The history of sculpture, drawn from the remarks of ancient writers,

would bear only upon the development of these technical processes, and

would give but little information concerning the style of this period,

if it were not possible to compare their accounts with several ancient

monuments which by great good-fortune have been preserved to our own

time. But it is necessary here not to overlook one point which is

frequently lost sight of altogether--namely, the local differences

betrayed by works of one or the same epoch. Examples of archaic stone

sculpture are presented by European Greece, by the Hellenic colonies of

the East in Asia Minor, and by those of the West in Sicily, which show

the two latter provinces to have followed a somewhat different course of

artistic development, and even the works of the Peloponnesos early to

have betrayed considerable variations, in conception and in principle,

from those of the more northern tracts of the Continent. Among the

provincial monuments, the first to be noted, because the oldest known,

are the metope reliefs upon the middle temple of the Acropolis of

Selinous in Sicily. The city was founded about 628 B.C., and, though

this temple may not have been the first built in the new colony, it must

be considered as dating at least from the first half of the sixth

century. Among numerous fragments of the metope sculptures two tablets

have been preserved almost uninjured which are of the greatest value

from the plainness with which they express both the artistic advance and

the imperfections of this early age. It would be a mistake, however, to

see in them representatives of the sculptural style of Greece proper,

for they betray in many respects the peculiar influences of Sicilian

Doric. In as far as the artistic understanding of the works permitted,

they evince a fresh and sound naturalism, and a careful observation of

the living model. But this did not extend beyond the more independent

members; while arms and legs, hands and feet, are relatively excellent,

the body and head are disagreeably heavy, rude, and ill-proportioned.

This contrast is particularly noticeable in that of the two reliefs

which represent Heracles carrying upon his bow the two Kercopes. The

more successful modelling of the details of the limbs shows it to have

been the work of an abler artist than the other (_Fig._ 192), where

Perseus, in the presence of Athene, cuts off the head of Medusa. The

deity, with naïve helplessness, turns her right foot sideways, though

otherwise facing entirely towards the front; the insufficient depth

rendered it impossible otherwise to give the foot its full length, and

the artist was perhaps withheld from a more correct form by an

unconscious dependence upon the more familiar style of low relief. The

left leg of the Medusa appears, on account of the confining frame, too

short by half, and the little Pegasos stands upon long, kangaroo-like

hinder legs, in order that the body may come within reach of the arm of

Medusa. Yet the weakness of the transition from the front view of the

upper body to the profile of the legs is less striking than in the

Egyptian and Assyrian sculptures, and both Perseus and Heracles are

wholly free from that typical petrifaction which characterized the art

of the Nile and of the Tigris. In spite of the first impression made by

the monstrous and disproportioned figures, these works have, with all

their imperfections, the peculiar charm of earnest effort, which is the

guarantee of ultimate success.

[Illustration: Fig. 193.--Statues from Miletos. British Museum.]

The most ancient Hellenic sculptures of Asia Minor do not show the same

self-reliance and direct study of nature. There the influence of

Mesopotamia, Phœnicia, Cyprus, and even of Egypt was so strongly felt

that art could not remain wholly free from canonical tendencies, and did

not develop simply and directly from natural models. The sitting

colossal statues which flanked the sacred way from the port of Panormos

to the Temple of Apollo Didymaios near Miletos, and, according to the

characters of the inscriptions, date from about 540 B.C., show the

naturalistic elements of Greek work in the treatment of the bodies, and

especially in the garments, with their scanty but correct folds; though

it is not to be denied that the arrangement in rows like the avenues of

sphinxes, and the enthroned, Memnon-like position of the priests and

priestesses betray reminiscences of Egyptian conceptions,--while the

fulness of the bodies and the technical details of the seats are more

similar to the traditional forms of Assyria and Phœnicia. The Asiatic

influence is still more evident in the epistyle and metope reliefs of

the remarkable Doric temple at Assos, now in the Louvre; though the

rudeness of their forms may be in part owing to the loss of the stucco

coating with which the coarse and excessively hard stone was doubtless

overlayed and in which many of the finer details may have been executed.

A similarity to the beaten work of metal plate peculiar to Phœnicia

is easily recognizable, and reliefs analogous in style, and even in

subject, to the sculptures of Assos are offered by the Etruscan

bronze-work of a chariot found in Perugia, now in the Munich Glyptothek.

[Illustration: Fig. 194.--Apollo of Thera.]

[Illustration: Fig. 195.--Archaic Relief from Sparta.]

A number of sculptures found in various parts of European Greece are

wholly different from these provincial works. Chief among them are

entirely nude youthful figures standing in a stiff position, the arms

hanging close to the body, and the legs separated--the left being

generally a little advanced; the head, with receding brow, is slightly

inclined, and looks directly forward; the eyes are large and protruding;

the smiling mouth drawn outward at the corners; while the wig-like hair

falls low over the shoulders. They are commonly designated as statues of

Apollo, although the want of all attributes, such as were so universally

employed by primitive art for the figures of deities, and which were so

necessary for their characterization, makes this more than uncertain.

Moreover, according to Plutarch, a Delian statue of Apollo, the work of

Tectaios and Angelion, teachers of the Æginetan Callon, and consequently

of this period, showed the god with outstretched hands; a position which

was typical in early antiquity, and seems long to have been retained, as

in the Milesian Apollo of Canachos, and the small bronze figure in the

Louvre. The supposition appears plausible that these figures are those

of victors in the national games of Greece; such votive offerings are

known to have been carved of wood in the earliest times, but, after 560

B.C., they appear to have been of stone, like that of Arrhachion in

Phigalia, described by Pausanias (viii. 40). The Apollo of Thera, now in

Athens (_Fig._ 194), is one of the more ancient of these works; the soft

and yet not voluptuous forms of the body, the beauty of outline, united

with an evident uncertainty, do not denote a later phase of artistic

development than the hard sharpness and strict conventionalism of the

greater number of archaic statues. The beginning of this discipline is

shown by the Apollo of Tenea, now at Munich, in which there is but

little grace and artistic beauty, but all the more an earnest striving

after close correctness of modelling, which is more successfully

attained in the limbs than in the trunk. Of this epoch, and similar in

style, though approaching more nearly to the Apollo of Thera, are the

marble statues of Orchomenos, preserved only to the knees, and the

torsos of Megara and Naxos, now in Athens. The more ancient sculptures

found in Greece proper are less antique in style than the sculptures and

reliefs already mentioned, with the exception of some marble steles from

Sparta, the most important of which represents upon the one side the

meeting of Orestes and Iphigenia, upon the other the murder of

Clytaimnestra (_Fig._ 195). The rude, short figures are somewhat similar

to those in the metopes of the middle temple upon the Acropolis of

Selinous. This excessive heaviness and awkwardness appears almost

entirely overcome in the stele of Aristion, found in northern Attica,

and now in Athens. The low relief (_Fig._ 196), designated as the work

of Aristocles, represents a man armed as a hoplite, and is similar, in

many important respects, to the Apollo of Tenea, though a decided

advance beyond that work. The Attic relief of a woman mounting a

chariot, notwithstanding a primitive harshness of form, shows, in the

graceful drapery, the inclination of the head and the position of the

arms, as well as in the greater certainty of the drawing, qualities

which cannot be ascribed exclusively to the superior perception of the

inhabitants of Attica, but must be due, at least in part, to a later and

more advanced stage of development. With these works may be compared the

so-called Leucothea relief in the Villa Albani, which does not, indeed,

equal them in composition, but is superior in grace of bearing and

beauty of detail. Another sculpture represents the bringing of a child

to a female figure seated upon a throne, perhaps the dead mother, and is

similar in subject to the celebrated reliefs of the Monument of the

Harpies at Xanthos, now in the British Museum, where the Harpies bear

children or souls to the deities of the lower world. The former, by

greater fulness and softness, as also by less clearness and

understanding in the general treatment, seems to precede the latter in

point of time, dating from the period between the Milesian colossal

figures and the Attic reliefs described, that is to say, from 520 to 500

B.C.

[Illustration: Fig. 196.--Stele of Aristion, by Aristocles.]

The older metopes of Selinous, the statues of Miletos, the reliefs of

Assos, and even the so-called figures of Apollo from Thera, Naxos,

Orchomenos, and Tenea, betray great looseness and uncertainty of form;

like the productions of every period of experiment, they give no

evidence of systematical and accepted principles--the canonical

establishment of a certain degree of perfection. In the subsequent

period there was, in various cities, an earnest endeavor to make an end

to this want of training by thorough and academic discipline. These

efforts could not, in Greece, result in that typical lifelessness, that

faulty execution and mannerism, universal in Egypt and the despotic

lands of the East, which operated against all direct study of nature;

but, by the combination of individual observations and improvements,

they increased and purified the artistic appreciation, no longer

restricting it to details, to the _partial_, but directing it to the

_complete_. Athens was most active in this advance, as is evident from

several ancient works closely related to that of the woman mounting the

chariot. The progress is illustrated by the statue of Athene found upon

the northern side of the Athenian Acropolis. A strict treatment of

details, like the aigis, the folds of the garments, the hair, etc., is

united to a considerable understanding of the forms of the body and the

functions of the limbs, which are sharply and perhaps a little hardly

modelled; while the work has in great measure freed itself from the

exactions of conventional symmetry, so markedly exemplified by the

sitting statues of Miletos and the Apollo of Tenea. The figure of Hermes

bearing a calf, found in Athens, is a somewhat similar work; its head

and hair are hard even to ugliness, but decided ability is shown in the

formation of the back and hams, and in the truth to nature of the calf,

held by the legs and pressed close to the neck. The progress is not less

plain in the bronze statuette of Apollo in the Louvre, nearly one meter

high, with the Greek inscription “to Athene from the tithes;” provided,

indeed, that the period of its origin is certain, and the work does not

belong to the extensive group of archaistic imitations.

The reliefs from the beginning of the fifth century are similar in

character. That upon a marble fountain-drum from Corinth represents the

meeting of Heracles and Hebe; it still preserves the silhouette-like

outline, the small parallel folds and general ornamental style of the

drapery, and the stepping of both feet flatly upon the soles; while the

unschooled endeavor and evident embarrassment of the artist does not

give an unpleasing expression of awkwardness to the figures, which have

a certain dignity and grace, especially remarkable in the garments and

in the action of the extremities. Here is attained at last that strict

and completed style which has cast off all loose uncertainty, and has

adopted a conventional form for accessories in order to secure the

harmonious execution of the whole. This is also noticeable upon a relief

discovered in Thasos, now in the Louvre, which, when compared with the

before-mentioned Corinthian relief, and with the monument of the

Harpies, displays the influence of the neighboring coasts of northern

Asia Minor, together with a certain picturesqueness of conception

peculiar to northern Greece. A beautiful stele, found in Orchomenos, the

work of Alxenor, an artist from Naxos, instead of giving to the portrait

figure the stiff position of parade, formerly universal, represents it

with crossed legs, lazily leaning upon a gnarled stick. The archaic

meagreness is, however, still to be seen in the form of the hand, and in

the folds of the cloak (_Fig._ 197). The stele from the Borgia

collection, at present in Naples, resembles it in general style. All the

merits and defects of the period are to be seen also in a number of

terra-cotta reliefs from Melos, not to mention some small figures in

clay and bronze, for the most part superficially executed, the

clumsiness of which may be ascribed to the maker’s individual want of

ability.

[Illustration: Fig. 197.--Stele by Alxenor, found in Orchomenos.]

The growth of art in Asia Minor, Sicily, and Lower Italy, in so far as

these lands were Hellenic, does not appear to have kept equal pace with

that of Greece proper; yet the intercourse, during the last decades of

the sixth century, was so active that they could not remain far behind.

The most remarkable examples of the sculptures of this class, perhaps of

a little later date than the Attic works described, are the metope

reliefs from the Middle Temple of the Eastern Plateau at Selinous,

representing the gigantomachia, as preserved in scanty fragments.

Although the crudeness of outline and modelling in the bodies of the

fallen giants in many respects recalls the older metopes of the

corresponding temple of the acropolis, the draperies of the goddesses,

on the other hand, show a skill exceeding in truth and beauty many of

the archaic works of Greece itself. The one remaining head of a giant,

wounded and outstretched in death (_Fig._ 198), shows, in spite of the

antique hardness in the form of the face and treatment of the hair, an

expression which could have resulted only from the intelligent study of

nature. A relief from Aricia, now in Palma, upon the island of Mallorca,

representing the murder of Ægisthos by Orestes, is known only through

insufficient representations; it shows weakness in composition and

inequality in rendering, the garments being sensibly inferior to the

treatment of the nude.

[Illustration: Fig. 198.--Head from a Metope of the Middle Temple upon

the Eastern Plateau of Selinous.]

Before mentioning by name those artists who carried art beyond this

stage of development, another class of monuments, numerically very

important, should be considered. It is well known that in all ages

antiquity has had a certain charm, either as appearing strange and

interesting in comparison with existing circumstances, or from religious

associations. When a devotional figure, with which many legends have

become associated, as is the case to-day with the altar-pieces of our

churches, was particularly reverenced on account of its antiquity, there

was a desire to preserve its primitive type, even from recognized

improvements. Hence arose an imitation of the original work, called

_archaistic_ in contradistinction from the _archaic_, or really old.

This imitative style became fashionable in later times; while an amateur

with the means of the Emperor Augustus was able to acquire an original

Boupalos or Athenis, other lovers of the antique were obliged to content

themselves with copies, or with works conventionalized after the manner

of the early masters. These products are not always to be distinguished

from the truly archaic, as is also the case with some modern imitations;

but usually some conventional, technical, or circumstantial oversight or

anachronism furnishes an easy criterion. There can be no doubt, for

example, concerning the age of a work of sculpture in which a Roman

Corinthian temple stands in the background, as upon a well-known relief

representing Victory filling a cup for Apollo Kitharoidos, who is

followed by Artemis and Leto. In other cases the head, hands, or

feet,--the expression or gesture,--or the step, which in ancient works

characteristically rests upon both soles,--betray a much later period

than the hard or regular folds of the drapery, as is the case with the

Artemis at Naples. (_Fig._ 199.) Sometimes the accessories are of a

later style, as in the ten scenes from the Gigantomachia upon the border

of the garment of Athene in Dresden; or, finally, the drapery upon one

figure of a group is strictly antique, while that of the others is free,

as upon a tripod of the same museum,--not to mention other less

important inconsistencies.

[Illustration: Fig. 199.--Archaistic Artemis from Pompeii.]

[Illustration: Fig. 200.--Central Figures of the Western Gable, Temple

of Athene upon Ægina.]

[Illustration: Fig. 201.--Harmodios and Aristogeiton. (Copies in

Naples.)]

[Illustration: Fig. 202.--Apollo after Canachos. (British Museum.)]

History of Ancient Art · 第 23 / 39 段