319. Disfranchisement of Electors; Benevolences.

Under Henry VI a property qualification was established by act of

Parliament which cut off all persons from voting for countyy members

of the House of Commons who did not have an income of forty shillings

(say 40 pounds, or $200, in modern money) from freehold land. County

elections, the statute said, had "of late been made by a very great,

outrageous, and excessive number of people...of which the most part

were people of small substance and of no value."

Later, candidates for the House of Commons from the counties were

required to be gentlemen by birth, and to have an income of not less

than 20 pounds (or say 400 pounds, or $2000, in modern money). Though

the tendency of such laws was to make the House of Commons represent

property holders more than the freemen as a body, yet no apparent

change seems to have taken place in the class of county members

chosen.

Eventually, however, these and other interferences with free elections

caused the rebellion of Jack Cade, in which the insurgents demanded

the right to choose such representatives as they saw fit. But the

movement appears to have had no practical result. During the civil

war which ensued, King Edward IV compelled wealthy subjects to lend

him large sums (seldom, if ever, repaid) called "benevolences."

Richard III abolished this obnoxious system, but afterward revived it,

and it became conspicuously hateful under his successor in the next

period.

Another great grievance was Purveyance. By it the King's purveyors

had the right to seize provisions and means of transportation for the

King and his hundreds of attendants whenever they journeyed through

the country on a "royal progress." The price offered by the purveyors

was always much below the real value of what was taken, and frequently

even that was not paid. Purveyance, which had existed from the

earliest times, was not finally abolished until 1660.

The Leading Facts of English History · 第 375 / 740 题