We have hitherto confined ourselves to an examination of the influence

of the principles and temper of this work upon its literary pretensions;

but his Lordship will forgive us if we now put off the mere critic for a

moment, and address him in that graver character which we assume to

ourselves in the title of our work. In truth, we are deeply affected by

the spectacle his poem presents to us. As the minor poems at the

conclusion of the work breathe the same spirit, suggest the same doubts,

and employ the same language with the "Childe Harold" we are compelled

to recognise the author in the hero whom he has painted. In fact, the

disclaimer, already noticed in the Preface, seems merely like one of

those veils worn to draw attention to the face rather than to baffle it:

and in the work before us we are forced to recognise a character, which,

since Rousseau gave his Confessions to the public, has scarcely ever, we

think, darkened the horizon of letters. The reader of the "Confessions"

is dismayed to find a man frankly avowing the most disgraceful vices;

abandoning them, not upon principle, but merely because they have ceased

to gratify; prepared to return to them if they promise to reward him

better; without natural affection, neither loving, nor beloved by any;

without peace, without hope, "without God in the world." When we search

into the mysterious cause of this autobiographical phenomenon, we at

once discover that Rousseau's immeasurable vanity betrayed him into a

belief, that even his vices would vanish in the blaze of his

excellencies; and that the world would worship him, as idolaters do

their mishapen gods, in spite of their ugliness. The confessions of

Lord Byron, we regret to say, bear something of an analogy to those of

the philosopher of Geneva. Are they, then, to be traced to the _same

source_? He plainly is far from indifferent to the opinion of

by-standers: can he, then, conceive that this peep into the window of

his breast must not revolt every virtuous eye? Can he boldly proclaim

his violations of decency and of sobriety; his common contempt for all

modifications of religion; his monstrous belief in the universal rest or

annihilation of man in a future state; and forget that he is one of

those who

"Play such tricks before high heaven,

As make the angels weep;"

as offend against all moral taste; as attempt to shake the very pillars

of domestic happiness and of public security?

It is, however, a matter of congratulation, that his Lordship, in common

with the republican Confessor, has not revealed his creed without very

honestly displaying the influence of this creed upon his own mind. We

should not, indeed, have credited a man of his sentiments, had he

assured us he was happy: happiness takes no root in such soils. But it

is still better to have his own testimony to the unmixed misery of

licentiousness and unbelief. It is almost comforting to be told, if we

dared to draw comfort out of the well of another man's miseries, that

"Though gay companions o'er the bowl

Dispel awhile the sense of ill;

Though pleasure fires the maddening soul,

The heart--the heart is lonely still."

It is consolatory also to contrast the peace and triumph of the dying

Christian, with the awful uncertainty, or rather the sullen despair,

which breathe in these verses.

"'Aye--but to die and go'--alas,

Where all have gone, and all must go;

To be the nothing that I was,

Ere born to life and living woe.

"Count o'er the joys thine hours have seen,

Count o'er thy days from anguish free;

And know, whatever thou hast been,

'Tis something better not to be."

Nor can religion be more powerfully recommended than by the following

avowal of an apostle of the opposite system.

"No, for myself, so dark my fate

Through every turn of life has been,

Man and the world I so much hate,

I care not when I quit the scene."

But whilst, for the benefit of others, we thus avail ourselves of the

antidote supplied by his Lordship to his own poison, we would wish also

that he might feel the efficacy of it himself. Could we hope that so

humble a work as this would reach the lofty sphere in which he moves, we

would solemnly say to him: "You are wretched, but will nothing make you

happy? You hate all men; will nothing warm you with new feelings? You

are (as you say) hated by all; will nothing make you an object of

affection? Suppose yourself the victim of some disease, which resisted

many ordinary applications; but that all who used one medicine uniformly

pronounced themselves cured:--would it be worthy of a philosopher not

merely to neglect the remedy, but to traduce it? Such, however, my Lord,

is the fatuity of your own conduct as to the religion of Christ.

Thousands, as wretched as yourself, have found 'a Comforter' in Him;

thousands, having stepped into these waters, have been healed of their

disease; thousands, touching the hem of His garment, have found 'virtue

go out of it.' Beggared then of every other resource, try this.

'Acquaint yourself with God, and be at peace.'" His Lordship may

designate this language by that expressive monosyllable, cant; and may

possibly, before long, hunt us down, as a sort of mad March hare, with

the blood-hounds of his angry muse. But we hope better things of him. We

assure him, that, whatever may be true of others, we do not "hate him."

As Christians, even he who professes to be unchristian is dear to us. We

regard the waste of his fine talents, and the laboured suppression and

apparent extinction of his better feelings, with the deepest

commiseration and sorrow. We long to see him escape from the black cloud

which, by what may fairly be called his "black art," he has conjured up

around himself. We hope to know him as a future buttress of his shaken

country, and as a friend of his yet "unknown God." Should this change,

by the mercy of God, take place, what pangs would many passages of his

present work cost him! Happy should we be, could we persuade him, in the

bare anticipation of such a change, even now to contrive for his future

happiness, by expunging sentiments that would then so much embitter it.

Should he never change; yet, such an act would prove, that, at least, he

meditated no cruel invasion upon the joys of others. Even Rousseau

taught his child religion, as a delusion essential to happiness. The

philosophic Tully also, if a belief in futurity were an error, deemed it

one with which it was impossible to part. Let the author then, at all

events, leave us in unmolested possession of our supposed privileges.

_He_ plainly knows no noble or "royal way" to happiness. _We_ find in

religion a bark that rides the waves in every storm; a sun that never

goes down; a living fountain of waters. Religion is suffered to change

its aspect and influence according to the eye and faith of the

examiner. Like one side of the pillar of the wilderness, it may merely

darken and perplex his Lordship's path: to millions it is like the

opposite side of that pillar to the Israelites, the symbol of Deity; the

pillar of hallowed flame, which lights and guides, and cheers them as

they toil onward through the pilgrimage of life. Could we hear any voice

proclaim of him, as of one reclaimed from as inveterate, though more

honest, prejudices, "behold, he prayeth;" we should hope that here also

the scales would drop from the eyes, and his Lordship become an eloquent

defender and promulgator of the religion which he now scorns.--_The

Christian Observer_.

[Footnote J: Hume.]

[Footnote K: Grant's Restoration of Learning in the East.]

[Footnote L: We cannot resist the temptation of saying, that in this

highest department of the poet's art, we know of no living poet who will

bear a comparison with Mr. Southey.]

PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY

_Alastor_; or, The Spirit of Solitude; and other Poems. By Percy Bysshe

Shelley. Crown 8vo. pp. 101. Baldwin, and Co. 1816.

We must candidly own that these poems are beyond our comprehension; and

we did not obtain a clue to their sublime obscurity, till an address to

Mr. Wordsworth explained in what school the author had formed his taste.

We perceive, through the "darkness visible" in which Mr. Shelley veils

his subject, some beautiful imagery and poetical expressions: but he

appears to be a poet "whose eye, in a fine phrenzy rolling," seeks only

such objects as are "above this visible diurnal sphere;" and therefore

we entreat him, for the sake of his reviewers as well as of his other

readers, (if he has any,) to subjoin to his next publication an _ordo_,

a glossary, and copious notes, illustrative of his allusions and

explanatory of his meaning.--_The Monthly Review_.

_The Cenci. A Tragedy, in Five Acts_. By PERCY BYSSHE SHELL[E]Y. Italy.

1819. pp. 104.

There has lately arisen a new-fangled style of poetry, facetiously

yclept the Cockney School, that it would really be worth any one's while

to enter as a candidate. The qualifications are so easy, that he need

never doubt the chance of his success, for he has only to knock, and it

shall be opened unto him. The principal requisites for admission, in a

literary point of view, are as follows. First, an inordinate share of

affectation and conceit, with a few occasional good things sprinkled,

like green spots of verdure in a wilderness, with a "parca quod satis

est manu." Secondly, a prodigious quantity of assurance, that neither

God nor man can daunt, founded on the honest principle of "who is like

unto me?" and lastly, a contempt for all institutions, moral and divine,

with secret yearnings for aught that is degrading to human nature, or

revolting to decency. These qualifications ensured, a regular initiation

into the Cockney mysteries follows as a matter of course, and the novice

enlists himself under their banners, proud of his newly-acquired honors,

and starched up to the very throat in all the prim stiffness of his

intellect. A few symptoms of this literary malady appeared as early as

the year 1795, but it then assumed the guise of simplicity and pathos.

It was a poetical Lord Fanny. It wept its pretty self to death by

murmuring brooks, and rippling cascades, it heaved delicious sighs over

sentimental lambs, and love-lorn sheep, apostrophized donkies in the

innocence of primaeval nature; sung tender songs to tender nightingales;

went to bed without a candle, that it might gaze on the chubby faces of

the stars; discoursed sweet nothings to all who would listen to its

nonsense; and displayed (_horrendum dictu_) the acute profundity of its

grief in ponderous folios and spiral duodecimos. The literary world,

little suspecting the dangerous consequences of this distressing malady,

suffered it to germinate in silence; and not until they became

thoroughly convinced that the disorder was of an epidemical nature, did

they start from their long continued lethargy. But it was then too late!

The evil was incurable; it branched out into the most vigorous

ramifications, and following the scriptural admonition, "Increase and

multiply," disseminated its poetry and its prose throughout a great part

of England. As a dog, when once completely mad, is never satisfied until

he has bitten half a dozen more, so the Cockney professors, in laudable

zeal for the propagation of their creed, were never at rest until they

had spread their own doctrines around them. They stood on the house tops

and preached, 'till of a verity they were black in the face with the

heating quality of their arguments; they stationed themselves by the bye

roads and hedges, to discuss the beauties of the country; they looked

out from their garrett [_sic_] windows in Grub-street, and exclaimed,

"_O! rus, quando ego te aspiciam_;" and gave such afflicting tokens of

insanity, that the different reviewers and satirists of the day kindly

laced them in the strait jackets of their criticism. "But all this

availeth _us_ nothing," exclaimed the critics, "so long as _we_ see

Mordecai the Jew sitting at the gate of the Temple; that is to say, as

long as there is one Cockney pericranium left unscalped by the tomahawks

of our satire." But notwithstanding the strenuous exertions of all those

whose brains have not been cast in the mould of this new species of

intellectual dandyism, the evil has been daily and even hourly

increasing; and so prodigious is the progressive ratio of its march,

that the _worthy_ Society for the Suppression of Vice should be called

upon to eradicate it. It now no longer masks its real intentions under

affected purity of sentiment; its countenance has recently acquired a

considerable addition of brass, the glitter of which has often been

mistaken for sterling coin, and incest, adultery, murder, blasphemy, are

among other favorite topics of its discussion. It seems to delight in an

utter perversion of all moral, intellectual, and religious qualities. It

gluts over the monstrous deformities of nature; finds gratification in

proportion to the magnitude of the crime it extolls; and sees no virtue

but in vice; no sin, but in true feeling. Like poor Tom, in Lear, whom

the foul fiend has possessed for many a day, it will run through

ditches, through quagmires, and through bogs, to see a man stand on his

head for the exact space of half an hour. Ask the reason of this raging

appetite for eccentricity, the answer is, such a thing is out of the

beaten track of manhood, _ergo_, it is praiseworthy.

Among the professors of the Cockney school, Mr. Percy Bysshe Shell[e]y

is one of the most conspicuous. With more fervid imagination and

splendid talents than nine-tenths of the community, he yet prostitutes

those talents by the utter degradation to which he unequivocally

consigns them. His Rosalind and Helen, his Revolt of Islam, and his

Alastor, or the Spirit of Solitude, while they possess beauties of a

superior order, are lamentably deficient in morality and religion. The

doctrines they inculcate are of the most evil tendency; the characters

they depict are of the most horrible description; but in the midst of

these disgraceful passages, there are beauties of such exquisite, such

redeeming qualities, that we adore while we pity--we admire while we

execrate--and are tempted to exclaim with the last of the Romans, "Oh!

what a fall is _here_, my countrymen." In the modern Eclogue of Rosalind

and Helen in particular, there is a pensive sadness, a delicious

melancholy, nurst in the purest, the deepest recesses of the heart, and

springing up like a fountain in the desert, that pervades the poem, and

forms its principal attraction. The rich yet delicate imagery that is

every where scattered over it, is like the glowing splendor of the

setting sun, when he retires to rest, amid the blessings of exulting

nature. It is the balmy breath of the summer breeze, the twilight's last

and holiest sigh. In the dramatic poem before us, the interest is of a

different nature; it is dark--wild, and unearthly. The characters that

appear in it are of no mortal stamp; they are daemons in human guise,

inscrutable in their actions, subtle in their revenge. Each has his

smile of awful meaning--his purport of hellish tendency. The tempest

that rages in his bosom is irrepressible but by death. The phrenzied

groan that diseased imagination extorts from his perverted soul, is as

the thunder-clap that reverberates amid the cloud-capt summits of the

Alps. It is the storm that convulses all nature--that lays bare the face

of heaven, and gives transient glimpses of destruction yet to be. Then

in the midst of all these accumulated horrors comes the gentle Beatrice,

"Who in the gentleness of thy sweet youth

Hast never trodden on a worm, or bruised

A living flower, but thou hast pitied it

With needless tears." Page 50.

She walks in the light of innocence; in the unclouded sunshine of

loveliness and modesty; but her felicity is transient as the calm that

precedes the tempest; and in the very whispers of her virtue, you hear

the indistinct muttering of the distant thunder. She is conceived in

the true master spirit of genius; and in the very instant of her

parricide, comes home to our imagination fresh in the spring time of

innocence--hallowed in the deepest recesses of melancholy. But

notwithstanding all these transcendant qualities, there are numerous

passages that warrant our introductory observations respecting the

Cockney school, and plunge "full fathom five," into the profoundest

depths of the Bathos. While, therefore, we do justice to the abilities

of the author, we shall bestow a passing smile or two on his unfortunate

Cockney propensities.

The following are the principal incidents of the play. Count Cenci, the

_daemon_ of the piece, delighted with the intelligence of the death of

two of his sons, recounts at a large assembly, specially invited for the

purpose, the circumstances of the dreadful transaction. Lucretia, his

wife, Beatrice, his daughter, and the other guests, are of course

startled at his transports; but when they hear his awful imprecations,

"Oh, thou bright wine whose purple splendor leaps

And bubbles gaily in this golden bowl

Under the lamp light, as my spirits do,

To hear the death of my accursed sons!

Could I believe thou wert their mingled blood,

Then would I taste thee like a sacrament,

And pledge with thee the mighty Devil in Hell,

Who, if a father's curses, as men say,

Climb with swift wings after their children's souls,

And drag them from the very throne of Heaven,

Now triumphs in my triumph!--But thou art

Superfluous; I have drunken deep of joy

And I will taste no other wine tonight--"

their horror induces them to leave the room. Beatrice, in the meantime,

who has been rating her parent for his cruelty, is subjected to every

species of insult; and he sends her to her own apartment, with the

hellish intention of prostituting her innocence, and contaminating, as

he pithily expresses it, "both body and soul." The second act introduces

us to a tete-a-tete between Bernardo (another of Cenci's sons) and

Lucretia; when their conference is suddenly broken off, by the abrupt

entrance of Beatrice, who has escaped from the pursuit of the Count. She

recapitulates the injuries she has received from her father, the most

atrocious of which appear to be, that he has given them all "ditch

water" to drink, and "buffalos" to eat. But before we proceed further,

we have a word or two respecting this same ditch water, and buffalo's

flesh, which we shall mention, as a piece of advice to the author. It is

well known, we believe, in a case of lunacy, that the first thing

considered is, whether the patient has done any thing sufficiently

foolish, to induce his relatives to apply for a statute against him: now

any malicious, evil-minded person, were he so disposed, might make

successful application to the court against the luckless author of the

_Cenci, a tragedy in five acts_. Upon which the judge with all the

solemnity suitable to so melancholy a circumstance as the decay of the

mental faculties, would ask for proofs of the defendant's lunacy; upon

which the plaintiff would produce the affecting episode of the ditch

water and buffalo flesh; upon which the judge would shake his head, and

acknowledge the insanity; upon which the defendant would be incarcerated

in Bedlam.

To return from this digression, we are next introduced to Giacomo,

another of Cenci's hopeful progeny, who, like the rest, has a dreadful

tale to unfold of his father's cruelty towards him. Orsino, the favored

lover of Beatrice, enters at the moment of his irritation; and by the

most artful pleading ultimately incites him to the murder of his

father, in which he is to be joined by the rest of the family. The plot,

after one unlucky attempt, succeeds; and at the moment of its

accomplishment, is discovered by a messenger, who is despatched to the

lonely castle of Petrella (one of the Count's family residences), with a

summons of attendance from the Pope. We need hardly say that the

criminals are condemned; and not even the lovely Beatrice is able to

escape the punishment of the law. The agitation she experiences after

the commission of the incest, is powerfully descriptive.

"How comes this hair undone?

Its wandering strings must be what blind me so,

And yet I tied it fast.--O, horrible!

The pavement sinks under my feet! The walls

Spin round! I see a woman weeping there,

And standing calm and motionless, whilst I

Slide giddily as the world reels--My God!

The beautiful blue heaven is flecked with blood!

The sunshine on the floor is black! The air

Is changed to vapours such as the dead breathe

In charnel pits! Pah! I am choaked! There creeps

A clinging, black, contaminating mist

About me--'tis substantial, heavy, thick,

I cannot pluck it from me, for it glues

My fingers and my limbs to one another,

And eats into my sinews, and dissolves

My flesh to a pollution, poisoning

The subtle, pure, and inmost spirit of life!"

At first she concludes that she is mad; but then pathetically checks

herself by saying, "No, I am dead." Lucretia naturally enough inquires

into the cause of her disquietude, and but too soon discovers, by the

broken hints of the victim, the source of her mental agitation.

Terrified at their defenceless state, they then mutually conspire with

Orsino against the Count; and Beatrice proposes to way-lay him (a plot,

however, which fails) in a _deep and dark ravine_, as he journeys to

Petrella.

"But I remember

Two miles on this side of the fort, the road

Crosses a deep ravine; 'tis rough and narrow,

And winds with short turns down the precipice;

And in its depth there is a mighty rock,

Which has, from unimaginable years,

Sustained itself with terror and with toil

Over a gulph, and with the agony

With which it clings seems slowly coming down;

Even as a wretched soul hour after hour,

Clings to the mass of life; yet clinging, leans;

And leaning, makes more dark the dread abyss

In which it fears to fall: beneath this crag

Huge as despair, as if in weariness,

The melancholy mountain yawns--below,

You hear but see not an impetuous torrent

Raging among the caverns, and a bridge

Crosses the chasm; and high above there grow,

With intersecting trunks, from crag to crag,

Cedars, and yews, and pines; whose tangled hair

Is matted in one solid roof of shade

By the dark ivy's twine. At noon day here

'Tis twilight, and at sunset blackest night."

Giacomo, meanwhile, who was privy to the transaction, awaits the arrival

of Orsino, with intelligence of the murder, in a state of the most

fearful torture and suspence.

"Tis midnight, and Orsino comes not yet.

(_Thunder, and the sound of a storm._)

What! can the everlasting elements

Feel with a worm like man? If so, the shaft

Of mercy-winged lightning would not fall

On stones and trees. My wife and children sleep:

They are now living in unmeaning dreams:

But I must wake, still doubting if that deed

Be just which was most necessary. O,

Thou unreplenished lamp! whose narrow fire

Is shaken by the wind, and on whose edge

Devouring darkness hovers! Thou small flame,

Which, as a dying pulse rises and falls,

Still flickerest up and down, how very soon,

Did I not feed thee, thou wouldst fail and be

As thou hadst never been! So wastes and sinks

Even now, perhaps, the life that kindled mine:

But that no power can fill with vital oil

That broken lamp of flesh. Ha! 'tis the blood

Which fed these veins that ebbs till all is cold:

It is the form that moulded mine that sinks

Into the white and yellow spasms of death:

It is the soul by which mine was arrayed

In God's immortal likeness which now stands

Naked before Heaven's judgment seat!

(_a bell strikes_)

One! Two!

The hours crawl on; and when my hairs are white

My son will then perhaps be waiting thus.

Tortured between just hate and vain remorse;

Chiding the tardy messenger of news

Like those which I expect. I almost wish

He be not dead, although my wrongs are great;

Yet--'tis Orsino's step."

We envy not the feelings of any one who can read the curses that Cenci

invokes on his daughter, when she refuses to repeat her guilt, without

the strongest disgust, notwithstanding the intense vigor of the

imprecations

Early Reviews of English Poets · 第 11 / 19 段