598. Death of Prince Albert; the American Civil War, 1861.

Not long after the Sepoy rebellion was quelled, Prince Albert (S589)

died suddenly (1861). In him the nation lost an earnest promoter of

social, educational, and industrial reforms, and the United States a

true and judicious friend, who, at a most critical period in the Civil

War, used his influence to maintain peace between the two countries.

After his death the Queen held no court for many years, and so

complete was her seclusion that Sir Charles Dilke, a well-known

Radical, suggested in Parliament (1868) that her Majesty be invited to

abdicate or choose a regent. The suggestion was indignantly rejected;

but it revealed the feeling, which quite generally existed, that "the

real Queen died with her husband," and that only her shadow remained.

In the spring of the year 1861, in which Prince Albert died, the

American Civil War broke out between the Northern and Southern

States. Lord Palmerston, the Liberal Prime Minister, preferred to be

considered the minister of the nation rather than the head of a

political party. At the beginning of the war he was in favor of the

North. As the conflict threatened to be bitter the Queen issued a

proclamation declaring her "determination to maintain a strict and

impartial neutrality in the contest between the said contending

parties." The rights of belligerents--in other words, all the rights

of war according to the law of nations--were granted to the South

equally with the North; and her Majesty's subjects were warned against

aiding either side in the conflict.

The progress of the war caused terrible distress in Lancashire, owing

to the cutting off of supplies of cotton for the mills through the

blockade of the ports of the Confederate States. The starving

weavers, however, gave their moral support to the North, and continued

steadfast to the cause of the Union even in the sorest period of their

suffering. The great majority of the manufacturers and business

classes generally, and the nobility, with a few exceptions,

sympathized with the efforts of the South to establish an independent

Confederacy. Most of the distinguished political and social leaders,

in Parliament and out, with nearly all the influential journals, were

on the same side, and were openly hostile to the Union.[1]

[1] Lord John Russell (Foreign Secretary), Lord Brougham, Sir John

Bowring, Carlyle, Ruskin, and the London Times and Punch espouses the

cause of the South more or less openly; while others, like

Mr. Gladstone, declared their full belief in the ultimate success of

the Confederacy. On the other hand, Prince Albert, the Duke of

Argyll, John Bright, John Stuart Mill, Professor Newman, Lord

Palmerston, at least for a time, and the London Daily News defended

the cause of the North. After the death of President Lincoln, Punch

manfully acknowledged (see issue of May 6, 1865) that it had been

altogether wrong in its estimation of him and his measures; and

Mr. Gladstone, in an essay on "Kin beyond Sea" in his "Gleanings of

Past Years," paid a noble tribute to the course pursued by America

since the close of the war.

Late in Autumn (1861) Captain Wilkes, of the United States Navy,

boarded the British mail steamer Trent, and seized two Confederate

commissioners (Mason and Slidell) who were on their way to England.

When intelligence of the act was conveyed to President Lincoln, he

expressed his unqualified disapproval of it, saying: "This is the very

thing the British captains used to do. They claimed the right of

searching American ships, and taking men out of them. That was the

cause of the War of 1812. Now, we cannot abandon our own principles;

we shall have to give up these men, and apologize for what we have

done."

The British Government made a formal demand that the commissioners

should be given up. Through the influence of Prince Albert, and with

the approval of the Queen, this demand was couched in most

conciliatory language. Slidell and Mason were handed over to Great

Britain, and an apology was made by Secretary Seward.

During the progress of the Civil War a number of fast-sailing vessels

were fitted out in England, and employed in running the blockade of

the Southern ports, to supply them with arms, ammunition, and

manufactured goods of various kinds. Later, several gunboats were

built in British shipyards by agents of the Confederate government,

for the purpose of attacking the commerce of the United States. The

most famous of these vessels was the Alabama, built expressly for the

Confederate service by the Lairds, of Birkenhead, armed with British

cannon, and manned chiefly by British sailors.

Charles Francis Adams, the American Minister at London, notified Lord

Palmerston, the Prime Minister, of her true character. But Palmerston

permitted the Alabama to leave port (1862), satisfied with the pretext

that she was going on a trial trip.[1] She set sail on her career of

destruction, and soon drove nearly every American merchant vessel from

the seas. Two years later (1864) she was defeated and sunk by the

United States gunboat Kearsarge. After the war the Government of the

United States demanded damages from Great Britain for losses caused by

the Alabama and other English-built privateers.

[1] The Queen's advocate gave his opinion that the Alabama should be

detained, but it reached the Foreign Secretary (Lord Russell) just

after she had put out to sea.

A treaty was agreed to by the two nations; and by its provisions an

international court was held at Geneva, Switzerland (1872), to deal

with the demands made by the United States on Great Britain. The

court awarded $15,500,000 in gold as compensation to the United

States, which was duly paid. One very important result of this

decision was that it established a precedent for settling by

arbitration on equitable and amicable terms whatever questions might

arise in future between the two nations.[1]

[1] This treaty imposed duties on neutral governments of a far more

stringent sort than Great Britain had hitherto been willing to

concede. It resulted, furthermore, in the passage of an act of

Parliament, punishing with severe penalties such illegal shipbuilding

as that of the Alabama. See Sheldon Amos's "Fifty Years of the

English Constitution, 1830-1880."

The Leading Facts of English History · 第 666 / 740 题