COMPARISON OF PRICES FOR 1861 AND 1864.

_Arsenal._ _Arsenal._ _Contractors._

1861. 1864. 1864.

Shirts, 17-1/2 15 8

Drawers, 12-1/2 10 7 @ 8

Infantry Pantaloons, 42-1/2 27 17 @ 20

Cavalry Pantaloons, 60 50 28 @ 30

Lined Blouses, 45 40 20

Unlined Blouses, 40 35 15 @ 20

Cavalry Jackets, 1.12-1/2 1.00 75 @ 80

Overalls, 25 20 8

Bed Sacks, 20 20 7

Covering Canteens, 4 2-1/2 --

Here was a state of things wholly without parallel in our previous

social history. On such wages women could not exist; they were the

strongest and surest temptation to the abandonment of a virtuous course

of life. Labor was here evidently cheated of its just reward. The

Government gave out the work by contract at the prices indicated in the

first two columns, and the contractors put it out among the sewing-women

at the inhuman rates set down in the third column. In this wrong the

Government participated; for it reduced its prices to the sewing-women,

while it was constantly increasing those it paid to every other class of

work-people. Even the freedmen on the sea-islands or in the contraband

camps made better wages,--while the liberated negro washer-woman, who

had never been paid wages during a life of sixty years, was suddenly

elevated to a position about the camps which enabled her to earn more,

every day, than thousands of intelligent and exemplary needle-women in

Philadelphia.

An extraordinary feature of the case was, that, while there was probably

four times as much sewing to be done, there were at least ten times as

many women to do it as before. The condition of things showed that this

must be the fact, because, though the work to be given out was enormous

in amount, yet there was a crowd and pressure to obtain it which was

even greater. I saw this myself on more than one occasion.

While congratulating ourselves that our women have not yet been degraded

to working at coal-mining, dressed in men's attire, or at gathering up

manure in the streets of a great city, we may be sure, that, if, in this

emergency, they were saved from actual starvation, it was not through

any generous, spontaneous outpouring of that sympathy whose fountain is

in the bottom of men's pockets. They pined, and worked, and saved

themselves.

At last they met together in public, common sufferers under a common

calamity, interchanged their experiences, and mingled their tears. If

the personal history of the pupils in my sewing-school was diversified,

in this assembly the domestic experience of each individual was in

mournful harmony with that of all. The great majority were wives of

soldiers who had gone forth to uphold the flag of our country. Hundreds

of them were clad in mourning,--their husbands had died in

battle,--their remittances of pay had ceased,--their dependence had been

suddenly cut off,--and they were thus thrown back upon the needle, which

they had laid down on getting married. Oh, how many hollow cheeks and

attenuated figures were to be seen in that sad meeting of working-women!

There was the dull eye, the pinched-up face, which betokened absolute

deprivation of necessary food,--yet withal, the careful adjustment of a

faded shawl or dress, the honest pride, even in the depth of misery, to

be at least decent, after the effort to preserve the old gentility had

been found vain.

It was the extraordinary number of the wives and daughters of the killed

and wounded in battle, who, suddenly added to the standing army of

sewing-women, had glutted the labor-market of the city, and whose

impatient necessity for employment had enabled heartless contractors to

cut down the making of a shirt to eight cents. I remember, when the

first rumor of the first battle reached our city, how the news-resorts

were thronged by these women to know whether they had been made widows

or not,--how the crowd pressed up to and surged around the placards

containing the lists of killed and wounded,--how those away off from

these centres of early intelligence waited feverishly for the morning

paper to tell them whether they were to be miserable or happy. I

remember, too, how, as the bloody contest went on, this impatient

anxiety died out,--use seemed to have made their condition a sort of

second nature,--they kept at home, hopeful, but resigned. Alas! how

many, in the end, needed all the resignation that God mercifully extends

to the stricken deer of the great human family!

They came together on the occasion referred to to compare grievances,

and devise whatever poor remedy might be found to be in the power of a

body of friendless needle-women. The straits to which many of these

deserving widows had been reduced were awful. The rich men of my native

city may hang their heads in shame over the recital of sufferings at

their very door. No generous movement had been made by any of them in

mitigation.

One widow, taking out shirts at the arsenal, earned two dollars and

forty cents in two weeks, but was denied permission to take them in when

done, though urgently needing her pay, being told that she would be

making too much money. Another made vests with ten button-holes and

three pockets for fifteen cents, furnishing her own cotton at twenty

cents a spool. A third, whose husband was then in the army, found the

price of infantry-pantaloons reduced from forty-two to twenty-seven

cents,--reduced by the Government itself,--but she made eight pair a

week, took care of five children, and was always on the verge of

starvation. She declared, that, if it were not for her children, she

would gladly lie down and die! A fourth worked for contractors on

overalls at five cents a pair! Having the aid of a sewing-machine, she

made six pair daily, but was the object of insult and abuse from her

employer.

The widow of a brave man who gave up his life at Fredericksburg worked

for the Government, and made eight pair of pantaloons a week, receiving

two dollars and sixteen cents for the uninterrupted labor of six days of

eighteen hours each. Another made thirteen pair of drawers for a dollar,

and by working early and late could sometimes earn two dollars in the

week. The wife of another soldier, still fighting to uphold the flag,

worked on great-coats for the contractors at thirty cents each, and

earned eighty cents a week, keeping herself and three children on that!

A wounded hero came home to die, and did so, after lingering six months

dependent on his wife. With six children, she could earn only two

dollars and a quarter a week, though working incessantly. She did

contrive to feed them, but they went barefoot all winter.

An aged woman worked on tents, making in each tent forty-six

button-holes, sewing on forty-six buttons, then buttoning them together,

then making twenty eyelet-holes,--all for sixteen cents. After working a

whole day without tasting food, she took in her work just five minutes

after the hour for receiving and paying for the week's labor. She was

told there was no more work for her. Then she asked them to pay her for

what she had just delivered, but was refused. She told them she was

without a cent, and that, if forced to wait till another pay-day, she

must starve. The reply was, "Starve and be d----d! That is none of my

business. We have our rules, and shall not break them for any ----."

A soldier's wife had bought coal by the bucketful all winter, at the

rate of sixteen dollars a ton, and worked on flannel shirts at a dollar

and thirty cents a dozen. She was never able to eat a full meal, and

many times went to bed hungry. A tailor gave to another sewing-woman a

lot of pantaloons to make up. The cloth being rotten, the stitches of

one pair tore out, but by exercising great care she succeeded in getting

the others made up. When she took them in, he accused her of having

ruined them, and refused to pay her anything. She threatened suit,

whereupon he told her to "sue and be d----d," and finally offered a

shilling a pair, which her necessities forced her to accept. Another

needle-woman worked on hat-leathers at two and a half cents a dozen. She

found her own silk and cotton, and put upwards of five thousand stitches

into the dozen leathers. How could such a slave exist? Her four children

and herself breakfasted on bread and molasses, with malt coffee

sweetened with molasses. They dined on potatoes, and made a quarter peck

serve for three meals!

So much for the mercy of the Government and the conduct of the trade.

Now for the doings of those who claimed to belong to the religious

class. One public praying man paid less than any other contractor, and

frequently allowed his hands to go unpaid for two or three weeks

together. Another would give only a dollar for making thirteen shirts

and drawers, of which a woman could finish but three in a day. One of

those in his employ, becoming weary of such low pay, applied for work at

another tailor's. There she found the inspector cursing an aged woman.

When solicited for work, he told the applicant to "clear out and be

d----d; he didn't want to see anything in bonnet or hoops again that

day."

What but fallen women must some of the subjects of such atrocious

treatment become? It was ascertained from a letter sent by one of this

class, that she had given way under the pressure of starvation. She

said,--

"I was once an innocent girl, the daughter of a clergyman. Left an

orphan at an early age, I tried hard to make a living, but, unable to

endure the hard labor and live upon the poor pay I received, I fell into

sin. Tell your public that thousands like me have been driven by want to

crime. Tell them, that, though it is well to save human souls from

pollution, it is better that they shall be kept pure, and know no

shame."

Another confessed as much; but how many more were driven to the same

alternative, who remained mute under their shame, no one can tell. Yet

the men who thus drove virtuous women to despair were amassing large

fortunes. Their names appeared in the newspapers as liberal contributors

to every public charity that was started,--to sanitary fairs, to

women's-aid societies, to the sick and wounded soldiers, to everything

that would be likely to bring their names into print. They figured as

respectable and spirited citizens. Of all men they were supremely loyal.

Loyal to what? Not to the cause of poor famishing women, but to their

own interest. Some of them were church-members, famous as class-leaders

and exhorters, powerful in prayer, especially when made in public,

counterparts of the Pharisees of old. Their wives and daughters wore

silk dresses, hundred-dollar shawls, and had boxes at the opera.

What would have been said of this unheard-of robbery by the men who won

victories at Gettysburg and Atlanta, had they known that it was

committed on the wives and mothers whom they had left behind? These

women gave up husbands and sons to fight the battles of the nation,

never dreaming that those who remained at home to make fortunes would

seek to do so by starving them. They considered the first sacrifice

great enough; but here was another. Who but they can describe how

terrible it was?

On this subject employers have generally remained silent, offering few

rebuttals to these charges of cruelty, extortion, and robbery. The

sewing-women and their friends have remonstrated, but the oppressors

have rarely condescended to reply. Even those of the same sex, who have

large establishments and employ numbers of women, have seldom done so.

This silence has been significant of inability, an admission of the

facts alleged.

Philanthropy has not been idle, however, while these impositions on

sewing-women have been practised. Numerous plans for preventing them,

and for otherwise improving the condition of the sex, have been

proposed, some of which have been put into successful operation,--the

object sought for being to diversify employment by opening other

occupations than that of the needle. It is a settled truism, that the

measure of civilization in a nation is the condition of its women. While

heathen and savage, they are drudges; when enlightened by education and

moulded by Christianity, they rise to the highest plane of humanity.

When a Neapolitan woman gave birth to a girl, it was, until very

recently, the custom of the poorer classes to display a black flag from

an upper window of the house, to avoid the unpleasant necessity of

informing inquirers of the sex of the infant. Even at the birth of a

child in the higher ranks, the midwife and physician who are in

attendance never announce to the anxious mother the sex of the newly

born, if a girl, until pressed to disclose it, because a female child is

never welcome.

It is much the fashion of the times to say that the sphere of woman is

exclusively within the domestic circle. It is highly probable that the

great majority desire no wider range; but even in the obscure quietude

of that circle they are subject to a thousand chances. We see what kind

of husbands many women obtain,--and that even the most deserving are at

times overtaken by sickness or poverty, and then are left with no

certain means of living. Poets and novelists may limit their destiny to

that of being beautiful and charming, but the wise and considerate have

long since seen that some comprehensive improvement in their condition

is needed. Their resources must be enlarged and made available. It will

increase their self-respect, and make them spurn dependence on the

charity of friends. I am inclined to think that all true women are

working-women,--at least they would be such, if they could obtain the

proper employment. American girls cannot all become house-servants,

and few of them are willing to be such. Their aspirations are

evidently higher. They have sought the factory, the bindery, the

printing-office,--thus graduating, by force of their own inherent

aptitude for better things, to a higher and more intellectual

occupation, leaving the Irish and Germans in undisputed possession of

the kitchen.

A volume has been printed, giving a list of employments suitable for

women, but meagre in practical suggestions how to secure them. It was

thought that the war would bring about a brisk demand for female labor,

as great armies cannot be collected without causing a corresponding

drain from many occupations into which women would thus find admission.

But the melancholy facts already recited show how fallacious the idea

is, that war can be in any way a blessing to the sex. If some have been

employed in consequence, multitudes who had been previously supported by

their husbands have been compelled to beg for work. The war has

everywhere brought poverty and grief to the humbler classes of American

women.

It is true that in the West, where the foreign population is large, the

German women go into the fields, and plough, and sow, and reap, and

harvest, with all the skill and activity of the men. It is equally true

of other sections of our country, in which no harvests would be

gathered, but for female help. But these are exceptional cases; and

these women can live without working on shirts at five to eight cents

apiece.

While the distress was greatest in our city, some one advertised for two

men, to be employed in a millinery establishment, who were acquainted

with trimmings, and before the day had passed, sixty applicants had

presented themselves for the situation: the men had not become scarcer.

Another shop, which advertised for three girls, at a dollar and a half a

week, "intelligent, genteel girls," as the advertisement read, was so

overrun before night with applications for even that pitiful

compensation, that the proprietor lost his temper under the annoyance,

and drove many away with insult and abuse. If the war gives employment

to women in the fields, it affords an insufficient amount of it in the

cities.

There are more female beggars in our streets, with infants in their

arms, than ever before. The saloons and beer-shops, stripped of their

male bar-tenders, have adopted female substitutes, driven by necessity

to take up with an employment that always demoralizes a woman. The

surgical records of the army show, that, among the wounded brought into

the hospitals, many women have thus been discovered as soldiers. Others

have been detected and sent home, Many of these heroines declared that

they entered the army because they could find no other employment. The

incognito they had preserved was strongly confirmatory of their

truthfulness. These are some of the minor effects of the war upon our

sex. Many have been sadly demoralizing, while probably very few have

been in any way beneficial.

It is one of the curiosities of the study how to improve the condition

of women, that the most eccentric plans have originated with their own

sex. The deportation of girls from England to Australia and other

colonies, where the majority of settlers are single men, is patronized

and presided over by ladies. It has been so extensive as to confer the

utmost benefit on distant settlements, equalizing the disparity of the

sexes, promoting a higher civilization by a proper infusion of female

society, and providing homes for thousands of virtuous, but friendless

and dependent girls, who had found the utmost difficulty in obtaining

even a precarious living. The exodus of American girls from New England

to California, as teachers first and wives afterwards, which some years

ago took place, originated with an American lady, who personally

superintended the enterprise. All through the West there are families

whose mothers are of the same enterprising class, while the South is not

without its representatives. There is a tribe of writers whose study it

is to ridicule and sneer at these humane and truly noble efforts to make

dependent women comfortable; but happily their sarcasm has been

unavailing.

I knew a young girl who was without a single relation in the world, so

far as she was aware. She had been picked up from a curb-stone in the

street, at the foot of a lamp-post, when perhaps only a week old,--her

mother having abandoned her to the charity of the first passer. She was

found by the watchman on his midnight beat, who, having no children,

adopted her as his own. One may feel surprised that foundlings are so

frequently adopted into respectable families, especially when infants of

only a few weeks old. But there are solitary couples whose hearts

instinctively yearn for the possession of children. Providence having

denied them offspring, they fill the void in their affections by taking

to their bosoms the helpless, friendless, and abandoned waifs of others.

Foundlings are preferred, because there is no chance of their

reclamation; the mother never troubles herself to demand possession of

her child; she may remember it, but it is only to rejoice at having cast

it off. The new parents are not annoyed by outside interference. The

foundling grows in their affections; they love it as they would their

own offspring; it cannot be torn away from them.

When only ten years of age, the protectors of the child referred to both

died, and she was turned loose to shift for herself. For three years she

underwent all the hardships incident to changing one bad mistress for

another, being poorly clothed, half fed, her education discontinued,

even the privilege of the Sunday school denied her, a total stranger to

kindness or sympathy.

An agent of a children's-aid society one day saw her washing the

pavement in front of her mistress's house, and being struck by her

shabby dress and evidently uncared-for condition, accosted her and

ascertained the principal facts of her little history. She was of just

the class whom it was the mission of the society to save from the

destitution and danger of a totally friendless position, by sending them

to good homes in the West. Thither she went, liberated from an

uncompensated bondage to the scrubbing-brush and washtub, and was

ushered into a new and joyous existence by the agency of one of the

noblest charities that Christian benevolence ever put it into the human

heart to extend to orphan children. The foundling of the lamp-post, thus

having an opening made for her, improved it and prospered. Out of the

atmosphere of city life, she grew up virtuous and respected. Her true

origin had been charitably concealed; she was known as an orphan; it

would have done no good to have it said that she was a foundling. She

married well, and became the mother of a family.

Hundreds of street-tramping orphan girls, with surroundings more

unfriendly to female purity than those of this foundling, have been

taken from the lowest haunts of a shocking city-life by the same noble

charity, and introduced into peaceful country homes, where they have

grown up to be respectable members of society. In this emigration effort

women have been conspicuous actors. In England they have been equally

prominent in promoting the emigration of nearly half a million of

unmarried females to the various colonies. They publish books, and

pamphlets, and magazines, and newspapers, in advocacy of the movement.

Educated and intellectual ladies leave wealthy homes and accompany their

emigrants on voyages of thousands of miles, to see that they are

comfortably cared for.

It would seem that in the ordering of Divine Providence there will

always be a multitude of women who do not marry. It is shown by the

census of every country in which the population is numbered

periodically, that there is an excess of females. In England there are

thirty women in every hundred who never marry, and there are three

millions who earn their own living. It is there contended that all

effort is improper which is directed toward making celibacy easy for

women, and that marriage, their only true vocation, should be promoted

at any cost, even at that of distributing through the colonies England's

half million of unmarried ones. Some declare that it is impossible to

make the labor of single women remunerative, or their lives free and

happy. But if the occupations of women were raised and diversified as

much as they might be, such impossibility would of itself be impossible.

If it is to be granted that a woman possesses only inferior powers, let

her be taught to use such powers as she has.

I doubt not that He who created woman has some mission, some purpose,

for those who, in His divine ordering, remain single. There is a church

which has taken note of this great fact, and devotes its single women to

cloisters or to hospitals, sometimes to useful objects, sometimes to

improper ones,--but seeing that they are a numerous class, it has

specifically appropriated them. I presume the lesson of a single life,

the necessity of living alone, must be a difficult one to learn. The

heart, the young heart always, is perpetually seeking for something to

love. Amid the duties of the household, around the domestic fireside,

this loving spirit has room for growth, expansion, and intensity. The

soft tendrils which it is ever throwing out find gentle objects to which

they may cling with indissoluble attachment. Solitude is fatal to the

household affections. The single woman lives in a comparative

solitude,--a solitude of the heart.

Yet it cannot be denied that even such hermitesses find compensations in

their retirement. If one resolve to remain single,--and it must require

strength of mind to come to this determination,--it is remarkable how

Nature fits such a woman for a position for which she could not have

been created. She takes her stand with a power of endurance not exceeded

by that of the other sex, and becomes more independent and at ease than

they. Let man's condition be what it may, whether rich or poor, he will

find his home cheerless and uncomfortable without the presence of a

woman. His desolateness at an hotel or boarding-house is proverbial. He

is unceasingly conscious that he has no home. But the single woman can

create one for herself.

Go into the cells of any prison for women, and those who never visited

such abodes will be astonished at the neatness, the order, the

embellishments, which many of them display. The home feeling that seems

to be natural to most of us develops itself here with affecting energy.

No man could surround his penitential cell with graces so profuse and

pleasing as do some of these unfortunate women.

Thus, go where a woman may, a native instinct teaches and qualifies her

to make a home for herself. If single, taste and housewifery are

combined within even the narrow limits of one or two rooms. Her

singleness need not chill the heart,--for there are other things to love

than men. The power to make tender friendships was born with her, and is

part of her nature; nor does it leave her now. She has, moreover, the

proud satisfaction of knowing that she has never lived to tempt others

to an act of sin and shame. But are the men who live equally solitary

lives as guiltless as she?

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 15, No. 92, June, 1865 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 26 / 65 题