The Mackmen made a bad beginning for champions, and on May 1 were in the

second division. During all of May and part of June they climbed into

the first division and fell out of it with great regularity. Not until

near the middle of June did the Athletics gain a strangle hold on the

upper half of the league standing, from that time on they kept above the

.500 mark, and toward the end of June they met the White Sox coming

back. There was a short scuffle during the early part of July among the

Athletics, Senators and White Sox for the possession of the position

next to Boston. Then Chicago was pushed back, leaving Philadelphia and

Washington to fight it out the rest of the way. Trimming the Phillies

four out of five games in their city series did not lessen the gloom of

the Athletics.

* * * * *

The White Sox by their meteoric career demonstrated the value of good

condition at the start. Although the Chicagoans experienced tough

weather in Texas last spring they fared better than any of the other

teams in their league, and that fact, combined with the readiness with

which youth gets into playing trim, enabled the White Sox to walk

through the early weeks of their schedule with an ease that astonished

everybody. Even prophets who were friendly to them had expected no such

showing. So fast did the Callahans travel that on May 3 they had lost

only four games, having won thirteen in that time. But Boston was

hanging on persistently. Chicago's margin over the Red Sox varied from

four to five and a half games; during May, on the fourteenth of that

month the White Sox had won twenty-one games and lost only five, giving

them the percentage of .808. During part of this time they were on their

first invasion of the east. May 18 saw the Chicago men five and a half

games in the lead and their constituents were dreaming of another

world's pennant almost every night.

Even the doubters were beginning to believe Manager Callahan had found

the right combination. Just then came the awakening. The luck which had

been coming their way began breaking against them with remarkable

persistency. Plays that had won game after game went wrong and youth was

not resourceful enough to offset the breaks. The White Sox began to fall

away fast in percentage, but managed to cling to the lead until June 10.

Boston passed them right there and the Chicagoans kept on going.

By mid-season Manager Callahan was fighting to keep his men in the first

division and their slump did not end until they landed in fifth place

for a couple of days in August. Then in desperation Callahan began

switching his line-up and by herculean effort--and the help of Ed

Walsh--climbed back into the upper quartet and stuck there to the

finish. It was a desperate remedy to take Harry Lord off third base,

where he had played during most of his professional career, and try to

convert him into an outfielder, a position in which he had had no

experience at all. But Lord was too good an offensive player to take out

of the game, in spite of his slump at third base, and he was willing to

try the outfield. Results justified the move. Lord learned outfielding

rapidly, and Zeider proved that third base was his natural position. The

acquisition of Borton for first base enabled Callahan to put Collins in

the outfield, and the White Sox in reality were a stronger team when

they finished than when they started their runaway race in April. With

one more reliable pitcher to take his turn regularly on the slab all

season the White Sox would have kept in the race. Callahan's men made up

for some of the disappointment they produced by beating the Cubs in a

nine-game post-season series, after the Cubs had won three victories.

Two of the nine games were drawn and one other went into extra innings,

making a more extended combat than the world's series.

* * * * *

Cleveland's 1912 experience was almost identical with that of 1911, even

to swapping managers in mid-season. Harry Davis, for years first

lieutenant to Connie Mack, took the management or the Naps under a

severe handicap. He succeeded a temporary manager, George Stovall, who

had made good in the latter half of the previous season, but who could

not be retained without abrogating a previous agreement with Davis. The

public did not take kindly to the situation when the Naps failed to get

into the fight, and the new management had a pitching staff of

youngsters with out much of a catching staff to help them out when in

trouble.

The Cleveland team never was prominent in the race after the first

fortnight, although it retained a respectable position at the top of the

second division, with an occasional journey into the first division

during the first month or six weeks. In the middle of June the Naps

dropped back into sixth place, below Detroit, for a while, then took a

brace and reclaimed the leadership of the second squad for part of July.

Midway in August found Cleveland apparently anchored in sixth spot and,

with the consent of the Cleveland club owners, Manager Davis resigned

his position.

The management was given to Joe Birmingham, who took hold of it with

enthusiasm but without experience, just as Stovall did the previous

year. He infused new life into the team, shook it up a bit, and improved

its playing so much that Cleveland passed Detroit before the end of the

race, and was threatening to knock Chicago out of fourth place at one

time. This would have happened but for the brace of the White Sox.

Profiting by previous experience the club owners did not look around for

a permanent manager until they saw what Birmingham could do, and in

consequence were in position to offer him the leadership of the Naps for

the season of 1913.

* * * * *

What was left to Manager Jennings from the great Detroit team that had

won three straight pennants was slowing up, with the exception of Tyrus

Cobb, who has yet to reach the meridian of his career, and the Georgian

got into trouble fairly early in the season, with the result that he was

suspended for a considerable period. That and the strike of the Tigers

in Philadelphia threw a monkey-wrench into the machinery, resulting in a

tangle which Jennings was unable to straighten out all the season. There

was a problem at first base which he had a hard time solving. The break

in Del Gainor's wrist the season before had not mended as it should have

done, and he was unable to play the position regularly. Moriarty was

pressed into service there and did good work in an unfamiliar position;

then the infield was shifted several times without marked benefit.

Donovan, who had always been of great help on the slab in hot weather,

was not equal to the task of another year and was made manager of the

Providence team. Jean Dubuc was the only one of the young pitchers who

proved a star, but his work kept the Tigers from being a lot more

disappointing proposition than they were.

* * * * *

St. Louis and New York were outclassed from the start. Two weeks after

the season opened it was apparent they were doomed to fight it out for

the last round on the ladder. That the Browns finally escaped the cellar

in the closing days of the race was due largely to the efforts of

Stovall, who was made manager to succeed Wallace near the middle of the

season.

As early as the first of May it was seen the Browns and Yankees were

destined to trail. The New York team quickly gravitated to the bottom.

It started without the services of Catcher Eddie Sweeney, who held out

for a larger salary, and it had a manager at the helm who was

inexperienced in major league leadership. Not until April 24 did New

York win a game and in that time it had lost seven straight,

postponements accounting for the rest of the time.

St. Louis got a little better start and for a while was inclined to

dispute sixth place with Detroit, but on May 1 the Browns found only New

York between them and the basement. In the middle of May the Yankees

passed St. Louis and ran seventh in the race until July. 4. But accident

and injury, and the loss of Cree, shot the Yankees to pieces. For nearly

six weeks, however, it was a battle royal between New York and St. Louis

to escape the last hole, but in the middle of August the Yankees again

established their superiority, retaining seventh place until after the

middle of September. In the homestretch the new blood given Stovall

enabled him to pull his men out of the last notch just before the

schedule ran out. This feat was soon forgotten in the defeat of the

Browns by the Cardinals in their post-prandial series for the

championship of the Mound City.

* * * * *

The year was not prolific of freak or record-breaking performances in

the American League. Walter Johnson of Washington, and Joe Wood of

Boston were credited with sixteen straight victories, which raised the

American League record in that respect from fourteen straight, formerly

held by Jack Chesbro of the Yankees. Mullin of Detroit and Hamilton of

St. Louis added their names to the list of hurlers who have held

opponents without a safe hit in nine innings. Mullin performed his

hitless feat against St. Louis and Hamilton retaliated by holding

Detroit without a safety. The number of games in which pitchers escaped

with less than four hits against them was smaller than usual, however.

There were only seventy-eight shut-out games recorded last season by

comparison with the American League's record of 145.

The longest game of the younger league's season lasted nineteen innings,

Washington defeating Philadelphia in that combat 5 to 4, and it was

played late in September when the two teams were scrapping for second

place. The American League record for overtime is twenty-four innings,

held by Philadelphia and Boston. There were a lot of slugging games in

1912, but not as many as during the season of 1911. Philadelphia piled

up the highest total, 25, in eight innings, but it was made against the

semi-professional team which wore Detroit uniforms on the day the Tigers

struck. The highest genuine total of hits was twenty-three, made by the

Athletics against New York pitchers. The Athletics also run up the

highest score of the league's season when they compounded twenty-four

runs against Detroit In May.

The semi-monthly standing of the race by percentages follows:

STANDING OF CLUBS ON MAY 1.

Club. Won. Lost. PC.

Chicago 11 4 .733

Boston 9 5 .643

Washington 8 6 .615

Cleveland 7 6 .538

Athletics 7 7 .600

Detroit 6 10 .375

St. Louis 5 9 .357

New York 3 10 .231

STANDING OF CLUBS ON MAY 15.

Chicago 21 6 .778

Boston 16 8 .667

Washington 12 12 .500

Cleveland 11 11 .500

Detroit 13 14 .481

Athletics 10 12 .466

New York 6 15 .286

St. Louis 6 17 .261

STANDING OF CLUBS ON JUNE 1.

Chicago 29 12 .707

Boston 25 14 .641

Detroit 21 20 .512

Athletics 17 17 .500

Cleveland 18 19 .486

Washington 19 21 .476

New York 12 23 .343

St. Louis 12 27 .308

STANDING OF CLUBS ON JUNE 15.

Boston 33 19 .635

Chicago 33 21 .611

Washington 33 21 .611

Athletics 27 21 .563

Detroit 26 29 .473

Cleveland 23 28 .451

New York 17 31 .364

St. Louis 15 37 .288

STANDING OF CLUBS ON JULY 1.

Boston 47 21 .691

Athletics 39 25 .609

Chicago 38 28 .576

Washington 37 31 .551

Cleveland 33 38 .492

Detroit 33 36 .478

New York 18 44 .290

St. Louis 18 45 .288

STANDING OF CLUBS ON JULY 15.

Boston 56 26 .683

Washington 60 33 .602

Athletics 46 36 .668

Chicago 44 35 .567

Cleveland 42 42 .500

Detroit 40 43 .488

New York 22 53 .298

St. Louis 22 56 .282

STANDING OF CLUBS ON AUGUST 1.

Boston 67 31 .684

Washington 61 37 .622

Athletics 55 41 .573

Chicago 49 36 .516

Detroit 48 42 .485

Cleveland 45 43 .464

New York 31 53 .333

St. Louis 30 56 .312

STANDING OF CLUBS ON AUGUST 15.

Boston 76 34 .691

Athletics 66 43 .606

Washington 67 44 .604

Chicago 54 55 .495

Detroit 55 58 .487

Cleveland 51 59 .464

New York 36 73 .327

St. Louis 36 74 .321

STANDING OF CLUBS ON SEPTEMBER 1.

Boston 87 37 .702

Washington 77 49 .611

Athletics 73 50 .593

Chicago 62 61 .504

Detroit 57 70 .449

Cleveland 54 71 .432

New York 45 78 .366

St. Louis 43 82 .344

STANDING OF CLUBS ON SEPTEMBER 15.

Boston 97 39 .713

Athletics 81 56 .591

Washington 82 57 .590

Chicago 67 69 .493

Detroit 64 75 .461

Cleveland 62 75 .453

New York 48 88 .353

St. Louis 47 89 .346

STANDING OF CLUBS ON OCTOBER 1.

Boston 103 48 .691

Washington 89 60 .567

Athletics 89 60 .567

Chicago 74 76 .493

Cleveland 72 77 .483

Detroit 69 80 .463

St. Louis 52 98 .347

New York 49 100 .329

STANDING OF CLUBS AT CLOSE OF SEASON

Bos. Wash. Ath. Chic. Clev. Det. S.L. N.Y. Won PC

Boston -- 12 15 16 11 15 17 19 105 .691

Washington 10 -- 7 13 18 14 14 15 91 .599

Athletics 7 18 -- 10 14 13 16 17 99 .592

Chicago 6 9 12 -- 11 14 13 13 78 .506

Cleveland 11 4 8 11 -- 13 15 13 75 .490

Detroit 6 8 9 8 9 -- 13 16 69 .451

St. Louis 5 8 6 9 7 9 -- 9 58 .344

New York 3 7 5 9 8 6 13 -- 50 .329

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Lost 47 61 62 76 78 84 101 102

NATIONAL LEAGUE

STANDING OF CLUBS AT CLOSE OF SEASON.

N.Y. Pitts.Chi. Cin. Phil.St.L. Bkln. Bos. Won. PC.

New York -- 12 9 16 17 15 16 18 103 .682

Pittsburgh 8 -- 13 11 14 15 14 18 93 .616

Chicago 13 8 -- 11 10 15 17 17 91 .607

Cincinnati 6 11 10 -- 8 13 16 11 75 .498

Philadelphia 5 8 10 14 -- 11 13 12 73 .480

St. Louis 7 7 7 9 11 -- 10 12 63 .412

Brooklyn 6 8 5 6 9 11 -- 13 58 .379

Boston 3 4 6 11 10 10 9 -- 52 .340

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ----

Lost 48 58 59 78 79 90 95 101

The Chicago-Pittsburgh game at Chicago, October 2, was protested by the

Pittsburgh club and thrown out of the records, taking a victory from the

Chicago club and a defeat from the Pittsburgh club.

CHAMPIONSHIP WINNERS IN PREVIOUS YEARS.

1871- Athletics .759 | 1885- Chicago .770 | 1899- Brooklyn .682

1872- Boston .830 | 1886- Chicago .726 | 1900- Brooklyn .603

1873- Boston .729 | 1887- Detroit .637 | 1901- Pittsburgh .647

1874- Boston .717 | 1888- New York .641 | 1902- Pittsburgh .741

1875- Boston .899 | 1889- New York .659 | 1903- Pittsburgh .650

1876- Chicago .788 | 1890- Brooklyn .667 | 1904- New York .693

1877- Boston .646 | 1891- Boston .630 | 1905- New York .668

1878- Boston .683 | 1892- Boston .680 | 1906- Chicago .765

1879- Providence .702 | 1893- Boston .667 | 1907- Chicago .704

1880- Chicago .798 | 1894- Baltimore .695 | 1908- Chicago .643

1881- Chicago .667 | 1895- Baltimore .669 | 1909- Pittsburgh .724

1882- Chicago .655 | 1896- Baltimore .698 | 1910- Chicago .676

1883- Boston .643 | 1897- Boston .795 | 1911- New York .647

1884- Providence .750 | 1898- Boston .685 |

INDIVIDUAL BATTING.

Following are the Official Batting Averages of National League players

who participated in any manner in at least fifteen championship games

during the season of 1912:

Name and Club G. A.B. R. H. T.B. 2B 3B HR SH SB PC

Zimmerman, Chicago 145 557 95 207 318 41 14 14 18 23 .372

Meyers, New York 126 371 60 133 177 16 5 6 9 8 .358

Sweeney, Boston 153 593 84 204 264 81 13 1 33 27 .344

Evers, Chicago 143 478 73 163 211 23 11 1 14 16 .341

Bresnaban, St. Louis 48 108 8 36 50 7 2 1 -- 4 .333

McCormick, New York 42 39 4 13 19 4 1 -- -- 1 .333

Doyle, New York 143 558 98 184 263 33 8 10 13 36 .330

Kuisely, Cincinnati 21 67 10 22 35 7 8 -- 1 3 .328

Lobert, Philadelphia 65 257 37 84 112 12 5 2 10 13 .327

Wiltse, New York 28 46 5 15 17 2 -- -- 1 1 .326

Wagner, Pittsburgh 145 558 91 181 277 36 20 7 11 26 .324

Hendrix, Pittsburgh 46 121 25 39 64 10 6 1 2 1 .322

Kirke, Boston 103 359 53 115 146 11 4 4 9 7 .320

Kelly, Pittsburgh 48 132 20 42 52 3 2 1 7 8 .318

Marsans, Cincinnati 110 416 59 132 168 19 7 1 9 35 .317

Kling, Boston 81 252 26 80 102 10 3 2 7 8 .317

Donlin, Pittsburgh 77 244 27 77 108 9 8 2 10 8 .316

Stengel, Brooklyn 17 57 9 38 22 1 -- 1 1 5 .316

Paskert, Philadelphia 145 540 102 170 221 38 5 1 11 35 .315

Konetchy, St. Louis 143 538 81 169 245 26 13 8 17 35 .314

Crandall, New York 50 80 9 25 25 6 2 -- 3 -- .313

Titus,

Philadelphia-Boston 141 502 99 155 224 32 11 5 15 11 .309

Merkle, New York 129 479 82 148 215 22 6 11 8 37 .309

Daubert, Brooklyn 145 559 81 173 232 19 16 3 14 39 .308

W. Miller, Chicago 86 241 45 74 93 11 4 -- 8 11 .307

S. Magee, Phila 132 464 79 142 203 25 9 6 29 30 .306

Wheat, Brooklyn 123 453 70 138 204 28 7 8 7 16 .305

Huggins, St. Louis 120 431 82 131 154 15 4 -- 11 35 .304

Carey, Pittsburgh 150 587 114 177 231 23 8 5 37 45 .302

Edington, Pittsburgh 15 53 4 16 20 -- 2 -- 3 -- .302

Simon, Pittsburgh 42 113 10 34 38 2 1 -- -- 1 .301

Spalding's Official Baseball Guide - 1913 · 第 9 / 9 段