CAIAPHAS

_Tuesday in Passion Week_

The thought may arise to many minds, if Jesus was so lovely, so

attractive, and so beloved, how could it have been possible that he

should be put to so cruel a death in the very midst of a people whom

he loved and for whom he labored?

The sacred record shows us why. It was this very attractiveness,

this very power over men's hearts, that was the cause and reason

of the conspiracy against Jesus. We have a brief and very dramatic

account of the meeting of the Sanhedrim in which the death of Christ

was finally resolved upon, and we find that very popularity urged

as a reason why he cannot be permitted to live. In John xi. 47, we

are told that after the raising of Lazarus the chief priests and

Pharisees gathered a council and said, "What do we? this man doeth

many miracles. If we let him thus alone all men will believe on him,

and the Romans will come and take away our place and nation."

There is the case stated plainly, and we see that these men talked

then just as men in our days talk. Do they ever resolve on an act

of oppression or cruelty, calling it by its right name? Never. It

is a "sacrifice" to some virtue; and the virtue in this case was

patriotism.

Here is the Jewish nation, a proud and once powerful people,

crushed and writhing under the heel of the conquering Romans. They

are burning with hatred of their oppressors and with a desire of

revenge, longing for the Messiah that shall lead them to conquest

and make their nation the head of the world.

And now, here comes this Jesus and professes to be the

long-promised leader; and what does he teach? Love and forgiveness

of enemies; patient endurance of oppression and wrong; and supreme

devotion to the pure inner life of the soul. If Roman tax-gatherers

distrain upon their property and force them to carry it from place

to place, they are to meet it only by free good will, that is,

willingness to go two miles when one is asked. If the extortionate

officer seizes their coat, they are to show only a kindliness that

is willing to give even more than that.

They are to love their bitterest enemies, pity and pray for them,

and continue in unbroken kindness, even as God's sunshine falls in

unmoved benignity on the just and the unjust!

It must have inflamed these haughty, ambitious leaders to fury to

see all their brilliant visions of war and conquest and national

independence melting away in a mist of what seemed to them the mere

impossible sentimentalism of love. And yet this illusion gains

ground daily; Christ is received in triumph at Jerusalem, and the

rulers say to each other, "Perceive ye how we prevail nothing?

behold the whole world is gone out after him."

Now, in the Jewish Sanhedrim Christ had friends and followers.

We are told of Joseph of Arimathea, who would not consent to the

deeds of the council. We are told of Nicodemus, who before now had

spoken boldly in the council, demanding justice and a fair hearing

for Jesus. We may well believe that so extreme a course as was now

proposed met at first strong opposition. There seems to have been

some warm discussion. We may imagine what it was: that Jesus was a

just and noble man, a prophet, a man all of whose deeds and words

had been pure and beneficent, was doubtless earnestly urged. The

advocates, it is true, were not men who had left all to follow

him, or enrolled themselves openly as his disciples, but yet they

could not consent to so monstrous an injustice as this. That the

discussion produced strong feeling is evident from the excited

manner in which Caiaphas sums up: "Ye know nothing at all, nor

consider that it is better that one man should die than that the

whole nation should perish." That was the case as he viewed it,

and he talked precisely as men in our days have often talked when

consenting to an injustice or oppression: Say what you will of this

Jesus; I will not dispute you. Admit, if you please, his virtues and

good works; still, he is a wrong-headed man, that will be the ruin

of our nation. Either he must perish or the nation be destroyed.

And so, on the altar of patriotism this murder was laid as a

sacrifice. And it was this same burning, impatient national spirit

of independence that slew Christ which afterwards provoked the Roman

government beyond endurance, and brought upon Jerusalem wrath to the

uttermost.

The very children and grandchildren of Caiaphas died in untold

miseries in that day of wrath and doom. The decision to reject

Christ was the decision which destroyed Jerusalem with a destruction

more awful than any other recorded in history.

We are apt to consider the actors in this great tragedy as sinners

above all others. But every day and every hour in our times just

such deeds are being reënacted.

There were all sorts of sinners in that tragedy: Caiaphas, who

sacrificed one whom he knew to be a noble and good man to political

ambition; Pilate, who consented to an acknowledged wrong from dread

of personal inconvenience; Judas, who made the best of his time in

selling out a falling cause to the newcomers; Peter, the impetuous

friend suddenly frightened into denial; the twelve, forsaking

and fleeing in a moment of weakness; the multitude of careless

spectators, those tide-waiters who turn as the flood turns, who

shouted for Jesus yesterday because others were shouting, and turn

against him to-day because he is unpopular. All these were there.

On the other hand, there were the faithful company of true-hearted

women that went with Jesus weeping on his way to the cross; that

beloved disciple and the Mother that stood by him to the last; all

these, both friends and foes, represent classes of people who still

live and still act their part in this our day.

"For, when under fierce oppression,

Goodness suffers like transgression,

Christ again is crucified;

But if love be there true-hearted,

By no pain or terror parted,

Mary stands the cross beside!"

Religious Studies, Sketches and Poems · 第 76 / 162 题