CHRIST AND THE FALLEN WOMAN

The absolute divinity of Jesus, the height at which he stood above

all men, is nowhere so shown as in what he dared and did for woman,

and the godlike consciousness of authority with which he did it. It

was at a critical period in his ministry, when all eyes were fixed

on him in keen inquiry, when many of the respectable classes were

yet trembling in the balance whether to accept his claims or not,

that Jesus in the calmest and most majestic manner took the ground

that the sins of a fallen woman were like any other sins, and that

repentant love entitled to equal forgiveness. The story so wonderful

can be told only in the words of the sacred narrative:--

"And one of the Pharisees desired him that he would eat with

him, and he went into the Pharisee's house and sat down to meat.

And behold a woman in that city which was a sinner, when she

knew that Jesus sat at meat in the Pharisee's house, brought

an alabaster box of ointment, and stood at his feet behind

him, weeping, and began to wash his feet with tears, and did

wipe them with the hairs of her head, and kissed his feet and

anointed them with the ointment. Now when the Pharisee which had

bidden him saw it, he spake within himself, saying, This man, if

he were a prophet, would have known who and what manner of woman

this is, for she is a sinner. And Jesus answering said unto

him, Simon, I have somewhat to say unto thee. He said unto him,

Master, say on. There was a certain creditor had two debtors;

the one owed him five hundred pence and the other fifty, and

when they had nothing to pay he frankly forgave them both. Tell

me, therefore, which will love him most. Simon answered and

said, I suppose he to whom he forgave most. And he said unto

him, Thou hast rightly judged. And he turned to the woman and

said unto Simon, Seest thou this woman? I entered into thy house

and thou gavest me no water for my feet, but she hath washed my

feet with tears and wiped them with the hairs of her head. Thou

gavest me no kiss, but this woman, since the time I came in,

hath not ceased to kiss my feet. My head with oil thou didst not

anoint, but she hath anointed my feet with ointment. Wherefore,

I say unto you, her sins, which are many, are forgiven her, for

she loved much; but to whom little is forgiven the same loveth

little. And he said unto her, Thy sins are forgiven. And they

that sat at meat began to say within themselves, Who is this

that forgiveth sins also? And he said to the woman, Thy faith

hath saved thee; go in peace."

Nothing can be added to the pathos and solemn dignity of this

story, in which our Lord assumed with tranquil majesty the rights

to supreme love possessed by the Creator, and his sovereign power

to forgive sins and dispense favors. The repentant Magdalene became

henceforth one of the characteristic figures in the history of the

Christian Church. Mary Magdalene became eventually a prominent

character in the mythic legends of the mediæval mythology. A long

history of missionary labors and enthusiastic preaching of the

gospel in distant regions of the earth is ascribed to her. Churches

arose that bore her name, hymns were addressed to her. Even the

reforming Savonarola addresses one of his spiritual canticles to St.

Mary Magdalene. The various pictures of her which occur in every

part of Europe are a proof of the interest which these legends

inspired. The most of them are wild and poetic, and exhibit a

striking contrast to the concise brevity and simplicity of the New

Testament story.

The mythic legends make up a romance in which Mary the sister of

Martha and Mary Magdalene the sinner are oddly considered as the

same person. It is sufficient to read the chapter in St. John which

gives an account of the raising of Lazarus, to perceive that such a

confusion is absurd. Mary and Martha there appear as belonging to

a family in good standing to which many flocked with expressions

of condolence and respect in time of affliction. And afterwards,

in that grateful feast made for the restoration of their brother,

we read that so many flocked to the house that the jealousy of

the chief priests was excited. All these incidents, representing

a family of respectability, are entirely inconsistent with any

such supposition. But while we repudiate this extravagance of the

tradition, there does seem ground for identifying the Mary Magdalene

who was one of the most devoted followers of our Lord with the

forgiven sinner of this narrative. We read of a company of women who

followed Jesus and ministered to him. In the eighth chapter of Luke

he is said to be accompanied by "certain women which had been healed

of evil spirits and infirmities," among whom is mentioned "Mary

called Magdalene," as having been a victim of demoniacal possession.

Some women of rank and fortune also are mentioned as members of

the same company: "Joanna the wife of Chusa, Herod's steward, and

Susanna, and many others who ministered to him of their substance."

A modern commentator thinks it improbable that Mary Magdalene could

be identified with the "sinner" spoken of by St. Luke, because women

of standing like Joanna and Susanna would not have received one of

her class to their company. We ask why not? If Jesus had received

her, had forgiven and saved her; if _he_ acknowledged previously her

grateful ministrations,--is it likely that they would reject her? It

was the very peculiarity and glory of the new kingdom that it had a

better future for sinners, and for sinful woman as well as sinful

man. Jesus did not hesitate to say to the proud and prejudiced

religious aristocracy of his day, "The publicans and harlots go

into the kingdom of heaven before you." We cannot doubt that

the loving Christian women who ministered to Jesus received this

penitent sister as a soul absolved and purified by the sovereign

word of their Lord, and henceforth there was for her a full scope

for that ardent, self-devoting power of her nature which had been

her ruin, and was now to become her salvation.

Some commentators seem to think that the dreadful demoniacal

possession which was spoken of in Mary Magdalene proves her not

to have been identical with the woman of St. Luke. But, on the

contrary, it would seem exactly to account for actions of a strange

and unaccountable wickedness, for a notoriety in crime that went far

to lead the Pharisees to feel that her very touch was pollution. The

story is symbolic of what is too often seen in the fall of woman. A

noble and beautiful nature wrecked through inconsiderate prodigality

of love, deceived, betrayed, ruined, often drifts like a shipwrecked

bark into the power of evil spirits. Rage, despair, revenge,

cruelty, take possession of the crushed ruin that should have been

the home of the sweetest affections. We are not told when or where

the healing word was spoken that drove the cruel fiends from Mary's

soul. Perhaps before she entered the halls of the Pharisee, while

listening to the preaching of Jesus, the madness and despair had

left her. We can believe that in his higher moods virtue went from

him, and there was around him a holy and cleansing atmosphere from

which all evil fled away,--a serene and healing purity which calmed

the throbbing fever of passion and gave the soul once more the image

of its better self.

We see in the manner in which Mary found her way to the feet of

Jesus the directness and vehemence, the uncalculating self-sacrifice

and self-abandon, of one of those natures which, when they move,

move with a rush of undivided impulse; which, when they love, trust

all, believe all, and are ready to sacrifice all. As once she had

lost herself in this self-abandonment, so now at the feet of her God

she gains all by the same power of self-surrender.

We do not meet Mary Magdalene again till we find her at the foot

of the cross, sharing the last anguish of our Lord and his mother.

We find her watching the sepulchre, preparing sweet spices for

embalming. In the dim gray of the resurrection morning she is there

again, only to find the sepulchre open and the beloved form gone.

Everything in this last scene is in consistency with the idea of

the passionate self-devotion of a nature whose sole life is in its

love. The disciples, when they found not the body, went away; but

Mary stood without at the sepulchre weeping, and as she wept she

stooped down and looked into the sepulchre. The angel said to her,

"Woman, why weepest thou? She answered, Because they have taken away

my Lord, and I know not where they have laid him." She then turns

and sees through her tears dimly the form of a man standing there.

"Jesus saith unto her, Woman, why weepest thou? whom seekest thou?

She, supposing him to be the gardener, saith unto him, Sir, if thou

have borne him hence, tell me where thou hast laid him, and I will

go and take him away. Jesus saith unto her, Mary! She turned herself

and said unto him, Rabboni,--Master!"

In all this we see the characteristic devotion and energy of her who

loved much because she was forgiven much. It was the peculiarity

of Jesus that he saw the precious capability of every nature, even

in the very dust of defilement. The power of devoted love is the

crown jewel of the soul, and Jesus had the eye to see where it lay

trampled in the mire, and the strong hand to bring it forth purified

and brightened. It is the deepest malignity of Satan to degrade and

ruin souls through love. It is the glory of Christ, through love, to

redeem and restore.

In the history of Christ as a teacher, it is remarkable that, while

he was an object of enthusiastic devotion to so many women, while

a band of them followed his preaching and ministered to his wants

and those of his disciples, yet there was about him something so

entirely unworldly, so sacredly high and pure, that even the very

suggestion of scandal in this regard is not to be found in the

bitterest vituperations of his enemies of the first two centuries.

If we compare Jesus with Socrates, the moral teacher most frequently

spoken of as approaching him, we shall see a wonderful contrast.

Socrates associated with courtesans, without passion and without

reproof, in a spirit of half-sarcastic, philosophic tolerance. No

quickening of the soul of woman, no call to a higher life, came from

him. Jesus is stern and grave in his teachings of personal purity,

severe in his requirements. He was as intolerant to sin as he was

merciful to penitence. He did not extenuate the sins he forgave.

He declared the sins of Mary to be _many_ in the same breath that

he pronounced her pardon. He said to the adulterous woman whom he

protected, "Go, sin no more." The penitents who joined the company

of his disciples were so raised above their former selves, that,

instead of being the shame, they were the glory of the new kingdom.

St. Paul says to the first Christians, speaking of the adulterous

and impure, "Such were some of you, but ye are washed, but ye are

sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and

by the Spirit of God."

The tradition of the church that Mary Magdalene was an enthusiastic

preacher of Jesus seems in keeping with all we know of the strength

and fervor of her character. Such love must find expression, and

we are told that when the first persecution scattered the little

church at Jerusalem, "they that were scattered went everywhere,

preaching the word." Some of the most effective preaching of

Christ is that of those who testify in their own person of a great

salvation. "He can save to the uttermost, for he has saved me," is

a testimony that often goes more straight to the heart than all the

arguments of learning. Christianity had this peculiarity over all

other systems, that it not only forgave the past, but made of its

bitter experiences a healing medicine; so that those who had sinned

deepest might have therefrom a greater redeeming power. "When thou

art converted, strengthen thy brethren," was the watchword of the

penitent.

The wonderful mind of Goethe has seized upon and embodied this

peculiarity of Christianity in his great poem of "Faust." The first

part shows the Devil making of the sweetest and noblest affection of

the confiding Margaret a cruel poison to corrupt both body and soul.

We see her driven to crime, remorse, shame, despair, all human forms

and forces of society united to condemn her, when with a last cry

she stretches her poor hands to heaven and says, "Judgment of God, I

commend myself to you;" and then falls a voice from heaven, "She is

judged; she is saved."

In the second part we see the world-worn, weary Faust passing

through the classic mythology, vainly seeking rest and finding

none; he seeks rest in a life of benevolence to man, but fiends

of darkness conflict with his best aspirations, and dog his steps

through life, and in his dying hour gather round to seize his soul

and carry it to perdition. But around him is a shining band. Mary

the mother of Jesus with a company of purified penitents encircle

him, and his soul passes, in infantine weakness, to the guardian

arms of Margaret,--once a lost and ruined woman, now a strong and

pitiful angel,--who, like a tender mother, leads the new-born soul

to look upon the glories of heaven, while angel voices sing to the

victory of good over evil:--

"All that is transient

Is but a parable;

The unattainable

Here is made real.

The indescribable

Here is accomplished;

The eternal womanly

Draws us upward and onward."

Religious Studies, Sketches and Poems · 第 56 / 162 题