115. _Eye in a fine phrenzy rolling_. Shakespeare's _Midsummer-Night's

Dream_, V, 1, 12.

115. _Above this visible diurnal sphere_. Milton's _Paradise Lost_, Book

VII, 22.

116. _Parca quod satis est manu_. Horace, _Odes_, III, 16, 24.

116. _Lord Fanny_. A nickname bestowed upon Lord Hervey, an effeminate

noble of the time of George II.

117. _O! rus, quando ego te aspiciam_. Horace, _Satires_, II, 6, 60.

117. _Mordecai_. See Book of _Esther_, V, 13.

118. _Last of the Romans_. Mark Antony in Shakespeare's _Julius Caesar_,

III, 2, 194.

120. _Full fathom five_. Shakespeare's _The Tempest_, I, 2, 396.

126. _Ohe! jam satis est_. Horace, _Satires_, I, 5, 12-13.

126. _Tristram Shandy_. The excommunication is in vol. III, chap. XI.

133. _Put a girdle_, etc. See Shakespeare's _Midsummer-Night's Dream_,

II, 1, 175.

JOHN KEATS

The history of English poetry offers no more interesting case between

poet and critic than that of John Keats. The imputed influence of a

savage critique in hastening the death of the poet has given the

_Quarterly Review_ an unenviable notoriety which clings in spite of the

efforts of scholars to establish the truth. To many students, Keats,

_Endymion_, and _Quarterly_ are practically connotative terms; and this

is a direct result of the righteous but misguided indignation of

Shelley--misguided because his information was incomplete and the more

guilty party escaped, thus inflicting upon the _Quarterly_ the brunt of

the opprobrium of which far more than half should be accredited to

_Blackwood's Magazine_.

_Endymion_ was published in April, 1818. One of the publishers (Taylor

and Hessey) requested Gifford, then editor of the _Quarterly Review_, to

treat the poem with indulgence. This indiscreet move probably actuated

Gifford to provide a severe critique; at any rate, in the belated April

number of the _Quarterly_, XIX (204-208), which was not issued until

September, appeared the famous review. A persistent error, which has

crept into W.M. Rossetti's _Life of Keats_, into Anderson's

bibliography, and even into the article on Gifford in the _Dictionary of

National Biography_, attributes this article to Gifford himself; but it

is known to be the work of John Wilson Croker. (See the article on

Croker in _Dict. Nat. Biog._ From the article on John Murray (_ibid._)

we learn that Gifford was not wholly responsible for a single article in

the _Quarterly_.)

Meanwhile, _Blackwood's Magazine_, III (519-524) had made _Endymion_ the

text of its fourth infamous tirade against the Cockney School of Poetry.

The signature "Z" was appended to all the articles, but the critic's

identity has not yet been discovered. Leigh Hunt thought it was Walter

Scott, Haydon suspected the actor Terry, but it is more probable that

the honor belongs to John Gibson Lockhart. One account attributes the

entire series to Lockhart; another attributes the series to Wilson, but

holds Lockhart responsible for the _Endymion_ article. Mr. Andrew Lang,

in his _Life and Letters of Lockhart_, dismissed the matter by saying

that he did not know who wrote the article.

The _Quarterly_ critique was reprinted in Stevenson's _Early Reviews_,

in Rossetti's _Life of Keats_, in Buxton Forman's edition of Keats'

_Poetical Works_ (Appendix V) and elsewhere. From a critical point of

view, it is, as Forman terms it, a "curiously unimportant production."

The student will at once question its power to cause distress in the

mind of the poet; as for malignant severity, there are several reviews

among the present reprints that put the brief _Quarterly_ article to

shame. When we turn to what Swinburne calls the "obscener insolence" of

the _Blackwood_ article, we find an unrestrained torrent of abuse

against both Hunt and Keats that amply justified Landor's subsequent

allusions to the _Blackguard's Magazine_. The _Quarterly_ critique was

captious and ill-tempered; but the _Blackwood_ article was a personal

insult.

It is impossible to consider in detail the vexed question of the

influence which these reviews had upon Keats. In Mr. W.M. Rossetti's

_Life of Keats_, pp. (83-106) there is a full discussion of the evidence

on the subject. Within a few months after the appearance of the

articles, Keats wrote:--"Praise or blame has but a momentary effect on

the man whose love of beauty in the abstract makes him a severe critic

of his own works. My own domestic criticism has given me pain without

comparison beyond what _Blackwood_ or _The Quarterly_ could possibly

inflict." Some weeks later he wrote that the _Quarterly_ article had

only served to make him more prominent among bookmen. After some time

he expressed himself less confidently and deprecated the growing power

of the reviews, but there is no evidence that he fretted over the

critiques. Haydon tells us that Keats was morbid and silent for hours at

a time; but it is quite likely that the consciousness of his physical

affliction--hereditary consumption--was oppressing his mind. His death

occurred on February 23, 1821--about two and a half years after the

appearance of the _Endymion_ critiques.

Shelley had gone to Italy before the reviews were published. He heard of

the _Quarterly_ article, but knew nothing of _Blackwood's_ while writing

_Adonais_; hence in both poem and preface, the former review is charged

with having caused Keats' death. Shelley declared that Keats' agitation

over the review ended in the rupture of a blood vessel in the lungs with

an ensuing rapid consumption. These statements, which Shelley must have

had indirectly, have not been substantiated. We are forced to the

conclusion now generally accepted--that Keats, although sensitive to

personal ridicule, was superior to the stings of review criticism and

that the distressing events of the last year of his life were sufficient

to assure the early triumph of the inherent and unconquerable disease.

141. _Miss Baillie_. Joanna Baillie (1762-1851) authoress of numerous

forgotten plays and poems which enjoyed great popularity in their day.

142. _Land of Cockaigne_. Here means London, and refers specifically to

the Cockney poets. An old French poem on the _Land of Cockaigne_

described it as an ideal land of luxury and ease. The best authorities

do not accept Cockney as a derivative form. The Cockney School was

composed of Londoners of the middle-class, supposedly ill-bred and

imperfectly educated. The critics took special delight in dwelling upon

the humble origin of the Cockneys, their lack of university training,

and especially their dependence on translations for their knowledge of

the classics.

142. _When Leigh Hunt left prison_. Hunt had been imprisoned for libel

on the Prince Regent (1812).

146. _Vauxhall_. The Gardens were a favorite resort for Londoners early

in the eighteenth century and remained popular for a long time. See

Thackeray's _Vanity Fair_ (chap. VI). The implication in the present

passage is that the Cockney poet gets his ideas of nature from the

immediate vicinity of London.

147. _East of Temple-bar_. That is, living in the City of London.

150. _Young Sangrado_. An allusion to Doctor Sangrado, in Le Sage's _Gil

Blas_ (1715).

ALFRED LORD TENNYSON

Tennyson's first poetical efforts, which appeared in _Poems by Two

Brothers_ (1827) attracted little critical attention. His prize-poem,

_Timbuctoo_ (1829) received the interesting notice here reprinted from

the _Athenaeum_ (p. 456) of July 22, 1829. _Timbuctoo_ was printed in the

_Cambridge Chronicle_ (July 10, 1829); in the _Prolusiones Academicae_

(1829); and several times in _Cambridge Prize-Poems_. The use of heroic

metre in prize-poems was traditional; hence the award was an enviable

tribute to the blank-verse of _Timbuctoo_.

Tennyson's success was emphasized by the remarkable series of reviews

that greeted his earliest volumes of poems. The _Poems, chiefly Lyrical_

(1830) were welcomed by Sir John Bowring in the _Westminster Review_, by

Leigh Hunt in the _Tatler_, by Arthur Hallam in the _Englishman's

Magazine_, and by John Wilson in _Blackwood's Magazine_. The _Poems_

(1833) were reviewed by W.J. Fox in the _Monthly Repository_, and by

John Stuart Mill in the _Westminster Review_. This array of names was

indeed a tribute to the poet; but the unfavorable review, was, as usual,

most significant. The article written by Lockhart for the _Quarterly

Rev._, XLIX (81-97), has been characterized as "silly and brutal," but

it was neither. Tennyson's fame is secure; we can at least be just to

his early reviewer. It is true that the poet winced under the lash and

that ten years elapsed before his next volume of collected poems

appeared; but Canon Ainger is surely in error when he holds the

_Quarterly Review_ mainly responsible for this long silence. The rich

measure of praise elsewhere bestowed upon the volume would leave us no

alternative but the conclusion that Tennyson was childish enough to

maintain his silence for a decade because Lockhart took liberties with

his poems instead of joining the chorus of adulation. We know that there

were other and stronger reasons for Tennyson's silence and we also know

that the effect of Lockhart's article was decidedly salutary. When the

next collection of _Poems_ (1842) did appear, the shorter pieces

ridiculed by Lockhart were omitted, and the derided passages in the

longer poems were altered.

We may, without conscientious scruples, take Mr. Andrew Lang's advice,

and enjoy a laugh over Lockhart's performance. Its mock appreciations

are, perhaps, far-fetched at times; but there are enough effective

passages to give zest to the article. It has been said in all

seriousness that Lockhart failed to appreciate the beauty of most of

Tennyson's lines, and that he confined his remarks to the most

assailable passages. Surely, when a critic undertakes to write a

mock-appreciation, he will not quote the best verses, to the detriment

of his plan. The poet must see to it that his volume does not contain

enough absurdities to form a sufficient basis for such an article. There

is a striking contrast to the humor of Lockhart in the little-known

review of the same volume by the _Literary Gazette_, 1833, pp.

(772-774). The latter seized upon some crudities that had escaped the

_Quarterly's_ notice, and, with characteristic brutality, decided that

the poet was insane and needed a low diet and a cell.

Although the reception accorded to _Poems_ (1842) was generally

favorable, the publication of _The Princess_ in 1847 afforded the

critics another opportunity to lament Tennyson's inequalities. The

spirit of the review of _The Princess_ here reprinted from the _Literary

Gazette_ of August 8, 1848, is practically identical with that of the

_Athenaeum_ on January 6, 1848, but specifies more clearly the critic's

objections to the medley. It is noteworthy that Lord Tennyson made

extensive changes in subsequent editions of _The Princess_, but left

unaltered all of the passages to which the _Literary Gazette_ took

exception. The beautiful threnody _In Memoriam_ (1850) and Tennyson's

elevation to the laureateship in the same year established his position

as the leading poet of the time; but the appearance of _Maud_ in 1856

proved to be a temporary check to his popularity. A few personal friends

admired it and praised its fine lyrics; but as a dramatic narrative it

failed to please the reviews. The most interesting of the critiques

(unfortunately too long to be reprinted here) appeared in _Blackwood's

Magazine_, XLI (311-321), of September, 1855,--a forcible, well-written

article, which, incidentally, shows how much the magazine had improved

in respectability since the days of the lampooners of Byron, Shelley,

and Keats. The authorship of the article has not been disclosed, but we

know that W.E. Aytoun asked permission of the proprietor to review

Tennyson's _Maud_. (See Mrs. Oliphant's _William Blackwood and his

Sons_.) The publication of the _Idylls of the King_ (1859), turned the

tide more strongly than before in Tennyson's favor, and subsequent

fault-finding on the part of the critics was confined largely to his

dramas.

153. _Catullus_. See Catullus, II and III--(_Passer, deliciae meae

puellae_, and _Lugete, O Veneres Cupidinesque_).

153. [Greek: Eithe lyre, k. t. l.] Usually found in the remains of

Alcaeus. Thomas Moore translates it with his _Odes of Anacreon_ (LXXVII),

beginning "Would that I were a tuneful lyre," etc. Lockhart proceeds to

ridicule Tennyson for wishing to be a river, which is not what the

quoted lines state. Nor does Tennyson "ambition a bolder metamorphosis"

than his predecessors. Anacreon (Ode XXII) wishes to be a stream, as

well as a mirror, a robe, a pair of sandals and sundry other articles.

See Moore's interesting note.

155. _Non omnis moriar_. Horace, _Odes_, III, 30, 6.

156. _Tongues in trees_, etc. Shakespeare's _As You Like It_, II, 1, 17.

157. _Aristaeus_. A minor Grecian divinity, worshipped as the first to

introduce the culture of bees.

164. _Dionysius Periegetes_. Author of [Greek: periegesis tes ges], a

description of the earth in hexameters, usually published with the

scholia of Eustathius and the Latin paraphrases of Avienus and Priscian.

For the account of AEthiopia, see also Pausanias, I, 33, 4.

167. _The Rovers_. _The Rovers_ was a parody on the German drama of the

day, published in the _Anti-Jacobin_ (1798) and written by Frere,

Canning and others. It is reprinted in Charles Edmund's _Poetry of the

Anti-Jacobin_. The chorus of conspirators is at the end of Act IV.

169. _The Groves of Blarney_. An old Irish song. A version may be seen

in the _Antiquary_, I, p. 199. The quotation by Lockhart differs

somewhat from the corresponding stanza of the cited version.

170. _Corporal Trim_. In Sterne's _Tristram Shandy_.

173. _Christopher North_. John Wilson, of _Blackwood's Magazine_.

ROBERT BROWNING

The reviews of Browning's poems are singularly uninteresting from a

historical standpoint. There is usually a protest against the obscurity

of the poetry and a plea that the author should make better use of his

manifest genius. For details concerning these reviews, see the

bibliography of Browning in Nicoll and Wise's _Literary Anecdotes of the

Nineteenth Century_. The list there given is extensive, but does not

include several of the reviews mentioned below.

The early poems were so abstruse that the critics were unable to make

sport of them as they did in the case of Wordsworth, Byron, Tennyson,

and the rest; and when Browning finally deigned to write within range of

the average human intellect, that particular style of reviewing had lost

favor. His earliest publication, _Pauline_ (1832) was well received by

W.J. Fox in _Monthly Repository_, and in the _Athenaeum_. _Tait's

Edinburgh Magazine_ called it a "piece of pure bewilderment." See also

the brief notice in the _Literary Gazette_, 1833, p. 183. _Paracelsus_

(1835) had a similar experience; the reprint from the _Athenaeum_, 1835,

p. 640, is fairly characteristic of the rest, among which are the

articles in the _Monthly Repository_, 1835, p. 716; the _Christian

Remembrancer_, XX, p. 346, and the reviews written by John Forster for

the _Examiner_, 1835, p. 563, and the _New Monthly Magazine_, XLVI

(289-308).

Neither the favorable review of _Sordello_ (1840) in the _Monthly Rev._,

1840, II, p. 149, nor the partly appreciative article in the _Athenaeum_,

1840, p. 431, seems to warrant the well-known anecdotes relating the

difficulties of Douglas Jerrold and Tennyson in attempting to understand

that poem. The _Athenaeum_ gave the poet sound advice, especially in

regard to the intentional obscurity of his meaning. That this admonition

was futile may be gathered from the _Saturday Review's_ article (I, p.

69) on _Men and Women_ (1855) published fifteen years after _Sordello_.

The critic reverted to the earlier style, and produced one of the most

readable reviews of Browning. Whatever may be the final verdict yet to

be passed upon Browning's poetic achievement, the fact remains that the

contemporary reviews from first to last deplored in his work a

deliberate obscurity which was wholly unwarranted and which precluded

the universal appeal that is essential to a poet's greatness.

189. _Della Crusca of Sentimentalism_. Robert Merry (1755-1798) under

the name Della Crusca became the leader of a set of poetasters who

flourished during the poetic dearth at the end of the eighteenth century

and poured forth their rubbish until William Gifford exposed their

follies in his satires _The Baviad_ (1794) and _The Maeviad_ (1795).

189. _Alexander Smith_. A Scotch poet (1830-1867).

189. _Mystic of Bailey_. Philip James Bailey (1816-1902), best known as

the author of _Festus_, published _The Mystic_ in 1855.

192. _Hudibras Butler, etc._ Samuel Butler, author of _Hudibras_

(1663-78); Richard H. Barham, author of the _Ingoldsby Legends_ (1840);

and Thomas Hood, author of _Whims and Oddities_ (1826-27). These poets

are cited by the reviewer for their skill with unusual metres and

difficult rhymes.

INDEX

_Academy_, xlii-xliii

_Account of English Dramatic Poets_, xv

_Adonais_, by Shelley, reviewed, 129-134; 214, 217

_Advice to Young Reviewer_, xxiii

Ainsworth, Harrison, xlv

Akenside, Mark, xvi

_Alastor_, by Shelley, reviewed, 115

_Album Verses_, by Lamb, reviewed, 66-67

Alford, Dean, xxxv

Allingham, William, l

_All the Year Round_, l

_Analytical Review_, xxii

_Anti-Jacobin Review_, xxiii

Appleton, Dr. Charles, xlii

Arber, Prof. Edward, xiii

Arnold, Matthew, xxxii, xxxvi, xlii

_Athenaeum_, xxxviii-xl, liv;

on Tennyson's _Timbuctoo_, 151;

on Browning's _Paracelsus_, 187

_Athenian Mercury_, xiv

_Atlas_, xl

Austin, Mr. Alfred, xxxvi

Bagehot, Walter, xxxii, xxxiv

Barrow, Sir John, xxviii

_Battle of the Reviews_, xx-xxi

Bayle, Pierre, xiii

_Bee_, xvi

Behn, Mrs. Aphra, xv

Beloe, William, xxiii

Bentham, Jeremy, xxxi

_Bentley's Miscellany_, l

Bibliography, lvi-lix

_Bibliotheca Literaria_, xvi

_Bibliotheque Ancienne et Moderne_, xvi

_Bibliotheque Angloise_, xv

_Bibliotheque Choisee_, xvi

Blackwood, John, xlvii

Blackwood, William, xlv

_Blackwood's Magazine_, xlv-xlvii;

on Keats' _Endymion_, 141-150; 216

_Blank Verse_, by Lamb and Lloyd, reviewed, 65

Blount, Sir Thomas Pope, xiv

_Bookman_, xxxvii

Bower, Archibald, xvi

_British and Foreign Review_, xxxii

_British Critic_, xxiii;

on Landor's _Gebir_, 68

_British Librarian_, xvi

_British Magazine_, xxii, xlv

_British Review_, xxxii, 213

Brougham, Henry, xxiv, xxvi-xxvii, xxx, 210

Browning, Robert, _Paracelsus_ rev. in _Athenaeum_, 187;

_Sordello_ rev. in _Monthly Rev._, 188;

_Men and Women_ rev. in _Saturday Rev._, 189-196; 220-222

Buckingham, James Silk, xxxviii

Budgell, Eustace, xvi

Bulwer, Edward, xxx, xlv

Bunting, Mr. Percy, xxxvi

Burns, Robert, _Poems_ rev. in _Edinburgh Mag._, 13-14;

in _Critical Rev._, 15; 199-200

Byron, Lord, 47, 48;

_Hours of Idleness_ rev. in _Edinburgh Rev._, 94-100;

_Childe Harold_ rev. in _Christian Observer_, 101-114; 210-213

Campbell, Thomas, xlv

Carlyle, Thomas, xxx, xlv, xlix

Cave, Edward, xliv

_Cenci_, by Shelley, reviewed, 116-128, 214

_Censura Celebrium Authorum_, xiv

_Censura Temporum_, xv

_Childe Harold_, by Byron, reviewed, 101-114; 212-213

_Christabel_, by Coleridge, reviewed, 47-59

_Christian Observer_, xxxiii;

on Byron's _Childe Harold_, 101-114

_Christian Remembrancer_, xxxii

Christie, Jonathan Henry, xlviii

Cleghorn, James, xlvi

Cobbett, William, xxxvii

Cockney School, _Blackwood's Mag._ on, 141-150; 216-217

Colburn, Henry, xxxvii, xlv

Coleridge, John Taylor, xxix

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, xlvi;

_Christabel_ rev. in _Edinburgh Rev._, 47-59; 201-202, 204-206

Collins, Mr. John Churton, li

Colvin, Mr. Sidney, xlii, liv

_Compleat Library_, xiv

Conder, Josiah, xxxii

_Contemporary Review_, xxxv

Cook, John D., xli

Copleston, Edward, xxiii

_Cornhill Magazine_, l

Cotton, Mr. James S., xliii

Courthope, Mr. W.J., xxxvi

Courtney, Mr. W.L., xxxv

Cowper, William, _Poems_ rev. in _Critical Rev._, 10-12; 198-199

_Critic_, xxxvii

_Critical Review_, xviii-xxi, xxiii, xxv, xxxiii;

on Goldsmith's _Traveller_, 5-9;

on Cowper's _Poems_, 10-12;

on Burn's _Poems_, 15;

on _Lyrical Ballads_, 20-23

Croker, John Wilson, xxviii

Dennis, John, xv

DeQuincey, Thomas, xlviii

_De Re Poetica_, xiv

_Descriptive Sketches_, by Wordsworth, reviewed, 16-18

Dickens, Charles, l, liv

Dilke, Charles W., xxxix

Dixon, William H., xxxix

Doble, Mr. C.E., xliii

Dowden, Prof. Edward, xxxiv

_Dublin Review_, xxxii

_Dublin University Magazine_, l

D'Urfey, Thomas, xv

_Eclectic Review_, xxxii

_Edinburgh Magazine_, xliv;

on Burns' _Poems_, 13-14

_Edinburgh Review_, xxiv-xxvii, xxix-xxxi, xlvi, liv;

on Wordsworth's _Poems_, 24-46;

on Coleridge's _Christabel_, 47-59;

on Scott's _Marmion_, 70-93;

on Byron's _Hours of Idleness_, 94-100; 209-211

Eliot, George, xxxiv, xlvii

Elliott, Hon. A.R.D., xxxi

Elwin, Whitwell, xxix

Empson, William, xxx

_Endymion_, by Keats, rev. in _Quarterly Rev._, 135-140;

rev. in _Blackwood's Mag._, 141-150; 215-218

_English Review_, xxii, xxxii

Escott, Mr. T.H.S., xxxv

_Evening Walk_, by Wordsworth, reviewed, 19

_Examiner_, xxxvii

Fonblanque, Albany, xxxvii

_Foreign Quarterly Review_, xxxii

_Foreign Review_, xxxii

Forster, John, xxxvii

_Fortnightly Review_, xxxiii-xxxv

Fox, W.J., xxxiii

_Fraser's Magazine_, xlix-l

Froude, James A., l

_Gebir_, by Landor, rev. in _British Critic_, 68;

rev. in _Monthly Rev._, 69; 208

_Gentleman's Journal_, xv, xliv

_Gentleman's Magazine_, xv, xliv

Gifford, William, xxvii, xxviii

Goldsmith, Oliver, xviii, xxi, xxii, xlv;

_The Traveller_ rev. in _Critical Rev._, 5-9, 197, 198

Grant, Charles, 108

Gray, Thomas, _Odes_ rev. in _Monthly Rev._, 1-4; 197-198

Green, John Richards, xxiii

Griffiths, Ralph, xvii, xviii, xx

Hallam, Henry, xxx

Hamilton, Sir William, xxx

Harris, Mr. Frank, xxxv, xli

Harwood, Mr. Philip, xli

Hazlitt, William, 204-205

Hervey, Thomas K., xxxix

Hind, Mr. C. Lewis, xliii

_Historia Literaria_, xvi

_History of Learning_, xiv

_History of the Works of the Learned_, xv, xvi

Hodge, Mr. Harold, xli

Hood, Thomas, xlviii

Hook, Theodore, xlv

Horne, Richard Hengist, xxxiii

Horner, Francis, xxiv, xxv

_Hours of Idleness_, by Byron, reviewed, 94-100; 210-212

_Household Words_, l

Hume, David, 105

Hunt, Leigh, xxxiii, xxxvii, 135, 136, 142

Hutton, Richard Holt, xxxii, xl

Introduction, xiii-lv

Jebb, Samuel, xvi

Jeffrey, Francis, xxiv-xxvi, xxix, xlviii, 203, 206, 209-210

Jerdan, William, xxxvii, xxxix

Johnson, Samuel, xxi, xxii, 198

_Journal des Savans_, xiii, xiv, xxi

Keats, John, _Endymion_, reviewed in _Quarterly Rev._, 135-140;

in _Blackwood's Mag._, 141-150; 152, 215-218

Kenrick, William, xx, xxi, xxii

Kingsley, Charles, l

Knowles, Mr. James, xxxv, xxxvi

Lamb, Charles, xlviii;

_Blank Verse_ rev. in _Monthly Rev._, 65;

_Album-Verses_ rev. in _Literary Gazette_, 66-67; 207-208

Landor, Walter Savage, _Gebir_ rev. in _British Critic_, 68;

in _Monthly Rev._, 69; 208

Langbaine, Gerald, xv

Le Clerc, Daniel, xvi

Le Clerc, Jean, xiv, xvi

Lewes, George Henry, xxxiv

Lewis, Sir George Cornewall, xxx

_Literary Chronicle_, xxxviii

_Literary Gazette_, xxxvii-xxxix;

on Lamb's _Album-Verses_, 66-67;

on Shelley's _Adonais_, 129-134;

on Tennyson's _The Princess_, 176-186; 207-208

_Literary Journal_, xvi

_Literary Magazine_, xvi, xxii

Lloyd, Charles, _Blank Verse_, rev. in _Monthly Rev._, 65

Lloyd, H.E., xxxvii

Lockhart, John Gibson, xxii, xxxi, 216, 218-219

_London Magazine_, xliv, xlvii-xlviii;

on Shelley's _Cenci_, 116-128

_London Quarterly Review_, xxxii

_London Review_, xxii, xxxi

_Longman's Magazine_, l

Lowth, Bishop, xvi

_Lyrical Ballads_, by Wordsworth, reviewed, 20-23; 201-203

Macaulay, Thomas Babington, xxix-xxx

MacColl, Mr. Norman, xxxix

Maclise, Daniel, xlix

_Macmillan's Magazine_, l

Early Reviews of English Poets · 第 18 / 19 段