A WOMAN.

* * * * *

Now that was not altogether an agreeable breakfast dish. And the worst

of it was that it was so supremely unjustifiable. Had my indignant

correspondent honoured me with her address, I should have answered

her at once. "Madam," I should have said, "your anger outstrips your

reason. I always intended to say something about men. I had already

begun a second letter to my friend VANITY on the subject. I can

therefore afford to forgive your hard words, and to admit that there

is a certain amount of truth in your strictures on us. But please

don't write to me again so furiously. Such excessive annoyance is

quite out of keeping with your pretty handwriting, and besides, it

takes away my appetite to think I have even involuntarily given you

pain. Be kind enough to look out for my next letter, but don't, for

goodness' sake, tell me what you think about it, unless it should

happen to please you. In that case I shall, of course, be proud and

glad to hear from you again."

I now proceed, therefore, to carry out my intention, and, as usual,

I address myself to the fountain head. My dear VANITY, I never shall

understand why you take so much trouble to get hold of men. They are

not a pleasing sight when you have got them, and after a time it

must cease to amuse even you to see yourself reproduced over and over

again, and in innumerable ridiculous ways. For instance, there is

Dr. PEAGAM, the celebrated author of _Indo-Hebraic Fairy Tales: a new

Theory of their Rise and Development, with an Excursus on an Early

Aryan Version of_ "_Three Blind Mice_." Dr. PEAGAM is learned; he has

the industry of a beaver; he is a correspondent of goodness knows how

many foreign philosophical, philological, and mythological societies;

his record of University distinctions has never been equalled; his

advice has been sought by German Professors. Yet he carries all this

weight of celebrity and learning as lightly as if it were a wideawake,

and seems to think nothing of it. But he has his weak point, and, like

Achilles, he has it in his feet.

This veteran investigator, this hoary and venerable Doctor, would

cheerfully give years off his life if only the various philosophers

who from time to time sit at his feet would recognise that those feet

are small, and compliment him on the fact. They _are_ small, there is

no doubt of it, but not small enough to be encased without agony in

the tiny, natty, pointed boots that he habitually wears. Let anybody

who wants to get anything out of Dr. PEAGAM lead the conversation

craftily on to the subject of feet and their proper size. Let him then

make the discovery (aloud) that the Doctor's feet are extraordinarily

small and beautiful, and I warrant that there is nothing the

Doctor can bestow which shall not be freely offered to this cunning

flatterer. That is why Dr. PEAGAM, a modest man in most respects,

always insists on sitting in the front row on any platform, and

ostentatiously dusts his boots with a red silk pocket-handkerchief.

Then, again, who is there that has not heard of Major-General

WHACKLEY, V.C., the hero who captured the ferocious Ameer of Mudwallah

single-handed, and carried him on his back to the English camp--the

man to whose dauntless courage, above all others, the marvellous

victory of Pilferabad was due? Speak to him on military matters,

and you will find the old warrior as shy as a school-girl; but only

mention the word poetry, and you'll have him reciting his ballads and

odes to you by the dozen, and declaiming for hours together about the

obtuseness of the publishing fraternity.

I don't speak now of literary men who value themselves above LAMB,

DICKENS, and THACKERAY, rolled into one; nor of artists who sneer at

TITIAN; nor of actors who hold GARRICK to be absurdly overrated. Space

would fail me, and patience you. But let me just for a brief moment

call to your mind ROLAND PRETTYMAN. Upon my soul, I think ROLAND the

most empty-headed fribble, the most affected coxcomb, and the most

conceited noodle in the whole world. He was decently good-looking

once, and he had a pretty knack of sketching in water-colours.

But oh, the huge, distorted, overweening conceit of the man! I have

seen him lying full length on a couch, waving a scented handkerchief

amongst a crowd of submissive women, who were grovelling round him,

while he enlarged in his own pet jargon on the surpassing merits

of his latest unpublished essay, or pointed out the beauties of the

trifling pictures which were the products of his ineffective brush.

He will never accomplish anything, and yet to the end of his life,

I fancy, he will have his circle of toadies and flatterers who will

pretend to accept him as the evangelist of a glorious literary and

artistic gospel. For unfortunately he is as rich as he is impudent

and incompetent. And when he drives out in a Hansom he never ceases to

simper at his reflected image in the little corner looking-glasses, by

means of which modern cab-proprietors pander to the weakness of men.

Such is your handiwork, my excellent VANITY. Are you proud of it?

Yours, &c.,

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 101, November 28, 1891 · 第 7 / 37 题