I have made this statement and representation, sir, on two accounts.

1. In order to repel the shocking and groundless imputation which I

understand that some pains have been taken to fix upon me, I do not

mean by you, sir, for you know the contrary that the object of my late

publication was to aim at destroying all religion, and the annihilation

of the publick worship of God, a charge which I reject with horror, and

also with bitter indignation, that it should ever have been attributed

to me. God forbid! that the publick worship and stated reverence which

all ought to pay to the Great and Tremendous Being from whom we receive

life and its every blessing; and to whose Providence we are subject;

and by whose goodness we are sustained, should ever be caused to be

neglected, or forgotten, by any man, or by the subvertion of any

opinions whatever. The propriety of the publick worship of God stands

independent and without need of support from the peculiar doctrines of

any sect. And the idea that this great duty would be superceded by the

dismission of the New Testament is so utterly groundless and absurd:

that to make it appear so, any man has only to recollect that the

public worship of the Supreme existed before the New Testament was

written or thought of; and to look round the world and see millions of

men worshipping God in houses of prayer, who know nothing about the New

Testament except by report. I regard, sir, the imputation I have spoken

of, as either a gross mistake of the simple, or a cunning and

deliberate calumny of the crafty. I have made this statement and

representation to show, that it does not follow, that in giving up the

New Testament Christians will be deprived of all religion. For in

retaining the Old Testament they would adopt nothing new, and would

retain nothing but what they now acknowledge as containing a divine

revelation; and in giving up the New Testament they would not, as I

think has been shown, give up a jot of what had ever any right to the

name of Scripture.

Whether however, people give up both, or retain one, or both, is their

concern. I have stated what I have merely to show, that in giving up

the New Testament they would not necessarily give up more than a part

of their bibles, or any part of their bible, except that whose

authenticity cannot be proved; nor any more of their faith, than that

part of it which for almost eighteen hundred years has produced

interminable disputes among themselves and misfortunes, and causeless

reproach to others.

"With great regard, and the most respectful esteem, I subscribe myself,

Reverend Sir, Your obliged and humble servant

Letter to the Reverend Mr. Cary Containing Remarks upon his Review of the Grounds of Christianity Examined by Comparing the New Testament to the Old · 第 3 / 5 题