592. The Corn Laws (1841).

At the accession of the Queen protective duties or taxes existed in

Great Britain on all imported breadstuffs and on many manufactured

articles. Sir Robert Peel, the Conservative Prime Minister (1841),

favored a reduction in the last class of duties, but believed it

necessary to maintain the former in order to keep up the price of

grain and thus encourage the English farmers. The result of this

policy was great distress among the poorly paid, half-fed workingmen,

who could not afford to buy dear bread. A number of philanthropists

led by Richard Cobden and John Bright organized an Anti-Corn Law

League[1] to obtain the repeal of the grain duties.

[1] Corn is the name given in England to wheat or other grain used for

food. Indian corn or maize cannot be grown in that climate, and is

seldom eaten there.

At the same time, Ebenezer Elliott, the "Corn-Law Rhymer," gave voice

to the sufferings of the poor in rude but vigorous verse, which

appealed to the excited feelings of thousands in such words as these:

"England! what for mine and me,

What hath bread tax done for thee?

. . . . . . . .

Cursed thy harvest, cursed thy land,

Hunger-stung thy skill'd right hand."

When, however, session after session of Parliament passed and nothing

was done for the relief of the perishing multitudes, many began to

despair, and great numbers joined in singing Elliott's new national

anthem:

"When wilt Thou save the people?

O God of mercy! when?

Not kings or lords, but nations!

Not thrones and crowns, but men!

Flowers of thy heart, O God, are they!

Let them not pass, like weeds, away!

Their heritage a sunless day!

God save the people!"

Still the Government was not covinced; the Corn Laws were enforced,

the price of bread showed no signs of falling, and the situation grew

daily more desperate and more threatening.

The Leading Facts of English History · 第 661 / 740 题