282. Battle of Shrewsbury (1403).

At Shrewsbury, on the edge of Wales, the armies of the King and of the

revolutionists met. A number of Henry's enemies had sworn to single

him out in battle. The plot was divulged, and it is said that

thirteen knights arrayed themselves in armor resembling the King's in

order to mislead the assailants. The whole thirteen perished on that

bloody field, where fat Sir John Falstaff vowed he fought on Henry's

behalf "a long hour by Shrewsbury clock."[2]

[2] Shakespeare's "Henry IV," Part I, Act V, scene iv.

283. Persecution of the Lollards; Statute of Heresy; the First Martyr

(1401).

Thus far Henry had spent much time in crushing rebels, but he had also

given part of it to burning heretics. To gain the favor of the

clergy, and so render his throne more secure, the King favored the

passage of a Statute of Heresy. The Lords and bishops passed such a

law (to which the House of Commons seems to have assented).[3] It

punished the Lollards (S255) and also all others who dissented from

the essential doctrines of Rome with death.

[3] See Stubb's "Constitutional History of England," III, 32.

William Sawtrey, a London clergyman, was the first victim under the

new law (1401). He had declared that he would not worship "the cross

on which Christ suffered, but only Christ himself who had suffered on

the cross." He had also openly denied the doctrine of

transubstantiation, which teaches that the sacramental bread is

miraculously changed into the actual body of the Saviour. For these

and minor heresies he was burned at Smithfield, in London, in the

presence of a great multitude.

Some years later a second martyrdom took place. But as the English

people would not allow torture to be used in the case of the Knights

Templars in the reign of Edward II (S265), so but very few of them

seem to have believed that by committing the body to the flames they

could burn error out of the soul.

The Lollards, indeed, were still cast into prison, as some of the

extreme and communistic part of them doubtless deserved to be (S255),

but we hear of no more being put to cruel deaths during Henry's reign,

though later, the utmost rigor of the law was again to some extent

enforced.

The Leading Facts of English History · 第 334 / 740 题