I.

There is a great deal of admirable literature concerning Miss Mitford,

so much of it indeed, that the writer of this little notice feels as if

she almost owed an apology to those who remember, for having ventured to

write, on hearsay only, and without having ever known or ever seen

the author of 'Our Village.' And yet, so vivid is the homely friendly

presence, so clear the sound of that voice 'like a chime of bells,' with

its hospitable cheery greeting, that she can scarcely realise that this

acquaintance exists only in the world of the might-have-beens.

For people who are beginning to remember, rather than looking forward

any more, there certainly exists no more delightful reading than the

memoirs and stories of heroes and heroines, many of whom we ourselves

may have seen, and to whom we may have spoken. As we read on we are led

into some happy bygone region,--such as that one described by Mr. du

Maurier in 'Peter Ibbetson,'--a region in which we ourselves, together

with all our friends and acquaintances, grow young again;--very young,

very brisk, very hopeful. The people we love are there, along with the

people we remember. Music begins to play, we are dancing, laughing,

scampering over the country once more; our parents too are young and

laughing cheerily. Every now and then perhaps some old friend, also

vigorous and hopeful, bursts into the book, and begins to talk or to

write a letter; early sights and sounds return to us, we have NOW, and

we have THEN, in a pleasant harmony. To those of a certain literary

generation who read Miss Mitford's memoirs, how many such familiar

presences and names must appear and reappear. Not least among them

that of her biographer, Mr. Harness himself, who was so valued by his

friends. Mrs. Kemble, Mrs. Sartoris, Charles Allston Collins, always

talked of him with a great respect and tenderness. I used to think they

had a special voice with which to speak his name. He was never among

our intimate friends, but how familiar to my recollection are the

two figures, that of Mr. Harness and Miss Harness, his sister and

housekeeper, coming together along the busy Kensington roadway. The

brother and sister were like characters out of some book, with their

kind faces, their simple spiritual ways; in touch with so much that was

interesting and romantic, and in heart with so much that suffered. I

remember him with grey hair and a smile. He was not tall; he walked

rather lame; Miss Harness too was little, looking up at all the rest of

the world with a kind round face and sparkling eyes fringed with thick

lashes. Mary Mitford was indeed happy in her friends, as happy as she

was unfortunate in her nearer relations.

With much that is sad, there is a great deal of beauty and enjoyment in

Miss Mitford's life. For her the absence of material happiness was made

up for by the presence of warm-hearted sensibility, of enthusiasm, by

her devotion to her parents. Her long endurance and filial piety are

very remarkable, her loving heart carried her safely to the end, and she

found comfort in her unreasoning life's devotion. She had none of the

restlessness which is so apt to spoil much that might be harmonious;

all the charm of a certain unity and simplicity of motive is hers, 'the

single eye,' of which Charles Kingsley wrote so sweetly. She loved

her home, her trees, her surrounding lanes and commons. She loved her

friends. Her books and flowers are real and important events in her

life, soothing and distracting her from the contemplation of its

constant anxieties. 'I may truly say,' she once writes to Miss Barrett,

'that ever since I was a very young girl, I have never (although for

some years living apparently in affluence) been without pecuniary

care,--the care that pressed upon my thoughts the last thing at night,

and woke in the morning with a dreary sense of pain and pressure, of

something which weighed me to the earth.'

Mary Russell Mitford was born on the 16th of December 1787. She was the

only child of her parents, who were well connected; her mother was an

heiress. Her father belonged to the Mitfords of the North. She describes

herself as 'a puny child, with an affluence of curls which made her look

as if she were twin sister to her own great doll.' She could read at

three years old; she learnt the Percy ballads by heart almost before she

could read. Long after, she used to describe how she first studied her

beloved ballads in the breakfast-room lined with books, warmly spread

with its Turkey carpet, with its bright fire, easy chairs, and the

windows opening to a garden full of flowers,--stocks, honeysuckles, and

pinks. It is touching to note how, all through her difficult life,

her path was (literally) lined with flowers, and how the love of them

comforted and cheered her from the first to the very last. In her

saddest hours, the passing fragrance and beauty of her favourite

geraniums cheered and revived her. Even when her mother died she found

comfort in the plants they had tended together, and at the very last

breaks into delighted descriptions of them.

She was sent to school in the year 1798 to No. 22 Hans Place, to a Mrs.

St. Quintin's. It seems to have been an excellent establishment. Mary

learnt the harp and astronomy; her taste for literature was encouraged.

The young ladies, attired as shepherdesses, were also taught to skip

through many mazy movements, but she never distinguished herself as a

shepherdess. She had greater success in her literary efforts, and her

composition 'on balloons' was much applauded. She returned to her home

in 1802. 'Plain in figure and in face, she was never common-looking,'

says Mr. Harness. He gives a pretty description of her as 'no ordinary

child, her sweet smiles, her animated conversation, her keen enjoyment

of life, and her gentle voice won the love and admiration of her

friends, whether young or old.' Mr. Harness has chiefly told Miss

Mitford's story in her own words by quotations from her letters, and, as

one reads, one can almost follow her moods as they succeed each other,

and these moods are her real history. The assiduity of childhood, the

bright enthusiasm and gaiety of her early days, the growing anxiety of

her later life, the maturer judgments, the occasional despairing

terrors which came to try her bright nature, but along with it all, that

innocent and enduring hopefulness which never really deserted her. Her

elastic spirit she owed to her father, that incorrigible old Skimpole.

'I am generally happy everywhere,' she writes in her youth--and then

later on: 'It is a great pleasure to me to love and to admire, this is a

faculty which has survived many frosts and storms.' It is true that

she adds a query somewhere else, 'Did you ever remark how superior old

gaiety is to new?' she asks.

Her handsome father, her plain and long-enduring mother, are both

unconsciously described in her correspondence. 'The Doctor's manners

were easy, natural, cordial, and apparently extremely frank,' says Mr.

Harness, 'but he nevertheless met the world on its own terms, and was

prepared to allow himself any insincerity which seemed expedient. He was

not only recklessly extravagant, but addicted to high play. His wife's

large fortune, his daughter's, his own patrimony, all passed through his

hands in an incredibly short space of time, but his wife and daughter

were never heard to complain of his conduct, nor appeared to admire him

less.'

The story of Miss Mitford's 20,000 pounds is unique among the adventures

of authoresses. Dr. Mitford, having spent all his wife's fortune, and

having brought his family from a comfortable home, with flowers and a

Turkey carpet, to a small lodging near Blackfriars Bridge, determined to

present his daughter with an expensive lottery ticket on the occasion

of her tenth birthday. She had a fancy for No. 2224, of which the added

numbers came to 10. This number actually came out the first prize of

20,000 pounds, which money started the family once more in comparative

affluence. Dr. Mitford immediately built a new square house, which he

calls Bertram House, on the site of a pretty old farmhouse which he

causes to be pulled down. He also orders a dessert-service painted with

the Mitford arms; Mrs. Mitford is supplied with a carriage, and she

subscribes to a circulating library.

A list still exists of the books taken out by her for her daughter's

use; some fifty-five volumes a month, chiefly trash: 'Vicenza,' 'A

Sailor's Friendship and Soldier's Love,' 'Clarentina,' 'Robert and

Adela,' 'The Count de Valmont,' 'The Three Spaniards,' 'De Clifford' (in

four volumes) and so on.

The next two or three years were brilliant enough; for the family

must have lived at the rate of three or four thousand a year. Their

hospitality was profuse, they had servants, carriages, they bought

pictures and furniture, they entertained. Cobbett was among their

intimate friends. The Doctor naturally enough invested in a good many

more lottery tickets, but without any further return.

The ladies seem to take it as a matter of course that he should

speculate and gamble at cards, and indeed do anything and everything he

fancied, but they beg him at least to keep to respectable clubs. He is

constantly away. His daughter tries to tempt him home with the bloom of

her hyacinths. 'How they long to see him again!' she says, 'how greatly

have they been disappointed, when, every day, the journey to Reading has

been fruitless. The driver of the Reading coach is quite accustomed

to being waylaid by their carriage.' Then she tells him about the

primroses, but neither hyacinths nor primroses bring the Doctor away

from his cards. Finally, the rhododendrons and the azaleas are in bloom,

but these also fail to attract him.

Miss Mitford herself as she grows up is sent to London more than

once, to the St. Quintin's and elsewhere. She goes to the play and to

Westminster Hall, she sees her hero, Charles James Fox, and has the

happiness of watching him helped on to his horse. Mr. Romilly delights

her, but her greatest favourite of all is Mr. Whitbread. 'You know I am

always an enthusiast,' she writes, 'but at present it is impossible to

describe the admiration I feel for this exalted character.' She speaks

of his voice 'which she could listen to with transport even if he spoke

in an unknown language!' she writes a sonnet to him, 'an impromptu, on

hearing Mr. Whitbread declare in Westminster Hall that he fondly trusted

his name would descend to posterity.'

'The hope of Fame thy noble bosom fires,

Nor vain the hope thy ardent mind inspires;

In British breasts whilst Purity remains,

Whilst Liberty her blessed abode retains,

Still shall the muse of History proclaim

To future ages thy immortal name!'

There are many references to the celebrities of the time in her

letters home,--every one agrees as to the extreme folly of Sheridan's

entertainments, Mrs. Opie is spoken of as a rising authoress, etc. etc.

etc.

Miss Austen used to go to 23 Hans Place, and Miss Mitford used to stay

at No. 22, but not at the same time. Mrs. Mitford had known Miss Austen

as a child. She may perhaps be forgiven for some prejudice and maternal

jealousy, in her later impressions, but Mary Mitford admired Jane Austen

always with warmest enthusiasm. She writes to her mother at length from

London, describing everything, all the people and books and experiences

that she comes across,--the elegant suppers at Brompton, the Grecian

lamps, Mr. Barker's beauty, Mr. Plummer's plainness, and the destruction

of her purple gown.

Mrs. Mitford writes back in return describing Reading festivities, 'an

agreeable dinner at Doctor Valpy's, where Mrs. Women and Miss Peacock

are present and Mr. J. Simpson, M.P.; the dinner very good, two full

courses and one remove, the soup giving place to one quarter of lamb.'

Mrs. Mitford sends a menu of every dinner she goes to.

In 1806 Dr. Mitford takes his daughter, who was then about nineteen,

to the North to visit his relations; they are entertained by the

grandparents of the Trevelyans and the Swinburnes, the Ogles and the

Mitfords of the present day. They fish in Sir John Swinburne's lake,

they visit at Alnwick Castle. Miss Mitford kept her front hair in papers

till she reached Alnwick, nor was her dress discomposed though she had

travelled thirty miles. They sat down, sixty-five to dinner, which was

'of course' (she somewhat magnificently says) entirely served on plate.

Poor Mary's pleasure is very much dashed by the sudden disappearance

of her father,--Dr. Mitford was in the habit of doing anything he felt

inclined to do at once and on the spot, quite irrespectively of the

convenience of others,--and although a party had been arranged on

purpose to meet him in the North, and his daughter was counting on his

escort to return home, (people posted in those days, they did not take

their tickets direct from Newcastle to London), Dr. Mitford one morning

leaves word that he has gone off to attend the Reading election, where

his presence was not in the least required. For the first and apparently

for the only time in her life his daughter protests. 'Mr. Ogle is

extremely offended; nothing but your immediate return can ever excuse

you to him! I IMPLORE you to return, I call upon Mamma's sense of

propriety to send you here directly. Little did I suspect that my

father, my beloved father, would desert me at this distance from home!

Every one is surprised.' Dr. Mitford was finally persuaded to travel

back to Northumberland to fetch his daughter.

The constant companionship of Dr. Mitford must have given a curious

colour to his good and upright daughter's views of life. Adoring her

father as she did, she must have soon accustomed herself to take his

fine speeches for fine actions, to accept his self-complacency in the

place of a conscience. She was a woman of warm impressions, with a

strong sense of right. But it was not within her daily experience, poor

soul, that people who did not make grand professions were ready to do

their duty all the same; nor did she always depend upon the uprightness,

the courage, the self-denial of those who made no protestations. At that

time loud talking was still the fashion, and loud living was considered

romantic. They both exist among us, but they are less admired, and

there is a different language spoken now to that of Dr. Mitford and his

school. * This must account for some of Miss Mitford's judgments of what

she calls a 'cynical' generation, to which she did little justice.

*People nowadays are more ready to laugh than to admire when

they hear the lions bray; for mewing and bleating, the

taste, I fear, is on the increase.

Our Village · 第 6 / 30 题