A good example to begin with is Fig. 8. These outlines will probably

suggest at first view a book, or better a book cover, seen with its

back toward you and its sides sloping away from you; but it may also

be viewed as a book opened out toward you and presenting to you an

inside view of its contents. Should the change not come readily, it

may be facilitated by thinking persistently of the appearance of an

open book in this position. The upper portion of Fig. 9 is practically

the same as Fig. 8, and if the rest of the figure be covered up, it

will change as did the book cover; when, however, the whole figure is

viewed as an arrow, a new conception enters, and the apparently solid

book cover becomes the _flat_ feathered part of the arrow. Look at the

next figure (Fig. 10), which represents in outline a truncated pyramid

with a square base. Is the smaller square nearer to you, and are the

sides of the pyramid sloping away from you toward the larger square in

the rear? Or are you looking into the hollow of a truncated pyramid

with the smaller square in the background? Or is it now one and now

the other, according as you decide to see it? Here (Fig. 13) is a

skeleton box which you may conceive as made of wires outlining the

sides. Now the front, or side nearest to me, seems directed downward

and to the left; again, it has shifted its position and is no longer

the front, and the side which appears to be the front seems directed

upward and to the right. The presence of the diagonal line makes the

change more striking: in one position it runs from the left-hand

_rear_ upper corner to the right-hand _front_ lower corner; while in

the other it connects the left-hand _front_ upper corner with the

right-hand _rear_ lower corner.

[Illustration: FIGS. 13, 13_a_, and 13_b_.--The two methods of viewing

Fig. 13 are described in the text. Figs. 13_a_ and 13_b_ are added to

make clearer the two methods of viewing Fig. 13. The heavier lines

seem to represent the nearer surface. Fig. 13_a_ more naturally

suggests the nearer surface of the box in a position downward and to

the left, and Fig. 13_b_ makes the nearer side seem to be upward and

to the right. But in spite of the heavier outlines of the one surface,

it may be made to shift positions from foreground to background,

although not so readily as in Fig. 13.]

[Illustration: FIG. 14.--Each member of this frieze represents a

relief ornament, applied upon the background, which in cross-section

would be an isosceles triangle with a large obtuse angle, or a space

of similar shape hollowed out of the solid wood or stone. In running

the eye along the pattern, it is interesting to observe how variously

the patterns fluctuate from one of these aspects to the other.]

[Illustration: FIGS. 15, 15_a_, and 15_b_.--The two views of Fig. 15

described in the text are brought out more clearly in Figs. 15_a_ and

15_b_. The shaded portion tends to be regarded as the nearer face.

Fig. 15_a_ is more apt to suggest the steps seen as we ascend them.

Fig. 15_b_ seems to represent the hollowed-out structure underneath

the steps. But even with the shading the dual interpretation is

possible, although less obvious.]

Fig. 15 will probably seen at first glimpse to be the view of a flight

of steps which one is about to ascend from right to left. Imagine it,

however, to be a view of the under side of a series of steps; the view

representing the structure of overhanging solid masonwork seen from

underneath. At first it may be difficult to see it thus, because the

view of steps which we are about to mount is a more natural and

frequent experience than the other; but by staring at it with the

intention of seeing it differently the transition will come, and often

quite unexpectedly.

[Illustration: FIG. 16.--This interesting figure (which is reproduced

with modifications from Scripture--The New Psychology) is subject in a

striking way to interchanges between foreground and background. Most

persons find it difficult to maintain for any considerable time either

aspect of the blocks (these aspects are described in the text); some

can change them at will, others must accept the changes as they happen

to come.]

[Illustration: Fig. 17_a_.]

[Illustration: Fig. 17_b_.]

[Illustration: Fig. 17.

FIGS. 17, 17_a_, and 17_b_.--How many blocks are there in this pile?

Six or seven? Note the change in arrangement of the blocks as they

change in number from six to seven. This change is illustrated in the

text. Figs. 17_a_ and 17_b_ show the two phases of a group of any

three of the blocks. The arrangement of a pyramid of six blocks seems

the more stable and is usually first suggested; but hold the page

inverted, and you will probably see the alternate arrangement (with,

however, the black surfaces still forming the tops). And once knowing

what to look for, you will very likely be able to see either

arrangement, whether the diagram be held inverted or not. This method

of viewing the figures upside down and in other positions is also

suggested to bring out the changes indicated in Figs. 13, 13_a_,

13_b_, and in Figs. 15, 15_a_, 15_b_.]

The blocks in Fig. 16 are subject to a marked fluctuation. Now the

black surfaces represent the bottoms of the blocks, all pointing

downward and to the left, and now the black surfaces have changed and

have become the tops pointing upward and to the right. For some the

changes come at will; for others they seem to come unexpectedly, but

all are aided by anticipating mentally the nature of the

transformation. The effect here is quite striking, the blocks seeming

almost animated and moving through space. In Fig. 17 a similar

arrangement serves to create an illusion as to the real number of

blocks present. If viewed in one way--the black surface forming the

tops of the blocks--there seem to be six arranged as in Fig. 18; but

when the transformation has taken place and the black surfaces have

become the overhanging bottoms of the boxes, there are seven, arranged

as in Fig. 19. Somewhat different, but still belonging to the group of

ambiguous figures, is the ingenious conceit of the duck-rabbit shown

in Fig. 20. When it is a rabbit, the face looks to the right and a

pair of ears are conspicuous behind; when it is a duck, the face looks

to the left and the ears have been changed into the bill. Most

observers find it difficult to hold either interpretation steadily,

the fluctuations being frequent, and coming as a surprise.

[Illustration: FIG. 18.]

[Illustration: FIG. 19.]

[Illustration: FIG. 20.--Do you see a duck or a rabbit, or either?

(From Harper's Weekly, originally in Fliegende Blätter.)]

All these diagrams serve to illustrate the principle that when the

objective features are ambiguous we see one thing or another according

to the impression that is in the mind's eye; what the objective

factors lack in definiteness the subjective ones supply, while

familiarity, prepossession, as well as other circumstances influence

the result. These illustrations show conclusively that seeing is not

wholly an objective matter depending upon what there is to be seen,

but is very considerably a subjective matter depending upon the eye

that sees. To the same observer a given arrangement of lines now

appears as the representation of one object and now of another; and

from the same objective experience, especially in instances that

demand a somewhat complicated exercise of the senses, different

observers derive very different impressions.

Not only when the sense-impressions are ambiguous or defective, but

when they are vague--when the light is dim or the forms obscure--does

the mind's eye eke out the imperfections of physical vision. The vague

conformations of drapery and make-up that are identified and

recognized in spiritualistic _séances_ illustrate extreme instances of

this process. The whitewashed tree or post that momentarily startles

us in a dark country lane takes on the guise that expectancy gives it.

The mental predisposition here becomes the dominant factor, and the

timid see as ghosts what their more sturdy companions recognize as

whitewashed posts. Such experiences we ascribe to the action of

suggestion and the imagination--the cloud "that's almost in shape like

a camel," or "like a weasel," or "like a whale." But throughout our

visual experiences there runs this double strain, now mainly outward

and now mainly inward, from the simplest excitements of the retina up

to the realms where fancy soars freed from the confines of sense, and

the objective finds its occupation gone.

FOOTNOTE:

[5] In order to obtain the effects described in the various

illustrations it is necessary in several cases to regard the figures

for a considerable time and with close attention. The reader is

requested not to give up in case the first attempt to secure the

effect is not successful, but to continue the effort for a reasonable

period. Individuals differ considerably in the readiness with which

they obtain such effects; in some cases, such devices as holding the

diagrams inverted or at an angle or viewing them with the eyes half

closed are helpful.

NATURE STUDY IN THE PHILADELPHIA NORMAL SCHOOL.

BY L. L. W. WILSON, PH. D.

When it was first proposed to me to write for the Popular Science

Monthly a brief account of the biological laboratories in the

Philadelphia Normal School, and of the Nature work carried on under my

direction in the School of Observation and Practice, I felt that I

could not do justice either to the place or the work; for, in my

judgment, the equipment of the laboratories and the work done in

connection with them are finer than anything else of the kind either

in this country or abroad--a statement which it seemed to me that I

could not make with becoming modesty. But, after all, it is not great

Babylon that I have built, but a Babylon builded for me, and to fail

to express my sense of its worth is to fail to do justice to Dr. W. P.

Wilson, formerly of the University of Pennsylvania, to whom their

inception was due; to Mr. Simon Gratz, president of the Board of

Education, who from the beginning appreciated their value, and without

whose aid they never would have taken visible form; to the principals

of the two schools, and, above all, to my five assistants, whose

knowledge, zeal, and hard work have contributed more than anything

else to the rapid building up of the work.

THE LABORATORIES AND THEIR EQUIPMENT.--The rooms occupied by the

botanical and zoölogical departments of the normal school measure each

seventy by twenty feet. A small workroom for the teachers cuts off

about ten feet of this length from each room. In the middle of the

remaining space stands a demonstration table furnished with hot and

cold water. Each laboratory is lighted from the side by ten windows.

From them extend the tables for the students. These give plenty of

drawer space and closets for dissecting and compound microscopes.

Those in the zoölogical room are also provided with sinks. Each

student is furnished with the two microscopes, stage and eyepiece

micrometers, a drawing camera, a set of dissecting instruments,

glassware, note-books, text-books, and general literature.

The walls opposite the windows are in both rooms lined with cases, in

which there is a fine synoptic series.

In the botanical laboratory this systematic collection begins with

models of bacteria and ends with trees. In other cases, placed in the

adjoining corridor, are representatives, either in alcohol or by means

of models, of most of the orders of flowering plants, as well as a

series illustrating the history of the theory of cross-fertilization,

and the various devices by which it is accomplished; another, showing

the different methods of distribution of seeds and fruits; another,

of parasitic plants; and still another showing the various devices by

means of which plants catch animals.

As an example of the graphic and thorough way in which these

illustrations are worked out, the pines may be cited. There are

fossils; fine specimens of pistillate and staminate flowers in

alcohol; cones; a drawing of the pollen; large models of the flowers;

models of the seeds, showing the embryo and the various stages of

germination; cross and longitudinal sections of the wood; drawings

showing its microscopic structure; pictures of adult trees; and

samples illustrating their economic importance. For the last, the

long-leaved pine of the South is used, and samples are exhibited of

the turpentine, crude and refined; tar and the oil of tar; resin; the

leaves; the same boiled in potash; the same hatcheled into wool; yarn,

bagging and rope made from the wool; and its timber split, sawn, and

dressed.

The series illustrating the fertilization of flowers begins with a

large drawing, adapted by one of the students from Gibson, showing the

gradual evolution of the belief in cross-fertilization from 1682, when

Nehemiah Grew first declared that seed would not set unless pollen

reached the stigma, down to Darwin, who first demonstrated the

advantages of cross-fertilization and showed many of the devices of

plants by which this is accomplished. The special devices are then

illustrated with models and large drawings. First comes the dimorphic

primrose; then follows trimorphic _Lythrum_, to the beautiful model of

which is appended a copy of the letter in which Darwin wrote to Gray

of his discovery:

"But I am almost stark, staring mad over Lythrum.... I

should rather like seed of Mitchella. But, oh, Lythrum!

"Your utterly mad friend,

"C. DARWIN."

Models of the cucumber, showing the process of its formation, and the

unisexual flowers complete this series. Supplementing this are models

and drawings of a large number of flowers, illustrating special

devices by which cross-fertilization is secured, such as the larkspur,

butter and eggs, orchids, iris, salvia, several composites, the

milkweed, and, most interesting of all, the Dutchman's pipe. This is a

flower that entices flies into its curved trumpet and keeps them there

until they become covered with the ripe pollen. Then the hairs wither,

the tube changes its position, the fly is permitted to leave, carrying

the pollen thus acquired to another flower with the same result.

Pictures and small busts of many naturalists adorn both of the rooms.

Of these the most notable is an artist proof of Mercier's beautiful

etching of Darwin. Every available inch of wall space is thus

occupied, or else, in the botanical laboratory, has on it mounted

fungi, lichens, seaweeds, leaf cards, pictures of trees, grasses, and

other botanical objects.

The windows are beautiful with hanging plants from side brackets

meeting the wealth of green on the sill. Here are found in one window

ferns, in another the century plant; in others still, specimens of

economic plants--cinnamon, olive, banana, camphor. On the tables are

magnificent specimens of palms, cycads, dracænas, and aspidistras, and

numerous aquaria filled with various water plants. Most of these

plants are four years old, and all of them are much handsomer than

when they first became the property of the laboratory. How much

intelligent and patient care this means only those who have attempted

to raise plants in city houses can know.

The zoölogical laboratory is quite as beautiful as the botanical, for

it, too, has its plants and pictures. It is perhaps more interesting

because of its living elements. Think of a schoolroom in which are

represented alive types of animals as various as these: amoeba,

vorticella, hydra, worms, muscles, snails and slugs of various kinds,

crayfish, various insects, including a hive of Italian bees, goldfish,

minnows, dace, catfish, sunfish, eels, tadpoles, frogs, newts,

salamanders, snakes, alligators, turtles, pigeons, canaries, mice,

guinea-pigs, rabbits, squirrels, and a monkey! Imagine these living

animals supplemented by models of their related antediluvian forms, or

fossils, by carefully labeled dissections, by preparations and

pictures illustrating their development and mode of life; imagine in

addition to this books, pamphlets, magazines, and teachers further to

put you in touch with this wonderful world about us, and you will then

have some idea of the environment in which it is the great privilege

of our students to live for five hours each week.

In addition to these laboratories there is a lecture room furnished

with an electric lantern. Here each week is given a lecture on general

topics, such as evolution and its problems, connected with the work of

the laboratories.

THE COURSE OF STUDY PURSUED BY THE NORMAL STUDENTS.--Botany: In

general, the plants and the phenomena of the changing seasons are

studied as they occur in Nature. In the fall there are lessons on the

composites and other autumn flowers, on fruits, on the ferns, mosses,

fungi, and other cryptogams. In the winter months the students grow

various seeds at home, carefully drawing and studying every stage in

their development. Meanwhile, in the laboratory, they examine

microscopically and macroscopically the seeds themselves and the

various food supplies stored within. By experimentation they get

general ideas of plant physiology, beginning with the absorption of

water by seeds, the change of the food supply to soluble sugar, the

method of growth, the functions, the histology, and the modifications

of stem, root, and leaves. In the spring they study the buds and

trees, particularly the conifers, and the different orders of

flowering plants.

The particular merit of the work is that it is so planned that each

laboratory lesson compels the students to reason. Having once thus

obtained their information, they are required to drill themselves out

of school hours until the facts become an integral part of their

knowledge.

For the study of fruits, for example, they are given large trays, each

divided into sixteen compartments, plainly labeled with the name of

the seed or fruit within. Then, by means of questions, the students

are made to read for themselves the story which each fruit has to

tell, to compare it with the others, and to deduce from this

comparison certain general laws.

After sufficient laboratory practice of this kind they are required to

read parts of Lubbock's Flower, Fruit, and Leaves, Kerner's Natural

History of Plants, Wallace's Tropical Nature, and Darwinism, etc.

Finally, they are each given a type-written summary of the work, and

after a week's notice are required to pass a written examination.

Zoölogy: The course begins in the fall with a rather thorough study of

the insects, partly because they are then so abundant, and partly

because a knowledge of them is particularly useful to the grade

teacher in the elementary schools.

The locust is studied in detail. Tumblers and aquaria are utilized as

vivaria, so that there is abundant opportunity for the individual

study of living specimens. Freshly killed material is used for

dissection, so that students have no difficulty in making out the

internal anatomy, which is further elucidated with large, home-made

charts, each of which shows a single system, and serves for a text to

teach them the functions of the various organs as worked out by modern

physiologists.

They then study, always with abundant material, the other insects

belonging to the same group. They are given two such insects, a bug,

and two beetles, and required to classify them, giving reasons for so

doing. While this work is going on they have visited the beehive in

small groups, sometimes seeing the queen and the drone, and always

having the opportunity to see the workers pursuing their various

occupations, and the eggs, larvæ, and pupæ in their different states

of development. Beautiful models of the bees and of the comb, together

with dry and alcoholic material, illustrate further this

metamorphosis, by contrast making clearer the exactly opposite

metamorphosis of the locust.

At least one member of each of the other orders of insects is compared

with these two type forms, and, although only important points are

considered at all, yet from one to two hours of laboratory work are

devoted to each specimen. This leisurely method of work is pursued to

give the students the opportunity, at least, to think for themselves.

When the subject is finished they are then given a searching test.

This is never directly on their required reading, but planned to show

to them and to their teachers whether they have really assimilated

what they have seen and studied.

After this the myriapods, the earthworm, and peripatus are studied,

because of their resemblance to the probable ancestors of insects. In

the meantime they have had a dozen or more fully illustrated lectures

on evolution, so that at the close of this series of lessons they are

expected to have gained a knowledge of the methods of studying

insects, whether living or otherwise, a working hypothesis for the

interpretation of facts so obtained, and a knowledge of one order,

which will serve admirably as a basis for comparison in much of their

future work.

They then take up, more briefly, the relatives of the insects, the

spiders and crustaceans, following these with the higher

invertebrates, reaching the fish in April. This, for obvious reasons,

is their last dissection. But with living material, and the beautiful

preparations and stuffed specimens with which the laboratory is

filled, they get a very general idea of the reptiles, birds, and

mammals. This work is of necessity largely done by the students out of

school hours. For example, on a stand on one of the tables are placed

the various birds in season, with accompanying nests containing the

proper quota of eggs. Books and pamphlets relating to the subject are

placed near. Each student is given a syllabus which will enable her to

study these birds intelligently indoors and out, if she wishes to do

so.

In the spring are taken up the orders of animals below the insect, and

for the last lesson a general survey of all the types studied gives

them the relationships of each to the other.

THE COURSE OF STUDY PURSUED IN THE SCHOOL OF PRACTICE.--In addition to

the plants and animals about them, the children study the weather,

keeping a daily record of their observations, and summarizing their

results at the end of the month. In connection with the weather and

plants they study somewhat carefully the soil and, in this connection,

the common rocks and minerals of Philadelphia--gneiss, mica schist,

granite, sandstone, limestones, quartz, mica, and feldspar.

As in the laboratories, so here the effort is made to teach the

children to reason, to read the story told by the individual plant, or

animal, or stone, or wind, or cloud. A special effort is made to teach

them to interpret everyday Nature as it lies around them. For this

reason frequent short excursions into the city streets are made. Those

who smile and think that there is not much of Nature to be found in a

city street are those who have never looked for it. Enough material

for study has been gathered in these excursions to make them a feature

of this work, even more than the longer ones which they take twice a

year into the country.

Last year I made not less than eighty such short excursions, each time

with classes of about thirty-five. They were children of from seven to

fourteen years of age. Without their hats, taking with them

note-books, pencils, and knives, they passed with me to the street.

The passers-by stopped to gaze at us, some with expressions of

amusement, others of astonishment; approval sometimes, quite

frequently the reverse. But I never once saw on the part of the

children a consciousness of the mild sensation that they were

creating. They went for a definite purpose, which was always

accomplished.

The children of the first and second years study nearly the same

objects. Those of the third and fourth years review this general work,

studying more thoroughly some one type. When they enter the fifth

year, they have considerable causal knowledge of the familiar plants

and animals, of the stones, and of the weather. But, what is more

precious to them, they are sufficiently trained to be able to look at

new objects with a truly "seeing eye."

The course of study now requires general ideas of physiology, and, in

consequences, the greater portion of their time for science is devoted

to this subject. I am glad to be able to say, however, that it is not

"School Physiology" which they study, but the guinea-pig and The

Wandering Jew!

In other words, I let them find out for themselves how and what the

guinea-pig eats; how and what he expires and inspires; how and why he

moves. Along with this they study also plant respiration,

transpiration, assimilation, and reproduction, comparing these

processes with those of animals, including themselves.

The children's interest is aroused and their observation stimulated by

the constant presence in the room with them of a mother guinea-pig and

her child. Nevertheless, I have not hesitated to call in outside

materials to help them to understand the work. A series of lessons on

the lime carbonates, therefore, preceded the lessons on respiration;

an elephant's tooth, which I happened to have, helped to explain the

guinea-pig's molars; and a microscope and a frog's leg made real to

them the circulation of the blood.

Appletons' Popular Science Monthly, January 1899 Volume LIV, No. 3, January 1899 · 第 2 / 17 段