CHAPTER XI.

GOVERNMENT BY POLICE.

In 1879 her writings included two pamphlets, _Government by Police_

and _Social Purity_, the latter being an address delivered at

Cambridge. This year the Federation held its Conference at Liége. A

bright and vivid account of the meetings at Liége, from the skilful

pen of Madame de Morsier, is given in the _Reminiscences of a Great

Crusade_, which shows that these annual gatherings of crusaders from

various countries were not wholly devoted to serious discussions of a

painful subject, but became occasions for true human fellowship (even

touched with gaiety) between persons of divers tastes and experiences.

The account concludes thus: “And now, little town of Belgium, sitting

on the banks of the Meuse, surrounded with green hills, let me take

one parting look at you! We have only known you a few days, and now

you live in our memories a luminous point in the past. Many of us

arrived within your walls strangers to each other, and have parted

friends; some arrived sorrowful, discouraged, asking what would be

the end of all this? They return peaceful, and fortified with the

conviction that work is happiness, and conflict a duty. _Manet alta

mente repostum._”

The agitation in Paris against the _Police des mœurs_, referred to

in the last chapter, had been continued, and led this year to the

resignation of M. Lecour, who was appointed chief “bell-ringer” of

Notre Dame; and this was followed by further enquiries and newspaper

revelations, and the subsequent resignation of the Prefect of Police

and other members of his staff, and later of the Minister of the

Interior. In these events M. Yves Guyot and other members of the

French branch of the Federation took a prominent part. Early in 1880

Mr. Alfred Dyer and Mr. George Gillett visited Brussels to investigate

cases of English girls, many of whom were minors, alleged to be

detained in the licensed houses of that city against their will, and

with the connivance of the police. Some of these girls were rescued,

and being brought to England, were placed under the care of Josephine

Butler.

Another of the poor refugees helped by Pastor Anet to escape from

Brussels came to our house in Liverpool. She appeared to be in pain,

and on being questioned she replied that she was suffering from

unhealed stripes on her back and shoulders from the lash of this tyrant.

I drew from her, when alone, the story of her martyrdom. The keeper

of this house in Brussels, enraged with her because of her persistent

refusal to participate in some exceptionally base proceedings among his

clients, had her carried to an underground chamber, whence her cries

could not be heard. She was here immured and starved, and several times

scourged with a thong of leather. But she did not yield. This poor

delicate girl had been neglected from childhood. She was a Catholic,

but had had little or no religious teaching. She told me, with much

simplicity, that in the midst of these tortures she was “all the time

strengthened and comforted by the thought that Jesus had Himself been

cruelly scourged, and that He could feel for her.”

Before her capture she had one day seen in a shop window in Brussels an

engraving of Christ before Pilate, bound and scourged. Some persons,

no doubt, may experience a little shock of horror at the idea of any

connection in the thoughts of this poor child between the supreme

agony of the Son of God and her own torments in the cellar of that

house of debauchery. We often sincerely mourn over these victims as

“lost” because we cannot reach them with any word of love or the

“glad evangel.” But He “descended into hell,” into the abode of the

“spirits in prison,” to speak to them; and I believe, and have had many

testimonies to the fact, that He visits spiritually these young souls

in their earthly prison many a time, He alone, in all His majesty of

pity, without any intervention of ours.

Josephine Butler published in May a statement making definite charges

of gross ill-treatment of young girls in Brussels, and these charges

were substantiated in a deposition on oath, made in response to a

formal application from the Belgian authorities, under the Extradition

Act. Some months later she sent a copy of her deposition to the

editor of _Le National_ in Brussels, intending it merely to be used

in connection with evidence, which he had to give before a Commission

then sitting on the subject. He however published it in _Le National_,

and it created a great sensation throughout Belgium.

To her sister.

You can imagine that on first hearing of this I felt a little

troubled, and as if I had been “given away.” Also persons friendly

to us, such as Lambillon, Hendrick and others, who had given us

information from a good motive, were angry at seeing their names

published as having had any knowledge whatever of these evil things;

and I was pained to think of _their_ pain.

I was pondering all this one evening, when I suddenly recollected that

on New Year’s Day of this year, and for many days after, I had taken

upon me to make a special and definite request to God for light to

fall upon these “dark places of the earth, wherein are the inhabitants

of cruelty.” Some strong influence seemed to urge me to make this

request. I used to kneel and pray, “O God, I beseech Thee, send light

upon these evil deeds! Whatever it may cost us and others, flash light

into these abodes of darkness. O send us light, for without it there

can be no destruction of the evil. We cannot make war against a hidden

foe. In the darkness these poor sisters of ours, these creatures of

Thine, are daily murdered, and we do not know what to do or where to

turn, and we find no way by which to begin to act. Send us light, O

our God, even though it may be terrible to bear.” I had made a record

of this petition, and then I had forgotten it. But not so our faithful

God. His memory is better than mine! He did not forget, and He is now

sending the answer to that prayer. Then I thought of the words, “O

fools, and slow of heart to believe.” Here is the very thing I had

asked for, brought about in a way I had not dreamed of.

One consequence of these revelations was the dismissal of M. Lenaers,

the Chief of the Brussels _Police des mœurs_, followed by the

resignation of his principal subordinate. Another consequence was the

formation of a strong committee in London for the suppression of the

white slave traffic. The proposals of this committee in regard to

legislation were ultimately adopted in that portion of the Criminal

Law Amendment Act, 1885, which deals with offences connected with

other countries. The matter was still further advanced many years

later, largely owing to the efforts of Mr. W. A. Coote, by the

Governments of Europe signing the International Convention for the

suppression of the white slave traffic, 1904. This Convention has no

doubt done something towards the suppression of this traffic, but as

Josephine Butler frequently pointed out, and as was emphasised in the

discussions at the Conference of the Federation in 1908, there is a

grave risk, that in those countries, in which the authorities still

license immoral houses, the police will not honestly and thoroughly

endeavour to prevent the traffic upon which the profits of those

houses so largely depend.

Josephine E. Butler: An Autobiographical Memoir · 第 11 / 20 章