CHAPTER III.

CHELTENHAM.

In the autumn of 1857 my husband was invited to fill the post of

Vice-Principal of the Cheltenham College. He accepted the invitation,

and we went to Cheltenham the same year. He here entered upon his

long course of assiduous and untiring work as a schoolmaster—a work

which covered a quarter of a century, beginning at Cheltenham in 1857,

and continued at Liverpool from the winter of 1865-66 until 1882. We

gained much at Cheltenham in an improved climate, and in the cessation

of material difficulties and anxieties. We lived in a large house,

in which, for some years, we received a number of pupils. It was

characteristic that it should have supplied some of the best athletes

of the College, and many successful competitors in the school games, in

feats of strength, activity and skill. My husband considered physical

training to be an essential part of the education of youth.

Our summer vacations continued to be spent largely at Dilston; we went

however one year to Switzerland with our eldest son. We visited Lucerne

and its neighbourhood, and afterwards the Rhone Valley, Chamounix,

and the great St. Bernard, passing a night at the hospice, where we

profited much by our intercourse with the beautiful dogs, one of whom,

a veteran called Bruno, the forefather of many a noble hound, attached

himself to us, and made himself our cicerone among the rocks in the

desolate surroundings of the monastery. Another summer excursion was,

with two of our children, to the Lakes of Killarney, including a visit

to my brother, Charles Grey, who lived then in a house of Lord Derby,

at Ballykisteen, in the “golden vale” of Tipperary. In both these

years my husband brought home many sketches. The grey rocks skirting

the borders of Killarney lakes, with their richly-coloured covering

of arbutus and other flowering trees and evergreens, were tempting

subjects for water-colours.

My father had been a friend of Clarkson, and a practical worker in

the movement for the abolition of the slave trade. When the War of

Secession in America broke out, my husband’s sympathies were warmly

enlisted on behalf of those who desired the emancipation of the

slaves, and he perceived that that was indeed the question, the vital

question of justice, which lay at the root of all that terrible

struggle. This was one of several occasions in our united life in

which we found ourselves in a minority; members of a group at first so

insignificant that it scarcely found a voice or a hearing anywhere,

but whose position was afterwards fully justified by events. It was a

good training in swimming against the tide, or at least in standing

firm and letting the tide go by, and in maintaining, while doing so,

a charitable attitude towards those who conscientiously differed, and

towards the thousands who float contentedly down the stream of the

fashionable opinion of the day. In this case the feeling of isolation

on a subject of such tragic interest was often painful; but the

discipline was useful, for it was our lot again more emphatically in

the future to have to accept and endure this position for conscience’

sake.

I recollect the sudden revulsion of feeling when the news was

telegraphed of the assassination of President Lincoln; the

extraordinary rapidity of the change of front of the “leading journal;”

and the self-questionings among many whose intelligence and goodness

had certainly given them the right to think for themselves, but who

had not availed themselves of that right. I remember the penitence of

_Punch_, who had been among the scoffers against the abolitionists

of slavery, and who now put himself into deep mourning, and gave to

the public an affecting cartoon of the British Lion bowed and weeping

before the bier of Lincoln. A favourite scripture motto of my husband’s

was, “_Why do ye not of yourselves judge that which is right_?” But

he was not argumentative. He loved peace, and avoided every heated

discussion. His silence was, perhaps, sometimes not less effectual by

way of rebuke or correction of shallow judgments than speech would have

been. Goldwin Smith, one of the few at Oxford who saw at that time the

inner meanings of the American struggle, paid us a visit. It occurred

to us, while listening to some pointed remarks he was making on the

prevalent opinion of the day, to ask him to write and publish something

in reply to the often-repeated assertion that the Bible itself favours

slavery. “The Bible,” he replied, “has been quoted in favour of every

abomination that ever cursed the earth.” He did not say he would

write; but the idea sank into his mind, and not long after he sent us

his able and exquisite little book, entitled _Does the Bible sanction

Slavery?_—a masterly and beautiful exposition of the true spirit of

the Mosaic law, and of the Theocratic government and training of the

ancient Hebrew people in relation to this and other questions. This

book was naturally not popular at the time, and I fear it has long been

out of print. (It was published in 1863.)

In this connection it is interesting to record, that two other notable

books owed their inspiration in a large measure to Josephine Butler.

_The Patience of Hope_, by Dora Greenwell, published in 1859, was

dedicated to J. E. B., with the inscription—_A te principium, tibi

desinet_ (from thee begun with thee my work shall close). _Te sine

nil altum mens inchoat_ (without thee nothing high my mind essays).

Frederic Myers, who had been at school at Cheltenham College, in his

_Fragments of Inner Life_,[1] tells how“Christian conversion came to

me in a potent form—through the agency of Josephine Butler, _née_

Grey, whose name will not be forgotten in the annals of English

philanthropy. She introduced me to Christianity, so to say, by an

inner door; not to its encumbering forms and dogmas, but to its heart

of fire. My poems of _St. Paul_ and _St. John the Baptist_, intensely

personal in their emotion, may serve as sufficient record of those

years of eager faith.” _St. Paul_, published in 1867, was dedicated to

J. E. B., with the inscription—[Greek: ᾗ καὶ τὴν ἐμὴν ψυχην ὀφείλω]

(to whom I owe my very soul). In 1869 Myers gave up a Lectureship

at Trinity in order to devote himself to the promotion of the higher

education of women, and he was one of the small band of university

men, who worked hard with Josephine Butler and her colleagues on the

North of England Council, to which we shall refer later on.

[1] _Fragments of Prose and Poetry_, by Frederic W. H. Myers, 1904

(Longmans, Green & Co.), p. 22.

Among the public events which interested us most during these years

was the revolution in Naples, the change of dynasty, and Garibaldi’s

career. Our interest was in part of a personal nature, as my sister,

Madame Meuricoffre, and her husband were in the midst of these events.

She had succeeded Jessie White Mario in the care of the wounded

Garibaldians in the hospitals, and was personally acquainted with some

of the actors in the dramatic scenes of that time. Having told her

that my husband had set as a subject for a prize essay—to be competed

for in the College at Cheltenham—“The unification of Italy,” my sister

mentioned it to Garibaldi, in expressing to him our sympathy for him

and his cause. He immediately wrote a few lines, signing his name at

the end, to be sent, through her, to the boy who should write the best

essay on the subject so near to his heart.

A part of the summer holidays of 1864 were spent at Coniston in the

house of Mr. James Marshall, which he lent to us. His sister, Mrs.

Myers, had been our kind and constant friend at Cheltenham. It was a

beautiful summer. We had returned to Cheltenham only a few days when

a heavy sorrow fell upon our home, the brightest of our little circle

being suddenly snatched away from us. The dark shadow of that cloud

cannot easily be described. I quote part of a letter written some

weeks after our child’s death to a friend.

CHELTENHAM, _August, 1864_.

These are but weak words. May you never know the grief which they hide

rather than reveal. But God is good. He has, in mercy, at last sent

me a ray of light, and low in the dust at His feet I have thanked

Him for that ray of light as I never thanked Him for any blessing in

the whole of my life before. It was difficult to endure at first the

shock of the suddenness of that agonising death. Little gentle spirit!

the softest death for her would have seemed sad enough. Never can I

lose that memory—the fall, the sudden cry, and then the silence. It

was pitiful to see her, helpless in her father’s arms, her little

drooping head resting on his shoulder, and her beautiful golden hair,

all stained with blood, falling over his arm. Would to God that I had

died that death for her! If we had been permitted, I thought, to have

one look, one word of farewell, one moment of recognition! But though

life flickered for an hour, she never recognised the father and mother

whom she loved so dearly. We called her by her name, but there was no

answer. She was our only daughter, the light and joy of our lives.

She flitted in and out like a butterfly all day. She had never had a

day’s or an hour’s illness in all her sweet life. She never gave us a

moment of anxiety, her life was one flowing stream of mirth and fun

and abounding love. The last morning she had said to me a little verse

she had learned somewhere—

Every morning the warm sun

Rises fair and bright;

But the evening cometh on,

And the dark, cold night.

There is a bright land far away,

Where tis never-ending day!

The dark, cold night came too soon for us, for it was that same

evening, at seven o’clock, that she fell. The last words I had with

her were about a pretty caterpillar she had found; she came to my

room to beg for a little box to put it in. I gave it her and said,

“Now trot away, for I am late for tea.” What would I not give now for

five minutes of that sweet presence? The only discipline she ever had

was an occasional conflict with her own strong feelings and will.

She disliked nothing so much as her little German lessons. Fräulein

Blümke had called her one day to have one. She was sitting in a low

chair. She grasped the arms of it tightly, and, looking very grave and

determined, she replied, “Hush, wait a bit, I am fighting!” She sat

silent for a few moments, and then walked quickly and firmly to have

her German lesson. Fräulein asked her what she meant by saying she was

fighting, and she replied, “I was fighting with myself” (to overcome

her unwillingness to go to her books). I overheard Fräulein say to

her in the midst of the lesson: “Arbeit, Eva, arbeit!” To which Eva

replied with decision, “I am _arbeiting_, Miss Blümke, as hard as ever

I can.”

One evening last autumn, when I went to see her after she was in bed

and we were alone, she said: “Mammy, if I go to heaven before you,

when the door of heaven opens to let you in I will run so fast to meet

you; and when you put your arms round me, and we kiss each other,

_all the angels will stand still to see us_.” And she raised herself

up in her ardour, her face beaming and her little chest heaving

with the excitement of her loving anticipation. I recall her look;

not the merry laughing look she generally had, but softened into an

overflowing tenderness of the soul. She lay down again, but could not

rest, and raising herself once more said, “I would like to pray again”

(she had already said her little prayer); and we prayed again, about

this meeting in heaven. I never thought for a moment that she would

go first. I don’t think I ever had a thought of death in connection

with her; she was so full of life and energy. She was always showing

her love in active ways. We used to imagine what it would be when

she grew up, developing into acts of mercy and kindness. She was

passionately devoted to her father, and after hugging him, and heaping

endearing names upon him, she would fly off and tax her poor little

tender fingers by making him something—a pincushion or kettle-holder.

She made him blue, pink, white and striped pincushions and mats, for

which he had not much use. But now he treasures up her poor little

gifts as more precious than gold. If my head ached, she would bathe

it with a sponge for an hour without tiring. Sweet Eva! Well might

the Saviour say, “Of such is the Kingdom of Heaven.” She was so

perfectly truthful, candid and pure. It was a wonderful repose for me,

a good gift of God, when troubled by the evils in the world or my own

thoughts, to turn to the perfect innocence and purity of that little

maiden. But that joy is gone now for us. I am troubled for my husband.

His grief is so deep and silent; but he is very, very patient. He

loves children and all young creatures, and his love for her was

wonderful. Her face, as she lay in death, wore a look of sweet, calm

surprise, as if she said, “Now I see God.” We stood in awe before her.

She seemed to rebuke our grief in her rapt and holy sleep. Her hair

had grown very long lately, and was of a deep chestnut brown, which in

the sun flashed out all golden:—

Hair like a golden halo lying

Upon a pillow white;

Parted lips that mock all sighing,

Good night—good night!

Good night in anguish and in bitter pain;

Good morrow crowns another of the heavenly train.

This sorrow seemed to give in a measure a new direction to our lives

and interests. There were some weeks of uncomforted grief. Her flight

from earth had had the appearance of a most cruel accident. But do the

words “accident” or “chance” properly find a place in the vocabulary

of those who have placed themselves, and those dear to them, in a

special manner under the daily providential care of a loving God? Here

there entered into the heart of our grief the intellectual difficulty,

the moral perplexity and dismay which are not the least terrifying

of the phantoms which haunt the “Valley of the shadow of Death”—that

dark passage through which some toil only to emerge into a hopeless

and final denial of the Divine goodness, the complete bankruptcy

of faith; and others, by the mercy of God, through a still deeper

experience, into a yet firmer trust in His unfailing love.

One day, going into his study, I found my husband alone, and looking

ill. His hands were cold, he had an unusual paleness in his face, and

he seemed faint. I was alarmed. I kneeled beside him, and, shaking

myself out of my own stupor of grief, I spoke “comfortably” to him,

and forced myself to talk cheerfully, even joyfully, of the happiness

of our child, of the unclouded brightness of her brief life on earth,

and her escape from the trials and sorrows she might have met with had

she lived. He responded readily to the offered comfort, and the effort

to strengthen him was helpful to myself. After this I often went to

him in the evening after school hours, when, sitting side by side,

we spoke of our child in heaven, until our own loss seemed to become

somewhat less bitter.

The following is from a brief diary of the close of that sad year—

_October 30th._—Last night I slept uneasily. I dreamed I had my

darling in my arms, dying; that she struggled to live for my sake,

lived again a moment, and then died. Just then I heard a sound, a low

voice at my door, and I sprang to my feet. It was poor Stanley (our

second son), scarcely awake, and in a fever. I took him in my arms,

and carried him back to his bed, from which he had come to seek my

help. In the morning he could not swallow, and pointed to his throat.

Dr. Ker came and said he had diphtheria. My heart sank. I wondered

whether God meant to ask us to give up another child so soon.

His illness was very severe, and for some days he hovered between life

and death. But we were spared the added sorrow we dreaded. When he was

sufficiently recovered, it was thought better that I should go with him

abroad, to escape the winter’s cold, and for a change of scene from

that house round which clung the memory of such a tragic sorrow. My

husband and other sons came to London with us, and a pleasant and able

courier was engaged, who accompanied me and my little convalescent to

Genoa, where we had been invited by kind relatives living there.

At the end of this visit it was arranged that I should accompany my

sister to Naples, when we learned that the railway and roads were

flooded, and that travelling by land would be difficult and even

dangerous. Being unwilling to give up the long-cherished hope of a

visit to my sister’s home, I proposed that we should go by sea. My

sister, though fearing a sea voyage for me in winter, assented to the

arrangement, and as the weather was then very calm we started with good

hopes. I had not, however, realised the gravity of the shock which my

health had sustained before leaving England.

On this voyage she was taken very seriously ill, nigh unto death. “I

was kneeling,” writes her sister, “and rubbing her hands and feet,

trying to warm them; and while my imagination was realising all the

terrors, my heart was praying desperately to God that He would make a

way of escape, that He would work a miracle for us. _And He did._ The

three boys went away and all prayed to God to save her. After a time

I felt a hand on my shoulder. It was the captain. He said: ‘I saw the

other mail vessel coming north, and I have signalled her. If she sees

us you shall go on board and return to Leghorn. Make haste!’ I drew a

long breath and said: ‘Thank God, I think we are saved!’ I felt the

horror melting away in a measure, and hope springing up. We rolled

her up, and I went for the weeping children, and found the kind young

Sicilian officer comforting them. I thanked him. He said, in Italian,

something about the love of Christ, so kindly. I had said very little

about her. People must have been impressed with her look, and thought

her dying, to take such extreme measures as to stop the two Government

steamers on the high seas.”

Josephine E. Butler: An Autobiographical Memoir · 第 3 / 20 章