emden_ by the Australian cruiser _Sydney_ off the Cocos

Islands and the capture of her intrepid commander, Captain von Mueller,

and many of his crew. The _Emden_ sank seventeen ships and cargoes

worth eleven million dollars before her career was ended. But von

Mueller won universal renown and even popularity in Great Britain for

his daring, "sportsmanship" and gallantry to vanquished merchantmen.

Germans do not appreciate such a spirit, and do not deserve to be its

beneficiary--the utter lack of the sporting instinct in the Fatherland

is responsible for that unfortunate fact--yet if von Mueller had been

landed a prisoner of war in England and could have been paraded down

Pall Mall, he might have counted confidently on a welcome which

Englishmen customarily reserve for their own heroes. Here and there in

London protests were raised against the encomiums which almost every

newspaper, and for the matter of that almost every Englishman, uttered

in praise of von Muller's vindication of the nobility of the sea, but

the overwhelmingly prevalent opinion was that he had "played the game"

and, pirate though he was, deserved well of a race which still holds

high the traditions of the naval service.

Ever-changing and stirring were November's events--the capitulation of

Germany's prized Chinese colony of Kiau-Chau to the besieging Japanese;

Lord Roberts' tragic death in the field among the soldiers he loved so

well, the Indians who had come to Europe to fight Britain's battles; the

still victorious advance of the Russians in East Prussia, though

Hindenburg's smashing blow in the Tannenberg swamps had been delivered

many weeks before; the honorable acquittal of Rear-Admiral E. C. T.

Troubridge, commanding the Mediterranean cruiser squadron, on the charge

of having allowed the German cruisers _Goeben_ and _Breslau_ to slip

through his meshes into Constantinople--the Admiral had applied for a

court-martial, to clear himself of a grotesque accusation that a

relationship with the captain of the _Goeben_ had induced him to let the

Germans through. But all these things combined left no such indelible

impression on my mind as the Lord Mayor's dinner at the Guildhall in the

city of London on the night of November 9. That function, the

inauguration of the new chief magistrate, is celebrated in British

history as the annual occasion on which leaders of the State promulgate

some great new line of Governmental policy--a national keynote for the

year to come. The Guildhall dinner in the midst of Britain's greatest

war was sure to be of immemorial significance, and my heart beat high

with anticipation when Lord Northcliffe assigned me to attend it and

record an American's impressions of England's most august feast.

Guildhall was the scene of a famous flamboyancy by the Kaiser not so

many years ago, when he had talked about the comparatively firmer

consistency of blood compared to water and consecrated himself to the

cause of Anglo-German peace and friendship. I was keenly anxious to

hear what sort of sentiments would echo through the century-old

sanctuary of the City to-night, with men like Asquith, Balfour,

Kitchener, Churchill and Cambon, the French Ambassador, as the speakers.

I looked forward to an evening sure to be crowded with imperishable

memories. I was not disappointed. At midnight when it was all over, I

sat down to write "an American's impressions" for _The Daily Mail_, and

as they were exuberant with the freshness of mental sensations just

experienced and have not cooled in the sincerity of their utterance in

the long interval which has supervened, I make no apology for repeating

them herewith verbatim:

"When I became the joyful recipient of an invitation to attend last

night's Guildhall banquet I reveled in the prospect of a feast of

Bacchanalian pomp and pageantry. I expected to witness nothing much

except a Lord Mayor's 'show,' translated into Lucullian environment, a

riot of food, drink, cardinal robes, gold braid, gold chains, gold

sticks, wigs and the other trappings of mayoral magnificence. I came

away utterly disillusioned, for I had spent three hours in what will

live in my recollection as the Temple of British Dignity.

"Those stately Gothic walls, whose simple groups of statuary which tell

of Wellington and Nelson and Beckford; those amazingly non-panicky war

speeches of your Romanesque premier, your grim Kitchener, your--and

our--Winston Spencer Churchill, and your polished Balfour, all made me

feel that I was tarrying for the nonce within four walls which, if they

did not envelop all the great qualities of the British race, at least

typified and epitomized them.

"Guildhall is dignified by itself beyond my feeble hours of description.

I have never trod its historic floors before, but I have the

unmistakable impression that it has taken on fresh dignity to-day for

the words which were spoken in it yestereve. I was about to say, in the

idiom which springs more naturally to the lips of an American, 'for the

words which rang through it.' Words were not made to 'ring' through

Guildhall. They would be ludicrously out of place. An American

political spellbinder, no matter how silver-tongued, would pollute the

atmosphere of London's civic shrine. Its acoustic qualities, which I

should think were not faultless, are intended for exclusively such

oratory as put them to the test last night.

"Guildhall's tone is the tone of Mr. Asquith--'practicing the equanimity

of our forefathers, the fluctuating fortunes of a great war will drive

us neither into exaltation nor despondency.' I thought that striking

phrase of a brilliant peroration British character in composite. It was

more than that. It was Guildhallian. The cheers for the Premier, like

those for Balfour, Churchill and Kitchener, would have been more

vociferous in my country. But my country is not British. We are not

devoid of dignity, I hope, but we have no Guildhall."

It was left to other hands to report in detail the speeches of the Prime

Minister, the First Lord of the Admiralty and the Secretary of War.

Each uttered phrases of golden significance. Mr. Churchill was

evidently still his ebullient self, although he had not yet fulfilled

his promise of September that the German navy, if it remained in port

and refused to come out, would be "dug out like a rat from a hole," nor

had his now acknowledged personal responsibility for the fiasco of the

Antwerp naval expedition perceptibly staled his infinite buoyancy.

"Six, nine, twelve months hence," he declared, "you will begin to see

the results that will spell the doom of Germany." I had never heard

"Winston" speak before, but I understood now the charm of his

personality and the attractiveness of an oratorical style made even more

magnetic by the suggestion of a combined stammer and lisp. "In spite of

its losses," he continued, "our Navy is now stronger, and stronger

relatively to the foe, than it was on the declaration of war." Asquith

read his speech, and Kitchener was about to do the same, but Churchill,

youthful, vibrant, tense, spoke extemporaneously, and the consequent

effect was indubitably the most striking of all the oratory of the

night.

Lord Kitchener, in khaki and with a mourning band on his arm, was

redolent of strength and impressiveness, but when he rose, clumsily

adjusted a pair of huge horn-rimmed reading glasses, and began to chant

his carefully-prepared "speech" in monotone from manuscript, he was far

less convincing, and certainly not approximately so electrifying as

Churchill. But he had messages of no less magnitude and cheer. "We may

confidently rely on the ultimate success of the Allies in the west," he

said simply. "But we want more men and still more men. We have now a

million and a quarter in training."

But it was Asquith's peroration, at which my impressionistic sketch in

_The Daily Mail_ only hinted, which was the nugget of the night.

Englishmen still repeat it as something which puts in more terse and

concrete words than anybody else has clothed it the solemn spirit in

which they have consecrated themselves to the task now trying the

Empire's soul:

"It is going to be a long, drawn-out struggle. But we shall not sheathe

the sword until Belgium recovers all, and more than all, she has

sacrificed; until France is adequately secured against the menace of

aggression; until the rights of smaller nations are placed on an

unassailable foundation; until the military domination of Prussia is

finally destroyed."

It was in that incorrigible resolve that Britain entered upon the second

calendar year of war, bleeding uncomplainingly, losing stoically, taking

what came and ruing it not; determined as she lived, to keep on until

her vow to herself was vindicated and her duty to civilization

performed.

The Assault: Germany Before the Outbreak and England in War-Time · 第 18 / 22 章