CHAPTER VIII

Deals with Charles IV, Roman Emperor, King of the Germans, first

Bohemian King of that name, and Father of his country. Charles as a

warrior and the part he took at Crecy. Some remarks about Crecy.

Friendly relations between Charles and Edward III of England, who at

Charles's suggestion declines the imperial crown. Charles concerns

himself with the welfare of his people. He builds and restores churches.

A short story about St. Wenceslaus, and a description of the chapel

dedicated to him. Of "St. Mary under the Chain" and the house of the

Knights of Malta. Of George Podiebrad, of Frederick the Winter King and

his wife Elizabeth. A word or two about the Hussites and the host of

crusaders that came out of the West and were defeated by [vZ]i[vs]ka. A

pageant of those whose life and work was connected with the Cathedral of

St. Vitus. Charles and Church Reform, and of a Pope who was himself in

need of reform. St. Henry and Kunigunde his wife, and the church

dedicated to them. Frederick II of Prussia and the church which Charles

had built and consecrated to the Virgin and St. Charles. St. Stephen's

Church. Some remarks on the saints who are patrons of Bohemia or in one

way or another interested in that country. A passing reference to

London's patron saint Erkenwald and some remarks about a students'

feast-day.

Despite his undoubted gallantry in battle, Charles, as a warrior, was

overshadowed by his picturesque sire; moreover, he shone more brightly

as a man of peace, as scholar, as founder and builder, even as author;

in the latter capacity he has left behind a remarkable work, his

autobiography, written in Latin: "Commentarius de Vita Caroli Bohemiae

Regis ab ipso Carolo conscriptus." Yet, had he done nothing else, his

military achievements would probably have brought him lasting renown. As

we have seen, he acquitted himself well, when quite a young man, in his

father's campaigns in Italy. He took part with conspicuous gallantry in

the Battle of Crecy. I gather that it was his advice not to attack with

tired troops, but he was overruled; not but what the result might have

been the same had the French agreed to wait another day. It was the

Bohemian cavalry that had already distinguished itself by preventing the

passage by the English Army of the bridge of St. Remy, and it was not

their fault that the ford of Blanche-Taque was insufficiently guarded

and thus left open a crossing over the Somme. Many of us know that

country about Abbeville well, the lush meadows and clumps of trees not

so unlike our own river scenery. Some of us may even have recalled

memories out of school of that battle fought out in so small a space

compared to the "shows" to which we had become used. While out of the

line in that neighbourhood I myself met the direct descendant of French

warriors who fought at Crecy, the mayor of a small village. I happened

to refer lightly to that page of long-ago history, but the mayor

corrected me--it had indeed been a most serious affair; he had lost

thirteen ancestors on that occasion, and the family had not recovered to

this day. As a social function the Battle of Crecy was certainly an

important affair; many of the best people in Europe were represented

there, four kings among others, and a brave show of nobles many of whom

indeed, did not recover.

John and Charles had undertaken this trip to France together no doubt

drawn by their relationship to the French royal family, and Charles had

fought valiantly by his father's side until forced to withdraw by his

nobles, who, according to Bene[vs] de Weitmil, were "fearful of losing

both their Kings."

One would think that this the first introduction to the English of

Bohemia's King would not make for cordial relations; as a matter of

fact, it led to an alliance between Charles and Edward III arising out

of circumstances which prove both these monarchs to have been wise men.

England had risen considerably in the estimation of continental Europe

in consequence of this victory, and an attempt was made, perhaps the

first in history--for you cannot take Richard of Cornwall seriously--to

draw our country into the sea of troubles that raged as usual in the

Holy Roman Empire. There was, of course, a section of German nobles who

opposed Charles and who on the death of King Louis offered the imperial

crown to the victor of Crecy. Edward III was wise enough to decline,

influenced, it is said, by a mission which Charles had sent to England;

what is more, a treaty of alliance was arranged between these two

countries, and this, to my thinking, had far-reaching effects on their

future relations, intermittent but extending over several centuries.

Charles had to rest awhile in France before returning to his country in

order to recover from his wounds received at Crecy. I wonder whether he

tried the waters of Carlsbad on his return home. Charles had been led to

discover the healing qualities of Carlsbad water when out hunting one

day among the lovely wood-clad heights just inside the frontier of

Bohemia. The legend is that Charles heard one of his hounds yelping in

pain, and discovered that the poor beast had plunged into a spring of

hot water. Charles had the water analysed (which sounds very up to

date), and being informed of its healing qualities, built himself a

castle on the spot round which grew up that charming health resort

Carlsbad.

The history of Charles IV as German King and Roman Emperor is

consequently also that of the Holy Roman Empire, but would lead us much

too afar afield from Prague, where this excellent monarch resided by

preference. He had grand schemes for improving the state of the country

and its capital, which he carried out systematically. He must have

begrudged the time he was obliged to spend in travelling abroad in

various imperial interests, when there was so much to claim his

attention at home. He certainly never went abroad for pleasure, for his

trips to Italy and Burgundy, undertaken at different times, were matters

of duty. It was the correct thing for an Emperor to be crowned at Rome,

and Charles was always strictly correct. On the way to Rome it was

obviously the right thing to call at Milan for the iron crown of the

Lombard Kings, which was also an imperial perquisite. Then on another

occasion Charles called at Arles to receive the crown of the Kingdom of

Burgundy, which country formed part of the Empire. Charles had some

business to transact with the Pope at Avignon near by, business

connected with Church Reform, which movement was gaining in strength in

Bohemia and which caused that country much suffering for conscience'

sake. These journeys were episodes in the life of the Emperor; the work

of the King of Bohemia lay in and about his capital, ancient Prague.

From my terrace I will point out to you some of the glorious monuments

raised by that Founder King.

Charles's first concern seems to have been for his people's spiritual

welfare: from all accounts some attention to this side of the national

life of Bohemia was sorely needed. The first and most obvious duty was

to set about the restoration of the Royal Castle, the Hrad[vs]any, with

its venerable cathedral. Both castle and cathedral were inadequate to

the high mission of Prague as a royal and imperial residence. The castle

had been repaired fitfully by one king or another as we have seen, and

had been provided with strong towers chiefly used as dungeons, and had

been allowed to fall into disrepair by the impecunious and extravagant

John. The cathedral was probably in not much better case. We have seen

glimpses of that sacred fane with its memories of royal saints and

martyrs, how St. Wenceslaus built the first church on the site of the

present one, as a casket to hold that precious relic the arm of St.

Vitus, given him by Henry the Fowler. The words of the chronicler will

give you some idea of this first church: "Ecclesiam Sancti Viti quam

Sanctus Wenceslaus construxerat ad similitudinem Romanae ecclesiae

rotundam." This building was yet unfinished when Wenceslaus was

martyred. The body of the saint was conveyed from Stara Boleslav to St.

Vitus for burial, and this was not allowed to pass without a miraculous

manifestation. The old wooden bridge, connecting the right bank of the

Vltava with the Mala Strana, had been partly destroyed by floods;

nevertheless the bearers passed over the half-ruined bridge as if they

had no burden to carry at all. This was very wonderful, and redounded

greatly to the saint's growing reputation, which was enhanced a little

farther along the route to be traversed. As the procession passed the

town-hall prison its inmates, clutching the bars, cried out for mercy;

the bearers were forced to halt, and found themselves quite unable to

proceed until all the captives had been released. Now this was very

beautiful, and it happened long ago.

Prince Spytihnev II, also a pious soul, considered the church built by

Wenceslaus too small for his religious requirements; he had it

demolished, and another one, also in the Romanesque style, erected in

its place. The church that Spytihnev built was also destroyed to make

way for the present edifice, which in its inception is due to Charles.

It must have been about the time when Charles joined his father at

Luxemburg, in 1344, that the former interviewed the master-builder

Matthew of Arras, to discuss plans for the reconstruction of Prague's

Cathedral Church. John and Charles, as we have seen, then went on

together to visit the Pope at Avignon. It seems to have been on this

occasion that Prague was raised to the dignity of an archbishopric, and

Charles wished to build a temple worthy of the high dignity to which in

matters spiritual, as temporal, his country had arisen; and so under the

hand of skilled craftsmen, from out the ruins of earlier shrines, rose

that crowning glory of Golden Prague, the Cathedral of St. Vitus. This

great temple was many years a-building, and is not completed yet. Great

men devoted their labours to this glorious fane: Peter Parler and his

son John, Bene[vs] of Loun and others were among the master-builders,

while many artists, goldsmiths and other craftsmen famous in their day

contributed to the decoration of "the Father's House." Great men lie

buried under its shadowy arches, and their memory lives on in sculpture,

in paintings and wonders of wrought iron. In a chapel dedicated to St.

Wenceslaus rests that princely martyr; you may see his epitaph and the

shirt of mail he wore. In the bronze gates of this chapel you are shown

a ring to which the saint is said to have clung when his murderers

hacked him down. The walls of the chapels are inlaid with the precious

stones of Bohemia--jasper and achates, chalcedon, amethyst and

carneol--and are adorned with frescoes illustrating incidents in the

life of the saint, most of them dating from the reign of Charles; the

scene of his martyrdom is from the brush of Lucas Cranach. The

candelabra and statue of St. Wenceslaus are attributed to Peter Fischer.

King Charles, the founder, father of his country, lies buried here with

his four wives, so do other Kings of Bohemia, Ladislas Posthumus, George

Podiebrad, Ferdinand I and Maximilian.

Looking out over my terrace to where the Cathedral of St. Vitus points

its tapering spires towards high heaven, a misty pageant seems to pass

beneath it. Following rapidly on the golden peace of Charles come the

troublous days of religious strife, for with his son began the Hussite

wars which left Bohemia desolate and a prey to the eagles of Habsburg.

Angry flames rising up out the township below the Hrad[vs]any cast

clouds of smoke over the cathedral what time the Hussites failed to

capture the Royal Castle and in their zeal for reform set fire to

various quarters of the Mala Strana. The Bishop's Palace, which stood

near the left bank bridgehead, was utterly destroyed, the glorious

Church of "St. Mary under the Chain," and with it the home of the

Knights of Malta, suffered the same fate. Of St. Mary's Church there

remain the chancel and two stout towers; I can see them from my

embowered terrace, the blunt red roofs rising above a glorious riot of

fruit blossom. The pageant moves on, giving a flash here and there of

some one who stood up above his fellows like George Podiebrad, or the

strong men who precipitated the Thirty Years' War. Then follows a

fleeting vision of a stranger King, a German Protestant with his wife

Elizabeth, daughter of "douce Jamie." A short reign this of Frederick

Count Palatine, the "Winter King." We see him enter by the Strahov Gate

to be crowned at St. Vitus on November 4, 1619. We may imagine the

indignation of his people at Frederick's Calvinist divines who wished to

remove the altar and paintings from the cathedral. We see Frederick a

year later, again entering the city by the Strahov Gate, fleeing in hot

haste from the stricken field of the White Mountain where Bohemia's

freedom went under before the foreign mercenaries of the Emperor. Not

for the first time either that the troops of Western Europe had marched

on Prague to conquer it in the name of religion. Shortly after the

burning of "St. Mary under the Chain" the Pope called upon Western

Europe to undertake a crusade against the Hussites. A contemporary

chronicler, Lawrence of Bre[vz]ova, gives us a list of the nationalities

represented in this host of crusaders raised by Sigismund, King of

Bohemia, Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, and led by an English

Cardinal. According to Lawrence there were Bavarians, Saxons, Austrians,

Frenchmen, men of Brabant and Dutchmen, Switzers, Lusatians and

Spaniards, a compact body of English, and soldiers of many other

nationalities; their number is estimated at between one hundred thousand

and one hundred and fifty thousand. Sigismund entered the Castle of

Prague and his motley forces encamped around the town, but "the Empire's

mismanaged feudal levy was no match for an infuriated people which stood

shoulder to shoulder in the service of the same inspiring idea." I quote

from _Europe in the Middle Age_, by Thatcher and Schwill. Moreover, the

Hussites were led and inspired by one of the greatest military leaders

of all ages, John [vZ]i[vs]ka. This is not the place to tell of the

doings of those Hussite armies and their exploits, and how they kept all

Europe at bay so that every Bohemian might feel secure in the faith that

was in him. Right away in the hazy background of hills against which

stand up the towers and spires of Prague you may see an incline sloping

down towards the river and to northward. This incline is now all built

over, and this quarter of the town is called [vZ]i[vs]kov in memory of

the great Hussite who held this hill against repeated attacks until he

was in a position to go over to the offensive. Dissensions had broken

out among the crusaders, the imperial armies melted away and left

Sigismund to face his people alone. He came to some agreement with the

leaders of the opposition and was even solemnly crowned at St. Vitus;

but the battle on [vZ]i[vs]ka's hill marked the beginning of the Hussite

wars.

[Illustration: ST. VITUS.]

With the defeat of the Bohemian army on the White Mountain ends the

story of St. Vitus as the cathedral of a free country. The building was

resumed after the Thirty Years' War came to an end, and other kings were

crowned in the church that had known the glory of Charles IV and George

Podiebrad; but those who came after were aliens to Bohemia, neither came

they to that country intent only on its interests; a succession of

Habsburgs passes by in pageant, to receive the crown of Bohemia as one

among many distinctions to which their house was heir. Ferdinand III and

Leopold I pass by, and Leopold's second son Charles VI second as King of

Bohemia, last male representative of the House of Habsburg, who was

succeeded by his daughter Maria Theresia. Troubles began again as in the

days when the P[vr]emysl dynasty died out, and the German Electors

decided to choose a new Emperor. The choice fell on Charles of Bavaria,

so old St. Vitus saw again a coronation pageant and one which much

resembled that of Frederick the Winter King. Charles of Bavaria was

crowned at Prague with all the usual pomp and ceremony; he then left

Bohemia never to return. Officially this Charles' coronation seems to

count for nothing in the history of Austria into which that of Bohemia

was merged. Bohemia became for years a pawn in the stern game between

Maria Theresia and Frederick of Prussia, and St. Vitus suffered damage

from the latter's guns; the glory of Golden Prague had departed and the

stately cathedral looked down for nearly three centuries on a city that

had been put aside, out of the way of the world's commerce and its great

affairs, to dream of the days when Charles IV was King and Bohemia the

land of a free and prosperous people.

* * * * *

We were really still in the days of Charles IV when it occurred to me to

sketch out a special pageant for the Cathedral Church of St. Vitus.

Charles, as I have said before, was particularly interested in churches,

was altogether a good, pious soul, and never missed an opportunity of

bearing testimony to his faith by deeds as well as words. This does not

mean that he submitted his judgment, even in things spiritual, entirely

to the ruling of the Church; on the contrary, he found that there was

more need of reform among the clergy of his land than of churches. He

did not hesitate, either, to point out to the Pope what reforms were

needed, and, moreover, took his part in improving matters, with his

usual energy and thoroughness. Indeed, according to all accounts, the

Bohemian clergy were sorely in need of the curb: they allowed their

sporting proclivities to run to excess in such pastimes as warfare,

tournaments, hunting and gambling, and the law of celibacy had fallen

into complete disuse. I have already noted that the St. Anthony of one

particular kind of temptation (I forget whether he was of Padua or

elsewhere) was not as popular in Bohemia as were many other saints.

After all, the clergy of Bohemia were probably no worse than that of

other countries, and Rome was not of much use as a "godly ensample";

there is, for instance, that little story told by Richenthal in his

chronicle about one of the Popes travelling across the Alps to some

council or other. This pontiff, it appears, "clothed himself with curses

as with a garment" and his horrible imprecations filled with terror the

souls of the pious peasants who flocked to see him. So when by some

accident the carriage of His Holiness was upset and himself pitched into

the road he exclaimed: "Here I lie in the name of the devil." This

sounds a bit feeble, and I could probably do better myself under similar

provocation; but such language at all is very shocking in a clergyman.

It is chiefly German historians who complain of Charles as being

priest-ridden, and also of neglecting the affairs of the Empire while

concentrating too much on Bohemia. This is a matter for historians to

wrangle about; personally I consider that by his Golden Bull, which very

much restricted the power of the Popes to interfere with the election of

Kings of the Germans, and in the protection he extended to priests

accused of heresy for their ardour on reform, Charles proved himself a

strong man, free from undue outside influence, and no bigot. But we are

concerned with what Charles did for Prague, and will take a look round

the churches which meant so much to him, many of which he built or

restored himself. One of these appeals to me particularly; I cannot say

why exactly, perhaps because I heard some glorious music there, one grey

evening in Lent. St. Henry's has long been famous for its Musical

Society. I have mentioned this church before; it is dedicated to St.

Henry and his wife Kunigunde. It is interesting and unusual to find a

married saint; in fact, as in this case, a couple of them. The portraits

of these two may be seen in the chancel of St. Henry's Church, but it

was too dark for me to distinguish anything on the occasion of my visits

there; moreover, I was sufficiently impressed with the shapely Gothic

pillars, the work of Charles IV's craftsmen, which rose over the

dilapidations of a much earlier building. Charles lost no time about the

restoration of St. Henry's, as he seems to have begun it in 1348 and it

was finished two years later. This church stands back from the rushing

traffic of the Henry Street--Jind[vr]i[vs]ska Ulice, to give it its

Czech name; the campanile of St. Henry's, a graceful tower with

characteristic turrets and saddle-roof, is set apart and looks down the

broad thoroughfare. This campanile is of more recent times than the

church: it dates from the early days of Vladislav II, about the end of

the fifteenth century. A sixteenth-century bell hangs in the campanile

of St. Henry's Church; its inscription recalls the famous lines of

Schiller's _Die Glocke_: "En ego campana, nunquam pronuntio vana, Ignam,

vel festum, bellum, vel funus honestum." About the time of the

restoration of St. Henry's, since much rebuilt outside, Charles set

about building another church on the rising ground north-east of

Vy[vs]ehrad; it is quaint rather than beautiful. You may note this

church by its squat appearance, a broad cupola flanked by a couple of

more slender ones, and the whole group is generally concealed by

scaffolding. This church has had as hard a time as any of those in

Prague. King Charles built it in 1350 and intended it to remind him of

the cathedral at Aachen where Charlemagne is buried. There certainly is

a good deal of resemblance still within this church dedicated

appropriately to the Virgin and St. Charles, for the original outlines

remain, as also the crypt below. But this church has suffered heavily

both at the hands of wilful destroyers and of the restorer. Matthew of

Arras was the architect. I wonder whether he would recognize his work

to-day, so much has happened to it since he completed it. Consecrated in

1377 and given over to the monks of the Augustine Order, church and

monastery were thoroughly destroyed by the Hussites less than a century

later. The church was rebuilt in 1498, seriously damaged in 1611, and

left in a state of disrepair for forty years. It had not long been

restored for the second time, when Frederick II of Prussia made a target

of it in his siege of Prague. Some eight hundred hot shot are said to

have struck this church and set it on fire more than fifty times: quite

good shooting but bad manners. No wonder, then, that this Church of the

Virgin and St. Charles has lost its pristine beauty; yet it has an

attraction of its own to those who sympathize with its misfortunes, and

there are still some quaint old corners of the Hermitage attached to the

edifice, built by Dienzenhofer, for those who like _baroque_.

We have noted Charles's interest in his cathedral on the Hrad[vs]any; he

also paid a delicate compliment to the Lady Abbess of the convent

attached to St. George's Church within the castle precincts. You will

remember how Boleslav II, of pious memory, founded this convent and that

his sister Milada was the first abbess. Charles raised that lady's

successors to princely rank and gave them the right to place the crown

on the head of the King at his coronation.

[Illustration: ST. STEPHEN'S.]

There are several other churches which have survived the chances and

changes of centuries, among these one which appeals to me on account of

its modesty. This church is tucked away among a congerie of respectable

elderly buildings that cluster to eastward of the Stepanska Ulice, one

of the thoroughfares that link up the higher lying part of the Nove

M[ve]sto, the New Town, with the Vaclavske Nam[ve]sti. This church has

indeed a somewhat neglected look: its quaint pointed steeple rises

almost apologetically above some scrubby trees, and hardly ventures to

o'ertop the grimy houses, that close it round. Nevertheless this ancient

church should have reason to hold high its head, for Bohemia's great

King and Father built it and dedicated it to a carefully selected saint,

to wit St. Stephen. St. Stephen's Church shows pleasant traces of the

gracious spirit which informed the master mind in those golden days of

Charles IV. Moreover, St. Stephen's Church has kept the best of

exclusive company during the six centuries of its existence, for close

by, separated only by a narrow lane, stands one of Prague's oldest

temples, the romanesque chapel of St. Longinus which from its memories

harking back to the first P[vr]eysl King, Vladislav, probably looks upon

its neighbour as a mere child.

You will have noticed how many and varied are the names of saints

mentioned in these my reflections from "a Terrace in Prague." I do not

profess deep knowledge of saints, and do not as a rule venture on the

hallowed ground where saints disport themselves. Nevertheless, while

dealing with the city of Prague in particular or the Bohemian people in

general, and endeavouring to become acquainted with them, you are faced

with the fact that there is in this country a strong and no doubt

commendable attraction towards saints of all possible varieties, and,

let us hope, a favourable reaction on the part of the latter. I do not

suggest that a saints' day merely means a holiday.

To begin with, the Bohemians, on taking to Christianity at all, started

with some very fine vintage saints of their own growing. You have heard

all about them: Ludmilla, Wenceslaus, Milada, Adalbert. These estimable

people were, after all, following the precepts of those who had brought

the "Glad Tidings" to Bohemia, and therefore were entitled to high

consideration and respect. We have met some of these most worthy people.

There were the brothers Constantine (better known as Cyril) and

Methodius, who did much missionary work in Central Europe, especially

among those of their own, the Slavonic race, for these two were citizens

of Solun (Salonika), where pure Slavonic was spoken in the ninth

century. As Slavs these two missionaries were disliked by the Germans,

but both Popes Adrian I and John VIII approved of them; we have heard

how Methodius converted that stubborn pagan Prince Bo[vr]ivoj. Another

couple of saints whom I have mentioned before, Cosmas and Damian, have

always been most popular in Bohemia. They came from the West, or at

least their reputation did, for they had been martyred in the third or

fourth century, before Czech and his merry men had arrived at [vR]ip,

before the Slavs had appeared in Europe in fact. Pope Felix III held

these two gentlemen in high esteem, had dedicated a church to them in

Rome, and his successors had no doubt recommended this worthy couple to

the Bohemians when the latter began to ask for spiritual patronage.

Cosmas and Damian, the oldest patron saints of Bohemian Christendom,

became very popular, and many churches were dedicated to them; in fact,

as we have seen, it was zeal in their cause that brought about the

martyrdom of St. Wenceslaus. I believe these two, Cosmas and Damian,

were precursors of that excellent body of medical missionaries who

wisely get at a man's soul by healing his body. There must be something

in my theory about Cosmas and Damian, as the medical faculty of Prague

University put up a sculptured group supposed to represent these two

saints, on the Charles Bridge, early in the eighteenth century. As

portraiture this group is not convincing.

The leading patron saint of Prague seems to be St. Vitus; at least in

the great cathedral dedicated to him he dominates not only the city but

also his co-patron saints of this most famous of all the city's many

churches. You will remember that in course of a friendly exchange of

concessions between St. Wenceslaus and King Henry the Fowler the latter

presented Bohemia's ruler with an arm of St. Vitus. I do not quite

understand how St. Vitus came to hold such high importance in Bohemia.

He was born in Sicily of pagan parents, poor perhaps, possibly honest,

about the beginning of the fourth century. Two Christians, Modestus and

Crescentia, taught young Vitus and converted him without his father's

knowledge. There was nothing unusual in this. Vitus was martyred in

Rome, an experience which might happen to any Christian in those days,

and we hear no more about him until he appears as patron saint of a

church founded about the middle of the ninth century on the Island of

Ruegen, by the monks of Corvey in Saxony. These monks had by some means

or other got hold of the relics of St. Vitus; perhaps they parted with a

bit to King Henry the Fowler, who then handed it on to Wenceslaus. The

Slavonic islanders of Ruegen relapsed into paganism but kept green the

memory of St. Vitus, whom they worshipped as a god.

Whereas St. Wenceslaus secured only an arm of St. Vitus, King Charles

acquired the rest of his body. St. Wenceslaus was, I fear, caught

napping on several occasions. He is not dead, according to popular

tradition, but sleeps inside a mountain, and sleeps soundly too, for he

seems to have missed the resurrection of his people. By way of useful

information I may tell you that the shrine of St. Wenceslaus is

sanctuary for murderers, but I cannot say whether this custom still

obtains under the constitution of the new Czecho-Slovak Republic.

King Charles arranged a great festival when the remains of St. Vitus

reached the cathedral dedicated to him. With his own hands Charles

placed a crown of gold upon the saintly head, or, as one old chronicler

puts it with unexpected humour, upon the head of one or other St. Vitus.

Charles was peculiarly expert in the matter of relics and a zealous

collector, which shows his constant concern for his people's welfare,

not only spiritual but physical as well. So, for instance, did that

pious monarch cause the remains of St. Sigismund to be conveyed to

Prague. St. Sigismund was a good sound sixth-century saint of France who

in the days of Gregory of Tours had frequently been invoked to ward off

fever; his remains would therefore be a useful asset as complement to

the limited knowledge of the art of healing in those days. Not that I

attach much importance to the opinion of Gregory of Tours. You may

remember that he admired one Chlodovech, King of all the Franks, who

outdid any other Teuton founder of kingdoms by his record of crime, of

murder and treachery, and generally speaking he had a tough lot to

compete against. Londoners have probably forgotten that they also have a

famous febrifuge in their city's patron saint, St. Erkenwald, to whose

shrine came many pilgrims for relief from pain. Modern pilgrims to

London come in their thousands to watch football matches--there is

little of healing in this. Other relics collected by Charles were the

spear, a bit of the cross and a nail, and the tablecloth used at the

Last Supper. All these precious relics, together with the crown jewels,

were kept in a strong castle built by Charles for the purpose. You may

catch a glimpse of this castle, Karlov Tyn, Karlstein, as you pass down

the valley of the winding Berounka of a summer's evening, coming to

Prague from Paris via Cheb. A day was set apart for the Feast of Relics,

the _Allatio Reliquiarum_. On this day the relics were conveyed to the

cathedral and exhibited to the people, and Charles had arranged that all

who attended this solemn function should be granted indulgence. I take

it there was no work done that day in Prague; as it happens this feast

coincided with that set apart for several saints, Macarius and Abel,

besides being the octave of St. Stephen, a further reason for

holiday-making.

Talking of holidays in Prague, I came across one such fixed for August

9th, and seriously described by a sound old writer on the manners and

customs of Bohemia. This feast was observed, I cannot say religiously,

but with great enthusiasm, by the students of the University. It was

called quite simply _Beano_. This will sound familiar to you, and you

will probably pronounce it as if derived from the bean, the common or

garden bean and the feast thereof. Not so. This _Beano_ should be

pronounced with due stress on each particular vowel, as if it were an

Italian word; indeed, it is derived from the Latin. Attempts have been

made to trace this word to early French influence at Prague University,

and to derive it from _bec-jaune_, pronounced with a certain abandon.

This, again, is wrong. _Beano_ is, or was, the great day on which the

new students, the "freshers," were initiated into the mysteries of

scholastic life with all manner of weird ceremony and horrible

observances. There was used much, indeed undue, emphasis, said some, in

order to impress upon the youngsters that a serious change of life was

upon them, for, quoth the elders: "Beanus est animal nesciens vitam

studiosorum."

From a Terrace in Prague · 第 8 / 12 章