Now this seems very surprising. It has sometimes, though we regret to

say rarely, happened, that, as in the present instance, we have been

able to deal out unqualified praise, but never found that the dose in

this case disagreed with the most squeamish stomach; on the contrary,

the patient has always seemed exceedingly comfortable after he had

swallowed it. He has been known to take the 'Review' home and keep his

wife from a ball, and his children from bed, till he could administer it

to them, by reading the article aloud. He has even been heard to

recommend the 'Review' to his acquaintance at the clubs, as the best

number which has yet appeared, and one, who happened to be an M.P. as

well as an author, gave a _conditional_ order, that in case his last

work should be favourably noticed, a dozen copies should be sent down by

the mail to the borough of ----. But, on the other hand, when it has

happened that the general course of our criticism has been unfavourable,

if by accident we happened to introduce the smallest spice of _praise_,

the patient immediately fell into paroxysms--declaring that the part

which we foolishly thought might offend him had, on the contrary, given

him pleasure--positive pleasure, but _that_ which he could not possibly

either forget or forgive, was the grain of praise, be it ever so small,

which we had dropped in, and for which, and _not for our censure_, he

felt constrained, in honour and conscience, to visit us with his extreme

indignation. Can any reader or writer inform us how it is that praise in

the wholesale is so very agreeable to the very same stomach that rejects

it with disgust and loathing, when it is scantily administered; and

above all, can they tell us why it is, that the indignation and nausea

should be in the exact inverse ratio to the quantity of the ingredient?

These effects, of which we could quote several cases much more violent

than Mr. Tennyson's, puzzle us exceedingly; but a learned friend, whom

we have consulted, has, though he could not account for the phenomenon,

pointed out what he thought an analogous case. It is related of Mr.

Alderman Faulkner, of convivial memory, that one night when he expected

his guests to sit late and try the strength of his claret and his head,

he took the precaution of placing in his wine-glass a strawberry, which

his doctor, he said, had recommended to him on account of its cooling

qualities: on the faith of this specific, he drank even more deeply,

and, as might be expected, was carried away at an earlier period and in

rather a worse state, than was usual with him. When some of his friends

condoled with him next day, and attributed his misfortune to six bottles

of claret which he had imbibed, the Alderman was extremely

indignant--'the claret,' he said, 'was sound, and never could do any man

any harm--his discomfiture was altogether caused by that damned single

strawberry' which he had kept all night at the bottom of his

glass.--_The Quarterly Review_.

[Footnote O: See Quarterly Review, vol. XIX, p. 204.]

[Footnote P: The same Camelot, in Somersetshire, we presume, which is

alluded to by Kent in 'King Lear'--

'Goose! if I had thee upon Sarum plain,

I'd drive thee cackling home to Camelot.'

]

_The Princess; a Medley_. By Alfred Tennyson. Moxon.

That we are behind most even of our heaviest and slowest contemporaries

in the notice of this volume, is a fact for which we cannot

satisfactorily account to ourselves, and can therefore hardly hope to be

able to make a valid excuse to our readers. The truth is, that whenever

we turned to it we became, like the needle between positive and negative

electric poles, so attracted and repelled, that we vibrated too much to

settle to any fixed condition. Vacillation prevented criticism, and we

had to try the experiment again and again before we could arrive at the

necessary equipose to indicate the right direction of taste and opinion.

We will now, however, note our variations, and leave them to the public

judgment.

The first lines of the prologue were repulsive, as a specimen of the

poorest Wordsworth manner and style--

"Sir Walter Vivian all a summer's day

Gave his broad lawns until the set of sun

Up to his people: thither flock'd at noon

His tenants, wife and child, and thither half

The neighbouring borough with their Institute

Of which he was the patron. I was there

From college, visiting the son,--the son

A Walter too,--with others of our set."

The "wife and child" of the tenants is hardly intelligible; and the

"set" is but a dubious expression. Nor can we clearly comprehend the

next line and a half--

"And me that morning Walter show'd the house,

Greek, set with busts:"

Does this mean that Sir Walter Vivian inhabited a Greek house, and that

the college "set" were guests in that dwelling "set with busts"? To say

the least, this is inelegant, and the affectations proceed--

"From vases in the hall

_Flowers of all heavens, and lovelier than their names_,

Grew side by side."

Persons conversant with the botanical names of flowers will hardly be

able to realize (as the Yankees have it) the idea of their loveliness;

the loveliness of Hippuris, Dolichos, Syngenesia, Cheiranthus,

Artocarpus, Arum dracunculus, Ampelopsis hederaca, Hexandria, Monogynea,

and the rest.

A good description of the demi-scientific sports of the Institute

follows; but the house company and inmates retire to a ruined abbey:--

"High-arch'd and ivy-claspt,

Of finest Gothic, lighter than a fire."

This is a curious jumble in company, two lights of altogether a

different nature; but the party get into a rattling conversation, in

which the noisy babble of the College Cubs is satirically characterized:

we

"Told

Of college: he had climb'd across the spikes,

And he had squeez'd himself betwixt the bars,

And he had breathed the Proctor's dogs; and one

Discuss'd his tutor, rough to common men

But honeying at the whisper of a lord;

And one the Master, as a rogue in grain

Veneer'd with sanctimonious theory."

The dialogue happily takes a turn, and the task of writing the

_Princess_ is assigned to the author, as one of the tales in the

Decameron of Boccaccio. A neighbouring princess of the south (so the

story runs as the prince tells it) is in childhood betrothed to a like

childish prince of the north:--

"She to me

Was proxy-wedded with a _bootless calf_ [?]

At eight years old."

Both grew up, the prince, all imaginative, filling his mind with

pictures of her perfections; but she turning a female reformer of the

Wolstencroft [_sic_] school, resolved never to wed till woman was raised

to an equality with men, and establishing a strange female colony and

college to carry this vast design into effect. In consequence of this

her father is obliged to violate the contract, and his indignant father

prepares for war to enforce it. The prince, with two companions, flies

to the south, to try what he can do for himself; and in the disguise of

ladies they obtain admission to the guarded precincts of the new

Amazonian league. He, meanwhile, sings sweetly of his mistress--

"And still I wore her picture by my heart,

And one dark tress; and all around them both

Sweet thoughts would swarm as bees about their queen."

And of his friend--

"My other heart,

My shadow, my half-self, for still we moved

Together, kin as horse's ear and eye."

His evasion is also finely told--

"But when the council broke, I rose and past

Through the wild woods that hang about the town;

Found a still place, and pluck'd her likeness out:

Laid it on flowers, and watch'd it lying bathed

In the green gleam of dewy-tassell'd trees:

What were those fancies? wherefore break her troth?

Proud look'd the lips: but while I meditated

A wind arose and rush'd upon the South,

And shook the songs, the whispers, and the shrieks

Of the wild woods together; and a Voice

Went with it 'Follow, follow, thou shalt win!'"

Almost in juxtaposition with these beauties, we find one of the

disagreeable blots, so offensive to good taste, which disfigure the

poem. The travellers are interrogating the host of an inn close to the

liberties where the princess holds her petticoated sway:--

"And at the last--

The summer of the vine in all his veins--

'No doubt that we might make it worth his while.

For him, he reverenced his liege-lady there;

He always made a point to post with mares;

His daughter and his housemaid were the boys.

The land, he understood, for miles about

Was till'd by women; all the swine were sows,

And all the dogs'"--

This is too bad, even for medley; but proceed we into the interior of

the grand and luxurious feminine institution, where their sex is

speedily discovered, but for certain reasons concealed by the

discoverers. Lectures on the past and what might be done to accomplish

female equality, and description of the boundaries, the dwelling place,

and the dwellers therein, fill many a page of mingled excellence and

defects. Here is a sample of both in half a dozen lines:--

"We saw

The Lady Blanche's daughter where she stood,

Melissa, with her hand upon the lock,

A rosy blonde, and in a college gown

_That clad her like an April daffodilly_

(Her mother's colour) with her lips apart,

And all her thoughts as fair within her eyes,

_As bottom agates seem to wave and float

In crystal currents of clear morning seas_."

Curious contradictions in mere terms, also occasionally occur. Thus, of

a frightened girl, we are told that--

"_Light_

As flies the _shadow_ of a bird she fled."

Events move on. The prince reasons as a man in a colloquy with the

princess, and speaks of the delights of maternal affections, and she

replies--

"We are not talk'd to thus:

Yet will we say for children, would they grew

Like field-flowers everywhere! we like them well:

But children die; and let me tell you, girl,

Howe'er you babble, great deeds cannot die:

They with the sun and moon renew their light

Forever, blessing those that look on them:

Children--that men may pluck them from our hearts,

Kill us with pity, break us with ourselves--

O--children--there is nothing upon earth

More miserable than she that has a son

And sees him err:"

A song on "The days that are no more," seems to us to be too laboured,

nor is the other lyric introduced, "The Swallow," much more to our

satisfaction. It is a mixture of prettinesses: the first four triplets

run thus, ending in a poetic beauty--

"O Swallow, Swallow, flying, flying South,

Fly to her, and fall upon her gilded eaves,

And tell her, tell her what I tell to thee.

"O tell her, Swallow, thou that knowest each,

That bright and fierce and fickle is the South,

And _dark_ and true and tender is the North.

"O Swallow, Swallow, if I could follow, and light

Upon her lattice, I would pipe and trill,

And _cheep and twitter twenty million loves_.

"O were I thou that she might take me in,

And lay me on her bosom, _and her heart

Would rock the snowy cradle till I died_."

The prince saves the princess from being drowned, when the secret

explodes like a roll of gun cotton, and a grand turmoil ensues. The

rival kings approach to confines in battle array, and the princess

resumes the declaration of war:--

"A tide of fierce

Invective seem'd to wait behind her lips,

As waits a river level with the dam

Ready to burst and flood the world with foam:

And so she would have spoken, but there rose

A hubbub in the court of half the maids

Gather'd together; from the illumin'd hall

Long lanes of splendour slanted o'er a press

Of snowy shoulders, thick as herded ewes,

And rainbow robes, and gems and gemlike eyes,

And gold and golden heads; they to and fro

Fluctuated, as flowers in storm, some red, same pale,

All open-mouth'd, all gazing to the light,

Some crying there was an army in the land,

And some that men were in the very walls,

And some they cared not; till a clamour grew

As of a new-world Babel, woman-built,

And worse-confounded: high above them stood

The placid marble Muses, looking peace."

She denounces the perils outside and in--

"I dare

All these male thunderbolts: what is it ye fear?

Peace! there are those to avenge us and they come:

If not,--myself were like enough, O girls,

To unfurl the maiden banner of our rights,

And clad in iron burst the ranks of war,

Or, falling, protomartyr of our cause,

Die: yet I blame ye not so much for fear;

Six thousand years of fear have made ye that

From which I would redeem ye: but for those

That stir this hubbub--you and you--I know

Your faces there in the crowd--to-morrow morn

We meet to elect new tutors; then shall they

That love their voices more than duty, learn

With whom they deal, dismiss'd in shame to live

No wiser than their mothers, household stuff,

Live chattels, mincers of each other's fame,

Full of weak poison, turnspits for the clown,

The drunkard's football, laughing-stocks of Time,

Whose brains are in their hands and in their heels,

But fit to flaunt, to dress, to dance, to thrum,

To tramp, to scream, to burnish, and to scour

For ever slaves at home and fools abroad."

Ay, just as Shakspere hath it--

"To suckle fools and chronicle small beer."

The hero also meets the shock, at least in poetic grace:--

"Upon my spirits

Settled a gentle cloud of melancholy,

Which I shook off, for I was young, and one

To whom the shadow of all mischance but came

As night to him that sitting on a hill

Sees the midsummer, midnight, Norway sun,

Set into sunrise."

It is agreed to decide the contest by a combat of fifty on each

side--the one led by the prince, and the other by Arac, the brother of

the princess. And clad in "harness"--

"Issued in the sun that now

Leapt from the dewy shoulders of the Earth,

And hit the northern hills."

To the fight--

"Then rode we with the old king across the lawns

Beneath huge trees, a thousand rings of Spring

In every bole, a song on every spray

Of birds that piped their Valentines."

The prince and his companions are defeated; and he, wounded almost to

the death, is consigned at her own request to be nursed by the

princess:--

"So was their sanctuary violated,

So their fair college turn'd to hospital;

At first with all confusion; by and by

Sweet order lived again with other laws;

A kindlier influence reign'd; and everywhere

Low voices with the ministering hand

Hung round the sick."

The result may be foreseen--

"From all a closer interest flourish'd up.

Tenderness touch by touch, and last, to these,

Love, like an Alpine harebell hung with tears

By some cold morning glacier; frail at first

And feeble, all unconscious of itself,

But such as gather'd colour day by day."

And the agreement is filled up:--

"Dear, but let us type them now

In our lives, and this proud watchword rest

Of equal; seeing either sex alone

Is half itself, and in true marriage lies

Nor equal, nor unequal: each fulfils

Defect in each, and always thought in thought,

Purpose in purpose, will in will, they grow,

The single pure and perfect animal,

The two-cell'd heart beating with one full stroke

Life"

"O we will walk this world,

Yoked in all exercise of noble end,

And so through those dark gates across the wild

That no man knows. Indeed I love thee; come,

Yield thyself up; my hopes and thine are one;

Accomplish thou my manhood and thyself

Lay thy sweet hands in mine and trust to me."

Who will question the true poetry of this production, or who will deny

the imperfections, (mostly of affectation, though some of tastelessness)

which obscure it? Who will wonder at our confessed wavering when they

have read this course of alternate power, occasionally extravagant, and

feebleness as in the long account of the _emeute_? Of the extravagant,

the description of the princess, on receiving the declaration of war, is

an example:--

"She read, till over brow

And cheek and bosom brake the wrathful bloom

As of some fire against a stormy cloud,

When the wild peasant rights himself, and the rick

Flames, and his anger reddens in the heavens."

The heroine, it must be acknowledged, is much of the virago throughout,

and the prince rather of the softest; but the tale could not be

otherwise told. We add four examples--two to be admired, and two to be

contemned, in the fulfilment of our critique.

"For was, and is, and will be, are but is,"

is a noble line; and the following, on the promised restoration of a

child to its mother, is very touching--

"Again she veiled her brows, and prone she sank, and so

Like tender things that being caught feign death,

Spoke not, nor stirr'd."

Not so the burlesque eight daughters of the plough, the brawny ministers

of the princess' executive, and their usage of a herald. They were--

"Eight daughters of the plough, stronger than men,

Huge women blowzed with health, and wind, and rain

And labour. Each was like a Druid rock;

Or like a spire of land that stands apart

Cleft from the main, and clang'd about with mews."

And they--

"Came sallying through the gates, and caught his hair,

And so belabour'd him on rib and cheek

They made him wild."

Nor the following--

"When the man wants weight the woman takes it up,

And topples down the scales; but this is fixt

As are the roots of earth and base of all.

Man for the field and woman for the hearth;

Man for the sword and for the needle she;

Man with the head and woman with the heart;

Man to command and woman to obey;

All else confusion. Look to it; the gray mare

Is ill to live with, when her whinny shrills

From tile to scullery, and her small goodman

Shrinks in his arm-chair while the fires of Hell

Mix with his hearth; but take and break her, you!

She's yet a colt. Well groom'd and strongly curb'd

She might not rank with those detestable

That to the hireling leave their babe, and brawl

Their rights or wrongs like potherbs in the street.

They say she's comely; there's the fairer chance:

_I_ like her none the less for rating at her!

Besides, the woman wed is not as we,

But suffers change of frame. A lusty brace

Of twins may weed her of her folly. Boy,

The bearing and the training of a child

Is woman's wisdom."

--_The Literary Gazette_.

ROBERT BROWNING

_Paracelsus_. By Robert Browning.

There is talent in this dramatic poem, (in which is attempted a picture

of the mind of this celebrated character,) but it is dreamy and obscure.

Writers would do well to remember, (by way of example,) that though it

is not difficult to imitate the mysticism and vagueness of Shelley, we

love him and have taken him to our hearts as a poet, not _because_ of

these characteristics--but _in spite_ of them.--_The Athenaeum_.

_Sordello_. By Robert Browning. London: Moxon. 1840.

The scene of this poem is laid in Italy, when the Ghibelline and Guelph

factions were in hottest contest. The author's style is rather peculiar,

there being affectations of language and invertions of thought, and

other causes of obscurity in the course of the story which detract from

the pleasure of perusing it. But after all, we are much mistaken if Mr.

Browning does not prove himself a poet of a right stamp,--original,

vigorous, and finely inspired. He appears to us to possess a true sense

of the dignity and sacredness of the poet's kingdom; and his imagination

wings its way with a boldness, freedom and scope, as if he felt himself

at home in that sphere, and was resolved to put his allegiance to the

test.--_The Monthly Review_.

_Men and Women_. By Robert Browning. Two Volumes. Chapman and Hall.

It is really high time that this sort of thing should, if possible, be

stopped. Here is another book of madness and mysticism--another

melancholy specimen of power wantonly wasted, and talent deliberately

perverted--another act of self-prostration before that demon of bad

taste who now seems to hold in absolute possession the fashionable

masters of our ideal literature. It is a strong case for the

correctional justice of criticism, which has too long abdicated its

proper functions. The Della Crusca of Sentimentalism perished under the

_Baviad_--is there to be no future Gifford for the Della Crusca of

Transcendentalism? The thing has really grown to a lamentable head

amongst us. The contagion has affected not only our sciolists and our

versifiers, but those whom, in the absence of a mightier race, we must

be content to accept as the poets of our age. Here is Robert Browning,

for instance--no one can doubt that he is capable of better things--no

one, while deploring the obscurities that deface the _Paracelsus_ and

the _Dramatic Lyrics_, can deny the less questionable qualities which

characterized those remarkable poems--but can any of his devotees be

found to uphold his present elaborate experiment on the patience of the

public? Take any of his worshippers you please--let him be "well up" in

the transcendental poets of the day--take him fresh from Alexander

Smith, or Alfred Tennyson's _Maud_, or the _Mystic_ of Bailey--and we

will engage to find him at least ten passages in the first ten pages of

_Men and Women_, some of which, even after profound study, he will not

be able to construe at all, and not one of which he will be able to

read off at sight. Let us take one or two selections at random from the

first volume, and try. What, for instance, is the meaning of these four

stanzas from the poem entitled "By the Fireside"?--

My perfect wife, my Leonor,

Oh, heart my own, oh, eyes, mine too,

Whom else could I dare look backward for,

With whom beside should I dare pursue

The path grey heads abhor?

For it leads to a crag's sheer edge with them;

Youth, flowery all the way, there stops--

Not they; age threatens and they contemn,

Till they reach the gulf wherein youth drops,

One inch from our life's safe hem!

With me, youth led--I will speak now,

No longer watch you as you sit

Reading by fire-light, that great brow

And the spirit-small hand propping it

Mutely--my heart knows how--

When, if I think but deep enough,

You are wont to answer, prompt as rhyme;

And you, too, find without a rebuff

The response your soul seeks many a time

Piercing its fine flesh-stuff--

We really should think highly of the powers of any interpreter who could

"pierce" the obscurity of such "stuff" as this. One extract more and we

have done. A gold medal in the department of Hermeneutical Science to

the ingenious individual, who, after any length of study, can succeed in

unriddling this tremendous passage from "Master Hugues of Saxe-Gotha,"

the organist:--

First you deliver your phrase

--Nothing propound, that I see,

Fit in itself for much blame or much praise--

Answered no less, where no answer needs be:

Off start the Two on their ways!

Straight must a Third interpose,

Volunteer needlessly help--

In strikes a Fourth, a Fifth thrusts in his nose,

So the cry's open, the kennel's a-yelp,

Argument's hot to the close!

One disertates, he is candid--

Two must dicept,--has distinguished!

Three helps the couple, if ever yet man did:

Four protests, Five makes a dart at the thing wished--

Back to One, goes the case bandied!

One says his say with a difference--

More of expounding, explaining!

All now is wrangle, abuse, and vociferance--

Now there's a truce, all's subdued, self-restraining--

Five, though, stands out all the stiffer hence.

One is incisive, corrosive--

Two retorts, nettled, curt, crepitant--

Three makes rejoinder, expansive, explosive--

Four overbears them all, strident and strepitant--

Five ... O Danaides, O Sieve!

Now, they ply axes and crowbars--

Now they prick pins at a tissue

Fine as a skein of the casuist Escobar's

Worked on the bone of a lie. To what issue?

Where is our gain at the Two-bars?

_Est fuga, volvitur rota!_

On we drift. Where looms the dim port?

One, Two, Three, Four, Five, contribute their quota--

Something is gained, if one caught but the import--

Show it us, Hugues of Saxe-Gotha!

What [with] affirming, denying,

Holding, risposting, subjoining,

All's like ... it's like ... for an instance I'm trying ...

There! See our roof, its gilt moulding and groining

Under those spider-webs lying?

So your fugue broadens and thickens,

Greatens and deepens and lengthens,

Till one exclaims--"But where's music, the dickens?

Blot ye the gold, while your spider-web strengthens,

Blacked to the stoutest of tickens?"

Early Reviews of English Poets · 第 15 / 19 段